Aisha's age at the time of her marriage

[TempestOfTempo]

I was judged in South Africa for hitting my partner and she never came defend her police statement.

She ran away discreetly, pretending to have forgiven me while I was unaware that she was leaving.

I was restrained for 40 days and was let out on promise not to repeat it ever again. First time ever in a police cell, and a week or so after, in a prison cell, for the remaining 33 days.

I was arrested on my birthday in 2020 on the highway, around midnight maybe, while I was stranded and homeless and walking back to where we were staying. I too had left the Wendy house 2 days after her desertion.

Funny thing in court, my lawyer was addressing the white judge as "Your Worship", and I stuck to "Your Honor" the whole time, Alhamdulillāh.

Wheres Haich or whatever its name is? Because yall straight up accused me of being a wife beater (total lie) in retaliation for my speaking the truth on this topic... yet here your own clique of cowards who promotes child r*pe are exposing yourselves as being spouse abusers. Disgusting, but revealing.

 

[TempestOfTempo]

Reality is if we go back only a 100 years we see "child marriage" was not only extremely common. It was literally the norm.

Globally.

View attachment 98469

View attachment 98470


Even in the "Christian" west.

View attachment 98468



The Bible itself is full of child marriage and if/when I get time I’m happy to dive into it. For example, Rebecca who was only 3 years old with Issac comes to mind. Also Mary, the mother of Jesus, was 12 while Joseph was in his 80's.

Call it fan fiction if you want. Many people put their fingers into their ears when something distasteful arrives.



There is a very big difference between fornication and marriage. In one scenario, she is considered a WIFE. In this case with Aisha, she stayed with the prophet until he died, it wasn't a 1 night stand.

Notice how no one mentions Kadeejah who was also the Prophet's (saw) wife, and she was 15 years older than him.


I haven't read a post by Tempo in well over a year because he's a vile person. So I have no desire to bump his thread. It is nothing more than troll bait.

But I assumed you to be better than the rest. Not saying that you're not, but know this is one of the proverbial dead horses on VC. It has been debated to death. While the reality is, you can't go back 3 or 4 generations without finding it in your own family tree. I can guarantee at some point, you yourself are a product of child marriage and that goes for everyone here.



Mentioning the age of Aisha is nothing more than a way to attack the prophet of Islam. Even though the practice was common amongst your own grandparents, let alone 1400 years ago.

Notice how millions have hated Islam the past millennia and Aisha's age was never brought up. Why do you think that is?
Because only in the liberal modern age has it become an issue. They say people are not an adult till 18. I say I know people who are 30 whom I don't consider to be adults.


There is a reason God gave women the ability to start a family at a young age. The concept of 18+ isn't even 100 years old. Truth be told it drives fornication because it demands celibacy for 6, 7 years with overwhelming hormones.

Honest question. When you show constant filth (and I do mean constant) from tv shows at prime time to advertisements everywhere. Then you push off marriage as late as possible... what do you think the results are? Especially today, where 7 and 8-year-olds can easily access porn. But have to wait until they are 18?

The answer is obvious. 50% of American kids today not knowing who their own dad is for starters. 65 million abortions in just the last 50 years is another result. This is literally 20% of our nation today.

There is nothing wrong with early marriage, especially when we consider the opposite of it.


Society today is all about destroying the family unit. I would think you, of all people, are aware of this.

View attachment 98471


Take the last word, I will not reply because I have zero desire to keep this thread on top.

"Other people were committing child sex abuse years ago, so our continued child abuse is justified!"

How about this doozy: "While the reality is, you can't go back 3 or 4 generations without finding it in your own family tree."
Speak for yourself inbred child abuser.

"Mentioning the age of Aisha is nothing more than a way to attack the prophet of Islam. Even though the practice was common amongst your own grandparents"
No Grandparents I know were marrying girls at six and having sex with them before they were even teenagers. This is just pure sexual fantasy from people who want to justify the filth they engage in. They have ZERO proof Muhammed did this.

