COVID-19, DOCTORS SPEAK OUT, W.H.O./GREAT RESET/4IR, 5G, DIGITAL ID, VACCINE, FOOD SUPPLY, TRACKING & TRACING...

rainerann

Star
Joined
Mar 18, 2017
Messages
4,550
View attachment 35636
Just wondering, but what do you think about the false-negative rate? Second question, why do you some of the same people that post about the Georgia Guidestones are the same people that are posting that this is fake? Doesn't it make sense in a place like this that something will really come along that people will die from?
 

Frank Badfinger

Superstar
Joined
Aug 4, 2019
Messages
16,108
Just wondering, but what do you think about the false-negative rate? Second question, why do you some of the same people that post about the Georgia Guidestones are the same people that are posting that this is fake? Doesn't it make sense in a place like this that something will really come along that people will die from?
Well according to Kary Mullis, the Inventor of Polymerase Chain Reaction test. He said the PCR was not a diagnosis tool but for research only due to the 80% false positive. It's not reliable nor accurate. I'll take his word.

Many believe CV-19 is a either a mild flu as many researchers are now stating or they believe it never existed. Many more however believe the vaccine that Gates/Fauci are concocting will be the real virus. That and 5G.
 

A Freeman

Superstar
Joined
Nov 11, 2019
Messages
8,226
Well according to Kary Mullis, the Inventor of Polymerase Chain Reaction test. He said the PCR was not a diagnosis tool but for research only due to the 80% false positive. It's not reliable nor accurate. I'll take his word.

Many believe CV-19 is a either a mild flu as many researchers are now stating or they believe it never existed. Many more however believe the vaccine that Gates/Fauci are concocting will be the real virus. That and 5G.
Thank-you. Agreed.

As the COVID-19 is likewise referred to as the Coronavirus, which is really one of a family of so-called coronaviruses, aka the common-cold, it would follow using cellular/terrain theory that everyone already has these "viruses" (bits of their own DNA and RNA in a protein wrapper) in their bodies. So the 80.33% false positive test really isn't surprising, and may actually be low, possibly due to how the swabs/samples were harvested.

In other words, it's further confirmation of the cellular/terrain theory (how else could the tests return so many positive results) which, in turn, means that the only way for anyone to really be "infected" is to be vaccinated, either intentionally or with a test kit intentionally contaminated with an engineered toxin/biological weapon.

Does it not strike anyone else as more in-your-face mockery that t.h.e.y. have taken their technical designation for the common cold (coronavirus), which is something that millions suffer through every year in this polluted environment, and relabeled it and sold it to the gullible public as a "deadly pandemic"?

The parasitic criminal class behind the Georgia Guidestones (it certainly wasn't just "R.C. Christian") have been telling us for decades not only how many they intend to cull, but that they plan to do so using wars and vaccines. So thank-you for posting what you have posted to warn others of the inherent danger of the planned vaccination program that t.h.e.y., through their front men like Gates and Fauci, intend to use to sterilize and/or murder billions. It wouldn't be surprising if there isn't a global effort to roll the vaccinations out within a very short period of time (e.g. within a window of a few days) to ensure their poisons are delivered to as many as possible.
 

DavidSon

Star
Joined
Jan 10, 2019
Messages
2,143
Just wondering, but what do you think about the false-negative rate? Second question, why do you some of the same people that post about the Georgia Guidestones are the same people that are posting that this is fake? Doesn't it make sense in a place like this that something will really come along that people will die from?
I hope you don't mind me answering but in the last months of reading/listening to journalists, writers, doctors, etc. I haven't heard one bit about the guidestones. Did you know that the CIA weaponized the term "conspiracy theory" years ago to gaslight researchers and plain citizens who doubt what our authorities are telling us? Intelligence agencies don't gather information; they spread disinformation and practice psychological operations, especially on their own citizens.

Look at the orchestrated pandemic. False positives, false negatives from completely unreliable tests. 2 different strains of covid, or possibly 50 strains. Symptoms similar to radiation toxicity- hypoxia, heart palpitations, blood clots, and delirium. Falsification of death certificates and wildly inaccurate models intended to shut down world society.

