also the michael thing wasn't referring to michelle it was about michael mullen
plus if all these singers were to get gender reassignment surgeries and vocal chord surgery to make their voices higher, they wouldn't be able to sing
vocal chords are so fragile they can get hemorrhages and nodules easily after vocal surgery that extreme (changing pitch from masculine to feminine) so they wouldn't be able to belt the way they do on stage
here's a comment i wrote a couple days ago-
View attachment 1369
also i saw a 'transvestigation' on harry styles and it confused me. if someone auditioned for xfactor, that meant they were regular kids and weren't exposed to fame at all. so how could they have been transgender at birth if they could've potentially never been in the ent industry? it doesn't make sense. just because someone is muscular or have a different hip to shoulder ratio doesn't mean they're a different gender from what they claim to be
maybe something's being hidden but i really don't think human bodies are that malleable and easy to change. even with plastic surgery you can kinda tell sometimes something's off about their face
if someone is transgender you can kind of detect it. look at gigi gorgeous and blair white, even though they look feminine you can still see that they have masculine facial features
it just seems unnecessary to go through all those lengths just to change someone's gender. how would the celebrity and label benefit from that? would they go through all that trouble for something so insignificant? probably not
www.dailymail.co.uk
