Coronavirus

rainerann

Star
Joined
Mar 18, 2017
Messages
4,550
I never bought into the 5g angle on this. If it is apparently making people this sick (exempting those who are electrically sensitive), then its safe to assume there'll hardly be anyone alive by the time 6/7g is rolled out.

Anyway, for those interested:
View attachment 34823

On September 23, 1998, 66 satellites, launched into low orbit by the Iridium Corporation, commenced broadcasting to the first ever satellite telephones. Those phones would work equally as well in mid-ocean, and in Antarctica, as in the middle of Los Angeles—a remarkable achievement.

But telephone interviews revealed that on that day exactly, electrically sensitive people all over the world experienced stabbing pains in their chest, knife-like sensations in their head, nosebleeds, asthma attacks, and other signs of severe electrical illness. Many did not think they were going to make it. Statistics published by the Centers for Disease Control reveal that the national death rate rose 4 to 5 percent during the following two weeks. Thousands of homing pigeons lost their way during those two weeks, all over the United States.

Several companies are now competing to provide not just cell phone service, but Wi-Fi and the equivalent of 5G, to every square inch of the earth from satellites in space in low earth orbit. Their target dates are 2019 or 2020. They are planning not 66 satellites, but tens of thousands of satellites. There isn’t much time to prevent a global ecological catastrophe.

The companies with the biggest schemes include:
SpaceX: 12,000 satellites
OneWeb: 4560 satellites
Boeing: 2956 satellites
Spire Global: 972 satellites

What do you think the difference is between the pursuit of something like this and the history of the relationship between people that opposed pollution and the oil industry?

that is what I have been wondering lately. How different is it to say that there will be a global catastrophe because of increasing satellites from the arguments made about impending climate change due to global warming?

personally, I am thinking some of these things will only be stopped completely after the fact if history is set to repeat itself. There will be another equivalent of a clean air act and a consequent power struggle for 30 years or more.

however, back to the concept of hidden agendas. There has to be some way to gather support for something to be successful. Like people were sensitive to the electricity, people are sensitive to things on a different level that makes it difficult to predict the way they will respond to something when they are faced with it and if you can’t be direct with them. Then you can’t really get their support and there will be a certain degree of drift they will create by their own interpretation of available information.

so even if there are many things intended to be an influence in a targeted way, the influence can not be considered evidence of what the outcome will be.
 
Last edited:

Maes17

Superstar
Joined
Jul 27, 2017
Messages
6,521
Not a damn thing. Vikings aren't scared of a little cold.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Europe and US is only freaking out now bc they cant take isolation. An Isolation that freaked out Wuhan aswell. Wuhans free now and things back to normal so... Hang in there!
Valhalla up in this mother!!!
 
Joined
Jan 9, 2018
Messages
1,367
The data or the stories about the data from alternative media even is conflicting.

Dana Ashlie on YouTube has an interview with a nurse from Utah stating that deaths are being reported as COVID-19 even if some are not.

Dr. Duc Vuong interviews Dr. Ariel Ortiz who says deaths are being under-reported and classified as "atypical pneumonia".

Maybe it depends on the individual country or state how they report the deaths.

I'm of the opinion that it's under-reporting mostly since Russia and the Soviet countries are acting like it hasn't hit them. It has. It's hitting every country.

Yet there could be cases of over-reporting or jumping to conclusions as well, but wouldn't it be in the best interest of TPTB to under-report? To make it seem less serious so more people die and they get the population control they've always wanted?
No, there’s actually MASSIVE OVER-reporting!

And it is being done by design. Doctors are being pressured by the CDC to report the cause of death on death certificates as caused by COVID-19, even when it isn’t verified/the deceased wasn’t even tested.

In so many scenarios when COVID-19 clearly was NOT the cause of death, the doctors are STILL told to list it as the cause ANYWAY, which is falsely & artificially inflating the death toll.....and the doctors CANNOT even notify the media about it (although I’m sure the MSM already know anyway, since they are complicit in peddling the lies already) or report it because it is illegal for the doctor to share this information due to HIPPA laws.