"There is a reason God gave women the ability to start a family at a young age. The concept of 18+ isn't even 100 years old. Truth be told it drives fornication because it demands celibacy for 6, 7 years with overwhelming hormones."
You just formally exposed yourself as a pedo... what the hell are you still doing on this site?

"50% of American kids today not knowing who their own dad is for starters."
More complete fantasy. You hate kids, we get it.

"Im defending the morality of the family unit... by suggesting that females should become wives at 6."
You Goddamn pathetic pervert.

 

[irrationalNinja]

Notice how no one mentions Kadeejah who was also the Prophet's (saw) wife, and she was 15 years older than him.

Wasn’t Kadeejah raised in a Catholic convent?

And, coming from a rich family, spent all of her wealth on making Mohammed, Mohammed?

 

[TempestOfTempo]

Wasn’t Kadeejah raised in a Catholic convent?

And, coming from a rich family, spent all of her wealth on making Mohammed, Mohammed?

I didnt find any serious evidence of Kadeejah being associated with convents or the Catholic church. Apparently much of that angle comes from the Chick Publications series of Christian literature. They are not a reliable source regarding this matter.

As far as her supporting Muhammed, thats true but it was her decision. She saw a pious man struggling hard to bring monotheistic order to the area and she supported his efforts financially, but he also worked both for her and others... so it wasnt like he was living off a sugar Mama, it was two spouses working together and supporting each other in matrimonial harmony. It is interesting that they would refernce the age-gap between the two as if a 15 year difference between grown adults were some sort of counter or excuse for this horrific hadeeth scam/scandal which has resulted in so much sin and misery.

 

[AspiringSoul]

You and the rest of your born-and-bred brethren should be the parties treading carefully, as these people and their institutions are drenched in shirk. There is Islam the religion (which Muslims are supposed to follow) which is essentially unrecognizable at this point thanks to deviations/innovations from born-and-bred "Muslims"... and there is the state of Islam, which ANYONE can find. Humans dont need the religion of Islam to attain a state of Islam... the deen of Islam is supposed to provide the straightest path and inside track to Islam as a state, but its not required to attain a state of Islam.

"That said, very very few muslims would ever be engaged in child trafficking, r*pe and murder."
This is just a complete falsehood. Its an epidemic, and it also leads to things like grooming gangs.

"however you certainly arent the one to talk about authentic islam."
Why not? What are you people so afraid of?

" as these people and their institutions are drenched in shirk"
this is a clear cut accusation of kufr and thus you are saying 'they are not muslims'

the accusation of innovation is laughable..because the prophet SAW said islam, unlike christianity, would not lose it's way through bidah.

those who accuse others of bidah are just dumb cunts.
bidah applies to alterations made to divinely prescribed lines and obligations.
For example the wobblers in saudi accuse other muslims of 'bidah and kufr' on the basis that 'da profit didnt doo dis himself'.
eg if something is specifically halal (eg the rememberance of Allah eg dhkr of sufis) and nor is it pushed as a divinely prescribed obligation like the 5 pillars, then it is perfectly good. Yet they will say 'the prophet didnt do it, therefore it is bidah'.
whereas to me, a bidah would be for example if someone said 'no we can have female imams', that is a direct alteration of specific rules that are unquestionable.

you can disagree with muslims, but your accusations of kufr and shirk are fucking lunacy.
you are not the saviour of islam. nor is your knowledge and intent better than mine. yet you think im a kafir and an innovator like the majority.

 

[TempestOfTempo]

First off, just like the rest of your subhuman inbred ilk, you have no impulse control. You cant communicate without vulgar insults, changing goalposts and outright falsehoods.

Second, Im not the party who has made an entire movement out of elevating Muhammed over the Creator and hadeeth over Quran. Example: these people will say, in Friday sermons (and MANY reverts have heard this in MANY mosques) that Muhammed was "perfect" yet when they are called out on it, all they offer is justification. When pressed further for an actual explanation we hear nonsense such as "Well, there is a special Arabic word for prophets which means "perfect"... but not really perfect!" Huh? Thats the best yall can do? If thats how lightly yall take Islam and you dont mind the shirk... by all means carry on. But dont expect people to continue affording you the respect earned by the pious when your actions are foul and forbidden and your excuses are saturated in shirk.

