You still arent answering my question. Where are the modern day successful black countries and mass black achievement? What, now that slavery is abolished? How were Europeans even able to whitewash history? Because they're inherently superior to black people? If you cant see the connection between the two then I really dont know what to tell you. You keep asking for mass contribution from women when you're smart enough to realize women were actively prevented from contributing. In societies that were more egalitarian you'll find that women contributed much more. Look up what they did in hunter gatherer societies for example. And they also always worked, contrary to the very narrow housewife model that has never been universal.
You don’t want to go to the appropriate thread to discuss whitewashing because you don’t care. Slavery hasn’t been abolished it moved to the private prisons. And the west STILL installs/disposes puppet regimes at its wish depending on if a country is going with or against their liking. The bankers backed feminism. You know what happened when black people tried to take things into their own hands during the civil rights era? The govt created a secret organization to monitor their movements, infiltrate from within, and dismantle.To go in depth on this and why it happened altogether you could open a thread about it or go in the designated thread and take off from where it left off. You won’t
And all that I mentioned is after the time black people could literally step outside and get lynched just because and you want to compare that to women being in marriages lol
What I wrote WERE definitions Koncrete. They even broke the words down to their roots. This was from people who actually work with linguistic analyses for a living. Did you even read any of it? Even in a simple, low-morphology language like English you should know that looking up a definition of any word at random is not going to give you the full scope of its usage or explain how it's used in context. Hebrew is even more conplex considering its morphology.
You say as you refuse to actually analyze the language of the biblical texts.
This is a moot point since you refuse to accept you dont know how to parse either "ezer" or "kenegdo".
You missed the point of the Corinthians passage. And the word "woman" doesnt come from the word "man" -the Germanic rootwords are different. The creation story isnt even recorded in English lol what even is this point you're trying to make?
Ezer means help yet you’re trying to argue against the woman being help to the man? That’s on you. i just pulled up the simple definitions to show that you have to play gymnastics to make them seem equal when still, at the end of the day, HELP, is still there. Which your link INCORRECTLY says meant strength.
And I said biblically speaking God named man and man named the woman. Meaning God gave Adam/man his name and then Adam/man gave Eve/woman her name. That’s the hierarchy.
Tell me now if you're not even going to bother reading my posts. It's a waste of time for me to write out responses only for you to completely ignore or skim them to the point that you regurgitate arguments already addressed. It's frustrating. If you want to believe men are superior to women and all the evil feminist women who want independence are doomed to miserable lives then whatever dude. But dont pretend like your belief stems from anything resembling objective reasoning if you have to rely on dismissing points out of hand becase you evidently cant engage them.
I’ll definitely do my best to address what you’re saying in general. But when there’s two or three paragraphs with different questions you can’t expect me to go answer you line by line and get literally everything you’re asking. As far as that post again, it’s mainly “what aboutisms”. The verse is clear when it says man wasn’t created for woman but woman for man. Your idea of addressing that is saying “yea but what about” and if I don’t go down that tangent then that means it’s out of my reach...
And even with that coworkers has nothing to do with what I’m saying. Brother and sister has nothing to do with what I’m saying. The only thing that is relevant is who is given dominion over everything on earth and that’s man. That’s why your feminist movement only works if men go along with it/support it.
en.m.wikipedia.org
maybe stomp your feet and make a fist