Did you know the world military games in Wuhan were taking place at the same time as event 201 in October? At the center of the creation of the "pandemic" and it's response are the same vaccine makers, GAVI, the World Economic Forum, and most importantly (I feel) is the John Hopkins Center for Health Security.

I don't know if your old enough to remember the devastation resulting from 9/11; what life was like before and after the "war on terror" was proclaimed. Do you believe the towers and building 7 imploded after being hit by planes? That 19 al-Qaeda terrorists organized by a guy in a cave with a cell phone pulled off the most elaborate covert military assault in all of history? I can tell you 100% this is the exact same type of operation, but it's larger and implications are even more severe.

Didn't you say you like Whitney Webb? Please check out any of the 10 articles she's published the last months. Listen to her interview with Douglas Valentine below and you'll understand what people are concerned about. The Phoenix program (that tortured and murdered 40,000 South Vietnamese) is just one of many limbs to this current global operation.

 

A Freeman

Superstar
Joined
Nov 11, 2019
Messages
8,226

Attachments

Frank Badfinger

Superstar
Joined
Aug 4, 2019
Messages
16,108


From: http://truthstreammedia.com/2015/01/14/1975-video-cia-admits-to-congress-the-agency-uses-mainstream-media-to-distribute-disinfo/

This 1975 clip of testimony given during a House Intelligence Committee hearing has the agency admitting on record that the CIA creates and uses disinformation against the American people.

and then there is this...
 

Frank Badfinger

Superstar
Joined
Aug 4, 2019
Messages
16,108
PROOF! The World Health Organization, the Vaccine Industry & Gov'ts are All in Bed Together


From debess:

The merger and collusion of Governments with Corporate interests is the broad definition of Fascism; in more polite terms, Corporatocracy. Dr. Mercola shows how the WHO, Big Pharma, Private Interests and Governments brought about the current COVID-19 PLANdemic for profit and more State control over its own people; however, depopulation is a top priority of the UN and the primary reason for the coming vaccination mandates.

Exposing the Global Population Control Agenda
https://www.hli.org/resources/exposing-the-global-population-control/

• The WHO’s influenza pandemic plan, devised in 1999, was heavily influenced by the drug industry
• The Council of Europe Parliamentary Assembly (PACE) questioned the WHO’s handling of the 2009 swine flu pandemic, saying its recommendation to stockpile antivirals and vaccines wasted public funds
• PACE concluded there was “overwhelming evidence that the seriousness of the pandemic was vastly overrated by WHO,” and that the drug industry had influenced the organization’s decision-making
• There’s other evidence suggesting the WHO is acting as little more than a Big Pharma front group. For example, a 2019 congressional report concluded Purdue Pharma had influenced WHO’s opioid guidelines
• Only 25% of WHO’s funding comes from member states. The remaining 75% comes from voluntary contributions. The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation — the investments of which include junk food manufacturers, alcohol and drug retailers — is the biggest funder
==========
Read more: Can You Trust the WHO With COVID-19 Pandemic Response? https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2020/04/14/world-health-organization-pandemic-planning.aspx?cid_source=bitchute&cid_medium=video&cid=health_world-health-organization-pandemic-planning
 
Joined
May 18, 2018
Messages
4,060
I posted these in the other corona thread but stuff gets buried there pretty quick. Here's two videos Ive found interesting in the past few days.

This one is interesting because youtube has been deleting it as fast as it can be put up.

Have people seen this?
At the whitehouse press conference a mic was left on, the new york times journalist was told to take his mask off because the death rate is like 0.1%, strangely they say everyone there has been vaccinated, and then he exclaims "so it was all a hoax?!"
This could have been a political stunt because it was the white house, but an interesting piece nonetheless
 
Last edited:

Lisa

Superstar
Joined
Mar 13, 2017
Messages
20,288
I posted these in the other corona thread but stuff gets buried there pretty quick. Here's two videos Ive found interesting in the past few days.

This one is interesting because youtube has been deleting it as fast any it can be put up.
I had the same thoughts about going to the store.

