King Christ has summonsed Charles The Pretender

[A Freeman]

https://rumble.com/v2h3aoi-5g-a-spiritual-war-the-battle-between-light-and-dark-with-mark-steele.html

At the 1 hour 57:26 minute mark, the interviewer says he was given a vision about Charles' coronation not happening on May 6th.

 

[lightseeker]

Christ said, in Matthew 5:17-19:
5:17 Think NOT that I am come to destroy The Law, or the Prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill.
5:18 For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no way pass from The Law, till ALL be fulfilled.
5:19 Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least COMMANDments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in The Kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach [them], the same shall be called great in The Kingdom of heaven.

Christ said, in Matthew 7:21-24:
7:21 Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into The Kingdom of heaven; ONLY he that doeth the Will of my Father which is in heaven.
7:22 MANY will say to me in That Day, Lord, Lord, HAVE WE NOT PROPHESIED IN THY NAME? AND IN THY NAME have cast out devils? AND IN THY NAME done many wonderful works?
7:23 And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work INEQUITY.
7:24 Therefore whosoever heareth these sayings of mine, and DOETH THEM, I will liken him unto a wise man, which built his house upon a Rock (the Truth):

The Law provides freedom and justice for ALL. God's Law is TRUTH.

The traditions of men (false legislation, false rules, false policies, false religious doctrines, etc.) produce nothing but INEQUITY/INJUSTICE through sin. Sin is the transgression of The Law (1 John 3:4).

Christ said: we make the Commandments of God of no effect by our traditions (Matt. 15:1-14).

The organized religion that deceitfully calls itself "Christianity" is literally FILLED with people who come in Christ's Name, claiming they call Christ "Lord", while refusing to keep The Law/Commandments of God. The Law which Christ Himself told us would NEVER go away, and that we MUST keep to PREVENT inequity/injustice and oppression, IF we love Him (John 14:15).

Christ said: I am The Way, the Truth, and the Life: NOT one man cometh unto the Father, EXCEPT by me (John 14:6).

Christ said: we have ONE Master/Teacher/High-Priest: CHRIST (Matt. 23:8, 10)

"CHRISTians", ALL of whom come in Christ's NAME, falsely claim that "CHRISTianity" is The Way, the Truth and the Life, and feel they are in a position to teach and repeat their SINFUL/UNLAWFUL/INEQUITABLE traditions INSTEAD of directing others to Christ and His TRUE Teachings to keep The Law/Commandments of God.

So every single "CHRISTian", including ALL of their priests, pastors, etc. of EVERY so-called CHRISTian denomination (sect/cult) ARE coming in CHRIST'S NAME and falsely claiming to be CHRIST, exactly as CHRIST prophesied.

Matthew 24:5 For MANY shall come IN MY NAME, saying that I am Christ; and shall deceive MANY.

And in doing so, what is every "CHRISTian" doing INSTEAD of doing God's Will?

They deceive others into staying AWAY from Christ, abandoning His True Gospel Teachings, and breaking God's Law, so they can continue to spread inequity as far and as wide as they can.

No wonder there are billions today who have been deceived into believing Christ is not here now, even though that is exactly what He (Christ) prophesied. When one believes and repeatedly does the exact opposite of what Christ teaches, they very obviously work for the Opposer.

If you want to help Christ reinstate The Law that God gave us to protect us from the inequity/injustice and oppression we are all suffering from, then start by keeping The Law/Commandments, as anyone who truly loves Christ will do.

With or without your help, Christ WILL rule with a rod of iron, by God's Law.

May His Bright Reign come soon.

”And they asked him, saying, Master, but when shall these things be? and what sign will there be when these things shall come to pass?
8 And he said, Take heed that ye be not deceived: for many shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and the time draweth near: go ye not therefore after them”

People have been calling themselves Christian for thousands of years. That’s not what is happening in this passage. His disciples are asking Jesus what to do in the end times. He says not to be deceived for people will tell them “I am Christ and the time draws near”. Then he instructs them, not to follow these people.
You have to admit the similarity to AJH is truly uncanny. This is exactly what he teaches! He is Christ and the time draweth near. You have to wonder why Jesus would say not to follow a person like this if he intended to reincarnate and give this exact teaching.

 

[Maldarker]

https://rumble.com/v2h3aoi-5g-a-spiritual-war-the-battle-between-light-and-dark-with-mark-steele.html

At the 1 hour 57:26 minute mark, the interviewer says he was given a vision about Charles' coronation not happening on May 6th.

That's because there is going to be a thunderdome event between these two "fake AC's" notice the same AJ initials whos the real one or are they both frauds?

 

[A Freeman]

”And they asked him, saying, Master, but when shall these things be? and what sign will there be when these things shall come to pass?
8 And he said, Take heed that ye be not deceived: for many shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and the time draweth near: go ye not therefore after them”

People have been calling themselves Christian for thousands of years. That’s not what is happening in this passage.

Of course that's exactly what is happening in the passage above, you just don't "see" it.

