While NOT CONDONING OR ADVOCATING FOR VIOLENCE, let's see... no one died in the fire, many lives will be saved for the time the murder factory is nonoperational, and if there was a greater fear of this happening perhaps more of them would shut down...Suspect in Planned Parenthood Arson Was Mad That His Ex-Girlfriend Had an Abortion
Tyler Massengill told the FBI that if the fire caused even “a little delay” in people getting care at the clinic, his crimes may have been “all worth it.”jezebel.com
Is arson worse than mirders?
So long as it also includes if the Moms life is at serious risk, seems like a good idea.this is a step in the right direction
A controversial Florida bill effectively banning abortions after six weeks, with few exceptions, was passed on Monday by lawmakers in the Republican-controlled Florida Senate.
Senate Bill 300, dubbed the “Heartbeat Protection Act” during the legislative session, would prohibit doctors from performing abortions after six weeks of pregnancy — with exceptions only in cases of r*pe, incest or human trafficking up to 15 weeks of pregnancy.
In those cases, the woman would have to provide documentation such as a medical record, restraining order or police report.
“For decades now, Florida has been a nationwide leader in defending the rights of the unborn. The Heartbeat Protection Act will make Florida a beacon of hope for those who understand that life is sacred and must be protected,” a statement by Republican Sen. Erin Grall said, in part.
The companion bill in the House, HB 7, last week gained favorable support from lawmakers — indicating that a final measure will head to Gov. Ron DeSantis' desk for approval. The governor, a potential 2024 presidential candidate, has said that he'll back the proposed ban.
While i agree in principle, in actuality many of the laws that include maternal health also include mental health, which means now the woman can abort because of stress or mood swings.So long as it also includes if the Moms life is at serious risk, seems like a good idea.
In short, saving the woman's life may result in the death of the baby (from not surviving premature delivery), but deliberately killing the baby is not necessary to save the life of the mother.As experienced practitioners and researchers in Obstetrics and Gynecology, we affirm that direct abortion is not medically necessary to save the life of a woman. We uphold that there is a fundamental difference between abortion and necessary medical treatments that are carried out to save the life of the mother, even if such treatments results in the loss of life of her unborn child. We confirm that the prohibition of abortion does not affect, in any way, the availability of optimal care to pregnant women.
There is a night and day difference between induced abortion and separating a mother and her unborn child for the purposes of saving a mother’s life (preterm parturition). There are times when separating the mother and her unborn child is necessary to save the life of the mother, even if the unborn child is too premature to live. In those tragic cases, if possible the life of the baby will be attempted to be preserved, and if not possible, the body of the unborn child is treated with respect, recognizing the humanity of the life which is lost in the separation.
In contrast, the purpose of an induced abortion is to produce a dead baby. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention defined legal induced abortion as an “intervention performed by a licensed clinician (e.g., a physician, nurse-midwife, nurse practitioner, or physician assistant) that is intended to terminate a suspected or known ongoing intrauterine pregnancy and produce a non-viable fetus at any gestational age.” That is what an abortionist is paid to do: to kill the unborn child before delivering it, or to kill the child during the delivery process, as is done with partial-birth abortion. So the focus of the abortion procedure is on killing the unborn child, and the purpose of the abortion is to produce a dead baby. Induced abortion, that is the deliberate killing of an unborn child prior to separating that child from the mother, is never necessary to save the life or preserve the health of any woman.
I mean if the delivery means her life is at serious risk, its then her choice.While i agree in principle, in actuality many of the laws that include maternal health also include mental health, which means now the woman can abort because of stress or mood swings.
The american association of pro life ob gyns claims that abortion is never needed to save the mother's life.
In short, saving the woman's life may result in the death of the baby (from not surviving premature delivery), but deliberately killing the baby is not necessary to save the life of the mother.
Yes. They murder and want to murder the most innocent of human beings...completely defenseless in the womb of their own mother...this is outright murdering of a Child and Peoples
should be against it period
American College of OB/GYNs announces support for killing preborn humans 'without limits'
ACOG and Society of Family Planning leaders said abortion "must be available without restrictions, without limitations and without barriers."www.liveaction.org
unfortunately it's all apart of tptb agendasYes. They murder and want to murder the most innocent of human beings...completely defenseless in the womb of their own mother...
Every child is a blessing...a gift from God...no matter what... A common feeling expressed by women who got an abortion is that, they always carry with them a sense of guilt that is unrequited...and a lingering fear...When women have had abortions for no good reasons, I wonder if they ever think with regret when they're old and grey and lonely- "That baby would be 50 years old now"
PS- my mam ended up living alone and I visited her nearly every day and she was always glad to see me.
If she'd aborted me she'd have been alone 24/7.