Covid-19 Vaccines Deaths & Side Effects

John K

Established
Joined
Oct 10, 2020
Messages
278
Sputnik is a viral vector vaccine so same mode of action as J&J and AZ. It deploys synthetic DNA into your cells whereas the Moderna and Pfizer deploy synthetic mRNA into cellls. All 4 instruct the body to make spike protein.
I’ve posted this before but here’s a primer on types of vaccines and how they differ:



Ha! This story is FASCINATING! So it appears Brazilian regulators are saying certain Sputnik batches are compromised due to there being LIVE virus in them.

Ok so guys in case you don’t understand- atentuated viral vector vaccines use an actual “harmless” virus to carry synthetically made DNA into your cells. Think of it like this: they take a virus like a cold virus - this is like a canoe that carries the synthetic spike protein DNA into your cells. Once there, the body converts the spike protein DNA into mRNA and makes spike protein.

Here’s the thing: the “canoe” (the cold virus) usually is “attenuated” meaning disabled. In what way is it disabled? Well it’s usually dead, or weakened so that it can’t REPLICATE in your body - otherwise, if it could, you’re getting a nasty cold (or whatever the virus IS).

In the case in this story - the Brazilians found LIVE virus in a batch! They said they think it happened due to a manufacturing issue.

This is HUGE problem because it means anyone who got that injection was injected with a modified virus (remember- your little canoe now has SARS-COV-2 spike protein loaded in as a passenger), that will replicate spike protein ALL OVER. In whatever cells it reaches!

Why do I say this news is huge? Because if it happened with Sputnik is sure as h*ll can happen with J*J and AZ. I guarantee the UK government nor US government are doing these quality control checks. The Brazilians probably only caught it because it’s a Russian vaccine and were wary.

From the article:

“According to a slideshow uploaded online, scientists at Anvisa, Brazil's regulator, said they tested samples of the booster shot and found it was "replication competent" — meaning that once inside the body, the adenovirus can continue to multiply.

They added that this had likely occurred because of a manufacturing problem called "recombination," in which the modified adenovirus had gained back the genes it needed to replicate while it was being grown inside engineered human cells in a lab.”
So, do you think is dangerous to have contact with a vaccinated person ?

This person could have a live virus after vaccination...

I had make a threat about vaccinated people and the risk for others.. https://vigilantcitizenforums.com/threads/we-should-avoid-have-contact-with-vaccinated-people-against-corona-virus.8949/
 






VigCizMember

Veteran
Joined
Jan 27, 2018
Messages
880
So, do you think is dangerous to have contact with a vaccinated person ?

This person could have a live virus after vaccination...

I had make a threat about vaccinated people and the risk for others.. https://vigilantcitizenforums.com/threads/we-should-avoid-have-contact-with-vaccinated-people-against-corona-virus.8949/
Ah thanks I’ll check out that thread.

I don’t know - there are so many unknowns it’s hard to say anything really conclusively. But I don’t like that an attenuated virus can become live again - that’s never good.

Edited to say “self replicating not live”
 






Last edited:

Maes17

Superstar
Joined
Jul 27, 2017
Messages
5,196
Thank-you and agreed about the difficulty. Everyone has their own free-will to choose between good and evil. The reason for striving to share the truth with others is for everyone's mutual benefit.

When meeting with strangers these days, the approach that's been personally taken is to ask them what they make of the current situation, to determine if they are awake to some degree and thus receptive, or still fast asleep.


Thank-you and completely understood. People NEED to recognize and overcome the mind-control/programming that is currently in overdrive with the magic virus scam. As you know, there's no such thing as an "asymptomatic" individual, which is how healthy humans are now being redefined in the relentless propaganda campaign.

A similar experience was had several weeks ago when happening upon a picnic of sorts, where a group in their 60s and 70s were returning from a swim, and having some herbal tea and homemade bread.

None were wearing masks or (anti) social distancing, and seemed healthy and friendly enough, inviting me to sit down with them at the picnic table. When asked what they made of the current situation, they began regurgitating the propaganda and what a serious threat the magic virus is, before volunteering one-by-one that they had all received "the jab". They then told of a friend of theirs who had just died within three weeks of receiving the second jab.