Christ doesn't come in His own name; Christ IS Christ. Do you tell people "I come in the name of 'lightseeker'?" No. You claim to come in the NAME of Christ as a so-called CHRISTian, hoping others will follow you and your cultural/traditional beliefs ("CHRISTianity"), which teach the exact opposite of what Christ actually teaches. And, in doing so, you are helping to deceive MANY (billions of fellow "CHRISTians"). For Christ's Sake, THINK about it.

Christ plainly stated that HE COMES IN FATHER'S NAME, not His own.

John 5:42-44
5:42 But I know you, that ye have not the love of God in you.
5:43 I AM COME IN MY FATHER'S NAME, and ye receive me not: if another shall come in his own name, him ye will receive.
5:44 How can ye believe, which receive honour one of another, and seek not the honour that [cometh] from God only?

Only "Christians" have the audacity to come in Christ's Name and teach the exact opposite of what Christ teaches, while pretending they're "saved", as if they are somehow in a position to judge themselves. Judging is Christ's Job (John 5:22), NOT the job of every so-called CHRISTian.

His disciples are asking Jesus what to do in the end times.

So they would recognized Him -- The REAL Christ, during His Second Coming -- in a world FILLED with silly superstitions, rites and rituals, including "Christianity", with its CHRIST-mass/Yuletide/Saturnalia LIES, and its Easter/Ishtar LIES, its Sun-day church LIES, and its Babylonian "trinity" LIES, etc.

Here is what the Disciples actually asked Him:

Matthew 24:3 And as he sat upon the Mount of Olives, the disciples came unto him privately, saying, Tell us, WHEN shall these things be? AND WHAT [SHALL BE] THE SIGN OF THY COMING, AND THE END OF THE WORLD?

You do understand that they were asking about His Coming right before the end of the world because they KNEW that He was going to return then, don't you?

He says not to be deceived for people will tell them “I am Christ and the time draws near”. Then he instructs them, not to follow these people.

And yet the world reportedly has over two billion people today, who have been deceived into believing that just because they use and abuse Christ's Name, and will follow every Tom, Dick and Harry into a church building (where God does NOT dwell), that they are somehow Christ's representatives here on Earth.

The pope, who is the visible leader of "CHRISTianity", literally claims to be both the Holy Father (God) and Christ's SUBSTITUTE here on Earth, even though he is identified in Scripture as the son of the destroyer (2 Thess. 2:3-12). How obvious does it need to be that the very same people who murdered Jesus and established the richest business empire on Earth (the Roman Catholic church), IN HIS NAME "CHRISTianity" do NOT work for Christ?

You and all of your so-called CHRISTian friends can continue to quote the parts of Matthew 24 that you mistakenly believe don't condemn you and what you're doing, while ignoring the other parts where Christ tells us exactly what will be happening in the world WHEN He returns right before Judgment Day (Now), bringing enlightenment to this very dark world that is hell-bent on destroying itself.

Or you can wake-up, face the truth, repent and LIVE. It's either one or the other.

 

[Maldarker]

So @A Freeman whos the fraud and whos really the Aussie claiming to be christ or the brit claiming to be? is it AJM or AJH (JAH) probably why he changed it to jah so as to not step on the aussies toes nice to see such politeness from jah.

 

[JoChris]

Christ said, in Matthew 5:17-19:
5:17 Think NOT that I am come to destroy The Law, or the Prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill.
5:18 For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no way pass from The Law, till ALL be fulfilled.
5:19 Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least COMMANDments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in The Kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach [them], the same shall be called great in The Kingdom of heaven.

Christ said, in Matthew 7:21-24:
7:21 Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into The Kingdom of heaven; ONLY he that doeth the Will of my Father which is in heaven.
7:22 MANY will say to me in That Day, Lord, Lord, HAVE WE NOT PROPHESIED IN THY NAME? AND IN THY NAME have cast out devils? AND IN THY NAME done many wonderful works?
7:23 And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work INEQUITY.
7:24 Therefore whosoever heareth these sayings of mine, and DOETH THEM, I will liken him unto a wise man, which built his house upon a Rock (the Truth):

The Law provides freedom and justice for ALL. God's Law is TRUTH.

The traditions of men (false legislation, false rules, false policies, false religious doctrines, etc.) produce nothing but INEQUITY/INJUSTICE through sin. Sin is the transgression of The Law (1 John 3:4).

Christ said: we make the Commandments of God of no effect by our traditions (Matt. 15:1-14).

The organized religion that deceitfully calls itself "Christianity" is literally FILLED with people who come in Christ's Name, claiming they call Christ "Lord", while refusing to keep The Law/Commandments of God. The Law which Christ Himself told us would NEVER go away, and that we MUST keep to PREVENT inequity/injustice and oppression, IF we love Him (John 14:15).

Christ said: I am The Way, the Truth, and the Life: NOT one man cometh unto the Father, EXCEPT by me (John 14:6).

