J.K. Rowling: "If sex isn’t real, the lived reality of women globally is erased."

J

justjess

Superstar
Joined
Mar 16, 2017
Messages
11,534
morita said:
I think if a little girl has short hair, and is dressed like a boy, then the world might react to her as a boy. After they hit puberty, it's easier to tell males and females apart in most cases.
Click to expand...
how many parents are going to go along with gender neutrality Or transgenderism for toddlers and small children? Typically that doesn’t start til middle or High school or even later.. at which point you’ve had a vastly different experience from born members of that gender.
 
thursdayafternoon

thursdayafternoon

Star
Joined
Mar 15, 2019
Messages
1,851
deadline.com

J.K. Rowling Defends Trans Statements In Lengthy Essay, Reveals She’s A Sexual Assault Survivor & Says “Trans People Need And Deserve Protection”

In a 3,600-word long essay posted to her website this morning, Harry Potter author J.K. Rowling sought to clarify and expound upon the statements she made about the trans community on Saturday over Twitter, which caused an uproar in recent days drawing rebukes from GLAAD and Wizarding World...
deadline.com deadline.com
June 10, 2020
...
“So I want trans women to be safe. At the same time, I do not want to make natal girls and women less safe. When you throw open the doors of bathrooms and changing rooms to any man who believes or feels he’s a woman – and, as I’ve said, gender confirmation certificates may now be granted without any need for surgery or hormones – then you open the door to any and all men who wish to come inside. That is the simple truth,” said the author.
...
I refuse to bow down to a movement that I believe is doing demonstrable harm in seeking to erode ‘woman’ as a political and biological class and offering cover to predators like few before it.
...
“the huge explosion in young women wishing to transition and also about the increasing numbers who seem to be detransitioning (returning to their original sex), because they regret taking steps that have, in some cases, altered their bodies irrevocably, and taken away their fertility. Some say they decided to transition after realising they were same-sex attracted, and that transitioning was partly driven by homophobia, either in society or in their families.”

“The more of their accounts of gender dysphoria I’ve read, with their insightful descriptions of anxiety, dissociation, eating disorders, self-harm and self-hatred, the more I’ve wondered whether, if I’d been born 30 years later, I too might have tried to transition. The allure of escaping womanhood would have been huge. I struggled with severe OCD as a teenager. If I’d found community and sympathy online that I couldn’t find in my immediate environment, I believe I could have been persuaded to turn myself into the son my father had openly said he’d have preferred.”

She continued, “I want to be very clear here: I know transition will be a solution for some gender dysphoric people, although I’m also aware through extensive research that studies have consistently shown that between 60-90% of gender dysphoric teens will grow out of their dysphoria…The current explosion of trans activism is urging a removal of almost all the robust systems through which candidates for sex reassignment were once required to pass. A man who intends to have no surgery and take no hormones may now secure himself a Gender Recognition Certificate and be a woman in the sight of the law. Many people aren’t aware of this.”

She says surprisingly right things. Despite all the infamous, politically correct agenda. As someone who writes occult novels.
 
Resistor

Resistor

Established
Joined
May 22, 2020
Messages
340
thursdayafternoon said:
variety.com

J.K. Rowling Gets Backlash Over Anti-Trans Tweets

Many people are calling out "Harry Potter" author J.K. Rowling for a series on anti-trans tweets on Saturday afternoon.
variety.com variety.com
‘Harry Potter’ author J.K. Rowling took the red pill. Surprising about one of the stars of the occult agenda.

Rowling’s latest controversy began when she commented on an article from Devex, a media platform for the global development community, titled “Opinion: Creating a more equal post-COVID-19 world for people who menstruate.”

“‘People who menstruate.’ I’m sure there used to be a word for those people. Someone help me out. Wumben? Wimpund? Woomud?” Rowling tweeted.

“If sex isn’t real, there’s no same-sex attraction. If sex isn’t real, the lived reality of women globally is erased. I know and love trans people, but erasing the concept of sex removes the ability of many to meaningfully discuss their lives. It isn’t hate to speak the truth,” she wrote. “The idea that women like me, who’ve been empathetic to trans people for decades, feeling kinship because they’re vulnerable in the same way as women — ie, to male violence – ‘hate’ trans people because they think sex is real and has lived consequences — is a nonsense.”
---
Dec 19, 2019
J.K. Rowling has sparked backlash after offering support to Maya Forstater, a researcher who lost her job after tweeting that a person cannot change their biological sex.