*(See video below)

TPTB are inflating the C-19 deaths because that is how they keep the public hoodwinked, terrified & on their knees begging the government to dissolve what little remains of our INALIENABLE rights, so long as they make the big, bad virus go away.

And the brainwashed public has become so hysterical, they are now doing the work of the globalists for them by ostracizing fellow citizens who step outside to rake their lawn.

It is Stockholm Syndrome combined with the Art of War and is marching us steadily to our collective demise.
Smh.


 

Dalit

Star
Joined
Oct 23, 2018
Messages
1,911
Even Kim Iversen says it's worse than reported and she's not one to say such. I hate cancer and viruses, yet am fascinated by this stuff. An "angry cell" mutates; the slightest variation matters. It's fascinating and terrifying like a train wreck I can't stop watching.

 

Karlysymon

Superstar
Joined
Mar 18, 2017
Messages
7,324
What do you think the difference is between the pursuit of something like this and the history of the relationship between people that opposed pollution and the oil industry?

that is what I have been wondering lately. How different is it to say that there will be a global catastrophe because of increasing satellites from the arguments made about impending climate change due to global warming?

personally, I am thinking some of these things will only be stopped completely after the fact if history is set to repeat itself. There will be another equivalent of a clean air act and a consequent power struggle for 30 years or more.
I think that there is a difference even though they are both noble causes. Opposition to the electrosmog or electro pollution is a much nobler cause because of the delicate nature of the planet and the possibility of affecting lots of people at the same time. You cannot compare Exxon Valdez or the BP oil spill to something like HAARP. This unnatural electrosmog (if I can call it that) is changing the natural balance that man and his habitation were supposed to perfectly exist within. And it’s a very real possibility that more people will die from EHS-related diseases than from something like Corexit
however, back to the concept of hidden agendas. There has to be some way to gather support for something to be successful. Like people were sensitive to the electricity, people are sensitive to things on a different level that makes it difficult to predict the way they will respond to something when they are faced with it and if you can’t be direct with them. Then you can’t really get their support and there will be a certain degree of drift they will create by their own interpretation of available information.

so even if there are many things intended to be an influence in a targeted way, the influence can not be considered evidence of what the outcome will be.
Yes, it is influence but i guess "they" bank on the hope that how someone responds when watching a film is the same way they will respond when that film's premise becomes reality.
 
Joined
Jan 9, 2018
Messages
1,367
Over reporting LOL there is no over reporting, what there is, is UNDER reporting.
Did you watch the video in my previous comment?

Many doctors are coming forward saying the CDC is making them list “COVID-19” as cause of death on death certificates of those who died from other causes.

No testing to confirm if the person even tested positive for Covid-19 is necessary to list the virus as cause of death.

How can they NOT be inflated??

13064D04-A548-4A92-9216-C90D426E2CD2.jpeg
 

manama

Star
Joined
Mar 15, 2017
Messages
3,827
Did you watch the video in my previous comment?

Many doctors are coming forward saying the CDC is making them list “COVID-19” as cause of death on death certificates of those who died from other causes.

No testing to confirm if the person even tested positive for Covid-19 is necessary to list the virus as cause of death.

How can they NOT be inflated??

View attachment 34840
Whatever you just posted is unreadable. As far as the video is concerned, i am having trouble with the credibility of the speaker also because i am unable to find ANY info on her. But she is wearing a stethoscope so she must be right :rolleyes: Lets ignore hundreds of thousands of doctors to listen to one just because whatever she is saying fits with whatever new quackery I just came up with :rolleyes:


As far as death certificates are concerned, when someone has multiple health problems and on top of that they also get covid-19, obviously it means that they died likely of covid-19 and their pre-existing health issues contributed to that.

There are not enough doctors to perform tests and treat people, you think anyone has the time to do autopsies? Use common sense for a second.
 
Joined
Jan 9, 2018
Messages
1,367
Yeah, it’s been in the US longer than thought and we haven’t even tested 1% of our population so the numbers are higher. I imagine it’s a similar situation in most countries that have been affected.

