I wonder what you might make of the way J D Farag puts things? I really like the simplicity of the way he explains the Gospel.It might surprise you that i know who God is.
But somebody got to know right ?
And why not me ?
His Name is Jesus Christ and He paid the penalty for your crimes... so you can change and be like Him with His help.
Do you believe it ? Do you want that ?
O boy do i got a Book for you.
Well it is the ABC of Christianity.I wonder what you might make of the way J D Farag puts things? I really like the simplicity of the way he explains the Gospel.
O boy do i got a Book for you.[/QUOTE]
If it is not Scriptural,....keep it, If it is, read it yourself.
Growing pains! Been there, no worries bro.I want to take this moment to publically apologize to Claire and whoever else i have hurt with my harshness.
I was just convicted.
Women are commanded not to preach in church. I wouldn’t dare to disobey that.Why are you even teaching ?
Don't you know what the Scriptures say about women teaching men ?
You don't even understand that you must also do what you hear. And if you love Him you must obey His commandments.
You refuse to recognize simple Scriptural truths and just cherry pick what suits you.
Sure you must believe the Gospel of Jesus Christ but that is the beginning of a changed heart and much good works and obedience to His commandments. How come you don't recognize the truth in this ?
What you are preaching is an endorsement of continued sins since in your mind it is enough to believe the Gospel of Jesus Christ and so in your flavour of theology absolutely all Christians are saved no matter what they do. For you cannot be a Christian and not believe the Gospel of Jesus Christ !
Jesus says it is not so.
Apology accepted, it happens to all of us.I want to take this moment to publically apologize to Claire and whoever else i have hurt with my harshness.
I was just convicted.
Look brother, I appreciate your contribution when you take the stance of preaching Christs Life Death and Resurrection for Salvation. I am not trying to be mean or harsh here but most of the things you think you are an expert on, you are not, and many of them I wholly disagree with.You ought to appreciate my contribution informing you about realities that are top secret. And interpreting Bible prophecies that connect to geopolitical events and technology.
Absolutely not, I am mostly concerned with preaching the Gospel, giving my Testimony and explaining why I agree or disagree with other Non Salvation Topics such as Eschatology, Calvinism, Eternal Salvation ect.Instead you are mostly concerned about Scriptural speculation and excusing sins.
Look brother, I could easily lob that against you, I mean you literally have just about every single professing Christian on here telling you, you are INCORRECT about this, yet YOU refuse to change your mind regardless of the evidence we present to you. However I wouldnt use that term to describe you in the least. I believe a bigot is one who spews hatred, and I definitely do not spew hatred towards you whatsoever.A bigot is one who refuses to change his/her mind in the face of evidence to the contrary.
As I stated never once have I nor any other Christian on here excused Sin, we are simply being HONEST about the REALITY of living as a Christian, and YOU are utterly and totally wrong to try and push your seeds of doubt into Christians minds that they are not saved because they are struggling with Sin or are not perfect. YOU need to be HONEST with yourself and realize that YOU are not perfect and YOU struggle with Sin.When Christendom is so plagued with sins then excusing it will not help one bit. Christians must obey the Commands of Jesus Christ.
We are all a work in progress, thats Sanctification. And I have no problem with being strict concerning Sins, it simply to declare that if one does Sin they cant be Christs, that would be to exclude all humans on Earth, including Paul and the rest of the Apostles...So i must watch my tounge and not put people down.
I felt the pain in my heart.
Of course i do not want to hurt others... i guess i felt unappreciated but still no excuse.
I'm a work in progress.
When it comes to salvation i know well that it is because of the Blood of Jesus Christ spilt for remission of sins.
And i do not apologize for being strict concerning sins but for hurting hearts.
I wanted to shut you down but felt terrible about that.Women are commanded not to preach in church. I wouldn’t dare to disobey that.
This is an open, public forum.
It does NOT say women cannot share the Gospel of Jesus Christ with others, and in fact, it commands us to.
No i understand perhaps not perfect but who does ?Look, Toki, I’m not trying to put you on the chopping block or disrespect you. I am not trying to lead you into promoting sin. I think you are absolutely correct in hating sin and it is good that you are taking a stand against all manner of sin.
