Red Heifer Birth Paves Way For Renewed Temple Service

Joined
Mar 18, 2017
Messages
2,814
Likes
5,409
The Monarch and the Anglican church and the Aristocracy was and is one big criminal company.
Since as you said its one big criminal company, you prompted me to look around for the number of Jewish members in the House of Lords. This list is for both houses;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_British_Jewish_politicians

I didn't know the Milibands were Jewish, well until now. David Cameron did say he has Jewish ancestry (not on the list). Alan Sugar is a suprise aswell (Trump's British counterpart....as in The Apprentice & his billions).
 





Joined
Dec 13, 2017
Messages
1,443
Likes
710
I ask because it seems to me that if, as you say, the aristocracy is part of "one big criminal company," it would logically and necessarily follow that the establishment of the State of Israel itself, including its precursors in the British Mandate, etc., represented and initiated by the Balfour Declaration, was the result of an agreement reached among aristocratic criminals. That is not an opinion I have heard you very clearly state on this board. Is my logic sound? Is that what you are saying, or suggesting?
Absolutely.

I've said it before that the elite thought the Jews were toast on Day 2 of their independence when the neighbouring Arab armies attacked in 1948. But somehow they survived that attack... and two more attempts in 1967 and 1973.

The elitist idea according to me was to round up the Jews in Israel and let the Arabs do the dirty work of annihilating them there.

But so far no cigar.
 





Joined
Dec 13, 2017
Messages
1,443
Likes
710
Since as you said its one big criminal company, you prompted me to look around for the number of Jewish members in the House of Lords. This list is for both houses;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_British_Jewish_politicians

I didn't know the Milibands were Jewish, well until now. David Cameron did say he has Jewish ancestry (not on the list). Alan Sugar is a suprise aswell (Trump's British counterpart....as in The Apprentice & his billions).
An apologist for Nephilim and an accuser of Jews ?

Time to turn.
 





Joined
Dec 13, 2017
Messages
1,443
Likes
710
I see, but I don't necessarily agree. That's an interesting, nuanced view, and, though I don't read very many threads on this board, I hadn't heard you so clearly state it. Thank you for answering.
You're welcome... and you don't agree ?

That's fine as well but if the elite really wanted peace in the Middle East... then they would not sit back and see if the Arabs would manage to invade Israel those three times. Anyway they seem to have been preparing and practising in Syria for a fourth attack against Israel... winter is coming ?
 





Joined
Mar 18, 2017
Messages
2,814
Likes
5,409
An apologist for Nephilim and an accuser of Jews ?

Time to turn.
Absolutely.

I've said it before that the elite thought the Jews were toast on Day 2 of their independence when the neighbouring Arab armies attacked in 1948. But somehow they survived that attack... and two more attempts in 1967 and 1973.

The elitist idea according to me was to round up the Jews in Israel and let the Arabs do the dirty work of annihilating them there.

But so far no cigar.
I won't play so nice like Serveto. First, you said the elite are a criminal bunch, then you were furnished evidence of the criminal bunch being part or heavily jewish, then you somehow took back your assertion. Inotherwords, you lost me!

Yeah, iam pro Nephilim. Atleast they still bore some of the perfection that Adam had, namely, great stature, longevity, and neither the 3lb brains that we shoulder today.
There is no way i would believe nor accept that Adam came forth from the Creator's hand averaging in height like Chinese males (5'5) today or the Pygmys of West-Central Africa.
 





Joined
Dec 13, 2017
Messages
1,443
Likes
710
I won't play so nice like Serveto. First, you said the elite are a criminal bunch, then you were furnished evidence of the criminal bunch being part or heavily jewish, then you somehow took back your assertion. Inotherwords, you lost me!
Don't you know that the elite is a criminal bunch ?

There are people pretending to be Jews according to Jesus... and i suspect in that box are the likes of Rothschild Warburg Marx and more. Besides it's secret societies that run the world... members of the elite or blue bloods.



Yeah, iam pro Nephilim. Atleast they still bore some of the perfection that Adam had, namely, great stature, longevity, and neither the 3lb brains that we shoulder today.
You said it. So i guess you got a problem with Jews as one of the tribes going medieval on them back then.



