If something can't be stated in just a few sentences in the posters own words I'm not interested...
You cant refuse to look at the evidence and then act like this is a debate of logic. Its a debate of evidence. You were given the logic for the attacks in a few sentences for your convinience. You saidBut there was NO NEED for the US to fake 9/11 in order to get an excuse to invade the mideast because they ALREADY HAD a good excuse; for example terrorists had already tried to blow up the WTC before with a truck bomb, plus there were anti-American terror attacks going on all around the world..
You've been provided with the evidence. If you cant put in 45 minutes to research what the hell youre talking about, you may as well say "I am happy being ignorant about this, I refuse to look at any evidence that would show I am arguing a false pretnse" and move onIf anybody can provide good solid evidence that 9/11 was a false flag, I'll be glad to change my view, fair enough?..