My only concern is that you do not seem to really understand the Gospel of Jesus Christ.
I disagree with the man in the video. What he is saying is that for example if someone makes a public commitment to Christ but later on becomes an atheist or a Satanist that person wasn't really saved in the first place. The Bible tells us of many people who were indeed saved but chose a different path to God's and were lost. The main example I gave in this forum was king Saul. He was chosen by God. Samuel had said to him, "...the Spirit of the LORD will come upon thee, and thou shalt prophesy with them, and shalt be turned into another man... And it was so, that when he had turned his back to go from Samuel, God gave him another heart: and all those signs came to pass that day." 1 Samuel 10:6-9. Saul was "turned into another man" (spiritually speaking), and God "gave him another heart". Saul was a converted man. He was saved. But sadly later in his life he grieved away the Holy Spirit and had a miserable end. Saul is a good example of someone who was once saved but died not saved. Is the Bible lying? So once saved always saved cannot be biblical.
You and I have different Lords. OT Israel has nothing to do with the promises to the Church. You are missing out on the Joy of salvation, free from works of the Law, but by the indwelling Holy Spirit as a premiant possession, Something the OT Saints did not have. If you could lose YOUR salvation, you must be carrying it on your key chain or in your pocket instead of a supernatural change in the renewing of your mind and heart, and stop making things up about the Bible that is not even close to what you make up in your own mind. And yes, It make me angry that you peddle such apostasy to the weak in Christ.I disagree with the man in the video. What he is saying is that for example if someone makes a public commitment to Christ but later on becomes an atheist or a Satanist that person wasn't really saved in the first place. The Bible tells us of many people who were indeed saved but chose a different path to God's and were lost. The main example I gave in this forum was king Saul. He was chosen by God. Samuel had said to him, "...the Spirit of the LORD will come upon thee, and thou shalt prophesy with them, and shalt be turned into another man... And it was so, that when he had turned his back to go from Samuel, God gave him another heart: and all those signs came to pass that day." 1 Samuel 10:6-9. Saul was "turned into another man" (spiritually speaking), and God "gave him another heart". Saul was a converted man. He was saved. But sadly later in his life he grieved away the Holy Spirit and had a miserable end. Saul is a good example of someone who was once saved but died not saved. Is the Bible lying? So once saved always saved cannot be biblical.
Salvation is not a one time shot of Jesus but a walk with the Lord until the end. There are those who think they can live in sin and still be saved because of His righteousness and grace but He will have to tell them to go away.You and I have different Lords. OT Israel has nothing to do with the promises to the Church. You are missing out on the Joy of salvation, free from works of the Law, but by the indwelling Holy Spirit as a premiant possession, Something the OT Saints did not have. If you could lose YOUR salvation, you must be carrying it on your key chain or in your pocket instead of a supernatural change in the renewing of your mind and heart, and stop making things up about the Bible that is not even close to what you make up in your own mind. And yes, It make me angry that you peddle such apostasy to the weak in Christ.
A saved man can not be lost and a saved man does not practice sin. You would know that if you were born again. You speak of carnal reasoning to Spiritual rebirth, You ask questions of why when you should know by rebirth. You are the enemy to the cross of Christ and teach self effort for salvation. The man who claims such things that he can continue in sin at will after claiming salvation has never meet Christ. You should seek Him.Once Saved, Always Saved?
ONE OF the greatest deceptions of these closing days is the widespread teaching that once a man has passed from a standing, of “condemnation” to a standing of “justification,” he can never again come under condemnation before God to the extent of being lost. It is claimed that no matter how completely he may afterward abandon himself to drunkenness, thievery, adultery, profanity, or any other sin even if he should die while practicing one or all of these sins-there is not the remotest possibility that he will be lost. He may lose his fellowship, but he cannot lose his salvation.
According to this teaching, being born again does not necessarily lead to discontinuance of sin. The instant a man believes in Christ and by faith accepts Him as Saviour, he receives eternal life. This being the case, no amount of subsequent sinning can deprive him of this life. If a man dies in his sins, he is not damned; instead he is believed to go to be with Jesus!
