Coronavirus

A Freeman

Superstar
Joined
Nov 11, 2019
Messages
8,375
Why? Are you saying all rich people are somehow evil and deserve death? How is that attitude even helpful to anyone. Personally, I'm pretty grateful to the 'rich' people who had the guts, vision, energy, and intelligence to start companies, give me opportunities, and pay my salary. Many of the 'rich' help the rest of us from being poor... if we are willing to work hard and take advantage of opportunities offered.

The saying 'Eat the rich, feed the poor' displays ignorance, childishness, jealousy and covetousness, which is the same driving force behind socialism/communism. Yes, eat the rich, redistribute (steal) their wealth... and watch everyone eventually become poor. What a genius you are.
Ever heard of Stockholm Syndrome please?

If it's impossible to serve our Creator and mammon/materialism, it should be self-evident that the filthy rich parasitic criminal class aren't benevolent. Isn't this entire coronavirus "pandemic" really about money and power? Isn't it always about the money and the power?
 

A Freeman

Superstar
Joined
Nov 11, 2019
Messages
8,375
Again people we already know and understand have a treatment for flu, this is a new disease compared to that. Plus flu has the death rate of 0.2% while covid's is higher at 2%.

How hard is it to understand that when people call flu more dangerous, they count data of YEARS. They say "xxxxx" amounts of deaths happened from flu in a certain region in a certain "year".
We have had SARS-COV-2 spread in some areas literally like 2-3 weeks ago and its rapidly killing people.

God gave you brains, use it.
Is it really new though? And how would you know?

Can we really treat the flu? Or is that just a lie we're told/sold so they can continue to sell flu shots which admittedly don't work (not to mention no one knows what's in the vaccination)?

How many people did SARS-COV-2 reportedly kill in 2002-2003? Less than 800, wasn't it? And are there really new cases of SARS-COV-2 killing people now? Again, how would you know?


And doesn't our God-given common-sense demand that we remain unemotional to make rational determinations based upon all of the available information, rather than be carried away with every new headline or official tally of the infected or dead?
 

manama

Star
Joined
Mar 15, 2017
Messages
3,827
Is it really new though? And how would you know?
Because I've never seen it before. Boom easy.

Can we really treat the flu? Or is that just a lie we're told/sold so they can continue to sell flu shots which admittedly don't work (not to mention no one knows what's in the vaccination)?

How many people did SARS-COV-2 reportedly kill in 2002-2003? Less than 800, wasn't it? And are there really new cases of SARS-COV-2 killing people now? Again, how would you know?
Information is publically available.

And doesn't our God-given common-sense demand that we remain unemotional to make rational determinations based upon all of the available information, rather than be carried away with every new headline or official tally of the infected or dead?
I wouldn't know that. Alot of you seem to act like every information that disagrees with you is incorrect.
 

manama

Star
Joined
Mar 15, 2017
Messages
3,827
Whatever conspiracy you believe in, at the end of the day you can't do anything or make a difference. You aren't a billionaire, you don't run a government. Most of you aren't even scientists or researchers, a very tiny minority here works in healthcare.

You can't eliminate corona, what you can do is try not to get sick and get yourself and others killed. Stay at your homes, take the necessary precautions.


This really boggles my mind though. "How do you know xxxxx information is correct?" the obvious answer is well someone in that profession told me and then they go "how do you know xxxx person is right?" Because they have documentation/research.
"Well how do you-" I don't fucking know Timmy

Honestly, the same people who ask so much stupid questions trying to find errors in scientific research and somehow the same people who believe that drinking water cures cancer. Where is your documented proof/research there? For God's sake.
 
Joined
May 17, 2019
Messages
16
Whatever conspiracy you believe in, at the end of the day you can't do anything or make a difference. You aren't a billionaire, you don't run a government. Most of you aren't even scientists or researchers, a very tiny minority here works in healthcare.

You can't eliminate corona, what you can do is try not to get sick and get yourself and others killed. Stay at your homes, take the necessary precautions.


This really boggles my mind though. "How do you know xxxxx information is correct?" the obvious answer is well someone in that profession told me and then they go "how do you know xxxx person is right?" Because they have documentation/research.
"Well how do you-" I don't fucking know Timmy

Honestly, the same people who ask so much stupid questions trying to find errors in scientific research and somehow the same people who believe that drinking water cures cancer. Where is your documented proof/research there? For God's sake.
so you suggest not questioning then?

Survive and accept?
 

A Freeman

Superstar
Joined
Nov 11, 2019
Messages
8,375
Because I've never seen it before. Boom easy.
Have you personally seen a lot of other viruses please? And are you personally and physically seeing the coronavirus please?

