Frank Badfinger
Superstar
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2019
- Messages
- 16,108
Just wondering, but what do you think about the false-negative rate? Second question, why do you some of the same people that post about the Georgia Guidestones are the same people that are posting that this is fake? Doesn't it make sense in a place like this that something will really come along that people will die from?View attachment 35636
STEP 1: Coronavirus Panic, STEP 2: Loss of Liberty and Depression
There is something very sketchy about the official cases of coronavirus versus the string of important people who have it. The U.K.’s health minister caught the virus. Canada’s First La…www.winterwatch.net
Well according to Kary Mullis, the Inventor of Polymerase Chain Reaction test. He said the PCR was not a diagnosis tool but for research only due to the 80% false positive. It's not reliable nor accurate. I'll take his word.Just wondering, but what do you think about the false-negative rate? Second question, why do you some of the same people that post about the Georgia Guidestones are the same people that are posting that this is fake? Doesn't it make sense in a place like this that something will really come along that people will die from?
Thank-you. Agreed.Well according to Kary Mullis, the Inventor of Polymerase Chain Reaction test. He said the PCR was not a diagnosis tool but for research only due to the 80% false positive. It's not reliable nor accurate. I'll take his word.
Many believe CV-19 is a either a mild flu as many researchers are now stating or they believe it never existed. Many more however believe the vaccine that Gates/Fauci are concocting will be the real virus. That and 5G.
I hope you don't mind me answering but in the last months of reading/listening to journalists, writers, doctors, etc. I haven't heard one bit about the guidestones. Did you know that the CIA weaponized the term "conspiracy theory" years ago to gaslight researchers and plain citizens who doubt what our authorities are telling us? Intelligence agencies don't gather information; they spread disinformation and practice psychological operations, especially on their own citizens.Just wondering, but what do you think about the false-negative rate? Second question, why do you some of the same people that post about the Georgia Guidestones are the same people that are posting that this is fake? Doesn't it make sense in a place like this that something will really come along that people will die from?
and then there is this...
From: http://truthstreammedia.com/2015/01/14/1975-video-cia-admits-to-congress-the-agency-uses-mainstream-media-to-distribute-disinfo/
This 1975 clip of testimony given during a House Intelligence Committee hearing has the agency admitting on record that the CIA creates and uses disinformation against the American people.
I had the same thoughts about going to the store.I posted these in the other corona thread but stuff gets buried there pretty quick. Here's two videos Ive found interesting in the past few days.
This one is interesting because youtube has been deleting it as fast any it can be put up.
thank you, I had forgotten what the reason I saw people saying this was. So this is another instance where diagnosis for something like mrsa has been showing false positives too then all this time because they use pcr to test for this too.Well according to Kary Mullis, the Inventor of Polymerase Chain Reaction test. He said the PCR was not a diagnosis tool but for research only due to the 80% false positive. It's not reliable nor accurate. I'll take his word.
Many believe CV-19 is a either a mild flu as many researchers are now stating or they believe it never existed. Many more however believe the vaccine that Gates/Fauci are concocting will be the real virus. That and 5G.
I posted it already but its worthwhile posting again.I posted these in the other corona thread but stuff gets buried there pretty quick. Here's two videos Ive found interesting in the past few days.
This one is interesting because youtube has been deleting it as fast as it can be put up.
Have people seen this?
At the whitehouse press conference a mic was left on, the new york times journalist was told to take his mask off because the death rate is like 0.1%, strangely they say everyone there has been vaccinated, and then he exclaims "so it was all a hoax?!"
This could have been a political stunt because it was the white house, but an interesting piece nonetheless
well that’s good that you haven’t heard anything about the guidestones. Although, it’s funny that no one is saying anything about these now in a situation like this because someone had gotten very upset with me for not considering them not all that long ago. It is almost like it is okay to entertain them when there are absolutely no visible threats, but somehow something that could be a threat is fake? It’s a little confusing really.I hope you don't mind me answering but in the last months of reading/listening to journalists, writers, doctors, etc. I haven't heard one bit about the guidestones. Did you know that the CIA weaponized the term "conspiracy theory" years ago to gaslight researchers and plain citizens who doubt what our authorities are telling us? Intelligence agencies don't gather information; they spread disinformation and practice psychological operations, especially on their own citizens.
Look at the orchestrated pandemic. False positives, false negatives from completely unreliable tests. 2 different strains of covid, or possibly 50 strains. Symptoms similar to radiation toxicity- hypoxia, heart palpitations, blood clots, and delirium. Falsification of death certificates and wildly inaccurate models intended to shut down world society.
Did you know the world military games in Wuhan were taking place at the same time as event 201 in October? At the center of the creation of the "pandemic" and it's response are the same vaccine makers, GAVI, the World Economic Forum, and most importantly (I feel) is the John Hopkins Center for Health Security.
I don't know if your old enough to remember the devastation resulting from 9/11; what life was like before and after the "war on terror" was proclaimed. Do you believe the towers and building 7 imploded after being hit by planes? That 19 al-Qaeda terrorists organized by a guy in a cave with a cell phone pulled off the most elaborate covert military assault in all of history? I can tell you 100% this is the exact same type of operation, but it's larger and implications are even more severe.