Let me make this clear to those who are new Muslims or not Muslims but interested in exploring this situation... The reason these people have elevated hadeeth or Quranic scripture and Muhammed over the Creator is because their primary goal in life is to attempt to satisfy their most base desires, constantly. Whatever impulse flashes through their compromised brains... thats what they put their effort into. Most of their desires are completely forbidden in Islam, so what better way to justify their forbidden (haram) desires than declare that its actually permissible/advised?

"you are not the saviour of islam. nor is your knowledge and intent better than mine."
I never claimed to be a "saviour of Islam" you just attempted to assign to me as a false narrative. Your knowledge is meaningless if you cant apply it in reality and your insecurity reeks through the screen.

 

[Zakat]

Hope this helps clear things out.

 

[TempestOfTempo]

Hope this helps clear things out.

This has nothing to do with the topic. More distraction attempts from those wishing to normalize/promote their heretical epidemic of child trafficking/r*pe/murder.

 

[Zakat]

This is Aishas own words on the subject. One would think that she would know...........Narrated ‘Aishah that the Prophet wrote the marriage contract with her when she was six years old and he consummated his marriage when she was nine years old, and then she remained with him for nine years (i.e. till his death).”[1]
“The Messenger of God came to our house and men and women of the Ansar gathered around him. My mother came to me [Aisha] while I was being swung on a swing between two branches and got me down. Jumaymah, my nurse, took over and wiped my face with some water and started leading me. When I was at the door, she stopped so I could catch my breath. I was then brought [in] while the Messenger of God was sitting on a bed in our house. [My mother] made me sit on his lap and said, “These are your relatives. May God bless you with them and bless them with you!” Then the men and women got up and left. The Messenger of God consummated his marriage with me in my house when I was nine years old.”[2]

I think the fact that three years separate the consummation of the marriage and the actual marriage ceremony speaks for itself.

 

[TempestOfTempo]

I think the fact that three years separate the consummation of the marriage and the actual marriage ceremony speaks for itself.

You are still here campaigning for the acceptance of grown men and women trafficking children not even aged into double digits into a life (and death) of sexual servitude, physical labor and outright r*pe resulting in child birth (many times at the expense of the young "Mothers" life)... you are still promoting this lie against Muhammed. On the Day of Judgement, how will you and the rest of your crowd here answer for this? What will be your excuse? What do you have to say to the millions of children whos lives have been devastated by your promotion and action regarding this? How will you square this with victims of the grooming gangs, which are a clear derivative phenomenon of yalls open p***philia promotion?

 

[TempestOfTempo]

Its pretty clear that this site's fake-Muslim/pedo-promotion squad continues to bump their own garbage threads or invent pointless new ones in order to attempt domination over the threads/push ones they find problematic or which expose them towards the back. Take a look at how many lame discussion threads Desert Rat and Zuckit alone have initiated on the first two pages for yourselves.

 

[A Freeman]

Until it is correctly understood that the self-contradictory and unscriptural documents referred to today as the "hadith" and "sunnah" were TOTALLY FABRICATED hundreds of years after the alleged lifetime of Muhammad, these ridiculous arguments will continue to rave on.

The hadith -- which reportedly contains over 100x the number of verses that the Quran does -- has been proven beyond any reasonable doubt to be a complete forgery, as it not only contradicts itself, but routinely contradicts the Quran.