There is no way i would believe nor accept that Adam came forth from the Creator's hand averaging in height like Chinese males (5'5) today or the Pygmys of West-Central Africa.
I don't know how tall Adam was but i suspect Noah and his sons were between 7 and 8 feet.
 





Joined
Apr 20, 2017
Messages
683
Likes
2,438
You're welcome... and you don't agree ?
Yours is an unusual, nuanced perspective, in parts, and I am considering it. At this point, I see little or no evidence that Israel is not fully supported by the most powerful factions of the international power elite, with full force and power of American arms, and practically unlimited (is it $38 billion per annum?) funds from the already drained American treasury. One needs only to examine the participants and guest list at the annual AIPAC Conventions, combined with their mission statements, to the extent that those are published, to see a who's who of international power brokers on full display and deduce their ultimate regional aims: namely, and in sum, to make the Middle East safe for continued Israeli nuclear hegemony. With that said, I allow for the probability that there was a great deal of mystery behind the signing of the Balfour Declaration, especially the motivations. For instance, I would like to know what the quid pro quo was in the transaction, or agreement. I know that Balfour wasn't motivated primarily by Christian largess, by any means, and would like to know what Rothschild promised, or offered, Balfour in exchange. The question is neither easily nor definitively answered, but is something I occasionally research as an amateur reader of history.


Edit to add:
As well, and though she did not provide many details, Hannah Arendt, on the political left, said that Jewish power elites, such as the so called European "Court Jews," the bourgeoisies, opposed general emancipation of the Jewish proletariat, the masses, then largely under rabbinic control in Europe and Russia, and that might support part of your claim, which is why I acknowledge that your perspective is nuanced. I don't have her book at hand to provide the specific quote and am operating from potentially faulty memory.
 





Last edited:
Joined
Jul 29, 2018
Messages
70
Likes
110

Yours is an unusual, nuanced perspective, and I am considering it. At this point, I see little or no evidence that Israel is not fully supported by the most powerful factions of the international power elite, with full force and power of American arms, and practically unlimited (is it $35 billion per annum) from the already emptied American treasury. One need only examine the participant and guest list at the annual AIPAC Conventions, combined with their mission statements, to the extent that those are published, to see a who's who of international power brokers on full display and deduce their ultimate regional aims: namely, and in sum, "to make the Middle East safe for Israeli nuclear hegemony." With that said, I allow for the probability that there was a great deal of mystery behind the signing of the Balfour Declaration, especially the motivations. For instance, I would like to know what the quid pro quo was in the transaction, or agreement. I know that Balfour wasn't motivated primarily by Christian largess, by any means, and would like to know what Rothschild promised, or offered, Balfour in exchange. The question is neither easily nor definitively answered, but is something I occasionally research as an amateur reader of history.
According to Benjamin Freedman, their offer was a guarantee of getting the USA into WW1 as Great Britain's ally to help them win the war against Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Turkey. Then as payment, they were to hand over Palestine to the Zionists (per the Balfour Declaration), which was basically a cryptically written receipt for the deal they made.
 





z gharib

Established
Joined
Sep 26, 2017
Messages
287
Likes
407
i think this belongs to this tread .....is this christian zionist in this forum ? - i like the rabbi ----- look how the christian zionist dragging the poor muslims.......

 





Joined
Dec 13, 2017
Messages
1,443
Likes
710
Yours is an unusual, nuanced perspective, in parts, and I am considering it. At this point, I see little or no evidence that Israel is not fully supported by the most powerful factions of the international power elite, with full force and power of American arms, and practically unlimited (is it $38 billion per annum?) funds from the already drained American treasury. One need only examine the participants and guest list at the annual AIPAC Conventions, combined with their mission statements, to the extent that those are published, to see a who's who of international power brokers on full display and deduce their ultimate regional aims: namely, and in sum, to make the Middle East safe for continued Israeli nuclear hegemony. With that said, I allow for the probability that there was a great deal of mystery behind the signing of the Balfour Declaration, especially the motivations. For instance, I would like to know what the quid pro quo was in the transaction, or agreement. I know that Balfour wasn't motivated primarily by Christian largess, by any means, and would like to know what Rothschild promised, or offered, Balfour in exchange. The question is neither easily nor definitively answered, but is something I occasionally research as an amateur reader of history.