Christ said: we have ONE Master/Teacher/High-Priest: CHRIST (Matt. 23:8, 10)

"CHRISTians", ALL of whom come in Christ's NAME, falsely claim that "CHRISTianity" is The Way, the Truth and the Life, and feel they are in a position to teach and repeat their SINFUL/UNLAWFUL/INEQUITABLE traditions INSTEAD of directing others to Christ and His TRUE Teachings to keep The Law/Commandments of God.

So every single "CHRISTian", including ALL of their priests, pastors, etc. of EVERY so-called CHRISTian denomination (sect/cult) ARE coming in CHRIST'S NAME and falsely claiming to be CHRIST, exactly as CHRIST prophesied.

Matthew 24:5 For MANY shall come IN MY NAME, saying that I am Christ; and shall deceive MANY.

And in doing so, what is every "CHRISTian" doing INSTEAD of doing God's Will?

They deceive others into staying AWAY from Christ, abandoning His True Gospel Teachings, and breaking God's Law, so they can continue to spread inequity as far and as wide as they can.

No wonder there are billions today who have been deceived into believing Christ is not here now, even though that is exactly what He (Christ) prophesied. When one believes and repeatedly does the exact opposite of what Christ teaches, they very obviously work for the Opposer.

If you want to help Christ reinstate The Law that God gave us to protect us from the inequity/injustice and oppression we are all suffering from, then start by keeping The Law/Commandments, as anyone who truly loves Christ will do.

With or without your help, Christ WILL rule with a rod of iron, by God's Law.

May His Bright Reign come soon.

What have all those bible verses got to do with AJH demanding for King Charles III to hand over the throne to him on April 23rd OR ELSE?!!!!

---
No matter how exasperating you [and probably several lurkers] can be at times, I doubt very much any of us wants you to come to any harm when AJH doesn't get his own way.

Will you promise us that you will not harm yourself/ves if everything falls apart (according to JAHtruth worldview)?

 

[JoChris]

https://rumble.com/v2h3aoi-5g-a-spiritual-war-the-battle-between-light-and-dark-with-mark-steele.html

At the 1 hour 57:26 minute mark, the interviewer says he was given a vision about Charles' coronation not happening on May 6th.

It appears that AJH wants his followers to follow the OT laws literally.

Will you obey the **bible's** commandment when the vision does not come to pass?

Deuteronomy 18:20 But the prophet, which shall presume to speak a word in my name, which I have not commanded him to speak, or that shall speak in the name of other gods, even that prophet shall die.

21 And if thou say in thine heart, How shall we know the word which the Lord hath not spoken?

22 When a prophet speaketh in the name of the Lord, if the thing follow not, nor come to pass, that is the thing which the Lord hath not spoken, but the prophet hath spoken it presumptuously: thou shalt not be afraid of him.

 

[JoChris]

@A Freeman:
I doubt few people on the forum are aware Anthony John Hill was a published author. https://www.amazon.com/Book-Tephi-Queen-Tara-Gibraltar/dp/B009438V32/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_product_top?ie=UTF8

AJH's claims didn't get an exactly complimentary review from the Irish Times newspaper either....
Here is the whole article, just in case it is removed for whatever reason.

Demolishing the myths at Tara - Irish Times (1998)

As the millennium draws to a close, a man has prophesied that the Ark of the Covenant is resting under the hill of Tara
Sat May 30 1998 - 01:00

As the millennium draws to a close, a man has prophesied that the Ark of the Covenant is resting under the hill of Tara. An isolated case of millenniumitis? Rather, a strange case of history repeating itself, as part of the Tara complex was destroyed at the turn of the last century, also in an attempt to unearth the Ark. It is unlikely that this latest fin de siecle request to excavate will be granted, especially as John Hill, the man in search of the Ark, has said it is located in or under the mound of the hostages. This mound was completely excavated in the 1950s . . . there were burials, cremations and a variety of grave-goods found - but no ark.

Mairead Carew, an archaeologist who is writing a book on the British Israelites' search for the Ark, is incensed with the publicity Hill has been getting recently. "I think it's incredible the media who were so tuned in, 100 years ago, to the destruction of a national monument that they launched a campaign to stop it, are now giving credence to Mr Hill who believes `If the Ark of the Covenant is still upon the Earth and not already inside the New Jerusalem' which is a ship the size of a city, that it is going to come down out of the sky (Revelation/Apocalypse 21:2 and 10) then it will be buried with Tephi at Tara," she says.

But, why the belief that the Ark rests at Tara, a place built for Pagan ritual? The British Israelites were founded in the 1850s, by John Wilson, a "linguist", who was of the opinion that the English language was descended from pure Hebrew. Those adhering to British-Israel doctrine believed that they were one of the lost tribes of Israel and descended from the ancient Hebrews. God's chosen people, they were destined to wander in the wilderness until they found the promised land. If they obeyed God's laws they believed they would find this land. The covenant found its physical expression in the Ark.