The Quran itself repeatedly warns its readers NOT to fall for the hadith, which means "the traditions of the fathers". A few examples below:

Sura 5:4. Forbidden to you (for food) are: dead meat (Lev. 22:8, Deut. 14:21), blood (Lev. 3:17, Lev. 17:10-11), the flesh of swine (Deut. 14:8), and that on which hath been invoked the name of other than "I AM" (Num. 25:1-3); that which hath been killed by strangling, or by a violent blow, or by a headlong fall, or by being gored to death; that which hath been (partly) eaten by a wild animal (Lev. 22:8); unless ye are able to slaughter it (in due form) that which is sacrificed on stone (altars); (forbidden) also is the division (of meat) by raffling with arrows: that is impiety. This day have those who reject Faith given up all hope of your religion: yet fear them not, but fear Me (Matt. 10:28). THIS DAY* I have perfected your religion for you, completed My favour upon you, and have chosen for YOU, submission to My will, as your religion (Matt. 6:9-13). But if any is forced by hunger, with no inclination to transgression, "I AM" (Allah) is indeed Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.

*This leaves absolutely NO wiggle room for men to fabricate additional sayings allegedly attributed to Muhammad AFTER the Koran, like Muhammad al-Bukhari “compiled” over 200 years after the alleged death of Muhammad.

Sura 2:170. When it is said to them: "Follow what God hath revealed:" they say: "Nay! we shall follow the ways of our fathers." What! even though their fathers were void of Wisdom and Guidance?

Sura 5:107. When it is said to them: "Come to what "I AM" (Allah) hath revealed; come to the Messenger": they say: "Enough for us are the ways we found our fathers following." What! even though their fathers were void of Knowledge and Guidance?

The Quran also repeatedly tells us that the TRUE Sunnah is found in the Bible, in The Law and in the Gospel of Jesus, THE Example to follow that is superior to ALL others (Sura 3:55).

See: Sura 2:53, 2:87-93, Sura 2:97-98, 3:1-3, 3:48-50, 4:47, 4:54, 5:46-51, 6:91-94, 6:154-157, 7:157, 9:111, 10:37, 11:17, 12:111, 15:9-10, 17:2-4, 21:48, 22:52, 23:20, 23:49, 25:35, 28:1-3, 32:23, 35:25-32, 37:117, 40:53, 40:70, 41:45, 42:14-17, 45:16, 46:12, 46:30, 48:29, 53:36-47, 57:25-29,61:6-7, 78:2

 

[A Freeman]

Sura 3:55. Behold! God said: "O Jesus! I will take thee and raise thee to Myself and clear thee (of the falsehoods) of those who blaspheme; I will make those who follow thee SUPERIOR to those who reject faith, to The Day of Resurrection: then shall ye all return unto Me, and I will judge between you of the matters wherein ye dispute.

And what did Christ-Jesus say about the treatment of children?

And Jesus called a little child unto him, and set him in the midst of them, and said, Verily I say unto you, Except ye be converted, and [then] become as little children, ye shall NOT enter into The Kingdom of heaven. Whosoever therefore shall humble himself as this little child, the same is greatest in The Kingdom of heaven. And whoso shall receive one such little child in my name receiveth me.

But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and [that] he were drowned in the depth of the sea.

-- the Gospel of Jesus, as recorded by Matthew in chapter 18, verses 1-6

 

[A Freeman]

Sura 61:6-7
61:6. And remember, Jesus, the son of Mary, said: "O Children of Israel! I am the Apostle of "I AM" (sent) to you, CONFIRMING The Law (which came) before me (the Torah), and giving Glad Tidings of a Messenger to come after me, whose name shall be the Comforter (John 16:7-15)." But when he came to them with Clear Signs, they said, "this is evident sorcery!"
61:7. Who doth greater wrong than one who invents falsehood against "I AM" (Allah), even as he is being invited to do His Will? And "I AM" guides not those who do wrong (Satan does).

For all TRUE believers, please read and DO as the Quran COMMANDS us to do, which is to read, study and follow God's Law and The Example that His Messenger and Anointed One (Christ) set.

That, and that alone would END all of the crimes against children in this generation and in future generations, including the merchandising, trafficking, molestation and sexual assault of children. These are capital crimes, regardless of how society today has rebranded them in the name of the unlawful legislation and traditions of the fathers that the corporate fictional governments and the corporate fictional organized religions use to lead us to our destruction (also, exactly as we have been warned for thousands of years - Isaiah 3:12).

