One thing the Greeks had a very good hold of was the quality of debate and the use and abuse of rhetorical devices.
As someone keen on the Classics, you may find this outline of logical debating fallacies as interesting as I did ;-)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies
One paragraph stood out to me...
"The conscious or habitual use of fallacies as
rhetorical devices are prevalent in the desire to persuade, when the focus is more on communication and eliciting common agreement rather than the correctness of the reasoning. One may consider the effective use of a fallacy by an orator as clever but by the same token the reasoning of that orator should be recognized as unsound, and thus the orator's claim, supported by an unsound argument, will be regarded as unfounded and dismissed."
Then I noticed this one ..
"
Fallacy of many questions (complex question, fallacy of presupposition, loaded question,
plurium interrogationum) – someone asks a question that presupposes something that has not been proven or accepted by all the people involved. This fallacy is often used rhetorically, so that the question limits direct replies to those that serve the questioner's agenda."
Then I saw this and it all became clear...
"Shotgun argumentation – the arguer offers such a large number of arguments for a position that the opponent can't possibly respond to all of them."