Apparently, their friend tragically "caught" the coronavirus one week after receiving the second jab and that's what killed him rather than the vaccine.

It's absolutely amazing the lengths that people will go to justify their own insanity/feed their own egos, including allowing themselves to be intentionally poisoned.

Just yesterday another stranger was asked the same question, and responded by saying that "we ought to just get back to the way things were" before asking me if I'd received "the jab". He didn't like the answer, being asked why anyone would allow themselves to be intentionally poisoned. He, of course, then claimed that "the jab" was saving lives, even though it has already killed hundreds of thousands (if not millions).

"The jab" is the latest euphemism for assault with a deadly weapon, which is exactly what someone coming at you with a needle really is. Everyone has a God-given right to self-defense/defence against evil.
Exactly. You can share your input, but it’s ultimately up to said individual what they choose to pursue. I’m not responsible for their life’s path. We all have our paths to walk. Whatever gets us there in a positive fashion is all that matters.

Life can be simple and yet complicated. I choose simplicity as much as I can. But simplicity is relative. Complexity is our mind seeking that stimuli for more, more, more. Complexity is being advantageous at times and abusing easily led astray people.

There’s a lot I can say, but I’ll leave this as the base of my perspective towards life.

All I’m saying is don’t fret of peoples perception on you. You will not please everyone. Just don’t lose touch with your values. Stay true to you.
 






Frank Badfinger

Superstar
Joined
Aug 4, 2019
Messages
8,751
Could that be where a lot of these variants are coming from ?
I've mentioned this before but I don't think its a coincidence that the variants just happen to be the same places that AZ did massive trial testing from April-November 2020.

Screenshot_2021-05-01 CORRECTED-Fact Check- COVID-19 vaccines are not experimental and they ha...png
Under claim 3.
 






Frank Badfinger

Superstar
Joined
Aug 4, 2019
Messages
8,751
Coronation Street actor gets the convid 1984 poison, in pain and bedridden.

Coronation Street's Will Mellor left bedridden and in crippling pain after getting his coronavirus jab - ASTRAZENECA
CORONATION Street bad boy Will Mellor filmed himself from his bed as he spoke of the "absolutely horrendous" after-effects he experienced following his coronavirus jab.
The soap star, who had the Oxford AstraZeneca version of the inoculation, told how he "felt like an 80-year-old man" after his first dose.
https://www.thesun.co.uk/tv/14764939/coronation-street-will-mellor-coronavirus-jab-side-effects-bedridden/
 






Karlysymon

Star
Joined
Mar 18, 2017
Messages
4,630
And now Pfizer is admitting their shot can cause transmission around non-vaccinated people:

Pfizer admits in its own mRNA jab trial documentation that non-jabbed people can be ENVIRONMENTALLY EXPOSED to the jab’s spike proteins by INHALATION or SKIN CONTACT.
You and @Fajr posted the Pfizer document. I'd seen it elsewhere and i didn't "like"/appreciate your posts because the language in that section wasn't really clear to me in regard to the vaccine side effects on the unvaxxed. However, this John Hopkins document is much clearer in the language and i think states what is actually going on. Even more interesting (pg 43) is the write up on the vaccine microneedles aka digital tattoos. But of great import is: is any of this ethical and legal? Do these "self-spreading vaccines" also spread side effects? "You" can't forcefully vaccinate the entire planet without our consent. International Medical lawyers need to step up because it looks like someone who willfully gets a jab also gets it for "you" against your will. Iam optimistic that there is a mechanism to inhibit one "acquiring" a jab from someone else.

Yes, Bill Gates, we'll take the next one seriously. :rolleyes::rolleyes:

1619902536588.png

1619902715471.png 1619902798469.png

Of interest is that Caitlin Rivers and Tom Inglesby were both present at Event 201**
1619903515861.png
 






Last edited:

Karlysymon

Star
Joined
Mar 18, 2017
Messages
4,630
:rolleyes::rolleyes:

 






peridot

Established
Joined
Jul 28, 2018
Messages
176
... almost as if some folks just don't trust everything they hear...


Just "LOVE" this quote...