 

[TempestOfTempo]

Until it is correctly understood that the self-contradictory and unscriptural documents referred to today as the "hadith" and "sunnah" were TOTALLY FABRICATED hundreds of years after the alleged lifetime of Muhammad, these ridiculous arguments will continue to rave on.

The hadith -- which reportedly contains over 100x the number of verses that the Quran does -- has been proven beyond any reasonable doubt to be a complete forgery, as it not only contradicts itself, but routinely contradicts the Quran.

The Quran itself repeatedly warns its readers NOT to fall for the hadith, which means "the traditions of the fathers". A few examples below:

Sura 5:4. Forbidden to you (for food) are: dead meat (Lev. 22:8, Deut. 14:21), blood (Lev. 3:17, Lev. 17:10-11), the flesh of swine (Deut. 14:8), and that on which hath been invoked the name of other than "I AM" (Num. 25:1-3); that which hath been killed by strangling, or by a violent blow, or by a headlong fall, or by being gored to death; that which hath been (partly) eaten by a wild animal (Lev. 22:8); unless ye are able to slaughter it (in due form) that which is sacrificed on stone (altars); (forbidden) also is the division (of meat) by raffling with arrows: that is impiety. This day have those who reject Faith given up all hope of your religion: yet fear them not, but fear Me (Matt. 10:28). THIS DAY* I have perfected your religion for you, completed My favour upon you, and have chosen for YOU, submission to My will, as your religion (Matt. 6:9-13). But if any is forced by hunger, with no inclination to transgression, "I AM" (Allah) is indeed Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.

*This leaves absolutely NO wiggle room for men to fabricate additional sayings allegedly attributed to Muhammad AFTER the Koran, like Muhammad al-Bukhari “compiled” over 200 years after the alleged death of Muhammad.

Sura 2:170. When it is said to them: "Follow what God hath revealed:" they say: "Nay! we shall follow the ways of our fathers." What! even though their fathers were void of Wisdom and Guidance?

Sura 5:107. When it is said to them: "Come to what "I AM" (Allah) hath revealed; come to the Messenger": they say: "Enough for us are the ways we found our fathers following." What! even though their fathers were void of Knowledge and Guidance?

The Quran also repeatedly tells us that the TRUE Sunnah is found in the Bible, in The Law and in the Gospel of Jesus, THE Example to follow that is superior to ALL others (Sura 3:55).

See: Sura 2:53, 2:87-93, Sura 2:97-98, 3:1-3, 3:48-50, 4:47, 4:54, 5:46-51, 6:91-94, 6:154-157, 7:157, 9:111, 10:37, 11:17, 12:111, 15:9-10, 17:2-4, 21:48, 22:52, 23:20, 23:49, 25:35, 28:1-3, 32:23, 35:25-32, 37:117, 40:53, 40:70, 41:45, 42:14-17, 45:16, 46:12, 46:30, 48:29, 53:36-47, 57:25-29,61:6-7, 78:2

Yet when clear evidence is presented to them regarding the very same behavior they are willfully engaged in... they swear that any/everyone else, "Muslim" or not, is who those revelations are referring to. They refuse even basic self-reflection and accountability.

Consider this, children who are sex-trafficked by the usual means of exploitation at least have some sort of chance for escape. They have multiple abusers and traffickers, but as horrible and wrong as all of that is there are still breaks and openings for the child to become free. Thats why many people are trying to rescue them and are at war with the traffickers.

But for the Muslim female victims here, there is almost zero chance of escape. Because their trafficker now fully owns her, controls her and has a support system of accomplices willing to enforce the "Islamic justified" abuse. Should the child make it through that abuse, should she survive the early pregnancies and motherhood, should she survive everything else that comes with this very often we see... once shes deemed old or unattractive, once she can deliver no more kids, or for whatever reason her "husband" decides... shes kicked to the curb. Re-entering into society with no formal education and after, often, being intentionally kept illiterate. She has no real world skills to survive on and is also often saddled with any of her children the father doesnt want around. Where can she go? Where can she take the kids? We already know, because there are millions of answers to this question throughout the "Muslim" world... she becomes another homeless beggar on the street, while her former "husband" gets to start his process of child trafficking/r*pe masquerading as matrimony all over again.