Edit to add:
As well, and though she did not provide many details, Hannah Arendt, on the political left, said that Jewish power elites, such as the so called European "Court Jews," the bourgeoisies, opposed general emancipation of the Jewish proletariat, the masses, then largely under rabbinic control in Europe and Russia, and that might support part of your claim, which is why I acknowledge that your perspective is nuanced. I don't have her book at hand to provide the specific quote and am operating from potentially faulty memory.
Yeah well i'm just shooting from the hip here. I don't know the motives of these players.

Obviously there is no solution or peace in sight in the ME... so let's just shoot it out until last man standing.
 





Joined
Mar 24, 2017
Messages
3,985
Likes
6,337
There is no way i would believe nor accept that Adam came forth from the Creator's hand averaging in height like Chinese males (5'5) today or the Pygmys of West-Central Africa.
The prophet Muhammad(pbuh) stated that Adam(pbuh) was 30 meters tall. And if you were to look at this logically it makes sense. If you and your wife were the only humans you needed to have been pretty big to survive on this earth and to keep on reproducing because it just simply wouldn't be possible to survive with the current stature we have now in such little numbers.
 





Joined
Mar 18, 2017
Messages
2,814
Likes
5,409

Yours is an unusual, nuanced perspective, in parts, and I am considering it. At this point, I see little or no evidence that Israel is not fully supported by the most powerful factions of the international power elite, with full force and power of American arms, and practically unlimited (is it $38 billion per annum?) funds from the already drained American treasury. One needs only to examine the participants and guest list at the annual AIPAC Conventions, combined with their mission statements, to the extent that those are published, to see a who's who of international power brokers on full display and deduce their ultimate regional aims: namely, and in sum, to make the Middle East safe for continued Israeli nuclear hegemony. With that said, I allow for the probability that there was a great deal of mystery behind the signing of the Balfour Declaration, especially the motivations. For instance, I would like to know what the quid pro quo was in the transaction, or agreement. I know that Balfour wasn't motivated primarily by Christian largess, by any means, and would like to know what Rothschild promised, or offered, Balfour in exchange. The question is neither easily nor definitively answered, but is something I occasionally research as an amateur reader of history.


Edit to add:
As well, and though she did not provide many details, Hannah Arendt, on the political left, said that Jewish power elites, such as the so called European "Court Jews," the bourgeoisies, opposed general emancipation of the Jewish proletariat, the masses, then largely under rabbinic control in Europe and Russia, and that might support part of your claim, which is why I acknowledge that your perspective is nuanced. I don't have her book at hand to provide the specific quote and am operating from potentially faulty memory.
"An important point – the Zionists were not a mass Jewish movement, atleast not at that time, but were a political
movement of rich and influential Americans, British and other Western Europeans.
Initially the British government tried to offer them Uganda, but the Zionist said no, they wanted Jerusalem and the land around it. And this is why we got the Balfour Declaration, but one of the various reasons is that Chaim Weizmann, a very wealthy and senior zionist, owned a business that produced huge quantities of acetone which was necessary for making bombs. So the British promised Palestine to the Zionists to get him on their side. Weizmann, ofcourse, went on to become the first President of Israel."

Anyone with a quick (article) link on the Parushim secret society?
 





Joined
Mar 18, 2017
Messages
2,814
Likes
5,409
The prophet Muhammad(pbuh) stated that Adam(pbuh) was 30 meters tall. And if you were to look at this logically it makes sense. If you and your wife were the only humans you needed to have been pretty big to survive on this earth and to keep on reproducing because it just simply wouldn't be possible to survive with the current stature we have now in such little numbers.
I don't know how tall Adam was but i suspect Noah and his sons were between 7 and 8 feet.
Skeletons measuring upto 36ft were unearthed in Turkey, evidently, without any skeletal deformations similar to what people today have, who suffer from giantism. Clearly, iam hardpressed to believe that Satan's creation would be way better than God's creation.
 





Joined
Apr 25, 2017
Messages
847
Likes
1,763
I ignore a lot of what you say because I don't want to dignify it with a response. :)
Right, or you dont have an answer, which is more likely...