"The conclusion that the resting place of the Ark was at Tara was based on their own mythology about the subject, which was an unusual mixture of early Irish history, genealogy, pseudo-etymology and Old Testament rhetoric which was discussed at length in their association's journal, the Covenant People," explains Carew, who is working with the Discovery programme, a research organisation which is funded by the Heritage Council. At this stage, Tara would have been regarded as a British Royal site, she adds.

--
In June 1899, Walton Adams, British-Israelite, archaeologist and freemason, and Charles Groom, British-Israelite and Freemason, arrived at Tara to commence explorations. They had received permission from the land owner, Mr Briscoe, a fellow freemason. The Ark of the Covenant is a very significant symbol in freemasonry.

By January 1901 the media campaign to put a stop to the explorations began in earnest. Arthur Griffith, editor of the United Irish- man, and Maude Gonne had visited Tara in December 1900. Maude Gonne subsequently wrote an article for the journal, describing a procession of strange people, walking on the hill to the accompaniment of harp music. Griffith, in common with other nationalists, believed Tara was "a living reminder of the former glory of an enslaved and half-debased nation."

He regarded the British Israelites as huns and barbarians. The Royal Irish Academy and the Royal society of Antiquaries also came in for censure. Griffith described them as "associations of men receiving pensions from the Anglo-Saxon government". The Royal Irish Academy was full of "old dotards whose veins are full of dirty water" while the Office of Public Works was full of "foreigners". The Royal Society of Antiquaries in Ireland was further described in the United Irishman as a body which "existed somewhere in Dublin in a state of coma". Its members were "ready to sell Tara for dinner and champagne".

The media campaign took on an international dimension when Maud Gonne had a letter published in L'Eclair, a Parisian newspaper. Then, a letter from W.B. Yeats, Douglas Hyde and George Moore, lamenting the destruction of Tara, was printed in the London Times.

In 1902, Maude Gonne organised a children's excursion to Tara. In a letter to W.B. Yeats in August of that year, she wrote: "Our children's excursion was a great success, and everybody enjoyed the day immensely. Briscoe had prepared an enormous bonfire to be lighted in honour of the King of England's coronation. We felt it would serve a better purpose if burnt in honour of an independent Ireland so lighted it and sang A Nation Once Again. The constabulary didn't like it at all and danced and jumped with rage - they added greatly to the fun."

The excavations came to an end in 1903, largely due to the pressure exerted in the media by Maude Gonne and other nationalists.

As to the present claim that the Ark lies with Tea or Tephi, Edel Bhreatnach, a historian working with the Discovery Programme, says that Tea appears in the Lebor Gabala Erenn, the book of the taking of Ireland. Thea is reputed to have been an Egyptian from Thebes who married Erimon.

To cure her homesickness, he promised to build a dun for them on the loveliest hill in Ireland. He would cast a spell on the dun so that the longing for home would not come upon her. While there are elements of historical fact in the Lebor Gabala Erenn, Bhreatnach says most of it is pseudo-history or a fictitious history put together by Irish medieval men of learning.

The old Irish name for Tara, Temair, has been interpreted as Tebe-mur, the wall of Thebes or Tea. This explanation is a folk etymology - guesswork as to what the origin of the word might be, explains Bhreatnach. In reality the name Temair probably means something like a scared space or sanctuary, which is what it was until the coming of Christianity, she adds. Surely, an unlikely resting place for the Ark, symbol of a covenant made between God and the Jewish people?

Sadly, for those who would still like to dream of an ark under Co Meath's verdant grass, the Discovery Programme has dealt a further blow to their hopes in the shape of Conor Newman's recently-published book Tara - An Archaeological Survey. For three years, between 1992 and 1995, Newman carried out a non-invasive survey of Tara using the most-up-to-date equipment. The result . . . new insights into ancient landscape but, definitively, no ark.

 

[JoChris]

@A Freeman:
I doubt few people on the forum are aware Anthony John Hill was a published author.
The book didn't get an exactly complimentary review from the Irish Times newspaper though....
Here is the whole article, just in case it is removed for whatever reason.

Demolishing the myths at Tara - Irish Times (1998)

As the millennium draws to a close, a man has prophesied that the Ark of the Covenant is resting under the hill of Tara
Sat May 30 1998 - 01:00

As the millennium draws to a close, a man has prophesied that the Ark of the Covenant is resting under the hill of Tara. An isolated case of millenniumitis? Rather, a strange case of history repeating itself, as part of the Tara complex was destroyed at the turn of the last century, also in an attempt to unearth the Ark. It is unlikely that this latest fin de siecle request to excavate will be granted, especially as John Hill, the man in search of the Ark, has said it is located in or under the mound of the hostages. This mound was completely excavated in the 1950s . . . there were burials, cremations and a variety of grave-goods found - but no ark.

