We have posted a lot of information on the subject, and these are not strawman arguments. If you dont agree with certain perspectives, feel free to address what you think is incorrect, feel free to post some sources and data which we can investigate together. Im not challenging you with a puffed out chest.... Im honestly requesting you to present some information we can all explore together as opposed to generalized opinions.
Why lol? Why can't you do me the courtesy of answering the questions I already asked you in the first place? Why would you rather change the subject and put the focus onto me, when I was asking you about predictive programming? I don't understand why you need everything to be made personal... I wasn't talking about yourself or myself, I was talking about the specific topic of predictive programming. What does predictive programming have to do with myself or my intentions? Why should I be obligated to ease your odd suspicions about my behavior, when I don't feel like I've done anything wrong to warrant those suspicions. I didn't ask for much, all I did was ask you to explain how your idea of predictive programming makes sense.
I don't have an "objective"... I come on this forum because it is fun sometimes to have conversations with people and talk about conspiracy topics. You can see the threads I have created on my profile.
That's not my intention... I don't "debunk" things, I'm just saying what I think about various topics. But if I see someone saying something that is not true or unsourced or something that just doesn't make much sense, I will ask them to explain it or maybe tell them why I think they're incorrect. That's really all that it is. I think that's what normal people do on forums, they browse and interject when they have something to say. Do you really tie yourself so closely to these ideas that a simple question or a bit of criticism feels like a personal attack to you? Because I don't want to make things personal and I would never attack someone... I never said anything about you.
I do question his evidence and his conclusions... I don't automatically take everything he says at face value and I don't blindly accept the narrative that he paints in all of his articles. You do realize that VC's articles are simply one man's perception of certain ideas and events? It's just his personal opinion that he's sharing with us, he doesn't have secret knowledge. That doesn't mean that I can't gain some useful ideas and insight from his articles... just like how the idea of predictive programming can be interesting to study and think about. But I can't just pretend all of these things are 100% true with absolutely no evidence. I try to think critically about everything anyone says...
And how the hell do you know that they're "in a hypnotic state suffering auditory hallucinations"? All I said is that I simply do not know the reason why the celebrities behaved in that way but I do think there is a reasonable explanation based upon the information that I actually have. And you told me yourself that this has absolutely nothing to do with predictive programming, so why do you keep bringing it up? What are we supposed to get out of talking about this video... none of us know the reason why they behaved abnormally, you can't pretend like you have the absolute answer... all we can do is speculate which is kind of useless.
Lol, I never said it doesn't exist. I simply asked you to explain your rationale for determining what predictive programming is. But instead of doing that, you resort to changing the topic and throwing around insults for no reason. I'm not trying to rain on your parade, I'm just asking you to tell me why you think it makes sense and how it all adds up. If you actually think it's true, then it should be able to hold up to scrutiny, I asked some valid questions. You can't just give up at the first sign of criticism or evaluation. But if you really want me to leave you alone in this thread and not ask you any questions, I will do it. You can post whatever and I won't ask you to explain how it makes sense.
I agree that they aren't all strawman arguments. What's right or wrong isn't really the point I was trying to address though. The point was people are taking this stuff way too personally. And if we are going to suspend our logic then we should understand the effect that will cause.
Boring is sexy. Tag me if you do
Now look back at all of those "lights in the sky" songs we have been bombarded with over the last couple of years.
Hadnt even thought about that angle..... thanks for the post!
Here are just a few examples of how this "event" has been implanted into the minds of millions upon millions of young people...
Well, I found out that the video was directed by “Po & Storm”
I really had to just stop reading and think as soon as I read the word Hipgnosis, taking into account the content of the video, that's quite lot to take in.
Yeah, and the fact that Po & Storm went along with it, adopting it as a company name, just shows that those were subjects that they were acquainted with/interested in, so they had no problem with the acronym.
https://www.vigilantcitizenforums.com/threads/crowley-dionysus-cults-and-rock-music.2620/#post-85929You said:
And where drugs are, the intelligence apparatus isn’t far off and I believe that Hollywood is an extension of/the other arm of said apparatus because the various forms of entertainment are the easiest avenues through which any society can be quickly transformed, and might I add, hypnotized. This is a really long essay but it doesn’t disappoint…You said:
Thanks aswell, because if you hadn't posted the video, i'd never have known about "Po & Storm" and how influential the duo was.You said:
As of yet Karly I've yet to read Mcgowans work but Mark Devlin covers much the same topic.
Very insightful post. But I strongly encourage you to investigate Dave McGowans works..... Both his "Programmed To Kill' and "Weird Scenes Inside The Canyon" books cover these topics with standard-setting quality.