I’ve been pondering the same thing but for me I was asking myself why it was everywhere in MSM. In alt-media anything goes so it wasn’t much of a concern popping up there. True, part of the discourse originated because of the Floyd aftermath.
I became suspicious after seeing TIP and their war gaming so widely reported on in MSM that I figured there is something else going on that isn’t being purposely reported. You don’t publicize your war strategy like that. If many entities tried to keep a lid on the Hunter Biden story, they sure could have lent a hand in hushing up this democratic plan.
So a civil war happens, then what? How has the billionaire class prepared to seize the moment? What I notice being done is that all the articles talking about election violence or a civil war are mute on the aftermath and the changes that might/will be introduced. But they drop hints….little bits and pieces that once gathered up and using history as a guide altogether paint a picture of what the aftermath will look like. To me, Rosa Brooks’ work is a real good clue
(I’ll start a thread on something). I don’t believe she lay in bed one night, stared up at the ceiling and decided to form her organization.
Imagine if the PNAC document had been widely publicized circa 2000 or early 2001. Yes, it called for a new Pearl Harbor but I imagine everyone reading it wouldn’t have envisioned the NDAA, DHS or the Patriot Act (which according to Ron Paul, was written years earlier and was shelved, awaiting an event like 9/11). So we shouldn’t expect (if anything happens) anything less than 9/11’s aftermath.
Which is why I believe that a very transformative event is planned and that the America that is going emerge is going to be very different from the one people knew in 2019.
If you’re wondering if military intelligence seeded it alt-media and why, It’s very probable that “they” want consent/complicity. Think of all the people who attended pro-war rallies back in 2002/2003 or at the present time who have and still support lockdowns….it doesn’t matter if you were lied to or not, you become complicit in the demise of your own country. See my post
here
I first read about the 2 retired military dudes’ letter to Gen.Milley here,
If the commander in chief attempts to ignore the election’s results, you will face a choice.
www.defenseone.com
so it’s not something emanating from Alex Jones/Mike Adams. The former have been criticized as being over the top, a tad paranoid as you can see in their letter but this particular line screamed at me;
"Due to a dangerous confluence of circumstances, the once-unthinkable scenario of authoritarian rule in the United States is now a very real possibility."
It’s become increasingly obvious in the last months that this is what TPTB want for America. So we should expect a VERY transformative event to usher in this authoritarianism…possibly to remain in a semi-permanent form. Come to think of it, before a war happens, MSM aggressively sells it to the public and all they have been consumed with in the last 12mths
(if we to go back to TIP’s formation in Nov 2019) is the homeland becoming a battlefield supposedly over the election results. I’ve been thinking again about the Jussie Smollett scandal…was it a dry run? Why didn’t “they” wait for 2020 to pull it off?
With articles such as these ^^
…I believe parts of it (methods to deal with the situation) is meant for deflection. I still believe there won’t be foreign troops on CONUS at the present time. I mean, think about it for a second, if things came to ahead would Trump honestly ask the UN to intervene? Everyone knows he wouldn’t do something like that and that atleast before he asks the UN, he would have engaged NATO. But
McConville gave the allies some reassurances so we shouldn’t expect them showing up/intervening either.
It seems to me that such NYT pieces are meant to get the public to choose, before hand, what authoritarianism they are comfortable with….foreign or domestic.
