kerrichinchilla
Star
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2017
- Messages
- 1,501
Apparently Charles new portrait is 8ft 6in by 6ft 6in. 666
I agree. Below is a chart from last fall indicating what nations want to be a republic rather than being part of the British monarchy:looks like he's on fire wonder if it's Good news like the "royals"
are about to be burned outta Our World but I Know that's way
too Good to be True
why do so many Peoples think this thing is the antichrist
I really Believe it will be a unknown evil that has never been in
the publics eye and there is next to no information online for
it's the only way Ya can capture even the nonreligious in the trap
this is the only way this evil will not have any preconceived bias
from Peoples
In my lifetime, Elizabeth was always painted as the nation’s grandma. Her age was used to excuse a lot of Royal Family scandals and secret laws they passed to benefit themselves. Oh she’s just an old lady, it’s the Royal Family as an institution which is the issue- not her- was the narrative of MSM. It’s expected though given she was a long serving monarch (maybe the longest serving monarch ever?). They’re all leeches and do naff all for this nation.I agree. Below is a chart from last fall indicating what nations want to be a republic rather than being part of the British monarchy:
(source)
This is interesting to note as well:
Now that Queen Elizabeth II is gone, I don't think people have the same reverence for the British monarchy as they once did. Despite how evil she and Prince Phillip were, there always seemed to be some semblance of respect for her, at least from the MSM view. Aside from cases before the courts about their ownership of countries, we all know about Charles and his escapades with Camilla when he was married to Princess Diana, and not very likeable so the gig might finally be up for the lot of them.
Some people here Canada revered her as well, and I'm not sure why. I mentioned it earlier in this thread, but reading Noel Botham's book "The Murder of Princess Diana" and what John Morgan seems to corroborate in "How They Murdered Princess Diana" is how evil they were towards her and the people she used to befriend and date. I would laugh out loud at the comments because they're so base since it is the Royal Family, but they're not good-natured or kind-hearted individuals in any sense of the word. Prince Phillip has psychopathic tendencies as described by a psychologist that was featured in the Princess Diana car crash documentary. He didn't like Diana at all.In my lifetime, Elizabeth was always painted as the nation’s grandma. Her age was used to excuse a lot of Royal Family scandals and secret laws they passed to benefit themselves. Oh she’s just an old lady, it’s the Royal Family as an institution which is the issue- not her- was the narrative of MSM. It’s expected though given she was a long serving monarch (maybe the longest serving monarch ever?). They’re all leeches and do naff all for this nation.
The Queen was probably the biggest racist out of them all, the things her husband would say and she wouldn’t bat an eyelid. Ironically, it’s the working class which idolise them not so much the middle and upper class. No doubt @Flarepath is a huge supporter of them. They lobby hard for their interests and it’s no secret they’ve bled the country dry.
The Guardian used to do a quarterly article exposing how they amass and hide wealth, yet still suck the public purse dry. These might be of interest:
Revealed: Queen lobbied for change in law to hide her private wealth | Queen Elizabeth II | The Guardian
Monarch dispatched private solicitor to secure exemption from transparency lawamp.theguardian.com
Royals vetted more than 1,000 laws via Queen’s consent | Queen Elizabeth II | The Guardian
Exclusive: secretive procedure used to review laws ranging from Brexit trade deal to inheritance and land policy<br>amp.theguardian.com
How the British royal family hides its wealth from public scrutiny | Monarchy | The Guardian
Ahead of the coronation of King Charles III, the Guardian’s Cost of the crown series exposes the entrenched secrecy around the royal family’s money and wealthamp.theguardian.com
I thought I knew royal greed – but King Charles profiting from the assets of the dead is a disgusting new low | Monarchy | The Guardian
For decades, parliament has been far too lenient about the royal family’s finances. This avaricious practice needs to end, says the former Liberal Democrat MP Norman Bakeramp.theguardian.com
Revealed: Queen’s sweeping immunity from more than 160 laws | Queen Elizabeth II | The Guardian
Guardian investigation finds monarch enjoys extraordinary exemptions in laws ranging from animal welfare to taxationamp.theguardian.com
He dressed as a nazi during his 20s, lost his virginity to an older woman in a field (she actually gave an interview on TV, so shameless!) and struck me as the odd, conflicted sheep of the family. I assume he was unable to ever move past the circumstances surrounding his mother’s tragic death and as he grew older, probably realised what a cesspit of a household he grew up in. After venturing out of his elite circles he probably decided for the safety of his wife and children, it’s better he stays away. I don’t have much of an opinion on him either, other than him fleeing across the world in an attempt to escape them shows he knows a heck of a lot more than he’s publicly stated.I have no opinion about Prince Harry, but I understand why he moved away from the bunch of them.
