I called Q a psyop right out of the gate. I am very familiar with crisis actors, setups., etc. Remember when You Tube had all those videos from France during a real psyop where Muslims were to blame? I could spin a good case for a psyop if I did not have some real info on this incident. There are some flags there but not overreacting and digging deeper clears some of it up. The original cam is dumbfounding on many fronts. You can make a case the cop originally from Cali is an actor and he has an interesting tat on his hand but he is just a bad inexperienced cop and young enough to have tats.. What the Jesuits or whomever you fill this blank in can do here is take a situation and manipulate it to their liking. That is plausible but they would have had to plan this from her birth if it is all fake.
There is a trail out there on her but not so much on him for he seemingly had his life tied to hers in that he was living through her. She was probably going to drop him and he dropped her. Numbness asked where is the body? This is not Jeffrey Epstein, LOL. But it is in autopsy. I have no doubt people are using this situation for their benefit even the I see trannies everywhere club. The MSM is sure giving it a spin per the old thing if she was not white this would not be a big deal. To some degree, they are right, but this fit like a movie as has been mentioned and it drives ratings when they are dead from the constant divide commentary.
I explained to Polly, I had deep dived this elsewhere, just so happen to know a person involved which is how I found out. I did get his age wrong, he is 55 now. I wish I could share more but really cannot. Imagine my surprise I knew someone investigating this. But I am open to seeing what people say but burned out on this to get too involved for so much else is going on. The talk in the coming weeks will be about how it was mishandled in Utah and could have been prevented. What could come out of that are stricter restrictions? Some would say for the betterment of things while it could be less freedom. I do worry about them using this to develop a system on domestic violence that pushes into personal freedoms but have not fleshed it out.
One last thing, this in no way fits the scope of psyop if it were one as 9-11 or Sandy Hook. This, again, would be small potatoes and I do not know of anyone who is really distracted by this. Yeah, it is all over the news now and I was on this before it happened but it is not taking my attention off the border, vaccines, etc, etc.
Although I try and avoid these stories as I said in the post above I lean the other way on this, but you've asked valid questions, not only about this but the way that we assess claims in a more general sense. I don't have a smoking gun piece of evidence to post, indeed if I did I'd think twice before doing so, but although I am acting primarily on supposition, I'll try and give you an idea of my thought process. In advance it's worth again saying that if this is indeed true, then it's a terrible tragedy for those concerned and I don't wish to give offence by speculating in this manner.
Firstly, I agree that, if fake, simply labelling it a distraction an unsupported claim. If any of these events are fake then I don't think simple distraction is a sufficient motive in any case. Why go to this effort when you could engineer a fake crisis with a celebrity or sports star with far less risk or expense?
As to motives, it could be used to drive changes in legislation, that's one possibility. There could be an element of behaviour modification or social engineering. It could be one chapter in a much longer project, perhaps connecting with the work they are conducting on pushing racial tension, or attacking 'toxic masculinity' etc. It doesn't in itself have to lead to a new law on gun control etc. to still contribute to a win on that question at a later date. I believe the narrative controllers measure their work over decades, even centuries. They don't need instant results.
The race line is one the media is now pushing. A similar line (media giving more attention to white than minority victims) is being aired in the UK just now following the death of
Sabine Nesser, with comparisons made to the coverage of Sarah Everard. Now I believe the latter was probably a false flag, based on media coverage, dates, the ritual nature of the post death vigils, names, numerology etc etc. I haven't checked the former and as far as I know its completely genuine. It serves the narrative either way.
Another speculative thought on motivation is that this is a trap. There's sufficient triggers embedded in the names, videos, images etc to have people in the truth community be suspicious, which would then help to discredit them in the eyes of the mainstream:
"Brian Laundrie? Brain = Brain, Laundrie = Laundry = Wash. BRAINWASH" was among some of the false claims being pushed by supporters of the radical movement.
www.newsweek.com
The explanation which I have found myself increasingly believing however is the most outlandish of the lot, I think many of these incidents are rituals. They are planned to coincide with particular points in the calendar, the events are synchronised with the alignments of certain stars and planets, the names are chosen or manipulated to carry meanings both via allusions to mythic tales and via gematria numerology. If you research a case like Madelaine Mcann in the UK or the death of Princess Diana, then there's a wealth of evidence you can find to support this theory, although of course there's a counter argument that if you look hard enough for something to support a particular line of thinking the human brain will supply it. Apophenia is always a risk in this world of deception.
I think some items on the news may well be planned out, months, years, even longer in advance. You say that they would need to have this person waiting since birth, I believe they do have this. Monarch/MK Ultra using connected families that are willing to sacrifice one of their offspring to gain favour for the rest. Again, not all, not everyone involved, but some.
As for the trans agenda. I've no idea if this is involved. I do think it gets too quickly thrown around and people should be careful before making those, or any allegations, but I also believe there's good evidence that it's a lot more widespread than most of us realise.
I've posted about it before, there are reasons behind it if you look, mostly rooted in ancient pagan practice and belief.
In closing, I don't think there's anything wrong with maintaining scepticism and being vigilant against making too many assumptions. However we all see 'through a glass darkly' here, simply because we're all off the reservation to some extent and when you're digging through rabbit holes you are likely to be deceived at one point or another.
At some points without definitive proof, supposition is all we have. So we need to share our thoughts with each other, correct and be corrected by each other when appropriate and hopefully find ways to move beyond simply just pointing out things to working on solutions and strategies to make this confused world a better place.