Mairead Carew, an archaeologist who is writing a book on the British Israelites' search for the Ark, is incensed with the publicity Hill has been getting recently. "I think it's incredible the media who were so tuned in, 100 years ago, to the destruction of a national monument that they launched a campaign to stop it, are now giving credence to Mr Hill who believes `If the Ark of the Covenant is still upon the Earth and not already inside the New Jerusalem' which is a ship the size of a city, that it is going to come down out of the sky (Revelation/Apocalypse 21:2 and 10) then it will be buried with Tephi at Tara," she says.

But, why the belief that the Ark rests at Tara, a place built for Pagan ritual? The British Israelites were founded in the 1850s, by John Wilson, a "linguist", who was of the opinion that the English language was descended from pure Hebrew. Those adhering to British-Israel doctrine believed that they were one of the lost tribes of Israel and descended from the ancient Hebrews. God's chosen people, they were destined to wander in the wilderness until they found the promised land. If they obeyed God's laws they believed they would find this land. The covenant found its physical expression in the Ark.

"The conclusion that the resting place of the Ark was at Tara was based on their own mythology about the subject, which was an unusual mixture of early Irish history, genealogy, pseudo-etymology and Old Testament rhetoric which was discussed at length in their association's journal, the Covenant People," explains Carew, who is working with the Discovery programme, a research organisation which is funded by the Heritage Council. At this stage, Tara would have been regarded as a British Royal site, she adds.

--
In June 1899, Walton Adams, British-Israelite, archaeologist and freemason, and Charles Groom, British-Israelite and Freemason, arrived at Tara to commence explorations. They had received permission from the land owner, Mr Briscoe, a fellow freemason. The Ark of the Covenant is a very significant symbol in freemasonry.

By January 1901 the media campaign to put a stop to the explorations began in earnest. Arthur Griffith, editor of the United Irish- man, and Maude Gonne had visited Tara in December 1900. Maude Gonne subsequently wrote an article for the journal, describing a procession of strange people, walking on the hill to the accompaniment of harp music. Griffith, in common with other nationalists, believed Tara was "a living reminder of the former glory of an enslaved and half-debased nation."

He regarded the British Israelites as huns and barbarians. The Royal Irish Academy and the Royal society of Antiquaries also came in for censure. Griffith described them as "associations of men receiving pensions from the Anglo-Saxon government". The Royal Irish Academy was full of "old dotards whose veins are full of dirty water" while the Office of Public Works was full of "foreigners". The Royal Society of Antiquaries in Ireland was further described in the United Irishman as a body which "existed somewhere in Dublin in a state of coma". Its members were "ready to sell Tara for dinner and champagne".

The media campaign took on an international dimension when Maud Gonne had a letter published in L'Eclair, a Parisian newspaper. Then, a letter from W.B. Yeats, Douglas Hyde and George Moore, lamenting the destruction of Tara, was printed in the London Times.

In 1902, Maude Gonne organised a children's excursion to Tara. In a letter to W.B. Yeats in August of that year, she wrote: "Our children's excursion was a great success, and everybody enjoyed the day immensely. Briscoe had prepared an enormous bonfire to be lighted in honour of the King of England's coronation. We felt it would serve a better purpose if burnt in honour of an independent Ireland so lighted it and sang A Nation Once Again. The constabulary didn't like it at all and danced and jumped with rage - they added greatly to the fun."

The excavations came to an end in 1903, largely due to the pressure exerted in the media by Maude Gonne and other nationalists.

As to the present claim that the Ark lies with Tea or Tephi, Edel Bhreatnach, a historian working with the Discovery Programme, says that Tea appears in the Lebor Gabala Erenn, the book of the taking of Ireland. Thea is reputed to have been an Egyptian from Thebes who married Erimon.

To cure her homesickness, he promised to build a dun for them on the loveliest hill in Ireland. He would cast a spell on the dun so that the longing for home would not come upon her. While there are elements of historical fact in the Lebor Gabala Erenn, Bhreatnach says most of it is pseudo-history or a fictitious history put together by Irish medieval men of learning.

The old Irish name for Tara, Temair, has been interpreted as Tebe-mur, the wall of Thebes or Tea. This explanation is a folk etymology - guesswork as to what the origin of the word might be, explains Bhreatnach. In reality the name Temair probably means something like a scared space or sanctuary, which is what it was until the coming of Christianity, she adds. Surely, an unlikely resting place for the Ark, symbol of a covenant made between God and the Jewish people?

Sadly, for those who would still like to dream of an ark under Co Meath's verdant grass, the Discovery Programme has dealt a further blow to their hopes in the shape of Conor Newman's recently-published book Tara - An Archaeological Survey. For three years, between 1992 and 1995, Newman carried out a non-invasive survey of Tara using the most-up-to-date equipment. The result . . . new insights into ancient landscape but, definitively, no ark.

And here is a reply, from a reader who wasn't particularly impressed by the journalist's article.

Myths At Tara?

