Jesus said He came down from Heaven to do the will of God who sent Him in John 6:38. And so He acted as a servant/slave of God on a specific mission... to teach truths and spill His blood for the sake of sinners.
But when speaking of God's suffering servant/slave one must also incorporate Isaiah 9:6 and Micah 5:2. You can't just cherry pick verses which fit your theology... unless you have an agenda of course.
Isaiah 9 6For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given, and the government will be upon His shoulders. And He will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.
Micah 5 2But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, who are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come forth for Me One to be ruler over Israel, whose origins are of old, from the days of eternity.
No, i am not merely talking about him 'coming down as a man' to refer to him as the 'servant'. The SON, the Eternal Logos is the servant of God the Father.
Jesus specifically said
John 5
Very truly I tell you, the Son can do nothing by himself; he can do only what he sees his Father doing,
Matthew 24
"However, no one knows the day or hour when these things will happen, not even the angels in heaven or the Son himself. Only the Father knows
Furthermore this contradicts the idea that Jesus is fully God in the flesh, since he doesnt know when the last hour is, or cannot do anything except by the Father.
It also, especially contradicts the Trinitarian doctrine that says Jesus/the Son is 'co equal' in Godhead with the Father and holy spirit.
The key to understand all of this, it to realise that God is both Trancendent and Immanent.
He is Immanent in the Son...
the Son is not the Trancendent Father..
The Son is more like the vehicle through which the Transcendent God makes Himself known.
@Thunderian
It's absolutely the crucifixion and resurrection that matters. Without those, what is the testimony of Jesus Christ? He was a good guy? He was a prophet? So what?
John, the scribe of Revelation, also wrote the book of John, which affirms that Jesus is God. John was a witness to the life, death and resurrection of Jesus. That is the testimony of Jesus Christ.
Are you even christian? the most important testimony is that Jesus is the Word of God and the messiah. The crucifixion can only carry weight with the other 2.
John 1
I have seen and I testify that this is God’s Chosen One.”
1 John 4:2
This is how you can recognize the Spirit of God: Every spirit that acknowledges that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is from God,
He was a good guy? He was a prophet? So what?
the Quran says Jesus is the Word of Allah and the 'Masih'/messiah...and also a 'sign of the Last Hour'.
Islam is diverse and open to interpretation esp on this matter. The verse 4:157 has at least 3 diff interpretations, but i know the measure of my own interpretation vs those. I believe the crucifixion happened and believe the verse was addressing the sadducee perspective. your ave muslim who has an opinion on this verse doesnt even know what sadducee is. It's largely because of Ahmad Deedat and later Zakir Naik's style of dawah that the other 'non-crucifixion' opinions became popular.
check this
https://abuaminaelias.com/was-jesus-christ-really-crucified-or-someone-else/
he presents yet another view.....
My understanding of the crucifixon goes like this
-we have carnal attachments that binds our soul to the mortal/physical world. When the world dies from our reality, then our soul experiences death too...and it suffers according to the extent of it's attachments to earth. This is death, coming from our sinful/flesh nature.
-Those who kill their carnal attachments cannot experience death./ Their body may appear to die, but they are living, their souls are free.
"i am in you and you are in me" relates to the concept of Gnosis (NOT gnosticism)...ie it means that your heart reflects his heart and hence you 'know' him (gnosis means knowledge)...you become 'one' ie branches in the tree. So in this context, when he died on the cross, you also die with him. he put his carnal attachments to the world, to death...ie total submission to the will of God...no personal/carnal resistance. IF you are in him ie if he is reflected in your heart through the bond of Love...then his metaphysical 'state' will also reflect in you. So you also experience being 'born again' and 'dying to the flesh'
THIS is where the crucifixion/resurrection becomes most relevant.
I do not regard anyone as 'saved' if they merely confess some words with the tongue about Jesus..because saved the christian way means you absolutely MUST be onewith Jesus and dead in the flesh.
are you? hell no you're not..so that means Jesus is not 'fully' in you.
The most important issue here is, in Rev 12 it's the way its worded
"rest of her children"
this has no context if the woman is christianity...but it does if the woman represents Israel and the 'rest of children' are the lost tribes who happen to be muslim.
As things stand, it fits perfectly when you realise the pasthun (like taliban) are from the lost tribes of israel...
like someone once told me, "if you want to know who is on haqq/truth...just look at who the elite are targetting"
it's rather funny too that
1260 days as years is derived from the bible as you know. Ie if muslims are 'right with God' then Jerusalem is 'ours'
but when we are sinful it isnt ours.
So it is natural for me to observe the time/years muslims had jerusalem, it came to 1258 off my calculations.That is no coincidence.
Revelation 11 also tells us the gentiles would trample there for 1260 days.
The place where Jesus was baptized and received the Spirit wasn't in the desert. It was at a well-known ford in the Jordan river, near a suburb of Jerusalem called Bethany, and nowhere near the desert.
That's a diff Bethany. This one was bethany beyond the Jordan and is part of the wilderness.
https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1446/
The wilderness here obv isnt the same as the one in the story of Hagar or the exodus. I'm using it as an example of how a wilderness is associated with death yet there are also positive themes connected to the wilderness(es).
Even if we ticked this one off, it doesnt disregard the overall argument ie the wilderness in Rev 12 is a shelter for the woman and her offspring.
When it states
"the serpent went after her OTHER CHILDREN" then at that point you realise it's def a reference to the lost tribes. It is these 'other children' who it says hold the testimony of Jesus and follow the commandments.
I can see for example that islam is being attacked by the colonial west. I can see how the pashtun people who are one part of the lost tribes...are being bombed under this hoax concept 'terrorism' (whilst israel funds al qaeeda/al nusra front, wicked stuff).
You asked me if I think the wilderness in 12 and 17 are the same.
The wilderness in 17 is babylon..
Jeremiah 50
She will be the least of the nations—
a wilderness, a dry land, a desert.
In Zechariah 5, the 'woman' (the same one in Rev 17) is on the basket..and it says
11 He replied, “To the country of Babylonia to build a house for it. When the house is ready, the basket will be set there in its place.”
The woman is also diff to the one in Rev 12
Thw woman in Rev 12 is the true israel, the remnant.
the whore of babylon as the false jewish nation..keeping in mind both israel and judea were described as adulteresses in Jeremiah.
the 'women' represent the shadow archetype, the Anima
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anima_and_animus
Also, im not claiming the woman is islam, but that the wilderness is linked to islam.
the 1260 days of shelter in the wilderness..is about judaism being saved by the arrival of islam.
The dragon attacking the woman was fulfilled by christians/romans/byzantines..it happened that the jews sought refuge in muslim lands..
of course that period is over.