Journalist Ibrahim Al-Amin:
...The enemy is seeking to alter the geographical and demographic realities in more than one area. When the enemy speaks of a buffer zone in southern Lebanon, it is not referring to an area free of militants or weapons. Instead, it aims for an area devoid of any people. The objective is to eliminate any human presence that could serve as a cradle for any group that opposes and resists the occupation. In the current situation in Lebanon, where sectarian divisions govern many aspects of life, the enemy is thinking of ways to make the Shia community in Lebanon pay the price for their commitment to the cause of resistance, not merely for allowing some of their members to join Hezbollah.
“Israel" seeks to mold Lebanon in a way that suits its interests. When it decided to engage in the current confrontation, it no longer considered the opinions of Western powers, Arab countries, or other Lebanese factions. If there are those who wish to avoid destabilizing Lebanon, or the outbreak of civil wars and major economic crises, "israel" will not hesitate to allow these events to unfold if they serve its agenda. Today, we are witnessing significant cooperation between "israel" and the United States, as well as some Arab capitals, aimed at encouraging groups, forces, and communities of different sectarian backgrounds to carry out an uprising against what they have instilled in their minds as the "Hezbollah state." In such a scenario, "israel" will not hesitate to provide support to anyone willing to align with its program. It will entice them with a substantial reward, under terms like partitions, federalism, or other similar names.
“Israel" is aiming to escalate its criminal operations in order to exert various forms of pressure on Hezbollah. It will strike meaningless targets in certain areas with the intention of causing the public to reject the presence of displaced individuals in their midst. In this scenario, "israel" seeks to repeat what it has done in Gaza, where it created continuous, open-ended displacement between areas supposedly deemed "safe." "Israel" seeks a rotating displacement of the people of the south, the Bekaa, and the southern suburbs of Beirut, pushing a significant portion of them to first abandon Hezbollah, and then to leave Lebanon altogether. The enemy believes that to succeed in this endeavor, it must deliver lethal strikes against any Lebanese individual who supports the resistance, assists it in its stance or actions, or even offers it shelter. "Israel" is betting on the narrative that if it succeeds in striking Hezbollah, it will generate a significant wave of despair within Hezbollah's popular cradle, which in turn will pave the way for a decline in its influence on multiple fronts.
What has been mentioned are not mere speculations or a theoretical exercise. These are elements of a plan that the enemy has already begun to implement, leading to a clear conclusion: we are facing a different kind of battle, one that is certain to be harsher and more complex than the 2006 war.
It is true that people are asking what Hezbollah will do. It is also true that those observing the success of the enemy’s security operations in recent months are seeking answers or explanations. But more important than all of this is the fact that those who find themselves at the heart of this battle must be prepared for a war whose duration is unknown, and for the enormous costs that will need to be paid. As for what the resistance will do, all anyone can do is wait. For, as things imply, the resistance has not yet spoken its final word!