So..are we just hearing about the death rate for this year so far as covid deaths? Ya, this can have multiple uses for evil people..but I still think that its use is for November...see how trump can make America great now that they tanked the economy..give Biden a chance..haha!
 

rainerann

Star
Joined
Mar 18, 2017
Messages
4,550
Well according to Kary Mullis, the Inventor of Polymerase Chain Reaction test. He said the PCR was not a diagnosis tool but for research only due to the 80% false positive. It's not reliable nor accurate. I'll take his word.

Many believe CV-19 is a either a mild flu as many researchers are now stating or they believe it never existed. Many more however believe the vaccine that Gates/Fauci are concocting will be the real virus. That and 5G.
thank you, I had forgotten what the reason I saw people saying this was. So this is another instance where diagnosis for something like mrsa has been showing false positives too then all this time because they use pcr to test for this too.

and in this case, more people are talking about its false negative rate. People are being tested more than once for this thing.

but like I said, we use these all the time already for other things and there are no issues like you are suggesting.

“No one is certain exactly how many tests are spitting back false negatives. One preprint paper relying on biological specimens from 213 patients in China suggested a false-negative rate as high as 30 percent. In a New York Times op-ed, Harlan M. Krumholz, director of the Yale New Haven Hospital Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, wrote, “Some of my colleagues, experts in laboratory medicine, express concerns the false-negative rate in this country could be even higher.” Patients have received suspicious resultssuggesting they don’t have the coronavirus infection despite having symptoms that are completely consistent with what we know about the virus, including high temperatures and a telltale cough. Perhaps the most notable example of a false negative is Li Wenliang, an ophthalmologist in Wuhan, China, who brought COVID-19 to international attention. Li died of the virus, but only after he repeatedly tested negative for the disease.”

 

Frank Badfinger

Superstar
Joined
Aug 4, 2019
Messages
16,108
I posted these in the other corona thread but stuff gets buried there pretty quick. Here's two videos Ive found interesting in the past few days.

This one is interesting because youtube has been deleting it as fast as it can be put up.

Have people seen this?
At the whitehouse press conference a mic was left on, the new york times journalist was told to take his mask off because the death rate is like 0.1%, strangely they say everyone there has been vaccinated, and then he exclaims "so it was all a hoax?!"
This could have been a political stunt because it was the white house, but an interesting piece nonetheless
I posted it already but its worthwhile posting again.
 

rainerann

Star
Joined
Mar 18, 2017
Messages
4,550
I hope you don't mind me answering but in the last months of reading/listening to journalists, writers, doctors, etc. I haven't heard one bit about the guidestones. Did you know that the CIA weaponized the term "conspiracy theory" years ago to gaslight researchers and plain citizens who doubt what our authorities are telling us? Intelligence agencies don't gather information; they spread disinformation and practice psychological operations, especially on their own citizens.

Look at the orchestrated pandemic. False positives, false negatives from completely unreliable tests. 2 different strains of covid, or possibly 50 strains. Symptoms similar to radiation toxicity- hypoxia, heart palpitations, blood clots, and delirium. Falsification of death certificates and wildly inaccurate models intended to shut down world society.

Did you know the world military games in Wuhan were taking place at the same time as event 201 in October? At the center of the creation of the "pandemic" and it's response are the same vaccine makers, GAVI, the World Economic Forum, and most importantly (I feel) is the John Hopkins Center for Health Security.

I don't know if your old enough to remember the devastation resulting from 9/11; what life was like before and after the "war on terror" was proclaimed. Do you believe the towers and building 7 imploded after being hit by planes? That 19 al-Qaeda terrorists organized by a guy in a cave with a cell phone pulled off the most elaborate covert military assault in all of history? I can tell you 100% this is the exact same type of operation, but it's larger and implications are even more severe.

Didn't you say you like Whitney Webb? Please check out any of the 10 articles she's published the last months. Listen to her interview with Douglas Valentine below and you'll understand what people are concerned about. The Phoenix program (that tortured and murdered 40,000 South Vietnamese) is just one of many limbs to this current global operation.

well that’s good that you haven’t heard anything about the guidestones. Although, it’s funny that no one is saying anything about these now in a situation like this because someone had gotten very upset with me for not considering them not all that long ago. It is almost like it is okay to entertain them when there are absolutely no visible threats, but somehow something that could be a threat is fake? It’s a little confusing really.