In other words, are you looking at what's referred to as COVID-19 under a microscope, comparing it to other strains of the flu or, alternatively, are you working with patients who have been diagnosed with it, and have access to their results?

Information is publically available.
Link?

I wouldn't know that. Alot of you seem to act like every information that disagrees with you is incorrect.
Most people are in an information gathering phase right now with this, striving to differentiate between unsubstantiated rumors and established fact, understanding that the mainstream media is a government propaganda mouthpiece.
 
Last edited:

AMK

Rookie
Joined
May 1, 2017
Messages
71
My company is officially closing all locations effective Monday. Tomorrow will be my last day. I’m surprised it took them this long to close down.

They’re paying us two weeks and still giving us our commission checks (I’m in commissioned sales). That should hopefully hold me over until the world becomes a normal place again.

There’s been a ton of rumors near me about a shelter in place coming really soon. But our governer made an announcement that he has no plans on making that executive order so I’m not sure what to think.
It's terrible. So many people have lost their jobs. My job has been closed since Monday we're supposed to open again on April 19th. I work for the City so for now I'm being paid but I worry how much longer before they just let us go.
 

manama

Star
Joined
Mar 15, 2017
Messages
3,827
Have you personally seen a lot of other viruses please? And are you personally and physically seeing the virus please?

In other words, are you looking at what's referred to as COVID-19 under a microscope, comparing it to other strains of the flu or, alternatively, are you working with patients who have been diagnosed with it, and have access to their results?
You can't see a virus under a microscope LOL
But i know people who are researching it, I know people who are researching the vaccines and medicines for it and I know doctors who are working with the patients. I'm not working with the patients myself right now because I haven't finished residency and don't have the healthiest body but due to the staff shortage i will be soon.

Most people are in an information gathering phase right now with this, striving to differentiate between unsubstantiated rumors and established fact, understanding that the mainstream media is a government propaganda mouthpiece.
Enlighten me with your information gathering ways. Are they research articles, certified websites and so on? OR is it a forum like this, facebook or that one link on google page no 31 that agrees with you?


Origin of the virus does NOT matter right now, it is here and its spreading. Do your part in not spreading it more.


P.s. COVID-19 is the disease not the virus but again like the virus, you can't see a disease under the microscope. If you are in an "information gathering phase" do it right.
 

A Freeman

Superstar
Joined
Nov 11, 2019
Messages
8,375
There are godly and benevolent people in the world who also have great wealth. Whether they got there by building it up themselves or inheritance really doesn't matter. God didn't condemn wealth, and not everyone with money are materialistic and chasing Mammon. Money is inanimate object. God condemned LOVE of money, coveting, jealousy, greed, theft, worldliness.

Some with great wealth can be evil parasites, and some can do more good than we can ever hope to. Pretty stupid to condemn all wealthy people without knowing them. It's called bearing false witness.
What was shared with you is that it's impossible to serve both God and mammon/materialism/money.

One of the most exhaustive works that has been personally read on the 300 richest people in the world is the book by Dr. John Coleman, entitled: CONSPIRATORS' HIERARCHY: THE STORY OF THE COMMITTEE OF 300.

In it, Dr. Coleman thoroughly and definitely identifies these people both by names and by associations, with Elizabeth A.M. Battenburg/Mountbatten (known by the criminal aliases "QE2" and "House of Windsor") at the very top of the list, running it all.

Of course to the world of those living in ignorance, she's just a little old great-grandma who wears interesting looking hats to wave to her adoring subjects. In reality, she is the richest woman on planet Earth, owning one-sixth of the planetary land-mass while many of her "subjects" live in abject poverty or on the streets. And how has she accumulated her obscene wealth? She's the world's biggest drug dealer, the head of the B.A.R. association worldwide, and the head of the Church of England. And that's before touching the documented evidence of her involvement in the death of Princess Diana or the numerous charges of p***philia that have been brought against her and the rest of the so-called royal family.

So no, there are no filthy rich people on this planet who are not materialistic or who don't love money and the temporary world power and fame it brings. God wants everyone to be wealthy, NOT just a few extremely evil people living at the expense of everyone else. That way poverty, crime and disease could finally be eliminated forever.

And how does all of this bear on the subject of this thread? The coronavirus apparently looks like a crown under and electron microscope, and has even been referred to as the "crown" virus because that's who signed off on its current deployment as a bioweapon, or as a con to create mass-panic so Elizabeth and her filthy rich family and friends can sell us the "cure" in the form of a vaccine that will likely murder countless more while "chipping" the survivors.