I call you a simpleton because for the purpose of your argument, you're pretending that similes don't exist -- that God can only be literal, or spiritual. You have to be a simpleton to believe that. Would you rather I just call you a heretic?
I dont pretend that similes dont exist, but if we choose to read the text literally then why dont you read it literally? Do you really think that the Scriptures concerning the Stone the Builder was to refuse was to be read as a simile before Jesus came? Do you think if we were to take the approach you say Jesus did to Scriptures, which is to take it literally, that when someone read those passages, they would have in any way thought of a man coming and dying on the Cross and being rejected by the Jews and the Church being built on top of Him?

No, they wouldnt, and that is my point, Jesus nor the Apostles read that literally, they read it Spiritually.

And go for it Thunder, you have already said it once or twice, simply because I dont agree with John Nelson Darby, you know like the entire Church history before he came along. Go ahead and call me one, your opinion means nothing honestly, and I dont believe you are a heretic simply because you are incorrect in your eschatology. In the end it doesnt matter, we both probably have a lot wrong with our understanding. You know just like John the Baptist, and Peter and the Apostles did concerning Jesus 1st Advent. Something you know is true but cant admit to for some reason...


Do you not remember when the disciples were arguing over who among them would be greater in the coming kingdom? What kingdom were they speaking of, if not the literal one that Jesus preached about, and that Isaiah, Ezekiel, and others foretold? You just keep saying it's a spiritual kingdom, but throughout the Bible, everyone is talking about it like it's a literal thing.
Except it is NOT literal, as you contend. What did Jesus Himself say of His Kingdom?

John 18:35 Pilate answered, Am I a Jew? Thine own nation and the chief priests have delivered thee unto me: what hast thou done?
36 Jesus answered, My kingdom is not of this world: if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now is my kingdom not from hence
.

Pretty clear answer about the Kingdom from Jesus own mouth, but you still believe He was trying to usher in some kind of physical kingdom. You are as blind as the Phrarisees were and as mistaken as all the other people who were believing Jesus was coming to usher in a physical kingdom for the Jews.

The Kingdom of Jesus is Spiritual, it is NOT of this World, if it was of this world then His Apostles and followers would have taken up arms and defended Him and did what you want to happen, but Jesus say nope you are wrong in your understanding, my Kingdom is NOT of this World.

Do the Apostles agree? Lets see:

2 Cor 5:For we know that if our earthly house of this tabernacle were dissolved, we have a building of God, an house not made with hands, eternal in the heavens.

Rom 14:17 For the kingdom of God is not meat and drink; but righteousness, and peace, and joy in the Holy Ghost.

1 Cor 4:20 For the kingdom of God is not in word, but in power.

1 Cor 15:50 Now this I say, brethren, that flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God; neither doth corruption inherit incorruption.

Col 1;13 Who hath delivered us from the power of darkness, and hath translated us into the kingdom of his dear Son:

Tim 4:18 And the Lord shall deliver me from every evil work, and will preserve me unto his heavenly kingdom: to whom be glory for ever and ever. Amen.

Heb 12:22 But ye are come unto mount Sion, and unto the city of the living God, the heavenly Jerusalem, and to an innumerable company of angels,

27 And this word, Yet once more, signifieth the removing of those things that are shaken, as of things that are made, that those things which cannot be shaken may remain.

28 Wherefore we receiving a kingdom which cannot be moved, let us have grace, whereby we may serve God acceptably with reverence and godly fear:

In pretty much each one of these Scriptures the writer is comparing and contrasting Earthly Physical things with against the Kingdom we are already IN, which is Spiritual.

If our earthly vessel dissolves, we have a building NOT made with hands, contrast of the Physical with the Spiritual.

The Kingdom of God isnt meat and drink, Physical but Righteousness Peace and Joy in the Holy Ghost, Spiritual.

Flesh and Blood can not inherit the kingdom, the Physical can not inherit the Spiritual.

The Kingdom isnt Word or Physical but Power, Spiritual.

Delivered from Darkness into the Kingdom of of His Son, past tense, because we are already IN the Kingdom, it is NOT something 2000+ years after Christ and Paul existed.