I was 18 during 9/11. I remember the terror warning red/orange/yellow banner on the news for the next few years. Then I had kids a few years after this and became blissfully unaware of the news because I was watching Dora the explorer everyday instead.

Then it was like one day, the internet changed and there was Alex Jones. I think it was called loose change? It was an old documentary on 9/11 that I watched and nothing was the same after this. Life is more complex than my involvement in research of this subject, but things changed overall.

so I get what your saying about some of these things. I just don’t see how any of this leads to a conclusion that this is fake considering there are more doctors releasing information about the complexity of the symptoms, than there are doctors saying it is mild like the flu.

i mean whether it was terrorists who brought down the World Trade Center or someone else, what happened to the buildings wasn’t fake. I don’t think the disease is fake, but I realize people feel strongly about this and have no problem with people testing this by opening up either.

most everything is going to be opening back up soon, and nothing has been passed to take away rights that I’m aware of. There have been several crowdsourcing endeavors, and if people want to participate in those things, there’s nothing wrong with that. Nothing terrible has happened and we are opening up so I think many people are missing the deception that could be present with this.

I do like Whitney Webb. She has a similar take on the virus being a virus and not a flu from what I remember.
 

Mackie

Newbie
Joined
Dec 27, 2019
Messages
2
One world currency is a possibility, but it's not answering some of the critical questions.

In order to eradicate all small and medium businesses, one would have to eradicate all the small and medium banks. According to one of my sources, In 2008 something like 450 banks went bye-bye. This would be important, except the end result was banking being made "Too Big to Fail".

Now I'm not being paid to decide policy, so I really don't want to dig into this right now. I'm just telling you, what to look out for if you think David Icke's prophecy will come true. There has to be some major course correction in the banking industry that leads 99% of the banks to fail.

The whole point of a controlled economic crash is to eliminate competition. And to have 1 company completely control its respective market. And the biggest roadblock to that end is the banking industry. So yeah, I think things could get real interesting, or maybe this is just another smokescreen.
You are more likely to get that nice polite letter that tells you your bank has merged with other provider due to recent events but not to worry nothing will change right now.Hmm
 

Frank Badfinger

Superstar
Joined
Aug 4, 2019
Messages
16,108
thank you, I had forgotten what the reason I saw people saying this was. So this is another instance where diagnosis for something like mrsa has been showing false positives too then all this time because they use pcr to test for this too.

and in this case, more people are talking about its false negative rate. People are being tested more than once for this thing.

but like I said, we use these all the time already for other things and there are no issues like you are suggesting.

“No one is certain exactly how many tests are spitting back false negatives. One preprint paper relying on biological specimens from 213 patients in China suggested a false-negative rate as high as 30 percent. In a New York Times op-ed, Harlan M. Krumholz, director of the Yale New Haven Hospital Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, wrote, “Some of my colleagues, experts in laboratory medicine, express concerns the false-negative rate in this country could be even higher.” Patients have received suspicious resultssuggesting they don’t have the coronavirus infection despite having symptoms that are completely consistent with what we know about the virus, including high temperatures and a telltale cough. Perhaps the most notable example of a false negative is Li Wenliang, an ophthalmologist in Wuhan, China, who brought COVID-19 to international attention. Li died of the virus, but only after he repeatedly tested negative for the disease.”

Was the COVID-19 Test Meant to Detect a Virus?


Worthwhile article on the PCR test and it's history. Regarding the false positive aspect I post here a segment of the article.

One of the ways to distinguish truth from deception in contemporary “science” is to track what gets removed. For example, David tells me, there was apparently an English abstract online at PubMed out of China that rendered the entire COVID testing industrial complex baseless and absurd.

“There was a famous Chinese paper that estimated that if you’re testing asymptomatic people, up to 80% of positives could be false positive. That was kind of shocking, so shocking that PubMed had to withdraw the abstract even though the Chinese paper appears to still be published and available. I actually have a translation with a friend. I translated it into English and it’s a really, standard calculation of what they call positive predictive value. The abstract basically said that in asymptomatic populations, the chance of a positive coronavirus test being a true positive is only about 20%. 80% will be false positive.”

“Doesn’t that mean the test means nothing?” I asked.

“The Chinese analysis was a mathematical analysis, a standard, the standard analysis that’s been done a million times before. There’s no reason to withdraw the paper for any reason. There’s nothing dramatic about the paper. It’s a really boring analysis. It’s just that they did the standard analysis and said, in some populations, like they estimated 1% of people are actually infected in the population. You could have 80% false positive. Uh, they couldn’t do a real analysis of false positives in terms of determining whether a test is correct or not because that requires a gold standard and the only gold standard is purification of the virus. So, we get back to the fact that the virus is not being purified. If you could purify the virus, then you could take a hundred people who tested positive and you could search for the virus in them. And if you found the virus in 50 out of a hundred and not in the other 50, you could say that the test is only accurate 50% of the time. But we have no way to do that because we haven’t yet purified the virus. And I don’t think we ever will.”

Dave Rasnick has had exchanges with David Crowe about this, and concurs, “To my knowledge, they have not yet purified this virus.”
 
Joined
Feb 22, 2020
Messages
2,506
Didn't you say you like Whitney Webb? Please check out any of the 10 articles she's published the last months. Listen to her interview with Douglas Valentine below and you'll understand what people are concerned about. The Phoenix program (that tortured and murdered 40,000 South Vietnamese) is just one of many limbs to this current global operation.

saw this video but just haven't watched it yet. Too many videos too little time.

Briefly how does Whitney connect Covid-19 to the Phoenix program ?
 

rainerann

Star
Joined
Mar 18, 2017
Messages
4,550
Was the COVID-19 Test Meant to Detect a Virus?


Worthwhile article on the PCR test and it's history. Regarding the false positive aspect I post here a segment of the article.

One of the ways to distinguish truth from deception in contemporary “science” is to track what gets removed. For example, David tells me, there was apparently an English abstract online at PubMed out of China that rendered the entire COVID testing industrial complex baseless and absurd.

“There was a famous Chinese paper that estimated that if you’re testing asymptomatic people, up to 80% of positives could be false positive. That was kind of shocking, so shocking that PubMed had to withdraw the abstract even though the Chinese paper appears to still be published and available. I actually have a translation with a friend. I translated it into English and it’s a really, standard calculation of what they call positive predictive value. The abstract basically said that in asymptomatic populations, the chance of a positive coronavirus test being a true positive is only about 20%. 80% will be false positive.”

“Doesn’t that mean the test means nothing?” I asked.

“The Chinese analysis was a mathematical analysis, a standard, the standard analysis that’s been done a million times before. There’s no reason to withdraw the paper for any reason. There’s nothing dramatic about the paper. It’s a really boring analysis. It’s just that they did the standard analysis and said, in some populations, like they estimated 1% of people are actually infected in the population. You could have 80% false positive. Uh, they couldn’t do a real analysis of false positives in terms of determining whether a test is correct or not because that requires a gold standard and the only gold standard is purification of the virus. So, we get back to the fact that the virus is not being purified. If you could purify the virus, then you could take a hundred people who tested positive and you could search for the virus in them. And if you found the virus in 50 out of a hundred and not in the other 50, you could say that the test is only accurate 50% of the time. But we have no way to do that because we haven’t yet purified the virus. And I don’t think we ever will.”

Dave Rasnick has had exchanges with David Crowe about this, and concurs, “To my knowledge, they have not yet purified this virus.”
you are quoting from a different article yes?. It might turn out that the process of diagnosis changes in the next couple of months. It is a brand new condition, but from what I’ve been reading about ct scan results, they may have really removed the article. Pcr might not be the best approach for testing, but that doesn’t mean it is fake or minimally affects people. It means it is new.

Doctors are starting to see consistent patterns on ct scans, which is interesting.

“It kind of looks like faint glass that has been ground up," Paras Lakhani, a radiologist at Thomas Jefferson University, told Business Insider. "What it represents is fluid in the lung spaces."

On its own, Lakhani said, ground glass isn't particularly helpful for identifying a coronavirus.

"You can see it with all types of infections — bacterial, viral, or sometimes even non-infectious causes," Lakhani said. "Even vaping could sometimes appear this way."

But the patches are significant, he added, when they extend to the edges of the patient's lungs.

"That's something we don't often see," Lakhani said. "We saw that with severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and we saw that with Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS)."

 
Top