Don't you find this ironic? I don't read or study the Quran just like you don't read and study the Bible. So don't even attempt to think you understand the true God of the Bible better than actual Christians. Goodbye!You claim that Islam encourages molesting slave woman. Another lie. In war there are going to be captives. It is not allowed to kill woman and children therefore something has to be done. They can either 1) be set free. This is problematic for many obvious reasons in a military situation. 2) They can be killed. Islam does not allow us to kill woman and children who are non combatants in miltary expeditions. So, this leaves only one alternative which is for a man to take care of them. This is what God prescribed. Other armies r*pe and share the woman amongst each other. Islam does not allow this instead one man takes care of them.
It is not allowed to r*pe those woman or to treat them unjustly. They must be feed the same food and clothed the same. Do you understand this? It is not allowed to eat different food from the servant. Slave is an incorrect translation. They are not slaves. The Prohpet salAllahu 'alaiyhi wasallam forbade Muslims from calling them slaves. Yes, it is allowed for the man to have intercourse with a female servant but not against her will. This is allowed because it is easy for a man to fall into sin if he is in a servants precense and they are attracted to each other. Islam does not forbid this and the scholars have consensus that this is allowed but NOT against their will. So, for you to use the word "molest" is just unjust, dishonest and shows you have no integrity in what you are posting. Once somebody lies it hard to take the rest of their posts seriously. I will quote the whole hadeeth from Abu Dawood which is authentic. Now, I want you to tell me where the word "molest" is.
Abu Sa’id Al Khudri said “The Apostle of Allaah(ﷺ) sent a military expedition to Awtas on the occasion of the battle of Hunain. They met their enemy and fought with them. They defeated them and took them captives. Some of the Companions of Apostle of Allaah (ﷺ) were reluctant to have relations with the female captives because of their pagan husbands. So, Allaah the exalted sent down the Qur’anic verse “And all married women (are forbidden) unto you save those (captives) whom your right hand posses.” This is to say that they are lawful for them when they complete their waiting period.
حَدَّثَنَا عُبَيْدُ اللَّهِ بْنُ عُمَرَ بْنِ مَيْسَرَةَ، حَدَّثَنَا يَزِيدُ بْنُ زُرَيْعٍ، حَدَّثَنَا سَعِيدٌ، عَنْ قَتَادَةَ، عَنْ صَالِحٍ أَبِي الْخَلِيلِ، عَنْ أَبِي عَلْقَمَةَ الْهَاشِمِيِّ، عَنْ أَبِي سَعِيدٍ الْخُدْرِيِّ، أَنَّ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم بَعَثَ يَوْمَ حُنَيْنٍ بَعْثًا إِلَى أَوْطَاسٍ فَلَقُوا عَدُوَّهُمْ فَقَاتَلُوهُمْ فَظَهَرُوا عَلَيْهِمْ وَأَصَابُوا لَهُمْ سَبَايَا فَكَأَنَّ أُنَاسًا مِنْ أَصْحَابِ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم تَحَرَّجُوا مِنْ غِشْيَانِهِنَّ مِنْ أَجْلِ أَزْوَاجِهِنَّ مِنَ الْمُشْرِكِينَ فَأَنْزَلَ اللَّهُ تَعَالَى فِي ذَلِكَ { وَالْمُحْصَنَاتُ مِنَ النِّسَاءِ إِلاَّ مَا مَلَكَتْ أَيْمَانُكُمْ } أَىْ فَهُنَّ لَهُمْ حَلاَلٌ إِذَا انْقَضَتْ عِدَّتُهُنَّ .
Does it say anything about molestation???!!! The verse maks it permissable to have sexual relation with them. Do you understand the difference between sexual relalatons that a woman agrees to and molestation? The narration says the companions refused. What does this mean? It means the woman wanted to have relations but the man refused! and God allowed it! Do you understand how wrong your understanding is? Read the narration carefully. It does not support your point in fact it opposes it.
Grade : Sahih (Al-Albani)
Last edited: