Ten tribes of the children of Israel were removed from the Holy land by Assyria and resettled beyond the Euphrates centuries before the time of Jesus. And the two tribes of Judah and Benjamin were removed from the Holy land by Rome and survivors resettled into the middle east north africa and europe.
The ten tribes must have mingled with the whole world by now and the two tribes as well although some kept their religion and customs and eventually returned to the Holy land.
That's not what the Bible says.
In 2 Chronicles 11 and elsewhere we read that the land of Israel was split, not between the tribes of Judah and Benjamin in the south and the other ten tribes in the north, but between the faithful and the unfaithful. Think about this: If it was only the tribes of Judah and Benjamin that remained of Israel, who was performing the ceremonies in the Temple? Chronicles tells us the tribe of Levi moved south to serve in the Temple during the reign of Rehoboam.
For the Levites left their suburbs and their possession, and came to Judah and Jerusalem: for Jeroboam and his sons had cast them off from executing the priest's office unto the LORD:
What about the rest of the Israelites who wanted to stay faithful to God?
And after them out of all the tribes of Israel such as set their hearts to seek the LORD God of Israel came to Jerusalem, to sacrifice unto the LORD God of their fathers.
Earlier in the chapter God addresses "all Israel in Judah and Benjamin". How can he address "all Israel" if it's only Judah and Benjamin? How can services be performed in the Temple if the tribe of Levi isn't there? Did you consider these things?
So the idea that Israel was split into 2 and 10 tribes, with the 10 tribes dispersed and lost, is popular among ignorant people, but not with anyone who reads the Bible. I am surprised to see you repeating this false notion.
The truth, as related in scripture, is that there were representatives of all the tribes of Israel present in the southern kingdom of Judah, and while the unfaithful of all tribes living in the northern kingdom of Israel were lost to captivity, the tribes themselves were never lost. If they were, who is James talking to when he addresses his letter "to the twelve tribes"?
This other thread might be helpful to you.
I feel like this might be a helpful article from Chuck Missler. :) The Ten Lost Tribes khouse.org/articles/1995/40 This month (June 1995) we celebrate the Feast of Shavout, or Pentecost. In Peter's famous speech on this day in Acts Chapter 2, he referred to both "Jews" and "Israel", which...
vigilantcitizenforums.com
if you believe in Jesus and observe His words you are a child of Israel.
If that's the case, what do you do with a passage like the following?
Seeing then that we have such hope, we use great plainness of speech:
And not as Moses, which put a vail over his face, that the children of Israel could not stedfastly look to the end of that which is abolished:
But their minds were blinded: for until this day remaineth the same vail untaken away in the reading of the old testament; which vail is done away in Christ.
But even unto this day, when Moses is read, the vail is upon their heart.
Nevertheless when it shall turn to the Lord, the vail shall be taken away.
It says that, even to this day, a vail is upon the heart of the children of Israel until their heart (not hearts, notice) turns to the Lord.
If all believers are children of Israel, what on earth is Paul talking about? The minds of believers are blinded until they turn to the Lord? How does that makes sense? Can you explain?