The CDC’s decision last month to pause the Johnson & Johnson vaccine while officials investigated a handful of “extremely rare” blood clotting incidents — and then to resume its use after the risk was confirmed to be vanishingly small and limited to women ages 18 to 48 — has not improved the situation.
 






peridot

Established
Joined
Jul 28, 2018
Messages
176
:rolleyes::rolleyes:

--- wait, what's show where if you just say "I believe you" repeated, that whatever it is will happen?
Or is that Peter Pan where you have to keep clapping to keep Tinkerbell alive...
No, I know. Click your heels 3 times.....

See, THAT's what those people should have done.

Now, what I really want to know, is what is worse:
A supposed cure that stops curing because the patient is emotionally distressed,
OR
The fact that there are people who have the gaul to print their patient blaming so that the world can see.
 






Maes17

Superstar
Joined
Jul 27, 2017
Messages
5,196
:rolleyes::rolleyes:

Lol. Right....
 






A Freeman

Star
Joined
Nov 11, 2019
Messages
2,835
You and @Fajr posted the Pfizer document. I'd seen it elsewhere and i didn't "like"/appreciate your posts because the language in that section wasn't really clear to me in regard to the vaccine side effects on the unvaxxed. However, this John Hopkins document is much clearer in the language and i think states what is actually going on. Even more interesting (pg 43) is the write up on the vaccine microneedles aka digital tattoos. But of great import is: is any of this ethical and legal? Do these "self-spreading vaccines" also spread side effects? "You" can't forcefully vaccinate the entire planet without our consent. International Medical lawyers need to step up because it looks like someone who willfully gets a jab also gets it for "you" against your will. Iam optimistic that there is a mechanism to inhibit one "acquiring" a jab from someone else.

Yes, Bill Gates, we'll take the next one seriously. :rolleyes::rolleyes:

View attachment 55241

View attachment 55242 View attachment 55243

Of interest is that Caitlin Rivers and Tom Inglesby were both present at Event 201**
There are human and animal studies referred to in Arthur Firstenberg's "The Invisible Rainbow" that were conducted during the so-called Spanish flu, c. 1918, where healthy horses were paired next to sick horses, and healthy humans were paired next to sick people, allegedly with the "Spanish flu". No matter what they did, they could not get a single healthy horse nor healthy human sick in this manner.

Similar studies were conducted during the so-called polio virus. Same results. Not a single healthy test subject became ill, regardless of the extensive means used to try to prove contagion. Anyone interested in this data (and so much more) should read "The Poisoned Needle" by Eleanor McBean, published in 1957. If you can't find either of these sources online, please PM me and PDF versions of both can be emailed.

The bottom line is there isn't one single study that conclusively proves contagion. That's why they use wording like "...the disease is thought to be transmitted in this manner..." in official reports (usually bought and paid for by the pharmaceutical companies).

Conversely, we have major studies conducted during two of the worst tragedies to date, where tens of millions were poisoned with vaccines and died, with their deaths blamed on these so-called viruses, and the poisonous vaccines heralded as the "cure". These studies conclusively rule out contagion as a potential means for spreading illnesses.

Now, within the first 6 months of the vaccine rollout, in the largest scale psy-op in human history, stories about vaccine "shedding" are appearing. So, on the one hand, we have people who can see through this magic virus scam and refuse to play along being labeled as "super-spreaders" while, on the other hand, those who are foolish enough to take one of these poisonous vaccines are being labeled as "shedders".

Does anyone else see yet another "us v. them" divide and conquer game being played? Or feel that truly independent studies proving unequivocally that shedding would be needed before it could be seriously considered as a possibility?

Fear is an extremely powerful (and dark, emotional) motivator, that makes people believe in, say and do things they otherwise wouldn't believe, say and/or do. It's what is actually driving this entire charade right now, along with every twist and turn it takes, including the fear of someone "shedding".
 






Last edited:

A Freeman

Star
Joined
Nov 11, 2019
Messages
2,835
modeRNA

The mRNA vaccine is allegedly (and irreversibly) replacing a string of someone's genetic code, which could cause any number of unforeseen health issues, potentially making one sick for the rest of their life.

