So shut up !So listen to Him and learn to also care about what He cares about and says.
No but why are you quoting the Devil ?You need to learn to stop thinking evil.
So shut up !So listen to Him and learn to also care about what He cares about and says.
No but why are you quoting the Devil ?You need to learn to stop thinking evil.
Rather just say what Jesus said and end it there, instead of saying what you want it to say or what you want to believe.So shut up !
Yes, you should. Stop thinking evil.
I quoted from the true Koran, which says the same as the Bible does, it even has cross references to it, which you could have checked. But instead, you chose to think evil and ask if I was a devil.but why are you quoting the Devil ?
This analogy shows the relationship between the Father (Daddy's self behind the computer) and the man Jesus (bible_student or Daddy's image in this realm (VigilantCitizenForums)). When bible_student reveals his Word on the VigilantCitizenForums, those who perceive that Word would be right to identify it as Daddy. This is about identity, not entity. The entity bible_student is not the entity Daddy, but it's the same identity.How is that analogy the same? It is not.
The Athenasian Creed says that Christ is not the Father.
So, the analogy you gave cannot be logically used for trying to prove the Athenasian Creed.
I am a spokesperson of Jesus Christ.Rather just say what Jesus said and end it there, instead of saying what you want it to say or what you want to believe.
The Quran is the Devil's drivel.I quoted from the true Koran, which says the same as the Bible does, it even has cross references to it, which you could have checked. But instead, you chose to think evil and ask if I was a devil.
Not this again.I am a spokesperson of Jesus Christ.
He chose me to speak for Him.
The Quran is the Devil's drivel.
See you don't learn.Not this again.
It's a thoughtful analogy, but it doesn't fit with what Scripture says about Christ.This analogy shows the relationship between the Father (Daddy's self behind the computer) and the man Jesus (bible_student or Daddy's image in this realm (VigilantCitizenForums)). When bible_student reveals his Word on the VigilantCitizenForums, those who perceive that Word would be right to identify it as bible_student. This is about identity, not entity. The entity bible_student is not the entity Daddy, but it's the same identity.
If you want an analogy of how three persons can be one being, then it would be different. A Word cannot exist without a Thought. A Thought cannot exist without a Mind. You cannot separate these three, yet they are distinct:
They are distinct from Each Other. This statement is taken in a wrong sense by every uneducated as well as every perversely disposed person, as if it predicated a diversity, in such a sense as to imply a separation. - Tertullian
Jesus is God's Word in the flesh, aka, God's Word manifesting in our world so we can perceive it, just as bible_student's Word manifests itself on VigilantCitizenForum so we can perceive it, and that we - who don't know you - may know you.
Jesus Christ is God.The question that begs to be asked is this: why is it so important to Roman Catholicism and her protestant daughters (Rev. 17:5), to believe that Jesus is supposedly God?
Your rebuttal is an inch away from agreeing if only you can get past the difference between a thing (a forum account) and a human. Things don't have free will, humans do. Jesus, the man, has a human will seperate from the Father's / Christ's, but the human will must take a backseat because divine providence or God's interference in human history cannot be guided by human will.It's a thoughtful analogy, but it doesn't fit with what Scripture says about Christ.
Matthew 26:42 He went away again the second time, and prayed, saying, O my Father, if this "Cup" (Holy Grail) may not pass away from me, except I drink it, Thy will be done.
(In the analogy you gave me, bible student would be the direct expression (word) of my will (or thought that I'm having) and could not have another separate will, to mine. What I type, comes up on the screen as bible student's typed out words, and "bible student" does not have a separate free-will, to be able to choose to not say what I type. bible student doesn't have to submit to my will, because bible student doesn't have a separate will, it's just a channel with no free will of its own, that displays what I type. In other words, it's not a separate person.
But, scripture shows this not to be the case when it comes to Christ, Who is shown to have His own Free-Will, which He willingly submits to the Will of Father (his God and our God). Which means, Christ didn't have to do what He did. And that He did what He did, because He chose to do it (he humbled himself and became obedient unto death). -
Philippians 2:8 And being found in fashion as a man, he humbled himself, and became obedient unto death, even the death of the cross.)
Since we are dealing with Life or death (ours) it is probably best to stick with the simplicity we are given in Scripture, and make it our aim to believe and be obedient to what we have been told:
John 17:3 And THIS is Life Eternal, that they might KNOW Thee the ONLY True God, and Christ the Saviour, whom Thou hast sent.
1 Corinthians 11:3 But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the head of the woman [is] the man; and the head of Christ [is] God.
i.e:
God
Christ
man
woman
And to not get side tracked into analogies that distract or divert from the simple Message in it, which says to learn to fear (have a healthy respect for) and love God and keep His Commandments and do His Will, just like Christ (Who is our Example, Lord and Saviour) said and demonstrated.