If governments are hiding anything it’s to downgrade the severity to prevent panics. That’s pretty much government 101. It’s always worse than they tell you.
A physician named Dr. Jensen even called them out on how they are supposed to list COVID-19 on death certificates, say

"I’ve never been encouraged to [notate 'influenza']," he said. "I would probably write 'respiratory arrest' to be the top line, and the underlying cause of this disease would be pneumonia ... I might well put emphysema or congestive heart failure, but I would never put influenza down as the underlying cause of death and yet that’s what we are being asked to do here."
Jensen then told Ingraham that under the CDC guidelines, a patient who died after being hit by a bus and tested positive for coronavirus would be listed as having presumed to have died from the virus regardless of whatever damage was caused by the bus.
"That doesn't make any sense," he said.”


 

elsbet

Superstar
Joined
Jun 4, 2017
Messages
5,122
The data or the stories about the data from alternative media even is conflicting.

Dana Ashlie on YouTube has an interview with a nurse from Utah stating that deaths are being reported as COVID-19 even if some are not.

Dr. Duc Vuong interviews Dr. Ariel Ortiz who says deaths are being under-reported and classified as "atypical pneumonia".

Maybe it depends on the individual country or state how they report the deaths.

I'm of the opinion that it's under-reporting mostly since Russia and the Soviet countries are acting like it hasn't hit them. It has. It's hitting every country.

Yet there could be cases of over-reporting or jumping to conclusions as well, but wouldn't it be in the best interest of TPTB to under-report? To make it seem less serious so more people die and they get the population control they've always wanted?
I don't think that is what it's about. You can't really implement large scale population control, until you can effectively control the population.

And it seems to be going swimmingly. :confused:
 

UnderAlienControl

Superstar
Joined
Mar 27, 2017
Messages
8,568
 
Last edited:

elsbet

Superstar
Joined
Jun 4, 2017
Messages
5,122
The economy was already f*cked to begin with. Who does it benefit beside the 1%.
True... but maybe there's a spectrum, here. For example, there's a difference between being screwed and totally f***ed, overnight.
 

Karlysymon

Superstar
Joined
Mar 18, 2017
Messages
7,324
Yeah, it’s been in the US longer than thought and we haven’t even tested 1% of our population so the numbers are higher. I imagine it’s a similar situation in most countries that have been affected.

If governments are hiding anything it’s to downgrade the severity to prevent panics. That’s pretty much government 101. It’s always worse than they tell you.
@Haich,(UK) @Maes17(USA) and @vancityeagle(Canada) have all consistently said what iam posting below

1586780125356.png


"There was also a report recently from Oxford University hypothesising that as many as two thirds of the people in the UK have already had coronavirus without realising it – which is what I suspect has happened. I’ll play you a clip from Sky news because it’s a wonderful example not just of bad journalism, but of why people are so confused and scared.

This in many ways typifies the media coverage we’ve been subjected to – some science stuff which isn’t really explained and so we can’t assess the conclusion for ourselves, some government officials saying they haven’t got a clue, and praise for social distancing because it will apparently protect the NHS and save lives.

In reality, if this study is right then social distancing is a massive con, because a huge number of those currently distancing themselves and hiding out in their homes have already had the virus, possibly without symptoms, and are therefore immune. It would also mean that the overall death numbers would actually be much much lower than predicted – more on that later. But because we cannot question the ‘OMG pandemic, be scared’ narrative, they somehow managed to twist this news item into a reiteration of the social distancing lockdown, when it should be a reason to doubt it.

The same week that this clip aired I saw two other news stories that suggest something like this scenario is accurate. The first is that Prince Charles has tested positive for the virus – one of the most socially isolated people in the country. If even he can get it then clearly social distancing isn’t going to work very well. The other story is that some people in prisons have already tested positive – literally the most socially isolated, socially distanced people in the country. If this stuff – reminder that it’s not a living organism, it’s more like a toxic dust – is already inside prisons then why the hell are the rest of us hiding out in our homes? Our homes which might already have the virus in them. Which many of us have already had without knowing it."
source

^^^That should cast doubt over "social distancing is working because lock downs have resulted in fewer deaths".
 
Last edited:
Top