Roe V. Wade To be overturned

JoChris

Superstar
Joined
Mar 15, 2017
Messages
5,710
you can’t help but walk into it na8 bitch my work is done . Anyone who chooses this makes a conscious decision.

the only good Nazi is a dead Nazi you all know what you signed up for and you know what awaits you
what is your personal definition of a Nazi?
 

Red Sky at Morning

Superstar
Joined
Mar 15, 2017
Messages
13,396
@JoChris

or that just the standard Christian belief?
Many Christians who accept Replacement Theology can be drawn into antisemitism by degrees . Also many Christians who believe that God has not finished with Israel find it very hard to reconcile the fact that some Jews hate God, others are secular, others are searching etc.

To the wider question of “why bother” being here…. I can answer that simply. I know where I’m going and sometimes catch glimpses of eternal joy - I would want to see as many people cheat Satan’s schemes for their destiny as I could, and I believe the Lord can break through the mess of peoples hearts to break them out. I will never look back and wish I did less for God. I’m not perfect and probably not even be all that good at reaching others but these words have never left me.

God loves the people far away, crouching from His presence:

The Parable of the Great Supper
15Now when one of those who sat at the table with Him heard these things, he said to Him, “Blessed is he who shall eat [e]bread in the kingdom of God!”

16Then He said to him, “A certain man gave a great supper and invited many,17and sent his servant at supper time to say to those who were invited, ‘Come, for all things are now ready.’ 18But they all with one accord began to make excuses. The first said to him, ‘I have bought a piece of ground, and I must go and see it. I ask you to have me excused.’ 19And another said, ‘I have bought five yoke of oxen, and I am going to test them. I ask you to have me excused.’ 20Still another said, ‘I have married a wife, and therefore I cannot come.’ 21So that servant came and reported these things to his master. Then the master of the house, being angry, said to his servant, ‘Go out quickly into the streets and lanes of the city, and bring in here the poor and the [f]maimed and the lame and the blind.’ 22And the servant said, ‘Master, it is done as you commanded, and still there is room.’23Then the master said to the servant, ‘Go out into the highways and hedges, and compel them to come in, that my house may be filled. 24For I say to youthat none of those men who were invited shall taste my supper.’ ”
 

JoChris

Superstar
Joined
Mar 15, 2017
Messages
5,710
You have failed to explain how posting pictures of war crimes from second world war is relevant to abortions done today Anon77777.
Calling anyone you dislike a Nazi really makes your arguments look weak.
 
Joined
Jun 26, 2022
Messages
967
This is ridiculous. The babies are already BORN alive, therefore all arguments of the woman's body autonomy are irrelevant.


The House of Representatives passed the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act on Wednesday, with votes at 220-210. If approved, the legislation would require health practitioners to care for an infant that is born alive after a failed abortion, according to the law.
...
In order to become law, the bill would need to be approved in the Senate and signed by President Joe Biden, which is unlikely. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said Wednesday that the bill, along with a second anti-abortion bill, are "doomed in the Senate" and "extreme."

"American women deserve to have their right to healthcare protected, not undermined," Schumer said in a statement.
...
Mothers seeking abortion care would not be subject to criminal prosecution, according to the law.
Even IF we were to look at abortion as healthcare, how does providing medical aid to the already-born infant possibly undermine women's right to "healthcare"?

Only an evil individual would call providing care to an already-born baby "extreme".
 

QMQS

Established
Joined
Apr 24, 2022
Messages
163
Gold abortion blood goddess installed on roof of New York City courthouse
The statue is meant to commemorate Ruth Bader-Ginsburg's "work" in the fight for abortion. The “work of art” by the Pakistani emigrant Shahzia Sikander shows a satanic-looking female figure with braids of hair twisted into ram's horns and eight tentacles instead of arms. The “artist” wants to depict the current reality of power and social mores. The figures on the roof of the Manhattan Courthouse are traditional representations of lawmakers.

1674731510835.png

The new statue atop the courthouse in Manhattan, New York City, is a stark departure from previous lawmakers in US history. "Feminist" artist Shahzia Sikander declared that this is part of an "urgent and necessary cultural reckoning underway as New York reconsiders traditional depictions of power in public spaces and reshapes civic structures to better reflect 21st-century social mores." . The New York Times quoted it as “ an urgent form of resistance ”.

The social mores of the 21st century are patently satanic and abortion-worshiping to the supporters of a new world order. The lace collar, part of a judge's uniform, is reminiscent of the abortion fanatic, Judge Ruth Bader Ginsburg.


The statue is part of a cycle - there is also a similar female demon in Madison Square Park. 1674731618356.png
 
Joined
Jun 26, 2022
Messages
967

Is arson worse than mirders?
While NOT CONDONING OR ADVOCATING FOR VIOLENCE, let's see... no one died in the fire, many lives will be saved for the time the murder factory is nonoperational, and if there was a greater fear of this happening perhaps more of them would shut down...

