A lot there, Karly. If he is intended, why? The world was going along just like the elite liked it headed to globalism and one worldview and speak. I have seen a lot of people calling Trump a Nazi but I see no sign he wants to conquer the world. And why end with Trump? Could there not be another person in mind for after Trump and so on and so on? The only thing the US was ripe for was a civil war from those who did not want to keep heading down the PC road to those who wanted anything to go. The US was ripe for change for sure, but why would this be orchestrated and or it end with Trump? I am just curious what changes you perceive are happening. If Trump starts going full-on dictator I can see your point but are you saying all this drama of wanting him out in the media is intended?Trump was selected by the elites to not only bring about political, social and cultural changes that the elites desire but to also, literally immanentize their eschaton. Its obvious from all the religious talk employed in alt-media and msm, to describe his actions.
It's also interesting that from Clinton, every president has served two terms, creating conditions ripe for a Trump admin. He is basically ripe for this time and he will make reality the elites' spiritual dreams, received from their master.
From my perspective, the terms “caliph” and “Christian Taliban” were witticisms and tongue and cheek comments as that’s the way Mehdi Hasan appears to be using it, in my opinion. In the commentary, he seems to on the verge of rolling his eyes considering how Muslims views are seen as extremist views in MSM, hence, the terminology.I don't like that title.
It's sort of forced anyways. It is a ridiculous metaphor and uses "Caliph" as a pejorative, as though it's something bad.
I don't believe there's any "Christian Taliban" in the US and I don't think people should pretend there is for political reasons.
Whoever thinks the world is run by devout religious people and we live in the Middle Ages.... they're lost or lying.
"Religious extremism" in the US is mentioning God in public. If you actually believe in your scripture, you're a "fundamentalist". You either bow down, let liberals rewrite your religion or you're a fundamentalist.
"Christian extremism" in the US means some guy in Alabama being like "I uhh mildly disagree with your position on abortion".
I can't really answer this question or can i say i can't put my finger on it. I guess the best way to find out is to pinpoint the groups of people that have benefitted the most from his presidency (policies: domestic & foreign) so far. And the interests of said groups of people, demographics or otherwise.A lot there, Karly. If he is intended, why?
I don't think its about him conquering the world but rather in place to do someone else's bidding.The world was going along just like the elite liked it headed to globalism and one worldview and speak. I have seen a lot of people calling Trump a Nazi but I see no sign he wants to conquer the world.
I didn't say it will all end with Trump. He just seems to be or made to appear as the right man for the season. There's something about him that screams that; whether it be his background in reality tv or his off-the-cuff remarks or other, i don't know.And why end with Trump? Could there not be another person in mind for after Trump and so on and so on? The only thing the US was ripe for was a civil war from those who did not want to keep heading down the PC road to those who wanted anything to go. The US was ripe for change for sure, but why would this be orchestrated and or it end with Trump?
Maybe or maybe not. On this, i thought John Whitehead's piece was really good, especially in light of the 'would/wouldn't' fiasco.I am just curious what changes you perceive are happening. If Trump starts going full-on dictator I can see your point but are you saying all this drama of wanting him out in the media is intended?
They use all sides to further their interests.
With Trump they probably compromised on directly fighting the Russians or the Chinese/North Korea but there are more ways than 2 for bringing about their much desired 'big war' and the 'new order' under their rule.
What is saddening is how they have everyone in their control through these crises wars, invasions and immigration will lead to more division, hatred and scapegoating instead of a confrontation with the puppet masters.
Corporate Globalism is a vehicle to create economic frustration and intentionally cause a backlash of neo-fascism and ultra-nationalism and it’s working from Brazil to Poland to the USA.The elites push globalism. Research the EU, UN, globalist leaders and activists [Obama, Soros, Alinsky, Cameron, Merkel...] , and you will see the agenda at work. In a nutshell:
"The ultimate goal of globalism is the eventual unification of humanity under a one-world government. Globalists oppose nationalism, national sovereignty, and self-governance."
With that in mind, how exactly do Trump's policies align with the elite's goal of globalism?
Ever hear that saying, "the greatest trick the Devil ever did was convince mankind he doesn't exist"? Trump is sort of like that, with nationalism. He claims that he's putting America first, that he cares about this country... But how much of his money is invested in America? Many Trump-branded products are made in other countries.The elites push globalism. Research the EU, UN, globalist leaders and activists [Obama, Soros, Alinsky, Cameron, Merkel...] , and you will see the agenda at work. In a nutshell:
"The ultimate goal of globalism is the eventual unification of humanity under a one-world government. Globalists oppose nationalism, national sovereignty, and self-governance."
With that in mind, how exactly do Trump's policies align with the elite's goal of globalism?
Alright.Here is the question I asked:
With that in mind, how exactly do Trump's policies align with the elite's goal of globalism?
So far, no answers.