 

[sugarprincessxox]

Reality is if we go back only a 100 years we see "child marriage" was not only extremely common. It was literally the norm.

Globally.

View attachment 98469

View attachment 98470


Even in the "Christian" west.

View attachment 98468



The Bible itself is full of child marriage and if/when I get time I’m happy to dive into it. For example, Rebecca who was only 3 years old with Issac comes to mind. Also Mary, the mother of Jesus, was 12 while Joseph was in his 80's.

Call it fan fiction if you want. Many people put their fingers into their ears when something distasteful arrives.



There is a very big difference between fornication and marriage. In one scenario, she is considered a WIFE. In this case with Aisha, she stayed with the prophet until he died, it wasn't a 1 night stand.

Notice how no one mentions Kadeejah who was also the Prophet's (saw) wife, and she was 15 years older than him.


I haven't read a post by Tempo in well over a year because he's a vile person. So I have no desire to bump his thread. It is nothing more than troll bait.

But I assumed you to be better than the rest. Not saying that you're not, but know this is one of the proverbial dead horses on VC. It has been debated to death. While the reality is, you can't go back 3 or 4 generations without finding it in your own family tree. I can guarantee at some point, you yourself are a product of child marriage and that goes for everyone here.



Mentioning the age of Aisha is nothing more than a way to attack the prophet of Islam. Even though the practice was common amongst your own grandparents, let alone 1400 years ago.

Notice how millions have hated Islam the past millennia and Aisha's age was never brought up. Why do you think that is?
Because only in the liberal modern age has it become an issue. They say people are not an adult till 18. I say I know people who are 30 whom I don't consider to be adults.


There is a reason God gave women the ability to start a family at a young age. The concept of 18+ isn't even 100 years old. Truth be told it drives fornication because it demands celibacy for 6, 7 years with overwhelming hormones.

Honest question. When you show constant filth (and I do mean constant) from tv shows at prime time to advertisements everywhere. Then you push off marriage as late as possible... what do you think the results are? Especially today, where 7 and 8-year-olds can easily access porn. But have to wait until they are 18?

The answer is obvious. 50% of American kids today not knowing who their own dad is for starters. 65 million abortions in just the last 50 years is another result. This is literally 20% of our nation today.

There is nothing wrong with early marriage, especially when we consider the opposite of it.


Society today is all about destroying the family unit. I would think you, of all people, are aware of this.

View attachment 98471


Take the last word, I will not reply because I have zero desire to keep this thread on top.

Yeah child marriage is still fucked up. They're pedophiles

 

[Daze]

Yeah child marriage is still fucked up. They're pedophiles

Your line of thinking is merely proof of how far humanity has drifted from a family mind set, to fornication.

For instance, you more than likely think a 14, 16-year-old boy married to a 10, 12-year-old girl is p***philia. But you probably have no problems with a 17, 18-year-old boy fornicating with a 16, 17 yr old girl. Even if you did, I'm sure you'd be a-ok with an 18 yr old girl fornicating with a 19-year-old boy because there's something "magical" about 18, isn't there?

There is only one difference in the 2 scenarios mentioned. 1, the couple is married. The other is they are fornicating.
Which one has God ordained? Why did God give girls and boys the ability to have families at young ages? Do you think God intended you to deal with overwhelming hormonal urges for 8-10 years and have no outlet?

I'm sure sex before marriage probably means nothing to your generation. After all, high body counts for women is normal today. But I'm from a generation where it was forbidden. Today, they all give the milk away for free in the west, and this is simple facts. Hell, if a girl invites you over on a first date to watch Netflix, odds of sex are like 90%. Because modern western women have accepted the only way they can get a man is if they spread their legs.