There is rock-solid evidence of Elizabeth's crimes, as there is for most if not all of the Committee of 300. And no, it isn't bearing false witness to expose such evil, particularly when it has now reached the point where BILLIONS are going to be murdered as a result of their fabricated wars and vaccines.
 
Joined
Mar 30, 2017
Messages
3,864
This might help you with some perspective, Dalit. Granted, this is sited from Wikipedia, although, it does give a good overview how the H1N1 virus was dealt with a little over a decade ago. I was speaking with a woman whose 4 year old daughter caught it and was fine afterwards. I'll be honest, I don't even remember it happening:

"Infection control[edit]
Travel precautions


On May 7, 2009, the WHO stated that containment was not feasible and that countries should focus on mitigating the effect of the virus. They did not recommend closing borders or restricting travel.[107] On April 26, 2009, the Chinese government announced that visitors returning from flu-affected areas who experienced flu-like symptoms within two weeks would be quarantined.[108]

U.S. airlines had made no major changes as of the beginning of June 2009, but continued standing practices which include looking for passengers with symptoms of flu, measles or other infections, and relying on in-flight air filters to ensure that aircraft were sanitised.[109] Masks were not generally provided by airlines and the CDC did not recommend that airline crews wear them.[109] Some non-U.S. airlines, mostly Asian, including Singapore Airlines, China Eastern Airlines, China Southern Airlines, Cathay Pacific and Aeromexico, took measures such as stepping up cabin cleaning, installing state-of-the-art air filters and allowing in-flight staff to wear face masks.[109]

According to studies conducted in Australia and Japan, screening individuals for influenza symptoms at airports during the 2009 H1N1 outbreak was not an effective method of infection control.[110][111]

Schools[edit]
U.S. government officials were especially concerned about schools because the H1N1 flu virus appears to disproportionately affect young and school-age people, between six months and 24 years of age.[112] The H1N1 outbreak led to numerous precautionary school closures in some areas. Rather than closing schools, the CDC recommended that students and school workers with flu symptoms should stay home for either seven days total, or until 24 hours after symptoms subsided, whichever was longer.[113] The CDC also recommended that colleges should consider suspending fall 2009 classes if the virus began to cause severe illness in a significantly larger share of students than the previous spring. They also urged schools to suspend rules, such as penalties for late papers or missed classes or requirements for a doctor's note, to enforce "self-isolation" and prevent students from venturing out while ill;[114] schools were advised to set aside a room for people developing flu-like symptoms while they waited to go home and to have ill students or staff and those caring for them use face masks.[115]

In California, school districts and universities were on alert and worked with health officials to launch education campaigns. Many planned to stockpile medical supplies and discuss worst-case scenarios, including plans to provide lessons and meals for low-income children in case elementary and secondary schools closed.[116] University of California campuses stockpiled supplies, from paper masks and hand sanitizer to food and water.[116] To help prepare for contingencies, University of Maryland School of Medicine professor of pediatrics James C. King Jr. suggested that every county should create an "influenza action team" to be run by the local health department, parents, and school administrators.[117] By October 28, 2009, about 600 schools in the United States had been temporarily closed, affecting over 126,000 students in 19 states.
[118]"

(source)
Again, for those that might be interested in reading. I found this among some of my old emails regarding the H1N1/swine flu and thought I'd share:

Political Lies and Media Disinformation regarding the Swine Flu Pandemic

By Michel Chossudovsky​
Global Research, May 1, 2009​

What is the flu? Influenza (the flu) is a serious contagious respiratory illness caused by influenza viruses. Millions of people in the United States get the flu each year. Most people are sick for about a week. Some people (especially young children, pregnant women, older people, and people with chronic health problems) can get very sick and may die from the flu. (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention)



The World Health Organization (WHO) raised its pandemic alert level to Phase 5 on a 6 point scale.

The WHO's Phase 5 alert means "there is sustained human-to-human spread in at least two countries and that global outbreak of the disease is imminent... It also signals an increased effort to produce a vaccine... Human cases have been confirmed in Mexico, the United States, Canada, Britain, Israel, New Zealand and Spain." (emphasis added)
According to reports, the WHO took this decision after " a 23-month-old [child] died [from the swine flu] in Texas after travelling there from Mexico for medical treatment."

The swine flu was, according to reports, confirmed in 11 states in the US. Health officials at the WHO in Geneva and Washington are quoted as saying that the "spread of the virus is unlikely to stop".

