A Freeman
Superstar
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2019
- Messages
- 6,895
Thank-you for admitting that.No, no I cannot prove it.
Is there? Or does it seem that way after a lifetime of programming to accept the assumptions of allopathic medicine?There is so much wrong with your post above that I wouldn’t really know where to even start to address it.
If a virus isn't alive, but is instead simply a small chain of DNA/RNA manufactured within its host cell to address a specific toxic situation IN THAT CELL, which is then wrapped up in a protein wrapper/trash bag and ejected from the cell when the job is done, how does it find its way into a cell in someone else's body please? And has anyone ever witnessed that happening?You do realise that when they talk about viruses and locomotion, they are primarily talking about the movement of the virus around the body or plant or whatever. They are not referring to the viruses ability to move from person to person.
Viruses cannot move independently - it’s one of the reasons they have to use a host.
If you research that, you'll find the answer is no.
And what exactly does "transmitted" mean to you please? Even if it is assumed they manage to make it from one person to another, how do they penetrate all of the body's natural defenses, and find their way inside HEALTHY cells inside someone else's body, and then how exactly do they adapt to the new host cell, with completely foreign DNA/RNA and somehow manage to replicate?They don’t move from person to person themselves. They are transmitted in a variety of different ways according to where they shed.
Again, is there ANY proof of this means of transmission?Influenza and Covid-19 are shed in the upper respiratory tract of infected individuals and transmitted as droplets. The sneeze or the cough expels them from one person and propels them either directly into the airways of another person or onto other surfaces. The droplet is then picked up by touch and if you touch your face, mouth, eyes etc can then infect you.
The "Spanish flu" which was neither Spanish, nor originated in Spain, nor was a flu in the way that term is used today, killed tens of millions. And as was previously shared with you, attempts to infect healthy people with it using every textbook means of transmission, including everything described above, FAILED.
Will it? Is there any proof of that? Again, if you'll research that subject in depth, you find the answer to that question is a resounding "no".If you wear a mask it may reduce the risk of contamination in this way.
And more importantly, wearing masks, particularly for prolonged periods of time, has been proven to be unhealthy.
Does it? Or is that yet another medical myth, which people regurgitate without researching?HIV or Hep B is transmitted through blood and other body fluids (not saliva). If you use a condom when having sex or gloves to handle body fluids etc, it reduces the risk of contamination.
HIV=AIDS? Fact or Fraud?
Deadly Deception Lecture – Dr. Robert Willner
From: http://whale.to/c/willner_deadly_deception.html
The History of the AIDS Epidemic
excerpt from Deadly Deception 1994
How the Lie BeganHIV does not cause AIDS.... The point that everyone is missing is that all of those original papers Gallo wrote on HIV have been found fraudulent.... The HIV hypothesis was based on those papers. — Peter Duesberg
In 1980, Dr. Robert Gallo, a retrovirologist with the National Cancer Institute, discovered the first human retrovirus (HTLV-I). A retrovirus is distinguished from an ordinary virus by virtue of the fact that its RNA is converted to DNA by an enzyme called reverse transcriptase. Its replication and survival is totally dependent on the viability of the host cell. If the host cell dies, the virus is finished. Dr. Gallo knew this basic fact; however, he would soon purposely ignore this fact in order to serve his own needs by claiming that the virus was very "mysterious". Somehow it would mysteriously survive while mysteriously slaughtering T-cells by the millions (this has never been observed). He had contended in the past, but failed to prove, that the very same retrovirus (HTLV-I) caused a specific type of leukemia which was occuring in Japan. The power of position, that of being a top government official and scientist, has allowed the erroneous label of "leukemia virus" to remain intact even though it was rejected by the scientific community.