Sir, - In Anne Byrne's article, "Demolishing the myths at Tara" (May 30th) she accused me of "Millenniumitis" and quoted two …

www.irishtimes.com

Myths At Tara?
Sir, - In Anne Byrne's article, "Demolishing the myths at Tara" (May 30th) she accused me of "Millenniumitis" and quoted two …
Wed Jul 8 1998 - 01:00

Sir, - In Anne Byrne's article, "Demolishing the myths at Tara" (May 30th) she accused me of "Millenniumitis" and quoted two so called experts, both of whom made incorrect statements that prove they don't know what they are talking about.

Mairead Carew states that the British-Israelites believe they are descended from one of the lost tribes of Israel, which is totally false. The British-Israelites are a world-wide body of well-educated people who believe that the Bible is the truth and who know that they and many others are descended from the 10 lost tribes of Israel and that includes the Irish people, who are mostly descended from the Tuatha de Dannan, Tribe of Dan - the fifth tribe of Israel.

Dr Edel Bhreathnach states as her reason for believing the Ark is unlikely to be at Tara that God made a Covenant with the Jews. This is also untrue. God made the Covenant with all 12 of the Tribes of Israel, which includes the Irish-Danites, and not just with the Jews, who are only one of the tribes, the fourth-Judah. The Jews broke the Covenant which is why Jerusalem and the Temple were destroyed. The Ark was taken away from them and brought to Ireland to the Irish-Israelite Children of Dan, by Jeremiah, exactly as prophesied in the Bible.

Dr Bhreathnach also states that Queen Tea was both a myth and also Queen of Thebes in Egypt. Both statements are untrue and I have Queen Tea's autobiography to prove it.


READ MORE

It is also obvious from her own statements that Dr. Bhreathnach does not know where the name Tara came from. Tea (Teia) Tephi was not an Egyptian, she was the daughter of King Zedekiah of Jerusalem (588 BC) and was taken to Tanis (not Thebes) by Jeremiah the Prophet, where she was adopted by Pharaoh Hopra as his daughter (not his queen) and from there brought, via Gibraltar, to Ireland where she landed at Howth on June 18th, 583 BC and was crowned at Cathair Crofinn (now Tara) as Queen of Ireland. She ruled Ireland by The Torah (God's Laws) given to Moses and Israel at Sinai, the originals of which are kept in the Ark (with copies being in your Bibles).

Tea changed the name Crofinn to Torah which became Taueragh in Anglo-Norman and is now Tara. Tara is not derived from Teamur. Teamur means "wall of Tea" and refers to her wall that she had built on Torah Hill, which was her "wailing-wall" (as in Jerusalem) where she wept over the destruction of Solomon's Temple and her native Jerusalem, as the people of Jerusalem still do today.

I believe I have demonstrated that I know far more about Tara and Tea than anyone at the Discovery Programme and have therefore earned the right to dig a tiny area of grass, 6' x 6' at Tara, to recover Tea and the Ark and replace the myths with the truth and the Ark of the Covenant for all to see. - Yours, etc.,Mr J A Hill,

PO Box 6205,

Gibraltar.

 

[A Freeman]

It appears that AJH wants his followers to follow the OT laws literally.

Exactly as would be expected of Christ during His Second Coming.

Isaiah 42:18-21
42:18 Hear, ye deaf; and look, ye blind, that ye may see.
42:19 Who [is] blind, but My servant? or deaf, as My messenger [that] I sent? who [is] as blind as [he that thinks he is] perfect, and blind as the "I AM"'s servant (Israel)?
42:20 Seeing many things, but thou takest no notice; opening the ears, but he heareth not.
42:21 The "I AM" is well pleased for His Righteousness' sake; He will magnify The Law, and make [it] honourable (Deut. 33:21).

Will you obey the **bible's** commandment when the vision does not come to pass?

To what "vision" are you referring please? Below are two of the prophesies (one from the Old Covenant and one from the New Covenant) concerning Father (God) giving the British-Israelite throne and crown to Christ:

Ezekiel 21:25-27
21:25 And thou, profane wicked prince of Israel, whose day is come, when inequity [shall have] an end,
21:26 Thus saith the Lord "I AM"; Remove the diadem (sovereignty), and take off the crown: this [shall] not [be] the same: exalt [him that is] low (Line of Zarah), and abase [him that is] high (Line of Pharez).
21:27 I will overturn, overturn, overturn, it: and it shall be no [more], [overturned] UNTIL he come whose Right it is; and I will give it [him - Shiloh (Gen. 49:10)].

Luke 1:31-33
1:31 And, behold, thou shalt conceive in thy womb, and bring forth a son, and shalt call his name JESUS (Saviour).
1:32 He shall be great, and shall be called the Son of The Highest: and THE LORD God his Father shall give unto him the Throne of David:
1:33 And he shall reign over the "House of Jacob/Israel" for ever; and of his Kingdom there shall be no end.

WHEN Father (God) decides to give the Throne to Christ is up to Father. Is there any realistic expectation of that happening on the 22nd of April 2023? NO. Has Christ/JAH prophesied that Father (God) will give Him (Christ) the Unenlightened (Ps. 2) and the Throne on the 22nd of April 2023? Again NO.

