J.K. Rowling: "If sex isn’t real, the lived reality of women globally is erased."

[thursdayafternoon]

J.K. Rowling Gets Backlash Over Anti-Trans Tweets

Many people are calling out "Harry Potter" author J.K. Rowling for a series on anti-trans tweets on Saturday afternoon.

variety.com

‘Harry Potter’ author J.K. Rowling took the red pill. Surprising about one of the stars of the occult agenda.

Rowling’s latest controversy began when she commented on an article from Devex, a media platform for the global development community, titled “Opinion: Creating a more equal post-COVID-19 world for people who menstruate.”

“‘People who menstruate.’ I’m sure there used to be a word for those people. Someone help me out. Wumben? Wimpund? Woomud?” Rowling tweeted.

“If sex isn’t real, there’s no same-sex attraction. If sex isn’t real, the lived reality of women globally is erased. I know and love trans people, but erasing the concept of sex removes the ability of many to meaningfully discuss their lives. It isn’t hate to speak the truth,” she wrote. “The idea that women like me, who’ve been empathetic to trans people for decades, feeling kinship because they’re vulnerable in the same way as women — ie, to male violence – ‘hate’ trans people because they think sex is real and has lived consequences — is a nonsense.”
---
Dec 19, 2019
J.K. Rowling has sparked backlash after offering support to Maya Forstater, a researcher who lost her job after tweeting that a person cannot change their biological sex.

Rowling took to social media herself Thursday morning, writing, “Dress however you please. Call yourself whatever you like. Sleep with any consenting adult who’ll have you. Live your best life in peace and security. But force women out of their jobs for stating that sex is real? #IStandWithMaya #ThisIsNotADrill”

although they bought everything in the media, the truth cannot stay where it's stuck.

 

[Lyfe]

You are basically a bigot if you don't go along with the cultural marxist agenda that redefines reality and pushes the bounds of everything that has been universally accepted as traditional or observably natural.

 

[morita]

All she's saying is that the experience of biological women is different to that of a trans woman. I don't see anything wrong with what she said.

 

[thursdayafternoon]

All she's saying is that the experience of biological women is different to that of a trans woman. I don't see anything wrong with what she said.

she said she believe that male and female sexes and it's not fluid. and this is wrong for genderlessness agenda.

 

[justjess]

I agree with her 100% tbh. There’s some sort of word for it... trans denialist feminist or some nonsense. I got kicked out of a couple feminist groups for that years back. A trans woman does not have the same lived experience as a born woman. That’s just reality.

 

[lightseeker]

Yeah gotta be one of the most humorous issues in the world. Some more normal feminists see this as just men infiltrating their movement, but the more woke stance, (woke being the more you deny somethings reality in favor of ideology), says that these men are literally women in every sense, so to exclude them from feminism is against these people who are literally women in every way.

 

[DevaWolf]

I agree with her 100% tbh. There’s some sort of word for it... trans denialist feminist or some nonsense. I got kicked out of a couple feminist groups for that years back. A trans woman does not have the same lived experience as a born woman. That’s just reality.

I agree this erases women. If everyone is a woman then nobody is a woman at the same time.

 

[thursdayafternoon]

the point isn't to exclude trans people from feminism (in my opinion, not for J.K.). feminism is about destroying masculinity and femininity by its nature (sex roles, motherhood and family.). feminism is inevitably related to LGBT and genderless ideology. do you think it's about being strong and free woman?

 

[justjess]

the point isn't to exclude trans people from feminism (in my opinion, not for J.K.). feminism is about destroying masculinity and femininity by its nature (sex roles, motherhood and family.). feminism is inevitably related to LGBT and genderless ideology. do you think it's about being strong and free woman?

I guess you missed that I was agreeing with you.

 

[morita]

There’s some sort of word for it... trans denialist feminist or some nonsense.

I heard the word "trans cult", a cult because if you challenge their beliefs you get ostracized.

 

[justjess]

I heard the word "trans cult", a cult because if you challenge their beliefs you get ostracized.

Being a woman, imo, is about way more then your genitalia. Someone who grew up as a man and had the world react to him as a man or even as a queer does not have the same lived experiences as someone who grew up as a woman with the world reacting to them as a woman. It’s a different experience entirely and imo again, reduces women to their anatomy and clothing preferences when being a woman is way more then that. It’s frustrating that any dissension from the crowd is automatically targeted as some sort of hate rather then aN evolving dialogue.

I accidentally called a trans kid her and she screamed at me she has a penis.. I used to change her diapers. She most certainly does not. I could see the hostility if you were actually being hostile towards someone and it was returned but a slip of the tongue or an acknowledgment of an objective reality with no ill intent or judgement... they’re doing too much.