The media has gone into full gear with little analysis and review of the evidence, focussing their attention on the more than 2400 cases of non-specific influenza in Mexico.
"the global outbreak is imminent...
all countries should activate preparedness plans",
The worst health crisis facing the world in 90 years..."
On the day following the WHO's Phase 5 Pandemic Alert, a scientist attached to the European Union's Centre for Disease Control and Prevention hinted, without evidence, that the epidemic could potentially affect 40% to 50% of the EU population "in a mild way". (See europeanvoice.com, April 30, 2009).

Professor Neil Ferguson, a member of the World Health Organisation task force on swine flu, stated that "40 per cent of people in the UK could be infected within the next six months if the country was hit by a pandemic."

“We don't really know what size epidemic we will get over the next couple of months... It is almost certain that, even if it does fade away in the next few weeks – which it might – we will get a seasonal epidemic in the autumn."

We might expect up to 30 to 40 per cent of the population to become ill in the next six months if this truly turns into a pandemic. “We could get substantial numbers infected in the next few weeks but, if I was to be a betting man, I would say it would be slightly longer because we are moving into summer.” Prof. Ferguson said the 152 deaths in Mexico probably made up a relatively small proportion of the total number infected, which might run into tens or hundreds of thousands." (Daily Express, May 1, 2009)

The media reports are twisted. Realities are turned up side down. Policy statements are not backed by medical and scientific evidence. Professor Ferguson's statements are unfounded. He has not bothered to check the number of "laboratory confirmed" swine flu cases in Mexico.

30 to 40 % of the British populaiton? Up to 50 % of the population of the European Union?

On what basis are these statements being made?

On April 27, there was, according to reports, only one case of swine flu in the entire European Union: "Europe's first confirmed case of swine flu has been diagnosed in Spain. The country's health ministry confirmed the news on Monday morning, after tests on a man who had recently returned from a trip to Mexico." (BBC, April 27, 2009)


Germany







Weakening the Social Protest Movement


Statements of this nature on the "inevitable spread" of the disease, create, quite deliberately, an atmosphere of fear, insecurity and panic. They also serve to distract people's attention from a devastating global economic crisis which is leading the World into mass poverty and unemployment, not to mention the war in the Middle East and the broader issue of US-NATO war crimes.

The Real Global Crisis is marked by poverty, economic collapse, ethnic strife, death and destruction, the derogation of civil rights and the demise of State social programs. The EU announcement of the swine flu pandemic inevitably serves to weaken the social protest movement which has spread across Europe.

The emergency measures which have "closed down" entire urban areas, are widely perceived as a pretext of the Felipe Calderon government to curb mounting social dissent against one of the most corrupt administrations in Mexcican history. In Mexico, the May 1st Parade, which was directed against the Calderon government, was cancelled

The WHO's Balance Sheet

The WHO advisory points to 148 laboratory confirmed cases Worldwide of the swine influenza, including 8 deaths, barely a pandemia:

"29 April 2009 -- The situation continues to evolve rapidly. As of 18:00 GMT, 29 April 2009, nine countries have officially reported 148 cases of swine influenza A/H1N1 infection. The United States Government has reported 91 laboratory confirmed human cases, with one death. Mexico has reported 26 confirmed human cases of infection including seven deaths.
The following countries have reported laboratory confirmed cases with no deaths - Austria (1), Canada (13), Germany (3), Israel (2), New Zealand (3), Spain (4) and the United Kingdom (5).
Further information on the situation will be available on the WHO website on a regular basis." (who.org)
In a 29 April statement, the WHO Director-General, Dr Margaret Chan confirmed that
"Based on assessment of all available information, and following several expert consultations, I have decided to raise the current level of influenza pandemic alert from phase 4 to phase 5.
Influenza pandemics must be taken seriously precisely because of their capacity to spread rapidly to every country in the world.
... WHO will be tracking the pandemic at the epidemiological, clinical, and virological levels.
... I have reached out to donor countries, to UNITAID, to the GAVI Alliance, the World Bank and others to mobilize resources.
Bonanza for the Pharmaceutical Conglomerates

Big Pharma has been identified by the WHO as the solution to the crisis:
"I [the WHO Director-General] have reached out to companies manufacturing antiviral drugs to assess capacity and all options for ramping up production. I have also reached out to influenza vaccine manufacturers that can contribute to the production of a pandemic vaccine."

The swine flu pandemic constitutes a corporate bonanza for a handful of BioTech conglomerates. The European Union has already given the green light to work with Big Pharma to develop a vaccine against the swine flu.