So if you wish to pretend that you are cleverly setting up for some failed prophecy that was NEVER made, then please go right ahead and continue your strawman and ad hominem attacks to your heart's content (Jer. 17:9), remembering that whatever evil you wish on others, you actually wish upon yourself. This subject has already been covered weeks ago, and also shared in this thread, more than once, including here:.

No Charles? No Problem.

Christ’s Reign as the King of kings is INDEPENDENT of any human decision or action, including any made or taken by Charles Battenberg/Windsor.

gibraltar-messenger.net

What will be interesting to see is what happens on the 6th of May with the pre-planned coronation of Charles Battenberg/Windsor. Will it be the same as it has been before, as with previous coronations? Will Charles, like his mom/mum Elizabeth did on the 2nd of June 1953, get away with FRAUD?

Elizabeth wasn't coronated on the REAL Stone of Destiny (Jacob's Pillar-Stone), which remains hidden somewhere in Scotland. There has even been talk among the Scots that the FAKE "Stone of Scone" on display in Edinburgh castle may not be released for the 6th of May, despite numerous press releases within a couple of days of Elizabeth's reported passing that the fake stone would make the trip from Scotland to England for the pre-planned, fraudulent (criminal) coronation.

Deuteronomy 18:20 But the prophet, which shall presume to speak a word in my name, which I have not commanded him to speak, or that shall speak in the name of other gods, even that prophet shall die.

21 And if thou say in thine heart, How shall we know the word which the Lord hath not spoken?

22 When a prophet speaketh in the name of the Lord, if the thing follow not, nor come to pass, that is the thing which the Lord hath not spoken, but the prophet hath spoken it presumptuously: thou shalt not be afraid of him.

You really should spend more time studying the prophecies concerning Christ's Second Coming and concern yourself with what YOU say (e.g. false accusations, bearing false witness, etc.), and what YOU do, rather than worrying about prophecies that no one ever made, and wishing ill on others, particularly on JAH/Christ, like you did here, here, here and here, among many other places.

Christ/JAH WILL reign on Earth, exactly as prophesied, when Father decides the timing is perfect (so the faithful are gathered). Until then, the world will continue to become darker and darker, with billions about to die from the vaccinations they were duped into taking and from WW3. It will, in fact, be so awful that if Father didn't step in to stop it, there would be no flesh saved (Matt. 24:21-22).

 

[lightseeker]

Interesting you attempt to change the meaning of the verse in plain sight. Because he didn't say "if someone comes in my name, do not believe them" ie Christians and pastors. He said "if someone tells you I AM the christ" exactly as Anthony Hill does, do not believe them. You are not capable of saying you follow this imperative statement of Jesus. The fact that you tried to change its meaning, instead of just saying yes I follow it, tells me that you know you don't in some capacity and try to rationalize it. Heres another one

And they asked him, saying, Master, but when shall these things be? and what sign will there be when these things shall come to pass?
8 And he said, Take heed that ye be not deceived: for many shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and the time draweth near: go ye not therefore after them

Jesus here is talking about the end times. His disciples ask him what to do in those times. He tells them, do not follow those that say "I am Christ".
Tell me
1. Does Anthony Hill tell people that?
2.do you follow him?

@A Freeman you never answered these questions

 

[Red Sky at Morning]

@A Freeman you never answered these questions

I couldn’t help but notice…

p.s. one of my favourite movie scenes

 

[A Freeman]

@A Freeman you never answered these questions

Why do you feel the need to lie so often? Everyone who has read this thread can see those questions have already been answered both accurately and thoroughly. When someone ignores the answers to their questions, they remain ignorant, do they not?

"Christianity" is the problem, NOT Christ.

Just because someone comes in Christ's Name, calling themselves a "Christian", doesn't mean they know or love Christ (John 17:3; John 14:15).

 

[lightseeker]

Why do you feel the need to lie so often? Everyone who has read this thread can see those questions have already been answered both accurately and thoroughly. When someone ignores the answers to their questions, they remain ignorant, do they not?

"Christianity" is the problem, NOT Christ.

Just because someone comes in Christ's Name, calling themselves a "Christian", doesn't mean they know or love Christ (John 17:3; John 14:15).

But thats not what Jesus said.
he said
-If someone says to you “I am Christ, the time draweth near”, do not go after them”
Hence my question
-Does Anthony Hill tell people this?
Maybe answer the question before you come with more projections about lying.

 

[A Freeman]

Christ came in His Father's Name in the body of Jesus. Christ/JAH has come again, in His Father's Name, which is IN Him (Exod. 23:21; Rev. 19:12).

Christ teaches that we MUST keep The Law/Commandments of God, which are eternal. There is absolutely NOTHING that Christ/JAH teaches that breaks The Law or goes against the TRUE Teachings of Christ. Christ/JAH has been warning people for almost 40 years not to follow any false christ/false teacher/false prophet.