As with all pharmaceutical drugs and vaccines, the body correctly sees these foreign substances as poisons, and reacts by using its own defensive system to rid itself of them. Naturally, dilution is a means of flushing out poisons, so the body being thirsty is its signal to run as much water through it as possible, to help rid it of the toxin.
You're welcome. Really meant more to point out that the mRNA is where their name originated rather than to point out the misspelling.
 






Fajr

Established
Joined
Jan 14, 2021
Messages
327
:rolleyes::rolleyes:

Ridiculous claims and people still don't see through the lies.
 






Karlysymon

Star
Joined
Mar 18, 2017
Messages
4,630
There are human and animal studies referred to in Arthur Firstenberg's "The Invisible Rainbow" that were conducted during the so-called Spanish flu, c. 1918, where healthy horses were paired next to sick horses, and healthy humans were paired next to sick people, allegedly with the "Spanish flu". No matter what they did, they could not get a single healthy horse nor healthy human sick in this manner.

Similar studies were conducted during the so-called polio virus. Same results. Not a single healthy test subject became ill, regardless of the extensive means used to try to prove contagion. Anyone interested in this data (and so much more) should read "The Poisoned Needle" by Eleanor McBean, published in 1957. If you can't find either of these sources online, please PM me and PDF versions of both can be emailed.

The bottom line is there isn't one single study that conclusively proves contagion. That's why they use wording like "...the disease is thought to be transmitted in this manner..." in official reports (usually bought and paid for by the pharmaceutical companies).

Conversely, we have major studies conducted during two of the worst tragedies to date, where tens of millions were poisoned with vaccines and died, with their deaths blamed on these so-called viruses, and the poisonous vaccines heralded as the "cure". These studies conclusively rule out contagion as a potential means for spreading illnesses.

Now, within the first 6 months of the vaccine rollout, in the largest scale psy-op in human history, stories about vaccine "shedding" are appearing. So, on the one hand, we have people who can see through this magic virus scam and refuse to play along being labeled as "super-spreaders" while, on the other hand, those who are foolish enough to take one of these poisonous vaccines are being labeled as "shedders".

Does anyone else see yet another "us v. them" divide and conquer game being played? Or feel that truly independent studies proving unequivocally that shedding would be needed before it could be seriously considered as a possibility?

Fear is an extremely powerful (and dark, emotional) motivator, that makes people believe in, say and do things they otherwise wouldn't believe, say and/or do. It's what is actually driving this entire charade right now, along with every twist and turn it takes, including the fear of someone "shedding".
Are you saying that there is such a thing as a “contagion myth”? Iam a picture of health and thankfully not afflicted by any crazy diseases but I will always catch a cold from a baby/young child if they have one. Conversely, adults don’t affect me that much, which is kinda weird.

I believe contagion to be real but it depends on the person’s immune system. I thought it was interesting that all the stories proliferating online about vaxxed people affecting the unvaxxed, there is little to none anectodes from males (except regarding the sexual aspect). Either males aren’t reporting fatigue, bruises headaches etc just from being around vaxxed people or somehow, it’s simply not affecting them and females are more susceptible.

@floss said he hasn’t been affected in anyway. You said you were at a picnic with a bunch of vaxxed people. @VigCizMember’s brother and friend were both vaxxed and he hasn’t expressed any effects from being around them. @polymoog should also give us feedback, if any, (as a male) from being around his co-worker.

If this affects females more, then obviously strengthening one’s immune system is key.

... almost as if some folks just don't trust everything they hear...


Just "LOVE" this quote...

The CDC’s decision last month to pause the Johnson & Johnson vaccine while officials investigated a handful of “extremely rare” blood clotting incidents — and then to resume its use after the risk was confirmed to be vanishingly small and limited to women ages 18 to 48 — has not improved the situation.
They are saying that it's 5million who haven't taken their second shot but i suspect that the number is much higher. Factor in people who died after their first shot without getting the second one. Even more important to ask: if the people who get vaccinated once really believed in the whole thing, why aren't they returning for the second one? Unless they are adversely affected??
 






polymoog

Superstar
Joined
Jun 17, 2017
Messages
5,255
@polymoog should also give us feedback, if any, (as a male) from being around his co-worker.
i will keep you updated, but ive already told him that i dont want any physical contact with him and to stay away from me and any of my food. when we are in the truck together, the windows are rolled down, but im not sure if that helps or makes things worse by swirling his airborne proteins around inside the cab for me to inhale.
ive started eating a lot more probiotics for lunch with the mentality that these good bugs might be able to break down the small amount of spike protein which i am exposed to, but again, i dont know if that will help or hurt things. its been proven that GMO DNA can be uptaken by the gut bacteria, making the gut bacteria themselves genetically modified and therefore, the person to some extent.

i shouldnt have to be worrying about this crap because of his stupid decision to get vaxxed.
 






