You've called your opponents
lunatics and
scum.
Thank-you for linking your references, so everyone can see you're being dishonest again. Neither of those comments were made toward my "opponents" as you've called them.
What was actually stated was that this is a lunatic asylum prison reform school for the criminally insane, which it is, and that the most insane have risen to the top, as scum always does, and are running the asylum. Please see for yourself (copied and pasted from the paragraph you linked).
-------
Hundreds of Scriptural references have already been provided within this thread, which should leave
NO REASONABLE DOUBT to any rationally-minded human+Being that everything stated above is irrefutable. But this is a lunatic asylum prison reform school for the criminally insane, and the most insane, egotistical
hypocrites have risen to the top, as
scum always does (
Isa. 3:12).
-------
What else would one call a planet where
EVERYONE is in open rebellion against our Creator despite having a death-sentence hanging over our heads? We call ourselves "sinners", but a sinner is, in fact, a
CRIMINAL.
We are all sinners (
Rom. 3:10). Sin is breaking The Law (
1 John 3:4). Breaking The Law is a crime. People who commit crimes are criminals. Hopefully you're following along so you don't ask to have this repeated to you later.
You call us dishonest while you deliberately avoid answering direct questions because you're afraid it will shake the foundations of your delusional belief. Yet here you are complaining about dishonesty and ad hominems.
When others are dishonest, it's pointed out to them, just as it's been pointed out to you, with the facts that illustrate the dishonesty. Most of what you have said in this thread has been dishonest, whether you realize it or not.
For example,
NONE of your direct questions have been avoided. They have,
in truth, already been answered
IF you take the time to read through the thread. Perhaps it makes you feel like you're in charge though if you can command others to repeat themselves?
Further, it's the foundations of the trinity delusion that have been shaken here, with
hundreds of verses cited proving beyond any
REASONABLE doubt that it's extra-Biblical, i.e. UNScriptural. In fact, even the Roman Catholic church you espouse has admitted as much (which likewise has been pointed out to you before), and brag on their ability to con the protestant denominations into accepting their completely baseless dogmas,
LIKE THE TRINITY.
“Our opponents sometimes claim that no belief should be held dogmatically which
is not explicitly stated in scripture ... But the Protestant Churches have
themselves accepted such dogmas,
AS THE TRINITY, for which there is
no such
precise authority in the Gospels,” — (Assumption of Mary, Life magazine, Oct 30,
1950, p. 51)
Source:
http://www.trinitytruth.org/the-trinity-doctrine-exposed.html#Part15
From the Athanasian Creed: "Whosoever will be saved, before all things it is
necessary that he hold the catholic faith. Which faith unless every one do keep
whole and undefiled, without doubt he shall perish everlastingly.
And the
catholic faith is this: that we worship one God in Trinity...
...This is the catholic faith; which except a man believe truly and firmly, he
cannot be saved."
"The doctrine of the Trinity is
the central Catholic Dogma, that Catholics are
obliged to believe.
“He therefore that will be saved, let him thus think of the Trinity.”
-the Athanasian Creed"
See:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Athanasian_Creed
Are you perhaps starting to see just how often you're dishonest with yourself and others?
You said "
Christ is not God." You go on to say "
Christ is the Lord of Lords." I show you Tanakh scripture (from YOUR king of king's bible) that says "
God is Lord of Lords." Therefore, according to your authoritative scripture, Christ must be God. When pressed on this matter, you choose to ignore it.
Except it wasn't really ignored, was it? Did you bother to read the same post you linked above about this being a lunatic asylum?
https://vigilantcitizenforums.com/threads/on-the-trinity.6477/post-252722
If so, then you would know your non-sequitur logical fallacy was addressed. Please take the time to actually read what was written, rather than
dishonestly pretending that your question wasn't already answered, when it was.
The Most High God (Father, the "I AM")--
Who is Christ's God according to Christ--can assign whatever designation He wishes to any of His Children, including His Firstborn Son. And that's exactly what the Scriptures tell us He is doing with His Firstborn Son:
The Messiah/Christ by
GIVING Christ the Throne and
MAKING Christ the King of kings and Lord of lords (see
1 Cor. 15:23-28).
For anyone to think otherwise is calling Christ a liar, which is not only very foolish, but potentially fatal if not corrected.
Because it is an overt fabrication
filled with lies that is not found in any canonical text for that very reason. How do we know with
absolute certainty it is a
FAKE (that was written after Peter's death)?
BECAUSE IT CONTRADICTS CHRIST, WHICH IS ANTICHRIST/CALLING HIM A LIAR.
You said Peter was never in Rome. I showed you
the Acts of Peter said otherwise. You ignored it.
It's the Scriptures that tell us Peter was never in Rome because Christ
COMMANDED Peter
not to go to Rome (
Matt. 10:6).
Why would any rationally-minded person not ignore a bunch of blatant lies from yet another
FAKE ANTICHRIST MANUSCRIPT? Do you really think it somehow isn't dishonest of you to promote such obvious satanic nonsense, that not only contradicts Christ and His Commands, but also contradicts other parts of Scripture,
AND contradicts the available physical evidence as well?
The Muratorian Fragment shows that people always had doubts, and it eventually became clear that it was written well after Peter had died.
Eusebius, in his 4th-century
History of the Church, writes "
The so-called Acts of Peter, however, and the Gospel which bears his name, and the Preaching and the Apocalypse, as they are called, we know have not been universally accepted, because no ecclesiastical writer, ancient or modern, has made use of testimonies drawn from them."
http://www.bible-researcher.com/eusebius.html
You said Peter wasn't crucified upside down. I showed you the Acts of Peter said otherwise. You ignored it.
Again, it's the Scriptures that tell us Peter was
NOT crucified upside down. In fact it was Christ Himself Who prophesied How Peter would die of old age (
John 21:17-19). Are you really choosing to believe your
FAKE ANTICHRIST MANUSCRIPT over Christ? That's your choice of course, but don't expect anyone else to believe such obvious lies.
You claim the Pharisees fabricated man-made traditions that were in violation of the Law.
I asked you which. You ignore it.
Because it had already been answered in post #571.
https://vigilantcitizenforums.com/threads/on-the-trinity.6477/post-252579
So it was
YOU who chose
again to ignore the answer that had already been provided.
I asked you a direct question if a word could exist without a thought. You saw light shining through the crannies of your antitrinitarian prison and you closed your eyes and looked away.
That question was answered too, without acquiescing to your
evil game.
https://vigilantcitizenforums.com/threads/on-the-trinity.6477/post-251981
Why can we be certain that it's an evil game that you're playing? Because if you were genuinely interested in helping me (or others) you would simply share your alleged revelation rather than bait and troll someone for pages and pages.
Even after all of this deceitful behavior on your part, if you wish to share your answers to, and what you feel is important about, your two questions, I'll be glad to discuss it with you, as long as you agree not to take Father's Name in vain again.
Then you have the audacity to call others dishonest.
Sometimes people don't realize they're being dishonest and thus need to have it pointed out to them, for everyone's benefit.
You must be the biggest hypocritical inflated ego I've seen in a long time. Bottom of the pit is where you're at.
Matthew 7:1-4
7:1
Judge NOT, that ye be not judged.
7:2
For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again.
7:3
And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
7:4
Or how wilt thou say to thy brother, Let me pull out the mote out of thine eye; and, behold, a beam [is] in thine own eye?
At least that was explicit.