"Christians" falsely claim to come in Christ's Name, while teaching and doing the exact opposite of what Christ teaches. "Christians" refuse to keep and enforce The Perfect Law that God gave us, they refuse to heed Christ's Teachings, and they go after every so-called Christian priest, pastor, teacher, etc. who does the same, while claiming to be representing Christ.

Every single "Christian" on Earth, according to Christ, is a false christ, false teacher and false prophet, and thus is lying to themselves and others. That's why the Babylonian mystery religion known as "Christianity" -- and its unwitting(?) victims/parishioners/followers/children -- promotes so many LIES.

The Top 10 Myths that Dominate "Christianity"

Revelation 18:4 And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, COME OUT of her, MY people, that ye take not part in her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues (punishment).

Amen to that.

 

[lightseeker]

Every single "Christian" on Earth, according to Christ, is a false christ, false teacher and false prophet, and thus is lying to themselves and others. That's why the Babylonian mystery religion known as "Christianity" -- and its unwitting(?) victims/parishioners/followers/children -- promotes so many LIES

According to Jesus, only the ones that tell people ““I am Christ, the time draweth near”
ill answer the question for you, Yes, Anthony Hill does tell people this. He then commands you not to follow this person

 

[JoChris]

You mentioned Eustace Mullins here. https://vigilantcitizenforums.com/threads/are-medicines-permitted-by-god-according-the-real-bible.10809/page-18#post-550230
A result on his book list was so interesting and relevant to this thread!
I would not be surprised if Anthony John Hill is a fan.

Eustace Mullins - Anglo-Saxons and Celts Unite and Fight against World Government : Eustace Mullins : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive

For all books and other materials from Eustace Mullins visit:https://archive.org/details/eustace-mullins-writings-collectionCheck the channel for further...

archive.org

 

[Red Sky at Morning]

You mentioned Eustace Mullins here. https://vigilantcitizenforums.com/threads/are-medicines-permitted-by-god-according-the-real-bible.10809/page-18#post-550230
A result on his book list was so interesting and relevant to this thread!
I would not be surprised if Anthony John Hill is a fan.

Eustace Mullins - Anglo-Saxons and Celts Unite and Fight against World Government : Eustace Mullins : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive

For all books and other materials from Eustace Mullins visit:https://archive.org/details/eustace-mullins-writings-collectionCheck the channel for further...

archive.org

View attachment 85987

1: I would hate the world if I was called Eustace!

2: His material reads like propaganda for the Aryan Nation!

 

[JoChris]

1: I would hate the world if I was called Eustace!

2: His material reads like propaganda for the Aryan Nation!

I will give the Wikipedia entry here too.

Eustace Mullins - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

Eustace Clarence Mullins Jr. (March 9, 1923 – February 2, 2010)[1] was an American white supremacist, antisemitic conspiracy theorist, propagandist,[2] Holocaust denier, and writer. A disciple of the poet Ezra Pound,[3] his best-known work is The Secrets of The Federal Reserve, in which he alleged that several high-profile bankers had conspired to write the Federal Reserve Act for their own nefarious purposes, and then induced Congress to enact it into law. The Southern Poverty Law Center described him as "a one-man organization of hate".[4]

Eustace Mullins
Born	March 9, 1923 Roanoke, Virginia, United States
Died	February 2, 2010 (aged 86) Hockley, Texas, United States
Nationality	American
Occupation	Writer
Known for	Antisemitism, Holocaust denial, conspiracy theory
Notable work	The Secrets of the Federal Reserve (1952) The Biological Jew (1967)
Movement	Neo-fascism, constitutional militia movement

His militant anti-Jew and anti-Holocaust position is especially worrying.

 

[Red Sky at Morning]

I will give the Wikipedia entry here too.

Eustace Mullins - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

Eustace Clarence Mullins Jr. (March 9, 1923 – February 2, 2010)[1] was an American white supremacist, antisemitic conspiracy theorist, propagandist,[2] Holocaust denier, and writer. A disciple of the poet Ezra Pound,[3] his best-known work is The Secrets of The Federal Reserve, in which he alleged that several high-profile bankers had conspired to write the Federal Reserve Act for their own nefarious purposes, and then induced Congress to enact it into law. The Southern Poverty Law Center described him as "a one-man organization of hate".[4]

Eustace Mullins
Born	March 9, 1923 Roanoke, Virginia, United States
Died	February 2, 2010 (aged 86) Hockley, Texas, United States
Nationality	American
Occupation	Writer
Known for	Antisemitism, Holocaust denial, conspiracy theory
Notable work	The Secrets of the Federal Reserve (1952) The Biological Jew (1967)
Movement	Neo-fascism, constitutional militia movement

His militant anti-Jew and anti-Holocaust position is especially worrying.

Well well….

Firstly, what a jerk!

Second, In Voyage of the Dawntreader, C.S. Lewis introduces us to the noxious Eustace Clarence Scrubb.

Surely that first and middle name were not common. Sometimes the best way to cut foolish ideas down to size is to satirise them!!