To start with you are taking one persons (MR Hills) version (unprovable story) of events versus black and white emails of what that person truly wrote and are choosing to believe his story over the emails without ever approaching me for my 'version'. That tells me that you are not interested in the truth because any real truthseeker needs all the information before making their decision. You have chosen to defend Mr Hill and your ego instead of disseminate the information available and maybe prove yourself wrong.
You need to look at those screenshots above because the PROVE that it was Mr Hill who asked to come to my house, and not that it was I who invited him. I told him I was 'petrified' at the idea of sharing a bed with him then after becoming ill at the thought of what he was proposing, I decided no way was that man setting foot in my house and that I would go along with his foolishness and see if I could get him to reveal his intentions. A few days later, he commended me, via an email that you have a copy of for how I had change from being petrified to willing to sleep with himand how this was so wonderful. He started calling my sweetie pie, precious and then proposed that he set up home, office and even move his other secret special relationship in as well. You have the emails, I am not lying. I believe all this is in the thread - What Father Has i Mind, where he also told me that I did not need to hear from Father about whether I should be his, but that Mr Hill would, instead speak FOR Father so I did not need to worry my pretty little head about it. How anyone who loves Father could ever tell someone that they don't need a relationship with Father, but hat they will speak on His behalf boggles my mind.
Most people who have given their lives to Father have had some sort of history they are not proud of, that is why they change their life. Not one of us is perfect and sins are not comparable - there is only 1 unforgiveable sin and this was not it. There is no big deal here regarding my actions, I am at one with Father regarding everything that has happened and have repented as and how He has asked me to.
The facts are that I shed some tears in the polytunnel, this has been embellished massively by Mr Hill. I mentioned I was smoking again and asked if he had any solutions. The solution he gave me later, via email, was then a 'smacked bottom' that he eventually eluded he would 'kiss better'. I thought he was joking - again, you will see that in the emails - "Are you actually serious about smacking my bottom" I asked when he started to propose a trip to my house to carry out the 'punishment'.
If there was no sexual advance, why would Mr Hill write that I would have to initiate any hanky panky? On more than 1 occasion it was made VERY clear that if I wanted hanky panky, I would have to initiate it. That was followed by a discussion on the difference of love making and hanky panky - as you can see from the screenshots above where HIS WORDS confirm what I am saying. How is love making ok but hanky panky is fornicating?
The man I was involved with was a DISCIPLE for 7 years, not a follower - even YOU are lying to try and save Mr Hill's face, you know he was a disciple because you were friends with him. So how is me fornicating any worse than you lying? All sins are sins.
What does that say about a man who says he has been 'Christ's disciple' for 17 years and is openly and provably breaking commandments on a public forum?
There is nothing wrong with the stairs in the house, except they are not carpeted but have the steel teeth for carpeting exposed creating a safety hazard for an old man going up and down them (Mr Hill). The upstairs has central heating which is on daily, as well as three spare bedrooms with a super king bed, and several singles/bunks. Mr Hill knows nothing of my house in the winter as he visited in the summer and has never asked me if my house is cold upstairs, or if I ever sleep upstairs, which I often do and in fact was doing at the time when he organised his trip anyway due to rat issues in the room below the downstairs bedroom so made the bit about the house being cold upstairs up as part of the parable.
Mr Hill climbed the stairs without any issue on more than one occassion witnessed by 2 of his disciples and I, however as part of my ruse, I had to offer him 'respect' and the bedroom on the bottom floor. I made it very clear that I was going to sleep upstairs (as far away form Mr Hill in a room with deadbolts top and bottom, I just did not tell him that bit) and that this was an offer fs respect - same as a follower in glasgow does. In fact to allow Mr Hill a bed, this follower slept on his couch for the whole summer because Mr Hill kept turning up at very short notice and sometimes unnanounced, as witnessed by a disciple. Why, when this follower did not even have a spare bed, did Mr Hill not offer to share that bed? Because it was a man, possibly??
And lastly, if Mr Hill would never take advantage of a woman, why are there several women in Scotland claiming that he has? Why does Tony and some of the other disciples already know of a situation that happened similar to this several years ago? How many times are you all going to listen to a man tell you that all these women who have never met each other are all making up the same story and that you must ignore them because they are all wrong and only he is right?