In 1981, it was proposed that an acquired immune deficiency was the basis for a new syndrome of diseases (AIDS) that appeared to be surfacing amongst promiscuous male homosexuals and intravenous drug users. Dr. David Durack, of Duke University, a recognized expert on infectious diseases and the immune system, though admitting the prevalence of drug use (particular "poppers" or amyl nitrites) and repeated multiple infections, ignored these well-known causes of immune deficiency and announced that this "truly new syndrome" must be due to "some new factor". Continuously this group of scientists has resorted to theory, not fact, as to how the AIDS virus supposedly accomplishes its dirty deeds. The words, "it is thought", are constantly used in casual conversations or in the non-scientific articles and popular magazines and books. In the scientific journals or at lectures the theory is presented as established fact although there are no facts involved. It is portrayed as an established truth and therefore is accepted as such by most scientists, including physicians. The so-called HIV virus is still referred to as a "new" virus in spite of the indisputable evidence to the contrary. Incorrectly, the virus has been characterized as "attacking" or "infiltrating" the immune system, when in reality this is impossible because it is not alive and does not invade. Retroviruses are engulfed by the cells and incorporated into the cell's life processes.
In 1983, Dr. Gallo embarked on a mission to convince his fellow scientists, in the absence of any scientific experimental proof whatsoever, that another virus he had discovered caused AIDS. At a widely publicized press conference held in Washington, D.C. on April 23, 1984, Dr. Gallo announced that he had discovered the cause of AIDS. He claimed the unearthing of a new retrovirus which he had named HTLV-III, thus inferring that it was a member of the family of retroviruses he had previously discovered. His claim was bolstered by Margaret Heckler, Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, who was under great pressure to come up with some answer to the looming "epidemic". Heckler announced, "Today we add another miracle to the long honor roll of American medicine and science." She also promised that we would have a vaccine within two years, undoubtedly as a result of Dr. Gallo's grandiose urgings. That very day, Dr. Gallo filed a U.S. patent for an HIV test kit which was destined to make him very wealthy. Dr. Gallo, unquestionably very knowledgeable in retrovirology, chose to set aside the facts and became the quintessential intellectual whore. The benefits to Dr. Gallo are money and power; but the costs to humanity are suffering and countless unnecessary deaths. In contrast, street prostitutes are honest – you know what you're getting and you know the risks – and, by the way, AIDS is not one of them.
Margaret Heckler very quickly awarded the lucrative contract for AZT to Burroughs-Wellcome Pharmaceutical Company before the first scientific paper ever appeared in any U.S. journal. AZT was a drug in search of a disease. It had been sitting on the shelves of the National Institutes of Health since the 1960's. It was an experimental drug that had failed as a cancer remedy and had been declared too toxic to use. Retrovirology had gained importance because of Nixon's "War on Cancer" and the belief that a retrovirus might be the cause of cancer in humans. This approach seemed logical at the time, because retroviruses typically prompted cells to multiply – a characteristic of the cancer process. This is directly opposite to the cell destruction that normally occurs in viral infections. Not only did that war fail, AZT failed, and retrovirologists came up empty-handed after twenty years of intense and arduous research. Alas, a whole group of scientists without a reason d'etre! As you would expect, in 1986, The International Committee of Retrovirologists named HIV the cause of AIDS. By giving credence to the hypothesis in the absence of proof, they became party to the conspiracy. It is just what one would expect when frustrated unsuccessful foxes are left to guard the hen house.
Adding to Dr. Gallo's blatant disregard for all established scientific requirements for validation of his claims, it was eventually discovered that HTLV-III was a retrovirus that had been sent to Dr. Gallo more than a year before by Luc Montagnier of the Pasteur Institute in Paris. On several occasions, Montagnier had sent samples of the virus he had isolated in the blood of some AIDS patients for Gallo's evaluation. A scandal erupted and a battle ensued over the credit for the discovery and the rights to the patents. It took the intervention of the French Prime Minister Jacques Chirac and U.S. President Ronald Reagan in order to reach an agreement that resulted in the sharing of the proceeds and the credit for the discovery (recently challenged again by the French after Gallo admitted he may have made a mistake). It is truly characteristic of scoundrels to quarrel over the spoils of fraud.
