I like the way you think! Just the facts, forget the polemics.My aim here is to summarize all the passages you guys provide (for/against) rapture into this thread for anyone to read and come to their own conclusion. Good science
I've moved your post here for obvious reasons.The other day I was listening to a Christian talk show and the radio host made the point of bringing the listeners attention to how the Cross is used in so man TV and Hollywood movies. Now, we all know how much programming happens in those movies and how much is subliminal or under our conscious awareness. He has made it a point to observe for this phenomenon and this is what he has to say; whenever a cross is in obscure view in so many of these shows, there is often a negative moment occuring that elicits emotions of distrust and often very contradictory feelings. Without even knowing it the cross is being associated with these feelings.
Have you ever run across someone who just hates the cross and all that it stands for without even knowing why.
Be as wise as serpents, gentle as doves...unless of course a serpent is trying to punch you in the face
This is a christian movie correct?I've moved your post here for obvious reasons.
I've never heard that theory before and it's certainly an interesting one. So upon reading your post, i decided to rack my brain for any movie with a memorable scene with the cross in it to test your theory. So here's Nick Cage's 2014 "Left Behind" movie and what do you have to say about the theory you've fleshed out in this trailer...does it hold up?
View attachment 77526
I think the Hollywood version of “Left Behind” is very much a twist (and a dilution) or the original story. Just saying.I've moved your post here for obvious reasons.
I've never heard that theory before and it's certainly an interesting one. So upon reading your post, i decided to rack my brain for any movie with a memorable scene with the cross in it to test your theory. So here's Nick Cage's 2014 "Left Behind" movie and what do you have to say about the theory you've fleshed out in this trailer...does it hold up?
View attachment 77526
I don't think a christian themed movie would be the one to look at for what is aspoused about the cruxifixI think the Hollywood version of “Left Behind” is very much a twist (and a dilution) or the original story. Just saying.
I had a look at th and one of the comments really intrigued me….The Truth About 'Left Behind'
On October 3, 2014, another Left Behind movie was theatrically released. It’s actually the fourth film in the Left Behind series of movies and a reboot of the 2000 release called Left Behind: The Movie. The script is based on the bestselling book series by Tim LaHaye and Jerry B. Jenkins. All the films have received mostly negative reviews, had mediocre box office runs, and were criticized for low production quality.
While this version rose to prominence because it stars Academy Award winning actor, Nicolas Cage, it's also one of the worst-reviewed films of 2014 (Rotten Tomatoes rated it at 2%, and Metacritic gave it a score of 12 out of 100). Still, it's managed to gross $11 million worldwide. Is it because it’s another apocalyptic disaster film or is there still interest among many in the popular rapture theory?
Some are startled to discover the diverse views floating around about the end times. Jim Denison, who attended Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary, grew up accepting the "pre-tribulation rapture" presented in the film as fact, but he was surprised when he took a class in college on the book of Revelation. In a recent article, he shares:
“ … discovered that conservative biblical scholars have held at least seven different approaches to the end times. In addition to the rapture position (usually called ‘premillennial dispensational’), popular options today range from ‘preterist’ (the Book of Revelation was fulfilled in the first century, with no predictive elements) to ‘historic premillenialists’ (Jesus will return before the millennium, but there will be no rapture), to ‘amillennial’ (Revelation is intentionally symbolic, with no literal rapture or millennium), to ‘postmillennial’ (Jesus will return after the millennium).” [1]
Denison then writes, “Whether he raptures the church before (or during, or after) a Great Tribulation, or returns to begin the millennium, or simply returns to end history and begin eternity, is not the practical question. You and I have no say in the matter.” That’s exactly right.
But the next question should be, “Does God have a say in the matter?”
Instead of throwing up our hands when many disagree about the final events of earth’s history, perhaps it would be wiser to search the Scriptures and set aside the theories of people. Doctrinal confusion is no reason for ignoring or minimizing Bible truth.
Christ never taught that His coming would be two different events separated by seven years, with the antichrist supposedly coming into power during this tribulation period. The word “rapture” is not even found in the Bible. There is nothing secret about Jesus’ return. Scripture states that when Jesus comes there will be a resurrection and all the saints will meet Him in the air, all at the same time at the end of the world. Those left behind are destroyed by the brightness of His coming.
If you are counting on a second chance at salvation based on the rapture theory for yourself, family, or friends, you will want to rethink this view before saying, “Oh well, I guess it doesn’t really matter.” There are serious consequences to being left behind if you don’t study your Bible carefully!
Link.
I had a look at th and one of the comments really intrigued me….
“Since Christ did say "...the meek shall inherit the earth..." imagine those who think they are saved/ "called" by rapturing, when in fact those that are Left Behind, are the saved ones!?
I really hadn’t come across many Adventists till visiting this forum as I don’t believe it’s very prevalent in the UK. What does seem to be common in what I am hearing from the SDAs is that there will likely be an event interpreted by some as the Rapture, but this will be a deceptive event. The real, true Christians will be those “left behind” while [presumably] those who have given their itching ears to false teachers will be caught up. The notion that getting left behind is a good thing worries me (for them).