Didn't you say you like Whitney Webb? Please check out any of the 10 articles she's published the last months. Listen to her interview with Douglas Valentine below and you'll understand what people are concerned about. The Phoenix program (that tortured and murdered 40,000 South Vietnamese) is just one of many limbs to this current global operation.
You are more likely to get that nice polite letter that tells you your bank has merged with other provider due to recent events but not to worry nothing will change right now.HmmOne world currency is a possibility, but it's not answering some of the critical questions.
In order to eradicate all small and medium businesses, one would have to eradicate all the small and medium banks. According to one of my sources, In 2008 something like 450 banks went bye-bye. This would be important, except the end result was banking being made "Too Big to Fail".
Now I'm not being paid to decide policy, so I really don't want to dig into this right now. I'm just telling you, what to look out for if you think David Icke's prophecy will come true. There has to be some major course correction in the banking industry that leads 99% of the banks to fail.
The whole point of a controlled economic crash is to eliminate competition. And to have 1 company completely control its respective market. And the biggest roadblock to that end is the banking industry. So yeah, I think things could get real interesting, or maybe this is just another smokescreen.
Was the COVID-19 Test Meant to Detect a Virus?thank you, I had forgotten what the reason I saw people saying this was. So this is another instance where diagnosis for something like mrsa has been showing false positives too then all this time because they use pcr to test for this too.
and in this case, more people are talking about its false negative rate. People are being tested more than once for this thing.
but like I said, we use these all the time already for other things and there are no issues like you are suggesting.
“No one is certain exactly how many tests are spitting back false negatives. One preprint paper relying on biological specimens from 213 patients in China suggested a false-negative rate as high as 30 percent. In a New York Times op-ed, Harlan M. Krumholz, director of the Yale New Haven Hospital Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, wrote, “Some of my colleagues, experts in laboratory medicine, express concerns the false-negative rate in this country could be even higher.” Patients have received suspicious resultssuggesting they don’t have the coronavirus infection despite having symptoms that are completely consistent with what we know about the virus, including high temperatures and a telltale cough. Perhaps the most notable example of a false negative is Li Wenliang, an ophthalmologist in Wuhan, China, who brought COVID-19 to international attention. Li died of the virus, but only after he repeatedly tested negative for the disease.”
Why the Coronavirus Test Gives So Many False Negatives
A great test is nothing with a bad sample.slate.com
saw this video but just haven't watched it yet. Too many videos too little time.Didn't you say you like Whitney Webb? Please check out any of the 10 articles she's published the last months. Listen to her interview with Douglas Valentine below and you'll understand what people are concerned about. The Phoenix program (that tortured and murdered 40,000 South Vietnamese) is just one of many limbs to this current global operation.
you are quoting from a different article yes?. It might turn out that the process of diagnosis changes in the next couple of months. It is a brand new condition, but from what I’ve been reading about ct scan results, they may have really removed the article. Pcr might not be the best approach for testing, but that doesn’t mean it is fake or minimally affects people. It means it is new.Was the COVID-19 Test Meant to Detect a Virus?
Was the COVID-19 Test Meant to Detect a Virus? - UncoverDC
The Corona Simulation Machine: Why the Inventor of The “Corona Test” Would Have Warned Us Not To Use It To Detect A Virus“Scientists are doing an awful lot of damage to the world in the name of helping it. I don't mind attacking my own fraternity because I am ashamed of it.” --Kary Mullis...uncoverdc.com
Worthwhile article on the PCR test and it's history. Regarding the false positive aspect I post here a segment of the article.
One of the ways to distinguish truth from deception in contemporary “science” is to track what gets removed. For example, David tells me, there was apparently an English abstract online at PubMed out of China that rendered the entire COVID testing industrial complex baseless and absurd.
“There was a famous Chinese paper that estimated that if you’re testing asymptomatic people, up to 80% of positives could be false positive. That was kind of shocking, so shocking that PubMed had to withdraw the abstract even though the Chinese paper appears to still be published and available. I actually have a translation with a friend. I translated it into English and it’s a really, standard calculation of what they call positive predictive value. The abstract basically said that in asymptomatic populations, the chance of a positive coronavirus test being a true positive is only about 20%. 80% will be false positive.”
“Doesn’t that mean the test means nothing?” I asked.
“The Chinese analysis was a mathematical analysis, a standard, the standard analysis that’s been done a million times before. There’s no reason to withdraw the paper for any reason. There’s nothing dramatic about the paper. It’s a really boring analysis. It’s just that they did the standard analysis and said, in some populations, like they estimated 1% of people are actually infected in the population. You could have 80% false positive. Uh, they couldn’t do a real analysis of false positives in terms of determining whether a test is correct or not because that requires a gold standard and the only gold standard is purification of the virus. So, we get back to the fact that the virus is not being purified. If you could purify the virus, then you could take a hundred people who tested positive and you could search for the virus in them. And if you found the virus in 50 out of a hundred and not in the other 50, you could say that the test is only accurate 50% of the time. But we have no way to do that because we haven’t yet purified the virus. And I don’t think we ever will.”
Dave Rasnick has had exchanges with David Crowe about this, and concurs, “To my knowledge, they have not yet purified this virus.”