Here is the question I asked:
With that in mind, how exactly do Trump's policies align with the elite's goal of globalism?
So far, no answers.
Well, we could begin with the embassy move.
Sure, a campaign promise that he kept. On the surface
it’s a political move but it is as much a religious one. Obviously, the 81% (a contested figure) evangelicals that voted for him were appeased but how is that beneficial to the average American atheist? To them, he is fulfilling a ‘biblical mandate’. Just watch TBN and DAYSTAR to see how much they fawn over him. If you decide to watch that video, ponder this; its very interesting that Israel is a big deal to both Christian Zionists and the Elite (aka Luciferians), that is bizarre because their belief systems are diametrically opposed but it seems they see eye to eye when it comes to this ‘prize’.
The Aid;
Trump approves largest ever aid package to Israel
The act gives the defense package the imprimatur of Congress, which would keep any future president from reneging. Nice
https://www.sun-sentinel.com/florida-jewish-journal/fl-jj-trump-aid-package-israel-turkey-f-35s-20180814-story.html
https://www.haaretz.com/us-news/senate-passes-bill-to-enshrine-military-aid-package-to-israel-into-law-1.6340748
Now, how is any of this beneficial to the average American? More importantly and in light of that, you could answer
Kung Fu’s questions in this thread. Inotherwords, why is Trump doing that? That money could have paid for the wall, you know? Priorities, I suppose.
”KF" said:
Again it makes no sense in this case because Israel offers nothing in terms of financial or resource gain to the US and in reality it's the exact opposite. The US does all the spending and work but yet only Israel seems to benefit.
When you just glance it or if your average person looks at the situation they really have no clue as to why the US does the things they do when it comes to Israel because they see the US get nothing in return for the things they do for Israel. But the more seasoned individual knows why and when you know the history of Zionism and the recognize the people who run institutions of influence within the US things start making sense.
The Iran Deal;
According to the Brookings Institute’s paper, Trump stuck to the script. Obama would sign the deal and Trump would withdraw from it.
"For those who favor regime change or a military attack on Iran (either by the United States or Israel), there is a strong argument to be made for trying this option first. inciting regime change in Iran would be greatly assisted by convincing the Iranian people that their government is so ideologically blinkered that it refuses to do what is best for the people and instead clings to a policy that could only bring ruin on the country.
The ideal scenario in this case would be that the United States and the international community present a package of positive inducements so enticing that the Iranian citizenry would support the deal, only to have the regime reject it.
In a similar vein, any military operation against Iran will likely be very unpopular around the world and require the proper international context—both to ensure the logistical support the operation would require and to minimize the blowback from it. The best way to minimize international opprobrium and maximize support (however, grudging or covert) is to strike only when there is a widespread conviction that the Iranians were given but then rejected a superb offer—one so good that only a regime determined to acquire nuclear weapons and acquire them for the wrong reasons would turn it down. Under those circumstances, the United States (or Israel) could portray its operations as taken in sorrow, not anger, and at least some in the international community would conclude that the Iranians “brought it on themselves” by refusing a very good deal."~Brookings Institute: Which path to Persia pg 52
The first and last policies are just
what one of his financial backers wanted:
While Trump’s campaign promises – particularly those populist and anti-war in nature – have rung hollow, the President has notably fulfilled his campaign promises that were of prime importance to Adelson. Those promises were the moving the U.S. embassy in Israel from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, which Adelson has aggressively promoted and is even helping to finance, andremoving the U.S. from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), better known as the Iran nuclear deal.
Hopefully, that helps answer your question. So, it isn’t some blind ‘hatred’ for the man (as some would call it) or blind belief that he is a puppet/pawn in the great game. The evidence is there and its solid enough for me to form the opinion that he is a puppet. When this forum was down and a couple of us were arguing over whether he was the real deal, I did say that I’d use the Brookings Institute paper (I think it was published a decade ago) as a litmus test. Well, now we know! Different pieces forming a picture in a puzzle.