They tell themselves marriage comes later… But tell that to all the single women in their late 30's and 40's with no hopes of ever having a traditional family. No man in his right mind wants a woman with a high body count to be his wife, while the vast majority of women don't want a husband before 30. Because yay feminism!


Look, society at large is indoctrinated to push marriage off as late as possible. However, you can sleep with all the guys you want, because there's nothing wrong with that. Hell, they are teaching sex ed to kindergartners over here. What is the purpose of this? Stop and think!

Yet you people still can't see the agenda? It's all about creating an immoral society because immoral people are easy to control. There's a reason porn is free and accessible for all ages. There is a reason Israel broadcast porn into Palestinian homes.

As long as there is no family unit, there is no protection.

Notice, NPR is a major news outlet.

 

[TempestOfTempo]

Your line of thinking is merely proof of how far humanity has drifted from a family mind set, to fornication.

For instance, you more than likely think a 14, 16-year-old boy married to a 10, 12-year-old girl is p***philia. But you probably have no problems with a 17, 18-year-old boy fornicating with a 16, 17 yr old girl. Even if you did, I'm sure you'd be a-ok with an 18 yr old girl fornicating with a 19-year-old boy because there's something "magical" about 18, isn't there?

There is only one difference in the 2 scenarios mentioned. 1, the couple is married. The other is they are fornicating.
Which one has God ordained? Why did God give girls and boys the ability to have families at young ages? Do you think God intended you to deal with overwhelming hormonal urges for 8-10 years and have no outlet?

I'm sure sex before marriage probably means nothing to your generation. After all, high body counts for women is normal today. But I'm from a generation where it was forbidden. Today, they all give the milk away for free in the west, and this is simple facts. Hell, if a girl invites you over on a first date to watch Netflix, odds of sex are like 90%. Because modern western women have accepted the only way they can get a man is if they spread their legs.

They tell themselves marriage comes later… But tell that to all the single women in their late 30's and 40's with no hopes of ever having a traditional family. No man in his right mind wants a woman with a high body count to be his wife, while the vast majority of women don't want a husband before 30. Because yay feminism!


Look, society at large is indoctrinated to push marriage off as late as possible. However, you can sleep with all the guys you want, because there's nothing wrong with that. Hell, they are teaching sex ed to kindergartners over here. What is the purpose of this? Stop and think!

Yet you people still can't see the agenda? It's all about creating an immoral society because immoral people are easy to control. There's a reason porn is free and accessible for all ages. There is a reason Israel broadcast porn into Palestinian homes.

As long as there is no family unit, there is no protection.

Notice, NPR is a major news outlet.

View attachment 98937

"Your line of thinking is merely proof of how far humanity has drifted from a family mind set, to fornication."
Translation: "Im horny and refuse to control my desires to the degree that unless myself and fellow grown, adult Muslim men are allowed/encouraged to marry and impregnate females before they are ten years old, we wont control our urges and might r*pe or fornicate out of wedlock... you guys are forcing us to r*pe and fornicate out of wedlock by not allowing our epidemic of child trafficking/r*pe/murder to be implemented.

"For instance, you more than likely think a 14, 16-year-old boy married to a 10, 12-year-old girl is p***philia. But you probably have no problems with a 17, 18-year-old boy fornicating with a 16, 17 yr old girl. Even if you did, I'm sure you'd be a-ok with an 18 yr old girl fornicating with a 19-year-old boy because there's something "magical" about 18, isn't there?"
Translation: "I realize that high school sweethearts can technicality be aged apart enough so that one may still be in school, the other graduated and they get married. Thats accepted in America so I will attempt to conflate such a phenomenon with grown men "marrying" sex slaves not yet aged 10 years old."

I could go on and on but its pretty clear that these people have run out of any rational-sounding excuses and are now just repeating/inventing their own sexual fantasies on order to attempt justifying that which has been clearly exposed here...

 

[TempestOfTempo]

Why does this fool calling himself zakat continue laughing about posts concerning child abuse?

 

[Zakat]