GOD's timing not ours and that sure sounds like a being caught up moment right there.How would you interpret Matthew 24:37-41
"37 As it was in the days of Noah, so it will be at the coming of the Son of Man. 38 For in the days before the flood, people were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, up to the day Noah entered the ark; 39 and they knew nothing about what would happen until the flood came and took them all away. That is how it will be at the coming of the Son of Man. 40 Two men will be in the field; one will be taken and the other left. 41 Two women will be grinding with a hand mill; one will be taken and the other left."
Now this is getting interesting! Which group of people is Jesus addressing in Matthew 24? The answer you give will have considerable bearing on your eschatology @StuckyHow would you interpret Matthew 24:37-41
"37 As it was in the days of Noah, so it will be at the coming of the Son of Man. 38 For in the days before the flood, people were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, up to the day Noah entered the ark; 39 and they knew nothing about what would happen until the flood came and took them all away. That is how it will be at the coming of the Son of Man. 40 Two men will be in the field; one will be taken and the other left. 41 Two women will be grinding with a hand mill; one will be taken and the other left."
I've actually never bothered to look into who funded the movie and why Hollywood would go to great lengths to toy with Christian eschatology. Granted, the Christian market is lucrative...they'll make money from the moviegoer...but a financial incentive cannot possibly be the only incentive to make the movie, right?This is a christian movie correct?
Iam yet to hear a Christian actor or the christian broadcasting networks that promote these films actually espouse the criticism you just levelled at them.I think the Hollywood version of “Left Behind” is very much a twist (and a dilution) or the original story. Just saying.
Yes, there is an older "Left behind" film with Kirk Cameron. I wanted to mention it to Red...that since he didn't like my original choice with Nick Cage, the older version, a "proper" Christian film with Christian actors (that was shown on all the Christian networks back in the day) would perhaps suffice? Anyway, i'll have to rewatch both of them to test the theory that @Jackfists mentioned.The Truth About 'Left Behind'
On October 3, 2014, another Left Behind movie was theatrically released. It’s actually the fourth film in the Left Behind series of movies and a reboot of the 2000 release called Left Behind: The Movie. The script is based on the bestselling book series by Tim LaHaye and Jerry B. Jenkins. All the films have received mostly negative reviews, had mediocre box office runs, and were criticized for low production quality.
While this version rose to prominence because it stars Academy Award winning actor, Nicolas Cage, it's also one of the worst-reviewed films of 2014 (Rotten Tomatoes rated it at 2%, and Metacritic gave it a score of 12 out of 100). Still, it's managed to gross $11 million worldwide. Is it because it’s another apocalyptic disaster film or is there still interest among many in the popular rapture theory?
Some are startled to discover the diverse views floating around about the end times. Jim Denison, who attended Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary, grew up accepting the "pre-tribulation rapture" presented in the film as fact, but he was surprised when he took a class in college on the book of Revelation. In a recent article, he shares:
“ … discovered that conservative biblical scholars have held at least seven different approaches to the end times. In addition to the rapture position (usually called ‘premillennial dispensational’), popular options today range from ‘preterist’ (the Book of Revelation was fulfilled in the first century, with no predictive elements) to ‘historic premillenialists’ (Jesus will return before the millennium, but there will be no rapture), to ‘amillennial’ (Revelation is intentionally symbolic, with no literal rapture or millennium), to ‘postmillennial’ (Jesus will return after the millennium).” [1]
Denison then writes, “Whether he raptures the church before (or during, or after) a Great Tribulation, or returns to begin the millennium, or simply returns to end history and begin eternity, is not the practical question. You and I have no say in the matter.” That’s exactly right.
But the next question should be, “Does God have a say in the matter?”
Instead of throwing up our hands when many disagree about the final events of earth’s history, perhaps it would be wiser to search the Scriptures and set aside the theories of people. Doctrinal confusion is no reason for ignoring or minimizing Bible truth.
Christ never taught that His coming would be two different events separated by seven years, with the antichrist supposedly coming into power during this tribulation period. The word “rapture” is not even found in the Bible. There is nothing secret about Jesus’ return. Scripture states that when Jesus comes there will be a resurrection and all the saints will meet Him in the air, all at the same time at the end of the world. Those left behind are destroyed by the brightness of His coming.
If you are counting on a second chance at salvation based on the rapture theory for yourself, family, or friends, you will want to rethink this view before saying, “Oh well, I guess it doesn’t really matter.” There are serious consequences to being left behind if you don’t study your Bible carefully!
Link.
I thought i would use my scripture reading for last night to start a thread but your post has given me the opportunity to explore the idea here. I want to follow up on your question to Stucky aswell. I won't write down all the verses, so people can look them up themselves. Who do you think was being adressed here, admonished to "stand firm", if the Church is going to be raptured and spared from what we all know is coming (digital ID, mandatory vaxx, martyrdom, persecution etc)?Now this is getting interesting! Which group of people is Jesus addressing in Matthew 24? The answer you give will have considerable bearing on your eschatology @Stucky
Part 34 - Matthew 24:40-42 One Will Be Taken by Thomas Ice
Thomas Ice :: Part 34 - Matthew 24:40-42 One Will Be Takenwww.blueletterbible.org