VigCizMember

Veteran
Joined
Jan 27, 2018
Messages
880
Are you saying that there is such a thing as a “contagion myth”? Iam a picture of health and thankfully not afflicted by any crazy diseases but I will always catch a cold from a baby/young child if they have one. Conversely, adults don’t affect me that much, which is kinda weird.

I believe contagion to be real but it depends on the person’s immune system. I thought it was interesting that all the stories proliferating online about vaxxed people affecting the unvaxxed, there is little to none anectodes from males (except regarding the sexual aspect). Either males aren’t reporting fatigue, bruises headaches etc just from being around vaxxed people or somehow, it’s simply not affecting them and females are more susceptible.

@floss said he hasn’t been affected in anyway. You said you were at a picnic with a bunch of vaxxed people. @VigCizMember’s brother and friend were both vaxxed and he hasn’t expressed any effects from being around them. @polymoog should also give us feedback, if any, (as a male) from being around his co-worker.

If this affects females more, then obviously strengthening one’s immune system is key.


They are saying that it's 5million who haven't taken their second shot but i suspect that the number is much higher. Factor in people who died after their first shot without getting the second one. Even more important to ask: if the people who get vaccinated once really believed in the whole thing, why aren't they returning for the second one? Unless they are adversely affected??
Hola ya’ll! Firstly I’m a woman haha! I just love Snake Pliskin - he’s my man!

Anywho yeah regarding the “shedding” theory - I am curious about it - but I too am wary of this Us vs. Them situation I feel many are falling into. Reminds me of the Sneetches.

But yeah so my brother lives in another state so I haven’t been in contact with him.

Now I don’t like adding fuel to a fire when so much is unknown but I will say this: my husband and I live in a very dense area and one that was known from the getgo for having a “high Covid” concentration and neither of us ever got sick.

However, and this just developed in the last week or so, but my husband got pretty ill (not hospital ill but pretty wiped out) and this occurred literally a day or two after spending a few hours in close contact with someone who had just gotten their second shot a few days prior. He also spent some time a few days later with another friend who also just had his 2nd shot and was complaining of the migraines and sore arms many seem to have.

Coincidence? Unrelated? We don’t know. Of course we’re not injected with this poison and never will be.

My hubby took Ivermectin today as his lungs were sounding a little congested - his O2 levels are ok but could be better. We’re following the MASK protocol. I’m sure it’ll work as Ivermectin is a wonderful drug.

But yeah - it’s really really weird we’ve been fine for a year and a half and now this. Hmmmm....
 






Attachments

floss

Star
Joined
Mar 26, 2017
Messages
2,033
i will keep you updated, but ive already told him that i dont want any physical contact with him and to stay away from me and any of my food. when we are in the truck together, the windows are rolled down, but im not sure if that helps or makes things worse by swirling his airborne proteins around inside the cab for me to inhale.
ive started eating a lot more probiotics for lunch with the mentality that these good bugs might be able to break down the small amount of spike protein which i am exposed to, but again, i dont know if that will help or hurt things. its been proven that GMO DNA can be uptaken by the gut bacteria, making the gut bacteria themselves genetically modified and therefore, the person to some extent.

i shouldnt have to be worrying about this crap because of his stupid decision to get vaxxed.
You sound just like my paranoid double masked vaxxed co-worker especially the rolled window down part and just to kick it up a notch, he also turn the damn heat on. o_O

Chill bro, I think this "vaxxed affecting the unvaxxed" is as of a hoax as asymptomatic transmission. Perhaps, this is one way to get the unvaxxed to start wearing their muzzles. :D
 






Last edited:
Top