A leading champion of this theory has written: “God wants a clean people. And they can be if they will humble themselves and confess their sins. To refuse to do so is to invite the judgment of God in weakness and sickness, and persistent unrepentance may result in the Lord taking them home, and then they will face the judgment seat of Christ.” But on this very point Jesus said, “You ... shall die in your sins: whither I go, you cannot come.” John 8:21.
The writer goes on: “Can the believer continue in sin and go unjudged?” He does not ask, “Can the believer continue in sin without being lost?” Indeed he teaches that a man can continue in sin until his last breath and still be saved. The Lord will visit weakness and sickness upon a man to make him “clean,” but if he persists in wickedness, then the Lord will take him “home.” There he will face the ‘Judgment seat of Christ,” not, however, for the purpose of receiving condemnation. There and then the final cleansing takes place before he is assigned a place in the kingdom. This is supposed to be the significance of facing the “judgment seat of Christ.”
The difference between this belief and the Catholic doctrine of purgatory is not great. In purgatory sinners are retained for a time to be cleansed from their sins before they are admitted to heaven. In this belief they are cleansed at the judgment seat of Christ before being assigned a place in the kingdom. According to Catholic theology, the sinner must have all defilement removed before he can come into Christ’s presence. Thus purgatory gives hope to those who die in their sins. In this belief the sinner comes before Christ with his defilement. The Apostle John, writing of the New Jerusalem, wherein Christ sits at the judgment seat, said, “There shall in no wise enter into it any thing that defiles.” Revelation 21:27. Just what explanation is made of this verse and other similar verses is not known.
1 once heard a preacher deliver a radio sermon on the prodigal son in which he emphasized that the prodigal “never ceased to be his father’s son.” Meeting him after the broadcast and knowing him to be a believer in the once-saved, always-saved doctrine, I said, “This son wasted his life living with harlots. Suppose he had died while living that way?” His unhesitating reply was, “He would have gone straight to heaven.” Holding the doctrine he did, he could not consistently answer otherwise.
The problem is, How can this view be made consistent with Scripture? John said, “There shall in no wise enter into it any thing that defiles.” And Jesus said, “Blessed are the pure in heart: for they shall see God.” And what of the claim that the prodigal son “never ceased to be his father’s son,” even while wasting his living “with harlots”-as the elder brother charged? Jesus gives the answer in the parable of the prodigal son, when He quotes the father as saying, “This my son ... was lost, and is found.” He was his father’s son; but he was a lost son. The same can be said of all who have turned back from Christ into the practice of sin. They are lost sons. If they die in that state, they certainly will not be taken home for cleansing; the only cleansing for sin that has ever been provided is the blood of Jesus Christ. Had the prodigal son continued in his sinning, he would have continued to be lost. Says the Scripture, ‘Whore mongers . . . shall have their part in the lake which burns with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.” And Paul said plainly that adulterers shall not inherit the kingdom of God. (1 Corinthians 6:9, 10.) This would have ruled the prodigal son out, had he died in his sins.
The once-saved, always-saved believers class such as “carnal Christians.” If there were such (but there are not) the lake of fire would still be their lot, for Paul declares, “To the carnally minded is death.” Romans 8:6. "If you live after the flesh, you shall die.” Verse 13. What a man does in this life has a great deal to do with his destiny. According to the Scriptures, a grace which gives license to sin is not grace; it is presumption. Jude speaks of some who “pervert the grace of our God into licentiousness.” Jude 4, Revised Standard Version. Moffatt’s Translation speaks of those who “pervert the grace of our God into immorality.”
Despite these warnings, a believer in “pure grace” boldly says: “When a child of God deliberately sins against the light he has received, he can be sure [Of being lost? Far from it!] that there is coming a time of real judgment, not unto condemnation, but either a chastening (as we shall see later) or a shameful appearing before the judgment Seat of Christ at his coming.” Why should a drunkard or an adulterer care to repent if he is made to believe that at the judgment seat of Christ he can be absolutely sure of eternal salvation despite his continued sinning? The author is not talking of a sin that is committed because of a sudden temptation or because of unwatchfulness. He is claiming that if a man who deliberately practices sin is not stopped by chastisement, he still need have no fear of condemnation. If that is not encouraging the “carnally minded” to live securely in their carnal ways, what is it doing? It was on this point that Paul most earnestly warned, “Be not deceived.”