You perfectly describe the hypostatic union and then deny there is a hypostatic union. Jesus (human) + Christ (divine) in one body. Are you simply caught up on semantics? Because you clearly get the concept.Jesus = the mortal human son of the virgin body of Mary, (Son of Man) descended from the line of David and born in Bethlehem, which is unquestionably in and of this world.
Christ = the immortal Spirit-Being (the Firstborn Son of God), Who is NOT OF THIS WORLD (John 17:5, 18:36).
When Christ incarnated the body of Jesus 2000 years ago (John 1:14), He became the human+Being known as Jesus+Christ.
There is no such thing as a "hypostatic union", which is nothing more than another made-up term to try to explain away something that doesn't exist. That's what humans do; they play with word meanings by redefining words and/or making up new ones in a vain attempt to push their untenable fictions on (deceive) others.
God needed a body in order to bleed and die for our sins.You perfectly describe the hypostatic union and then deny there is a hypostatic union. Jesus (human) + Christ (divine) in one body. Are you simply caught up on semantics? Because you clearly get the concept.
I think I may comprehend the position you are taking, if what you wrote above has been correctly understood; (i.e. you believe Christ = the Father)?Your rebuttal is an inch away from agreeing if only you can get past the difference between a thing (a forum account) and a human. Things don't have free will, humans do. Jesus, the man, has a human will seperate from the Father's / Christ's, but the human will must take a backseat because divine providence or God's interference in human history cannot be guided by human will.
Think about it.
Father (the ONE TRUE God) IS God. There is no other. Father created ALL of His Sons, known here on Earth as angels (spirit-Beings, like Father), beginning with His FIRSTBORN Son, known here on Earth as The Messiah/Christ/Mahdi. So Father (YHWH, or in English the "I AM") has a Father-Son relationship with ALL of His Children, as one would logically expect.
But if Christ = the Father, rather than His Eldest/Firstborn/i.e. First created Son (Angel; the "sons of God" are the angels, according to Genesis and the Book of Job) then do the following Words spoken by Christ still make sense?:
Who has denied Christ's Divinity?You two sockpuppets have nothing better to do than to deny the Divinity of Jesus Christ.
You are still thinking evil.Just like your father whom you are fond of quoting.
Jesus Christ is God the Creator.Who has denied Christ's Divinity?
Angels are divine beings (sons of God) and Christ is Divine.
John
10:34 Jesus answered them, Is it not written in your Law, I said, Ye are gods?
10:35 If he called them gods, unto whom the Word of God came, and the Scripture cannot be broken;
You quote Satan from the Quran as if he is God the Creator.3:59 You seem to want to believe Satan, and that you are no better than a smelly animal. You don’t
seem to want to be divine again.
You are still thinking evil.
“Honi soit qui mal y pense” - evil be to him who thinks it.
HebrewsJesus Christ is God the Creator.
JohnYour eternity is entirely in His hands.
I quote God's Message from the true Koran (correctly translated and interpreted) in the King of kings' Bible (which I happen to be reading from at the moment):You quote Satan from the Quran as if he is God the Creator.
Does John 1:1 not include the same? The Word was with God, and the Word was God. Ergo Christ being with God doesn't mean He is not God.I think I may comprehend the position you are taking, if what you wrote above has been correctly understood; (i.e. you believe Christ = the Father)?
King of kings' Bible, John
1:14 And the Word was made flesh (incarnated), and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only incarnated of the Father) full of Grace and Truth (Nazir in Hebrew).
1:15 John bare witness of him, and cried, saying, This was he of whom I spoke, He that cometh after me is preferred before me: for he was (in existence) before me (before the world was).
But if Christ = the Father, rather than His Eldest/Firstborn/i.e. First created Son (Angel; the "sons of God" are the angels, according to Genesis and the Book of Job) then do the following Words spoken by Christ still make sense?:
17:4 I have glorified Thee on the Earth: I have finished the work which Thou gavest me to do.
17:5 And now, O Father, glorify Thou me with Thine Own self with the glory which I had with Thee BEFORE THE WORLD WAS.
As it does not say, that Christ said, "glorify Thou me with Thine Own self with the glory which I had as Thee before the world was", but rather, it says that Christ said "the glory which I had with Thee before the world was"
So, if it's true that Christ = the Father, then the question could be asked, why did Christ not say here "as Thee" (i.e. as Himself?) before the world was (to make this undoubtedly clear)? But it doesn't and instead says that Christ spoke about the glory he had with the Father, rather than "as" the Father.