A Freeman
Superstar
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2019
- Messages
- 8,348
Sura 7:162-7:165Allah says in the Qur’an
7:162. But the transgressors among them changed the word from that which had been given them so We sent on them a plague from heaven. For that they repeatedly transgressed.
7:163. Ask them concerning the town standing close by the sea. Behold! They transgressed in the matter of the Sabbath. For on the day of their Sabbath their fish did come to them, openly holding up their heads, but on the day they had no Sabbath, they came not: thus did We make a trial of them, for they were given to transgression.
7:164. When some of them said: "Why do ye preach to a people whom "I AM" will destroy or visit with a terrible punishment?"- Said the preachers: "To discharge our duty to your Lord, and perhaps they may fear Him."
7:165. When they disregarded the warnings that had been given them, We rescued those who forbade Evil; but We visited the wrong-doers with a grievous punishment, because they were given to transgression.
The Top 10 Myths that Dominate “Islam”
A careful, honest examination of the core, doctrinal beliefs of “Islam” reveals that few if any of their traditional beliefs are actually scriptural.
gibraltar-messenger.net
Are you a real muslim?
The word Muslim means “one who is true in faith” or simply “faithful”. That means being faithful to and obeying Allah/God, NOT men.
gibraltar-messenger.net
The Sabbath day is the seventh day of the week (Saturday on the Gregorian calendar). It is preceded by the day of preparation (Friday), which all true believers have been COMMANDED to keep FOREVER (Exod. 31:13-17). Why then do all of the "Islamic" SECTS (Sura 6:159) violate God's COMMANDMENTS in forgetting His Sabbath day (Exod. 20:8-11; Deut. 5:12-15; Sura 4:47)?
Sura 16:123-125
16:123. So We have taught thee the inspired (Message), "Follow the example of Abraham the True in Faith, and he joined not gods with "I AM"."
16:124. The Sabbath was only made (strict) for those who disagreed (as to its observance); but "I AM" will judge between them on The Day of Judgment, as to their differences.
16:125. Invite (all) to The Way (John 14:6; Sura 4:159) of thy Lord with wisdom and beautiful preaching; and argue with them in ways that are best and most gracious: for thy Lord knoweth best, who have strayed from His Way, and who receive guidance.
Christ's "Lineage" is crystal clear: Prince Michael/Christ (The Messiah/Mahdi) is the first immortal spiritual-Being that God/Allah/the "I AM" created (Col. 1:12-15; Heb. 1:1-6; Rev. 3:14).Even the lineage of Christ is questionable.
Why should anyone believe someone who very obviously is completely ignorant of the differences between the spirit (a spiritual-Being/Jinn/Soul) and the flesh (the human)? Christ is the first-created and immortal Son of God. Jesus WAS the mortal son of the virgin body of Mary, whom the Roman government crucified at the behest of the "Jews", and whom God raised 3 days and 3 nights later (Matt. 12:39-40; Sura 4:158).
No, it isn't. This is simply more ignorance, which Lucifer/Satan/Iblis gets his imams to deceitfully promote throughout the Islamic sects.Jesus’ genealogy is given in two places in Scripture: Matthew 1 and Luke 3:23-38.
The genealogy of Jesus is provided THROUGHOUT the entire Old Covenant/Testament, and is CONFIRMED in Matthew 1:1-17 and in Luke 1. The same genealogy that is likewise CONFIRMED in multiple places in the Koran/Quran, e.g. Sura 3:35-37; Sura 19 and Sura 66:12).
What is provided in Luke 3:23-38 is the lineage of Joseph, Mary's husband. It is to show that both Mary, the virgin mother of Jesus, AND Joseph, Mary's husband, were both descended from the royal line of David, which can trace its ancestry back through Abraham to Adam.
That is why the lineage listed in Matthew 1:1-17 is different than that of Luke 3:23-38; something which any real student of Scripture should immediately recognize. So the fault lies, as usual, with the ignorant reader who, like you, has decided to judge the Word of God -- which they know nothing about -- as wrong, when instead of looking inward for the error.
Of course those two passages are tracing different genealogies, as should be self-evident. One for Jesus via Mary and her lineage, and another for Joseph, Mary's husband, for the reasons stated above.Matthew traces the genealogy from Jesus to Abraham. Luke traces the genealogy from Jesus to Adam. However, there is good reason to believe that Matthew and Luke are in fact tracing entirely different genealogies.
Which is speaking of Joseph of Arimathaea, Mary's guardian and uncle (her dad's brother). It cannot possibly be referring to Joseph, Mary's husband, because Mary's husband had absolutely NOTHING to do with the virgin birth. Further, if someone was to wrongly assume that the lineage in Matthew 1:16 is speaking about Mary's husband, then that would leave the generational count at 13 from the carrying away into Babylon unto Jesus, which the next verse - Matthew 1:17 -- clearly states is not the case.For example, Matthew gives Joseph’s father as Jacob (Matthew 1:16),
The Joseph referenced is therefore and very obviously the uncle and guardian of Mary, which should explain why Joseph of Arimathaea -- Jesus' great-uncle -- was able to claim the body of Jesus after the crucifixion, as only a family member could do according to Roman law.
In the English translation of the Peshitta, which is the Aramaic version of the Bible, Matthew 1:16 states that Joseph was the guardian of Mary, NOT her husband.
https://biblehub.com/hpbt/matthew/1.htm
Logically, Jacob, son of Matthan (in verse 1:15) probably didn't have two sons that were both named Joseph*. If Mary's dad passed away in Mary's youth, then it makes perfect sense that her dad's younger brother – Joseph of Arimathaea – would have stepped in to be her guardian, i.e. her uncle taking on the roll of her adoptive dad. And both Mary's dad and her dad's brother would have identical lineages, as they had the same dad (Matthan).
*Note: Mary's dad was reportedly Joachim
https://ensignmessage.com/articles/joseph-of-arimathea-who-was-he/
Exactly as should be expected when tracing the lineage of two different people.while Luke gives Joseph’s father as Heli (Luke 3:23). Matthew traces the line through David’s son Solomon (Matthew 1:6), while Luke traces the line through David’s son Nathan (Luke 3:31). In fact, between David and Jesus, the only names the genealogies have in common are Shealtiel and Zerubbabel (Matthew 1:12; Luke 3:27).
No. Again, the only error here is one of ignorance and assumption, both borne of arrogance, in believing one knows better than God.these differences as evidence of errors in the Bible. .
You literally have to ignore the entire Old Covenant/Testament and all of the prophecies of Jesus to come up with such a ridiculous, satanic opinion of Scripture. And of course, you also have to ignore over two dozen places in the Koran/Quran, where we are specifically instructed to read the Old Covenant/Testament that contains God's Law and the New Covenant/Testament that contains the Gospel, and to NOT BE IN DOUBT of them reaching us, as God Himself has preserved them.
What is shared above is part of the promise of God that LIGHT IS ON THE WAY, and is actually already here for those who seek it.
The Scriptural Marks of Christ
There seems to be a huge disconnect between popular beliefs concerning Christ's Second Coming and what the Scriptures actually say about it.
gibraltar-messenger.net
Last edited: