@A Freeman
you are contradicting yourself to try and make this 5G theory work
On the one hand you claim deaths in South Korea are so low because they only have 5 million subscribers, yet You dont need to subscribe to 5G to get radiation, you can be in the vicinity of towers or somebody else who has 5G
and anyways, Why aren't those 5 million subscribers dying ? So if its "only" 5 million subscribers, they are somehow protected from the deadly effects of 5G ? what you said makes no sense.
First, you created a strawman argument claiming 5G isn't the "main cause" (which was never said or implied) and now you're trying to refute a logical, plausible answer to your question without thinking it through based on another strawman argument you've made up: that S. Korea hasn't suffered a comparable number of coronavirus cases which, in your mind, means 5G can't be a contributing factor to the thousands of cases they have there,
IF we are to believe their numbers (or any of these case and death toll numbers) at all.
That's simply a deduction that cannot
logically be made based upon the available evidence.
So do you mind telling me how many subscribers Iran has ?
The answer I believe is ZERO.
If they have been testing 5G since September 2017, and currently have 70,000,000 broadband customers, and finished their preparations for 5G at almost the exact time they started reporting coronavirus cases (mid-February 2020), then your estimate is probably a bit low.
I agree 5G is bad, but the disinformation this crowd is pushing is that there is nothing else going on but 5G and I believe that to be disinfo. I dont believe 5G is what is causing these deaths. The evidence and facts do not support it.
Every time you make a statement that you cannot back up with any evidence
YOU become the disinformation crowd. Labeling anyone who has noticed the
obvious connections between 5G and the coronavirus, both in geographic locations as well as their identical symptoms, is yet another logical fallacy.