Keep in mind that Gallo and his cohorts have been getting away with the most elementary and unscientific ploy one could imagine. They have avoided performing scientific controlled studies that would be universally accepted as proof. Such studies would unmask their fraud. They have instead relied on fear, intimidation, sensationalism, greed, ambition, envy and the need for recognition. In this way they have coerced and stupefied an army of followers into believing what, in the past, would have been laughed at, or dismissed as coincidence and/or "anecdotal". HIV has been made the scapegoat for incompetence, and a gateway to the lifestyle of the rich, famous and powerful, for unscrupulous, immoral and incompetent scoundrels. The blitzkrieg of misinformation has obliterated from consideration even the most elementary knowledge, logic and evidence in research and disease.It is important to point out from the beginning that the acronymn AIDS represents the official and scientific designation of the "disease", ACQUIRED IMMUNE DEFICIENCY SYNDROME, which is discussed, examined and critiqued in this book. The inevitable conclusions which a growing number of many prominent scientists have reached, and, which I am sure, you will also, is that AIDS fits neither the definition of a disease, nor of a syndrome. It is merely the lumping together of an ever-increasing number of diseases and symptoms, 25 at the last count (depending on the source), in order to fraudulently create the impression that an epidemic exists.
We have known for more than half a century that we co-exist with many bacteria and viruses. We are well aware that potentially deadly organisms reside within us at all times, waiting only for the balance of health to be tipped in favor of "disease". Streptococcus, tuberculosis, and Pneumocystis carinii, the most common "components" of AIDS, are but a fraction of the infectious organisms that the majority of us live with constantly. Pneumocystis carinii are present in the lungs of virtually every individual on the surface of our planet. Yet, precious few of us ever get the disease they cause: pneumocystis pneumonia. This is just one of the most obvious examples of the basic and pervasive flaws in the guiding premises of "modern" medicine.
Consider, for the moment, the following questions:
When the great flu of 1919 took the lives of millions of people in the United States, Why didn't the entire population succumb?
When the great bubonic plague destroyed one-third of the population of Europe, Why didn't the other two-thirds die also?
Why didn't everyone die?
The answer:
When an epidemic destroys its susceptible population, it ceases to exist. In other words, it is the inability of the individual's immune system that determines the degree to which an individual "falls ill" or whether or not he becomes ill at all. As Pasteur is purported to have exclaimed on his deathbed, "It is not the organism; it is the terrain!" If this were not true, then everyone, in the examples cited above, would have gotten the plague or the flu and all would have died. In fact, the first disease on earth would have been the last! The deceivers of infamy have succeeded in creating a chain of events that have destroyed logic and common sense, and in their place, established the following "Commandments" for science, government, the press and the public:
The Ten Commandments of Fraud
- Coincidence is proof of cause and effect.
- Circumstantial evidence is direct evidence.
- One example proves the rule.
- One guess supported by another guess creates a fact.
- Saying it is so, makes it so.
- Don't confuse the issue with facts.
- Proof is unncessary and should be avoided.
- Lie, lie, lie, and they'll believe it.
- Silence, ignore and suppress the truth.
- Replace reason with dogma, fraud and blindfolded fear.
Sanitary conditions are important, and the lack thereof can make the body sick, just as a lack of nutrition can do. But repeating the lie that tiny invisible viruses are outside invaders waiting to destroy otherwise healthy cells doesn't make it true. It only helps perpetuate lies, and through those lies FEAR.Other viruses are transmitted via the faecal-oral root. Someone gets particles of poo on their hands - even tiny invisible ones. They then shake your hand and you put your hand in your mouth and hey, presto...you’re infected. Washing your hands after using the toilet should help prevent this.
And yet you have in no way offered any evidence nor even a rational explanation for how the virus makes its way past all of the body's natural defense mechanisms (skin, mucus membranes, macrophages, bacteria, fungus, etc.). That is the fundamental flaw in your reasoning.That is transmission. It does not require the virus to have locomotion. I think that might be a fundamental flaw in your understanding.