Delivered from Evil Work the Physical into the Heavenly Kingdom the Spiritual.

The writer of Hebrews contrasts the Physical Kingdom of Israel, Mt. Sinai, Jerusalem ect, with the Spiritual the real city of the Living God, the Spiritual Jerusalem and Mount Sion. He then speaks of how the Physical is MOVED and SHAKEN, but we belong to a Kingdom that can not be shaken, because it is not of this World, it is Spiritual.

Over and over the Apostles speak of the Kingdom being Spiritual and have zero care or relating to a Physical Kingdom especially one thousands of years removed from them or Christ...

What else does Jesus teach about the Kingdom?

Luke 17;20 And when he was demanded of the Pharisees, when the kingdom of God should come, he answered them and said, The kingdom of God cometh not with observation:
21 Neither shall they say, Lo here! or, lo there! for, behold, the kingdom of God is within you.

John 3:3 Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God.
4 Nicodemus saith unto him, How can a man be born when he is old? can he enter the second time into his mother's womb, and be born?
5 Jesus answered, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God.
6 That which is born of the flesh is flesh; and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit.

7 Marvel not that I said unto thee, Ye must be born again.

Matt 16:18 And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.
19 And I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.


Again Jesus teaches the contrast of a Physical Kingdom vs a Spiritual Kingdom, His Kingdom is Spiritual.

He teaches that the Kingdom doesnt come with observation, it is not something you can see with your Physical eye, which is what YOU want it to be and what the Pharisees wanted it to be, no instead it is within us or among them at the time, being Spiritual and in Jesus.

He literally teaches that no one can get into the Kingdom unless they are Born Again, that we must be transformed SPIRITUALLY in order to even see the Kingdom let alone enter in. Must be Born of the Spirit, nothing to do with the Flesh, it is completely contrasted against the Physical yet again.

Peter and we are given the keys to the Kingdom of HEAVEN, because it is Spiritual not Physical. You keep wanting to see a Physical Kingdom, Jesus instead only talks of a Spiritual Kingdom, the Apostles only write of a Spiritual Kingdom...

And as I stated before which you have no answers for is that much of the Prophecies from the Authors you list are interpreted by the Authors of the New Testament Spiritually and NOT Physically, not Literally. The writers of the Old Testament under the SPIRIT wrote of SPIRITUAL things in imagery that resonated with their audience, which would be Jews. You however dont want to see it as they (those after Christ who understood that it was all imagery of the Spiritual veiled in a method that would relate to those who lived back then) do, instead you want to look at it all as Literal, but as I have pointed out when done so, it either becomes absurd, or completely removes the true application of these text.

The rest of the passage, everything from the day of vengeance of our God, has not taken place yet.
Really? Jesus didnt fulfill this?


3 To appoint unto them that mourn in Zion, to give unto them beauty for ashes, the oil of joy for mourning, the garment of praise for the spirit of heaviness; that they might be called trees of righteousness, the planting of the Lord, that he might be glorified.

Jesus really hasnt given you beauty for ashes? Oil of joy for mourning? Praise for the Spirit of heaviness? You havent been planted as a tree of Righteousness by the Lord for His Glory?

Bet you believe Jesus has done all of that for you, you know He has but because of your brainwashing you are going to say it hasnt happened...

6 But ye shall be named the Priests of the Lord: men shall call you the Ministers of our God: ye shall eat the riches of the Gentiles, and in their glory shall ye boast yourselves.

Have you been named a Priest of the Lord, a Minister of our God?

Rev 1:6 And hath made us kings and priests unto God and his Father; to him be glory and dominion for ever and ever. Amen.

Is 61:8 For I the Lord love judgment, I hate robbery for burnt offering; and I will direct their work in truth, and I will make an everlasting covenant with them
.

Did Jesus NOT make an Everlasting Covenant with the Gentiles and everyone else?

Mark 14:24 And he said unto them, This is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many.

Is 61:10 I will greatly rejoice in the Lord, my soul shall be joyful in my God; for he hath clothed me with the garments of salvation, he hath covered me with the robe of righteousness, as a bridegroom decketh himself with ornaments, and as a bride adorneth herself with her jewels.
11 For as the earth bringeth forth her bud, and as the garden causeth the things that are sown in it to spring forth; so the Lord God will cause righteousness and praise to spring forth before all the nations
.