 

[lightseeker]

Being a woman, imo, is about way more then your genitalia. Someone who grew up as a man and had the world react to him as a man or even as a queer does not have the same lived experiences as someone who grew up as a woman with the world reacting to them as a woman. It’s a different experience entirely and imo again, reduces women to their anatomy and clothing preferences when being a woman is way more then that. It’s frustrating that any dissension from the crowd is automatically targeted as some sort of hate rather then aN evolving dialogue.

I accidentally called a trans kid her and she screamed at me she has a penis.. I used to change her diapers. She most certainly does not. I could see the hostility if you were actually being hostile towards someone and it was returned but a slip of the tongue or an acknowledgment of an objective reality with no ill intent or judgement... they’re doing too much.

Unfortunately, you are a white supremacist, and probably a danger to society for those views.

Opinion: How Britain's colonial past can be traced through to the transphobic feminism of today

Much like imperialist classifications, rejecting the idea of more fluid sex seeks to violate anyone who doesn’t conform

www.independent.co.uk

 

[justjess]

Unfortunately, you are a white supremacist, and probably a danger to society for those views.

Opinion: How Britain's colonial past can be traced through to the transphobic feminism of today

Much like imperialist classifications, rejecting the idea of more fluid sex seeks to violate anyone who doesn’t conform

www.independent.co.uk

Lmao.. troll much? Stop deflecting. Your not proving any point. I’m not a white supremacist for saying trans people reduce womanhood to genitalia. I am aware that many people think that makes me homphobic. They are entitled to their opinion, I don’t care what they think. I deal with reality.

 

[lightseeker]

Lmao.. troll much? Stop deflecting. Your not proving any point. I’m not a white supremacist for saying trans people reduce womanhood to genitalia. I am aware that many people think that makes me homphobic. They are entitled to their opinion, I don’t care what they think. I deal with reality.

I'm not trying to prove anything. It was published in the news that your views are white supremacy. Do with that what you will

 

[justjess]

I'm not trying to prove anything. It was published in the news that your views are white supremacy. Do with that what you will

1) that article is quite a stretch and I tend to ignore extremists

2) my argument differs radically from the one the article is debunking but you wouldn’t know that from two brief posts on a forum. My argument is simply that a transgender woman has a different lived experience then a born woman. The world approaches them as a man until they start transitioning and they are not subject to the same issues as women who are born that way. Different issues which are every bit as real, but still different.

 

[lightseeker]

1) that article is quite a stretch and I tend to ignore extremists

2) my argument differs radically from the one the article is debunking but you wouldn’t know that from two brief posts on a forum. My argument is simply that a transgender woman has a different lived experience then a born woman. The world approaches them as a man until they start transitioning and they are not subject to the same issues as women who are born that way. Different issues which are every bit as real, but still different.

Yeah I agree with you and think you are completely correct in your views. I thought it was interesting that there is an article calling them white supremacy though, I thought it was a good example of that term being used as a weapon to beat people over the head who have rational, informed, and normal views that contradict the slosh being pumped out to destroy the old world and bring in the NWO.

 

[justjess]

Yeah I agree with you and think you are completely correct in your views. I thought it was interesting that there is an article calling them white supremacy though, I thought it was a good example of that term being used as a weapon to beat people over the head who have rational, informed, and normal views that contradict the slosh being pumped out to destroy the old world and bring in the NWO.

The only people I call white supremacists are white supremacists and sometimes ones who deny racism even exists. Others I think have been a bit brainwashed by state propaganda.

why do some of you seem to think this nwo is going to be some sort of Kumbaya false harmony type thing? I strongly disagree with that sentiment. If that is the necessary backdrop we will never get there - people can’t even agree on the weather.

 

[lightseeker]

The only people I call white supremacists are white supremacists and sometimes ones who deny racism even exists. Others I think have been a bit brainwashed by state propaganda.

why do some of you seem to think this nwo is going to be some sort of Kumbaya false harmony type thing? I strongly disagree with that sentiment. If that is the necessary backdrop we will never get there - people can’t even agree on the weather.

I think the NWO is about an inversion of all values, calling everything that used to be called "good" or "normal", "bad".The only sin left in the western world is "racism" so that's what is used to destroy old values grounded not in pure materialism, atomistic individualism, etc

 

[~JC~]

I love this statement by JK.. BRAVO! In reality, who gives a rat's arse what people call themselves. Ironically, it seems it's the women who are being discriminiated against by stating the truth. We've thrown biology out the window and catering to mental illness, IMO. We're creating war at every turn, on the smallest levels and it's just gross.

 

[morita]

my argument differs radically from the one the article is debunking but you wouldn’t know that from two brief posts on a forum. My argument is simply that a transgender woman has a different lived experience then a born woman. The world approaches them as a man until they start transitioning and they are not subject to the same issues as women who are born that way.

I think if a little girl has short hair, and is dressed like a boy, then the world might react to her as a boy. After they hit puberty, it's easier to tell males and females apart in most cases.