Ridiculous that they are pressing FEDERAL arson charges, what are these places now protected as federal buildings or something? That should tell us something about our government
 

redqueen

Star
Joined
May 15, 2017
Messages
4,155
warning this is Soul wrenching,this is pure True evil

if these sorta things actually made the news
I Believe that if Peoples actually Knew and understood
what an abortion actually was specially late term,it wouldn't
be accepted the way We See it now with all the pro activists

 

redqueen

Star
Joined
May 15, 2017
Messages
4,155
this is a step in the right direction

A controversial Florida bill effectively banning abortions after six weeks, with few exceptions, was passed on Monday by lawmakers in the Republican-controlled Florida Senate.

Senate Bill 300, dubbed the “Heartbeat Protection Act” during the legislative session, would prohibit doctors from performing abortions after six weeks of pregnancy — with exceptions only in cases of r*pe, incest or human trafficking up to 15 weeks of pregnancy.

In those cases, the woman would have to provide documentation such as a medical record, restraining order or police report.

“For decades now, Florida has been a nationwide leader in defending the rights of the unborn. The Heartbeat Protection Act will make Florida a beacon of hope for those who understand that life is sacred and must be protected,” a statement by Republican Sen. Erin Grall said, in part.

The companion bill in the House, HB 7, last week gained favorable support from lawmakers — indicating that a final measure will head to Gov. Ron DeSantis' desk for approval. The governor, a potential 2024 presidential candidate, has said that he'll back the proposed ban.
 

TempestOfTempo

Superstar
Joined
Jan 29, 2018
Messages
7,678
this is a step in the right direction

A controversial Florida bill effectively banning abortions after six weeks, with few exceptions, was passed on Monday by lawmakers in the Republican-controlled Florida Senate.

Senate Bill 300, dubbed the “Heartbeat Protection Act” during the legislative session, would prohibit doctors from performing abortions after six weeks of pregnancy — with exceptions only in cases of r*pe, incest or human trafficking up to 15 weeks of pregnancy.

In those cases, the woman would have to provide documentation such as a medical record, restraining order or police report.

“For decades now, Florida has been a nationwide leader in defending the rights of the unborn. The Heartbeat Protection Act will make Florida a beacon of hope for those who understand that life is sacred and must be protected,” a statement by Republican Sen. Erin Grall said, in part.

The companion bill in the House, HB 7, last week gained favorable support from lawmakers — indicating that a final measure will head to Gov. Ron DeSantis' desk for approval. The governor, a potential 2024 presidential candidate, has said that he'll back the proposed ban.
So long as it also includes if the Moms life is at serious risk, seems like a good idea.
 
Joined
Jun 26, 2022
Messages
967
So long as it also includes if the Moms life is at serious risk, seems like a good idea.
While i agree in principle, in actuality many of the laws that include maternal health also include mental health, which means now the woman can abort because of stress or mood swings.

The american association of pro life ob gyns claims that abortion is never needed to save the mother's life.


As experienced practitioners and researchers in Obstetrics and Gynecology, we affirm that direct abortion is not medically necessary to save the life of a woman. We uphold that there is a fundamental difference between abortion and necessary medical treatments that are carried out to save the life of the mother, even if such treatments results in the loss of life of her unborn child. We confirm that the prohibition of abortion does not affect, in any way, the availability of optimal care to pregnant women.

There is a night and day difference between induced abortion and separating a mother and her unborn child for the purposes of saving a mother’s life (preterm parturition). There are times when separating the mother and her unborn child is necessary to save the life of the mother, even if the unborn child is too premature to live. In those tragic cases, if possible the life of the baby will be attempted to be preserved, and if not possible, the body of the unborn child is treated with respect, recognizing the humanity of the life which is lost in the separation.

In contrast, the purpose of an induced abortion is to produce a dead baby. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention defined legal induced abortion as an “intervention performed by a licensed clinician (e.g., a physician, nurse-midwife, nurse practitioner, or physician assistant) that is intended to terminate a suspected or known ongoing intrauterine pregnancy and produce a non-viable fetus at any gestational age.” That is what an abortionist is paid to do: to kill the unborn child before delivering it, or to kill the child during the delivery process, as is done with partial-birth abortion. So the focus of the abortion procedure is on killing the unborn child, and the purpose of the abortion is to produce a dead baby. Induced abortion, that is the deliberate killing of an unborn child prior to separating that child from the mother, is never necessary to save the life or preserve the health of any woman.
In short, saving the woman's life may result in the death of the baby (from not surviving premature delivery), but deliberately killing the baby is not necessary to save the life of the mother.
 

TempestOfTempo

Superstar
Joined
Jan 29, 2018
Messages
7,678
While i agree in principle, in actuality many of the laws that include maternal health also include mental health, which means now the woman can abort because of stress or mood swings.

The american association of pro life ob gyns claims that abortion is never needed to save the mother's life.




In short, saving the woman's life may result in the death of the baby (from not surviving premature delivery), but deliberately killing the baby is not necessary to save the life of the mother.
I mean if the delivery means her life is at serious risk, its then her choice.
 
Top