So do you rejoice in the Lord? Is your soul joyful in God? Have you been clothed with garments of Salvation? Have you been covered in robes of Righteousness? Has not Jesus caused Righteousness and praise to spring forth from all of the Nations?

You and I both know Jesus has done all of this already, He gives you oil of joy and beauty for ashes, He gives you praise for heaviness, planted you as a Tree of Righteousness for His Glory, made you a Priest, made an Everlasting Covenant, clothed you in Salvation and Righteousness and has caused Righteousness and Praise to spring forth before all the Nations. That is what happens to everyone that gets Born Again, because Christ already fulfilled it, but you keep on thinking He hasnt bud..
 





Joined
Mar 13, 2017
Messages
3,050
Likes
3,857
I dont pretend that similes dont exist, but if we choose to read the text literally then why dont you read it literally? Do you really think that the Scriptures concerning the Stone the Builder was to refuse was to be read as a simile before Jesus came? Do you think if we were to take the approach you say Jesus did to Scriptures, which is to take it literally, that when someone read those passages, they would have in any way thought of a man coming and dying on the Cross and being rejected by the Jews and the Church being built on top of Him?
I won't keep going over this. There are things to be taken literally, and things to be taken spiritually. We use the context of the entire Bible to discern. It's not that hard.

Except it is NOT literal, as you contend. What did Jesus Himself say of His Kingdom?

John 18:35 Pilate answered, Am I a Jew? Thine own nation and the chief priests have delivered thee unto me: what hast thou done?
36 Jesus answered, My kingdom is not of this world: if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now is my kingdom not from hence
.

Pretty clear answer about the Kingdom from Jesus own mouth, but you still believe He was trying to usher in some kind of physical kingdom. You are as blind as the Phrarisees were and as mistaken as all the other people who were believing Jesus was coming to usher in a physical kingdom for the Jews.

The Kingdom of Jesus is Spiritual, it is NOT of this World, if it was of this world then His Apostles and followers would have taken up arms and defended Him and did what you want to happen, but Jesus say nope you are wrong in your understanding, my Kingdom is NOT of this World.
There are two kingdoms. The Kingdom of God is the spiritual one, which is Jesus Christ. That's the one that's within us, the one that is not of this world. Take a King James Bible and do a word search on Kingdom of God. In each case, you are able to substitute the name of Jesus Christ and the verse still makes sense.

For example:

Matthew 21:43 - Therefore say I unto you, The kingdom of God [Jesus Christ] shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof.
This is why you guys screw up Israel's inheritance and standing so badly.

Do the Apostles agree? Lets see:

2 Cor 5:For we know that if our earthly house of this tabernacle were dissolved, we have a building of God, an house not made with hands, eternal in the heavens.

Rom 14:17 For the kingdom of God is not meat and drink; but righteousness, and peace, and joy in the Holy Ghost.

1 Cor 4:20 For the kingdom of God is not in word, but in power.

1 Cor 15:50 Now this I say, brethren, that flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God; neither doth corruption inherit incorruption.

Col 1;13 Who hath delivered us from the power of darkness, and hath translated us into the kingdom of his dear Son:

Tim 4:18 And the Lord shall deliver me from every evil work, and will preserve me unto his heavenly kingdom: to whom be glory for ever and ever. Amen.

Heb 12:22 But ye are come unto mount Sion, and unto the city of the living God, the heavenly Jerusalem, and to an innumerable company of angels,

27 And this word, Yet once more, signifieth the removing of those things that are shaken, as of things that are made, that those things which cannot be shaken may remain.
28 Wherefore we receiving a kingdom which cannot be moved, let us have grace, whereby we may serve God acceptably with reverence and godly fear:

In pretty much each one of these Scriptures the writer is comparing and contrasting Earthly Physical things with against the Kingdom we are already IN, which is Spiritual.

If our earthly vessel dissolves, we have a building NOT made with hands, contrast of the Physical with the Spiritual.

The Kingdom of God isnt meat and drink, Physical but Righteousness Peace and Joy in the Holy Ghost, Spiritual.

Flesh and Blood can not inherit the kingdom, the Physical can not inherit the Spiritual.

The Kingdom isnt Word or Physical but Power, Spiritual.

Delivered from Darkness into the Kingdom of of His Son, past tense, because we are already IN the Kingdom, it is NOT something 2000+ years after Christ and Paul existed.

Delivered from Evil Work the Physical into the Heavenly Kingdom the Spiritual.

The writer of Hebrews contrasts the Physical Kingdom of Israel, Mt. Sinai, Jerusalem ect, with the Spiritual the real city of the Living God, the Spiritual Jerusalem and Mount Sion. He then speaks of how the Physical is MOVED and SHAKEN, but we belong to a Kingdom that can not be shaken, because it is not of this World, it is Spiritual.

Over and over the Apostles speak of the Kingdom being Spiritual and have zero care or relating to a Physical Kingdom especially one thousands of years removed from them or Christ...

What else does Jesus teach about the Kingdom?

Luke 17;20 And when he was demanded of the Pharisees, when the kingdom of God should come, he answered them and said, The kingdom of God cometh not with observation:
21 Neither shall they say, Lo here! or, lo there! for, behold, the kingdom of God is within you.

John 3:3 Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God.
4 Nicodemus saith unto him, How can a man be born when he is old? can he enter the second time into his mother's womb, and be born?
5 Jesus answered, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God.
6 That which is born of the flesh is flesh; and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit.

7 Marvel not that I said unto thee, Ye must be born again.

Matt 16:18 And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.
19 And I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.


Again Jesus teaches the contrast of a Physical Kingdom vs a Spiritual Kingdom, His Kingdom is Spiritual.

He teaches that the Kingdom doesnt come with observation, it is not something you can see with your Physical eye, which is what YOU want it to be and what the Pharisees wanted it to be, no instead it is within us or among them at the time, being Spiritual and in Jesus.

He literally teaches that no one can get into the Kingdom unless they are Born Again, that we must be transformed SPIRITUALLY in order to even see the Kingdom let alone enter in. Must be Born of the Spirit, nothing to do with the Flesh, it is completely contrasted against the Physical yet again.

Peter and we are given the keys to the Kingdom of HEAVEN, because it is Spiritual not Physical. You keep wanting to see a Physical Kingdom, Jesus instead only talks of a Spiritual Kingdom, the Apostles only write of a Spiritual Kingdom...

And as I stated before which you have no answers for is that much of the Prophecies from the Authors you list are interpreted by the Authors of the New Testament Spiritually and NOT Physically, not Literally. The writers of the Old Testament under the SPIRIT wrote of SPIRITUAL things in imagery that resonated with their audience, which would be Jews. You however dont want to see it as they (those after Christ who understood that it was all imagery of the Spiritual veiled in a method that would relate to those who lived back then) do, instead you want to look at it all as Literal, but as I have pointed out when done so, it either becomes absurd, or completely removes the true application of these text.
This is one reason why I don't reply to you sometimes, and I've been pretty open about this. Instead of using one good example and verse and moving on to the next point, you go on and on and on and on. I don't want to invest that much time in reading your posts, so I generally don't.

The other kingdom of the two is the Kingdom of Heaven, also known as the Millennial Kingdom. This the earthly, literal kingdom of Jesus Christ. This is the kingdom where Israel will finally fully inherit the promised land. The nations will be bound to obey certain parts of the law, including sacrifices and observing feasts, and representatives will attend the Temple for these things. Christians will rule and reign with Jesus Christ, doing his work and teaching the nations. a fact acknowledged by the disciples when they asked, "Who is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven?"

Do you believe that we will have rank in a spiritual kingdom? To what point? Who would we be governing? The disciples' question doesn't make sense in that context.

You don't know there's a difference between the two kingdoms, even though scripture speaks of each distinctly, so you just make everything spiritual, which is not only heretical, but totally boring.

Really? Jesus didnt fulfill this?

3 To appoint unto them that mourn in Zion, to give unto them beauty for ashes, the oil of joy for mourning, the garment of praise for the spirit of heaviness; that they might be called trees of righteousness, the planting of the Lord, that he might be glorified.

