Hah, parrotting the internationally orchestrated media like a pro.
Might as well go work for them.
CNN's John Berman and SE Cupp discuss Rudy Giuliani admitting to "exaggerating a bit" while reviewing the Trump campaign's claims of voter fraud during a Fox Business interview.
edition.cnn.com
Rudy Giuliani revealed Monday he 'exaggerated' when he said there were more votes cast in Detroit than there are citizens - even though Trump used that exact claim to overturn the election.
www.dailymail.co.uk
“I’m exaggerating a bit”, soit “J’exagère un peu”: la petite phrase qui en dit long de Rudy Giuliani, avocat de Donald Trump et ancien maire de New York, a certainement porté un coup à la stratégie du président sortant. Alors que de plus en plus de républicains reconnaissent que les affirmations...
www.7sur7.be
View attachment 47159
“Ik overdrijf een beetje.” Met dat kleine zinnetje lijkt Donald Trumps persoonlijke advocaat Rudy Giuliani gisterenavond de hele strategie van zijn baas onderuit te hebben gehaald. Want terwijl nu ook steeds meer Republikeinen erkennen dat de claims van het Trump-kamp geen kans maken voor de...
www.hln.be
View attachment 47160
Here's the interview. Watch it and see the deceitful ways of corporate media.
You know what they say: "don't read the news and you're uninformed, read it and you're misinformed."
Be ready to parrott the media when they try to spin the narrative that the actual coup d'état is
against those who stole the election with millions of fraudulent votes.
the article I posted included the video clip. I already watched it. I included the whole quote and did not clip only the part where he said he was exaggerating.
the problem with what you are saying is that I didn’t narrow anything to try to create a spin. I posted a quote where Giuliani clearly is still claiming fraud while admitting that the fraud cannot be defined by the claim of there being more votes than voters because he was exaggerating this.
therefore, the viral message when it is based on this claim, is a false claim by his own admission, but he is still claiming there is fraud in the video clip. This isn’t removed in order to spin something.
You could try to say that other sources still support this claim of more votes than voters, but Giuliani is trumps lawyer and these are just random people who are upset that trump is losing. If Giuliani admits this, than this is not a claim that has enough evidence to be proven in court. Do you understand this?
the problem with many of you is that you can’t seem to define boundaries when you are researching something. If something can’t be used in court by the lawyer working to defend trumps case regarding election fraud, than articles specific to the claim of there being more votes than voters are useless. Do you understand? Lol, I’m guessing you or somebody is still going to try to post something that you think provides evidence that this claim is still true even though Giuliani is providing a boundary with what he is saying here. This boundary will probably go right over your heads though.
this is another reason that trump sources are worse than msm. The researching techniques of the people who support trump fly over boundaries all the time that would serve to increase their credibility. While biased, msm still has to work within boundaries that the trump camp has basically thrown out altogether. That is the difference. When you listen to msm, you have to look out for bias, but you don’t have to look out for exceeding research boundaries the way you do with the alt right news media.
I know reading comprehension becomes a challenge when someone challenges your narrative, but don’t go making something up. I’m not trying to spin anything the way you are. I didn’t isolate anything about the exaggeration comment to try to create a false impression.
and the quote is from the horses mouth with video corroboration of Giuliani saying it in contest. It isnt translated from an interview and used to prove an argument within an article. As disappointing as this may be for you, it is the reality of the situation specific to the claim of there being more votes than voters.
I am genuinely curious though.
