LOL, but i knew from the get-go that the covid was nonsense. this gene therapy and the spreading of the spike proteins? this is serious. ive said before that i have a degree in genetics, so maybe thats why i am so freaked out.
how close was he to the others?
i hope thats true. its still early to know anything for certain. imagine an airborne prion. someone mentioned in the comments section that if the vaxxed can infect the unvaxxed, then surely the elites would be barricading themselves in their mansions.... or they have the antidote.
I think a new "Q movement" type are being created for the AntiVaxxer side. They hooked you with plenty of truth in the beginning, then slowly release enough lies to confused you and put you in a frantic mode. Further dividing the Vaxxer (L) and Unvaxxer (R). As a man of faith, I know my life is in God's hand and the devil have to play by His rule to kill me. The only way he can succeed is if I consent. He can tempt me all he want to eat that fruit or inject the juices into my vein, but No mean No and he will have to honor that. The devil dare not crossing that line.
I'm sure there are many legalities in the attempt to administer something to individuals that don't want it. Especially, those who've had adverse side effects such as miscarriages, as there may some challenges with those who've consented.You and @Fajr posted the Pfizer document. I'd seen it elsewhere and i didn't "like"/appreciate your posts because the language in that section wasn't really clear to me in regard to the vaccine side effects on the unvaxxed. However, this John Hopkins document is much clearer in the language and i think states what is actually going on. Even more interesting (pg 43) is the write up on the vaccine microneedles aka digital tattoos. But of great import is: is any of this ethical and legal? Do these "self-spreading vaccines" also spread side effects? "You" can't forcefully vaccinate the entire planet without our consent. International Medical lawyers need to step up because it looks like someone who willfully gets a jab also gets it for "you" against your will. Iam optimistic that there is a mechanism to inhibit one "acquiring" a jab from someone else.
Yes, Bill Gates, we'll take the next one seriously.
View attachment 55241
View attachment 55242 View attachment 55243
Of interest is that Caitlin Rivers and Tom Inglesby were both present at Event 201**
From the article I posted in Frank's thread, someone in the comment section had an illustration of what might be going on. Although, I think many have already drawn this conclusion:
covidvaccinereactions.com
Agreed. It probably lasts a short while which is likely why the Pfizer guy said a shot will be needed every 12-18months. Besides, there are alot of variables that could affect the transmission of the shot such as the weather, change of diet (i hope!), etc
Please see Jon Rappoport's argument.
This shedding thing is what made the whole game a lot harder. I thought just avoid the vaccination and endure being a 2nd class citizen and you win the game, but shedding introduced very challenging new rules.From the article I posted in Frank's thread, someone in the comment section had an illustration of what might be going on. Although, I think many have already drawn this conclusion:
I also stumbled across this website. Apologies if it's already been posted:
COVID-19 VACCINE REACTIONS
UNVACCINATED WOMEN’S CYCLE ODDITIES
Unvaccinated Women’s Cycle Oddities – Covid-19 Vaccine Reactions
www.lifesitenews.com
dailyexpose.co.uk
You know what? They are actually playing mind games on us because if a pharma executive comes out and says that the covid vaccines are actually self-spreading vaccines, then it automatically kills the vaccine passport argument...since everyone can get inoculated and you can't opt out of the inoculation....so no need for the passports to discriminate.
Real close - like sitting right next to them. The one guy was in our house but I never got sick.
I personally don’t think pharma companies would like the idea of self-spreading vaccines because that would cut massively into their profit margins. I mean if you could knock out administration by 1/3 or 1/4 the population that’s less $$$ for them. I’m not saying the technology doesn’t exist, but pharma will never be in support of anything that decreases their $$$.Matt Hancock pretend-cries on GMB after the first Briton gets inoculated
Where are his real tears for the...
19,916 ‘eye disorders’ including blindness following COVID vaccine reported in Europe - LifeSite
More than 10,000 reports of eye disorders after COVID shots in the U.K. alone
Hancock has blood on his hands – Shocking rise in expectant mothers who’ve lost their baby after having the Covid Vaccine
A tragic milestone has been surpassed as the effects of the mass roll-out of an experimental vaccine continue to devastate the lives of those who “get the jab, when they get the call”. …
You know what? They are actually playing mind games on us because if a pharma executive comes out and says that the covid vaccines are actually self-spreading vaccines, then it automatically kills the vaccine passport argument...since everyone can get inoculated and you can't opt out of the inoculation....so no need for the passports to discriminate.
thats a great point... IF this is profit based. unfortunately, i think the overarching goal is depopulation. the elites wont mind losing a $500 million or more in profit if they can bring down the population 15 or 20%. their secret society goals come first.
what about all the people who were forcibly vaxxed? children who were vaxxed?
My parents and middle brother are vaxxed.
a male friend (whos father is vaxxed) said the exact same thing.
Forcibly vaxxed how? Are they tied down with a knee on their neck while someone else jab them? I think most people have more choices than they are led to believe.
www.lifesitenews.com