Jesus really hasnt given you beauty for ashes? Oil of joy for mourning? Praise for the Spirit of heaviness? You havent been planted as a tree of Righteousness by the Lord for His Glory?

Bet you believe Jesus has done all of that for you, you know He has but because of your brainwashing you are going to say it hasnt happened...

6 But ye shall be named the Priests of the Lord: men shall call you the Ministers of our God: ye shall eat the riches of the Gentiles, and in their glory shall ye boast yourselves.

Have you been named a Priest of the Lord, a Minister of our God?

Rev 1:6 And hath made us kings and priests unto God and his Father; to him be glory and dominion for ever and ever. Amen.

Is 61:8 For I the Lord love judgment, I hate robbery for burnt offering; and I will direct their work in truth, and I will make an everlasting covenant with them.

Did Jesus NOT make an Everlasting Covenant with the Gentiles and everyone else?

Mark 14:24 And he said unto them, This is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many.

Is 61:10 I will greatly rejoice in the Lord, my soul shall be joyful in my God; for he hath clothed me with the garments of salvation, he hath covered me with the robe of righteousness, as a bridegroom decketh himself with ornaments, and as a bride adorneth herself with her jewels.
11 For as the earth bringeth forth her bud, and as the garden causeth the things that are sown in it to spring forth; so the Lord God will cause righteousness and praise to spring forth before all the nations
.

So do you rejoice in the Lord? Is your soul joyful in God? Have you been clothed with garments of Salvation? Have you been covered in robes of Righteousness? Has not Jesus caused Righteousness and praise to spring forth from all of the Nations?

You and I both know Jesus has done all of this already, He gives you oil of joy and beauty for ashes, He gives you praise for heaviness, planted you as a Tree of Righteousness for His Glory, made you a Priest, made an Everlasting Covenant, clothed you in Salvation and Righteousness and has caused Righteousness and Praise to spring forth before all the Nations. That is what happens to everyone that gets Born Again, because Christ already fulfilled it, but you keep on thinking He hasnt bud..
I think you have forgotten the original point, which was the Jesus didn't read those things. In the progression of the passage, everything after what he reads will be fulfilled completely after the day of vengeance, which is still on the way.
 





Joined
Dec 13, 2017
Messages
1,443
Likes
710
Skeletons measuring upto 36ft were unearthed in Turkey, evidently, without any skeletal deformations similar to what people today have, who suffer from giantism. Clearly, iam hardpressed to believe that Satan's creation would be way better than God's creation.
Bigger is not always better.

Imagine their appetite and their piles of shite.

And the amount of time and energy poor humans would have to work to feed those bastards.
 





Joined
Dec 13, 2017
Messages
1,443
Likes
710
"An important point – the Zionists were not a mass Jewish movement, atleast not at that time, but were a political
movement of rich and influential Americans, British and other Western Europeans.
Initially the British government tried to offer them Uganda, but the Zionist said no, they wanted Jerusalem and the land around it. And this is why we got the Balfour Declaration, but one of the various reasons is that Chaim Weizmann, a very wealthy and senior zionist, owned a business that produced huge quantities of acetone which was necessary for making bombs. So the British promised Palestine to the Zionists to get him on their side. Weizmann, ofcourse, went on to become the first President of Israel."

Anyone with a quick (article) link on the Parushim secret society?

Jews are back in the land God gave them... so it's not like it's Arab land anyway.

Sure there were Arabs during the 500 year Turkish occupation. And before that Arabs occupied it for a thousand years... and before that Rome/Byzantine.

But now the Jews are back to the land God gave them... so you can all stuff it... or try to do something about it.
 





Joined
Jan 9, 2018
Messages
822
Likes
1,217
“Almost three years ago the Temple Institute inaugurated its Raise a Red Heifer in Israel program. Due to laws restricting the importation of live cattle into Israel, the Temple Institute imported frozen embryos of red angus, implanting them in Israeli domestic cows. The pregnant cows were raised on cattle ranches in different locations throughout the country. The cows are giving birth this summer with several calves already having been born.”

There’s nothing “natural” about freezing & importing cow embryos & implanting them into another host.