Rowling took to social media herself Thursday morning, writing, “Dress however you please. Call yourself whatever you like. Sleep with any consenting adult who’ll have you. Live your best life in peace and security. But force women out of their jobs for stating that sex is real? #IStandWithMaya #ThisIsNotADrill”

although they bought everything in the media, the truth cannot stay where it's stuck.
Click to expand...
Men are men and women are women, yeah.

It's a tired discussion. Trans people have every right to exist in society but Rowling is right there.
 
Artful Revealer

Artful Revealer

Star
Joined
Apr 13, 2017
Messages
4,574
Resistor said:
And because whatever somebody chooses to do to their body is not my business. As long as it's not imposed upon kids (as in adults only allowed to modify their bodies).
Click to expand...
So if technology permits, people would have the right to become a trans ... dog, for instance?
 
Artful Revealer

Artful Revealer

Star
Joined
Apr 13, 2017
Messages
4,574
Resistor said:
Well yeah?

It's really fucking stupid though, I will say very explicitly.
Click to expand...
lol ok.

Wouldn't it then be the adult and responsible thing to do, as a society, to prevent people from doing stupid things and not use "rights" as the justification for letting people do stupid things?
 
Resistor

Resistor

Established
Joined
May 22, 2020
Messages
340
Artful Revealer said:
Wouldn't it then be the adult and responsible thing to do, as a society, to prevent people from doing stupid things and not use "rights" as the justification for letting people do stupid things?
Click to expand...
No definitely not.
This is people doing "stupid" things to themselves. People shouldn't be able to do such things to other people though, that should be a given. They have to consent on their own accord.
If someone modifies their body, it's their choice to go through with it, they are their own responsibility.
 
Artful Revealer

Artful Revealer

Star
Joined
Apr 13, 2017
Messages
4,574
Resistor said:
No definitely not.This is people doing "stupid" things to themselves. People shouldn't be able to do such things to other people though, that should be a given. They have to consent on their own accord.
If someone modifies their body, it's their choice to go through with it, they are their own responsibility.
Click to expand...
This is the problem with this liberal-libertarian 'live and let live' attitude. Rights are being pushed to the extreme at the expense of duty. What adults do in real life has an affect on wider society, especially children. Allowing stupid behaviour and decisions from adults will facilitate stupid behaviour and decisions by future generations. Individuals have a duty to not do stupid things or promote stupidity to others. If not, society has a duty to prevent individuals from doing stupid things or promoting stupidity to others.
 
L

Lurker

Star
Joined
Mar 14, 2017
Messages
3,783
Artful Revealer said:
This is the problem with this liberal-libertarian 'live and let live' attitude. Rights are being pushed to the extreme at the expense of duty. What adults do in real life has an affect on wider society, especially children. Allowing stupid behaviour and decisions from adults will facilitate stupid behaviour and decisions by future generations. Individuals have a duty to not do stupid things or promote stupidity to others. If not, society has a duty to prevent individuals from doing stupid things or promoting stupidity to others.
Click to expand...
Who gets to decide what's stupid?
 
P

pescatarian09

Star
Joined
May 12, 2019
Messages
1,607
www.dailymail.co.uk

NHS U-turns on puberty-blocking drugs for transgender teens

The drugs - used by UK NHS gender clinics to halt the puberty of supposedly transgender children - could have long-term consequences for youngsters' brains, bones and mental health.
www.dailymail.co.uk www.dailymail.co.uk
cmfblog.org.uk

The NHS quietly changes its transgender guidance

Last week in The Spectator, James Kirkup revealed that the NHS had amended its transgender guidance for children. It is unclear whether or not this is directly
cmfblog.org.uk cmfblog.org.uk
www.spectator.co.uk

The NHS has quietly changed its trans guidance to reflect reality

Imagine you have a child who says they believe they were born in the wrong body, describing what amounts to a fundamental and painful mismatch between their biological sex and their gender identity. Imagine the child you see as your daughter declaring that they are in fact a boy. Where would you...
www.spectator.co.uk www.spectator.co.uk
 
Tidal

Tidal

Star
Joined
Mar 4, 2020
Messages
3,803
Jesus said:-"The Creator made them male and female, and said, 'For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh' So they are no longer two, but one." (Bible: Matt 19:4)

"Judy Judy Judy..."



 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top