looks like he's on fire wonder if it's Good news like the "royals"
are about to be burned outta Our World but I Know that's way
too Good to be True
why do so many Peoples think this thing is the antichrist
I really Believe it will be a unknown evil that has never been in
the publics eye and there is next to no information online for
it's the only way Ya can capture even the nonreligious in the trap
this is the only way this evil will not have any preconceived bias
from Peoples
In my lifetime, Elizabeth was always painted as the nation’s grandma. Her age was used to excuse a lot of Royal Family scandals and secret laws they passed to benefit themselves. Oh she’s just an old lady, it’s the Royal Family as an institution which is the issue- not her- was the narrative of MSM. It’s expected though given she was a long serving monarch (maybe the longest serving monarch ever?). They’re all leeches and do naff all for this nation.
The Queen was probably the biggest racist out of them all, the things her husband would say and she wouldn’t bat an eyelid. Ironically, it’s the working class which idolise them not so much the middle and upper class. No doubt @Flarepath is a huge supporter of them. They lobby hard for their interests and it’s no secret they’ve bled the country dry.
The Guardian used to do a quarterly article exposing how they amass and hide wealth, yet still suck the public purse dry. These might be of interest:
Revealed: Queen lobbied for change in law to hide her private wealth | Queen Elizabeth II | The Guardian
Monarch dispatched private solicitor to secure exemption from transparency lawamp.theguardian.com
Royals vetted more than 1,000 laws via Queen’s consent | Queen Elizabeth II | The Guardian
Exclusive: secretive procedure used to review laws ranging from Brexit trade deal to inheritance and land policy<br>amp.theguardian.com
How the British royal family hides its wealth from public scrutiny | Monarchy | The Guardian
Ahead of the coronation of King Charles III, the Guardian’s Cost of the crown series exposes the entrenched secrecy around the royal family’s money and wealthamp.theguardian.com
I thought I knew royal greed – but King Charles profiting from the assets of the dead is a disgusting new low | Monarchy | The Guardian
For decades, parliament has been far too lenient about the royal family’s finances. This avaricious practice needs to end, says the former Liberal Democrat MP Norman Bakeramp.theguardian.com
Revealed: Queen’s sweeping immunity from more than 160 laws | Queen Elizabeth II | The Guardian
Guardian investigation finds monarch enjoys extraordinary exemptions in laws ranging from animal welfare to taxationamp.theguardian.com
In my experience its the working classes on the whole that adore the Royals and the middle classes that have a tendency to be nonplussed with them.Id disagree. The working class hate them. The middle class I find treat them as something revere.
Sorry I had to respond to this. Not to sound boastful, but I do hand drawn portraits professionally. I have a close friend who paints oil portraits that are such an uncanny likeness of the subject, they could pass as a real photograph. I don't want to be too hard on the artist here, but that looks nothing like her... Did they select the painter from a middle school art class? I would not even guess that is supposed to be her. There is no way this isn't being done intentionally to humiliate her... Or as some kind of inside joke. No way."'Dreadful' new Kate Middleton portrait outrages the public..."