Examination of the Evidence
The data used to justify a Worldwide level 5 alert is extremely scanty. The WHO states a "global outbreak of the disease is imminent". As documented by William Engdahl, the symptoms of swine flu are non specific, similar to those of flu in general. (See William Engdahl, Global Research, April 29, 2009).
Scientific opinion contradicts the WHO official statement:
"Scientists studying the virus are coming to the consensus that this hybrid strain of influenza -- at least in its current form -- isn't shaping up to be as fatal as the strains that caused some previous pandemics.

In fact, the current outbreak of the H1N1 virus, which emerged in San Diego and southern Mexico late last month, may not even do as much damage as the run-of-the-mill flu outbreaks that occur each winter without much fanfare.
Mounting preliminary evidence from genetics labs, epidemiology models and simple mathematics suggests that the worst-case scenarios are likely to be avoided in the current outbreak." (Los Angeles Times, April 30, 2009)
Mexico

Influenza is a common disease. There are millions of cases of influenza across America, on an annual basis. "According to the Canadian Medical Association Journal, the flu kills up to 2,500 Canadians and about 36,000 Americans annually. Worldwide, the number of deaths attributed to the flu each year is between 250,000 and 500,000" (Thomas Walkom, The Toronto Star, May 1, 2009)

Most of the reported influenza cases in Mexico do not exhibit the A/H1N1 strain.

From the press reports, most of the Mexican cases of swine flu were "suspected", they have not been confirmed by an advanced lab examination. The Mexican Minister of Health, José Ángel Córdova confirmed that there were "2498 serious cases of atypical pneumonia associated with a flu condition" ...[which] could be related to the A/H1N1 virus". Out of those 2498 cases of influenza, 159 died, of influenza or related ailments, but only seven of these deaths were related to the swine flu, according to the official statement of the Minister of Health.

The figures above are consistent with the overall pattern of influenza observed in Mexico in previous years. "In a normal year, between 6,500 and 7,500 Mexicans die from pneumonia-like diseases" (Ibid)

159 reported deaths "have been blamed on the outbreak" but the lab reports suggest that the swine flu was the cause of death only in seven out of 159 cases.
For instance, in the Veracruz town of La Gloria where there was an outbreak of acute respiratory infections, out of 450 cases, 35 were tested for the swine flu virus and only one came back positive.
No details were given as to the lab results pertaining to these seven cases.
Most of the press reports will quote 152 deaths from the H1N1 virus, when in fact only seven of these deaths are associated with the particular A/H1N1 strain, according to the Minister of Health. The other deaths may be associated with cases of ordinary flu and/or related conditions.
In the US only one lab in the entire country has the ability to confirm the identify of the virus, namely the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention located in Atlanta. How many labs are there in Mexico which have the ability to confirm the identify of the virus?

According to reports, samples are being sent to Mexico's National Institute of Epidemiological Diagnosis and Reference, which then forwards them to government labs in the US and Canada. What this suggests is that there is no lab based analysis which documents the relatively large number of suspected cases. According to the Minister's statements, the laboratory analysis pertaining to the 159 deaths is being conducted in Mexican labs with the support of the Atlanta based CDCP and that the results are forthcoming.
The US
In the US there have been 109 reported cases of the virus (April 30, 2009), of which only five were hospitalized. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control confirmed that a 23 month child in Texas had died from the swine flu virus, following hospitalisation and clinical examination.
U.S. Human Cases of Swine Flu Infection
(As of April 30, 2009, 10:30 AM ET)

States​
# of laboratory confirmed cases​
Deaths​
Arizona1
California14
Indiana1
Kansas2
Massachusetts2
Michigan1
Nevada1
New York50
Ohio1
South Carolina
10​
Texas
26​
1
TOTAL COUNTS109 cases1 death
International Human Cases of Swine Flu Infection
See: World Health Organization
Media Disinformation

News reports point to "hundreds of New York schoolchildren reported to have fallen sick with "suspected swine flu". There was, however, no evidence corroborated by lab examinations of the incidence of the swine flu H1N1 strain. In all likelihood, the children were suffering from the flu, which is part of a common occurrence during the month of April. "All the cases were mild, no child was hospitalized, no child was seriously ill,” Dr. Frieden said. Health officials reached their preliminary conclusion after conducting viral tests on nose or throat swabs from the eight students, which allowed them to eliminate other strains of flu."
Tests were conducted on school children in Queen's, but the tests were inconclusive: among theses "hundreds of school children", there were no reports of laboratory analysis leading to a positive identification of the influenza virus. In fact the reports are contradictory: according to the reports, the Atlanta based CDCP is the "only lab in the country that can positively confirm the new swine flu strain — which has been identified as H1N1." (NYT, April 25, 2009)
Influenza is a common disease. Unless there is a thorough lab examination, the identity if the virus cannot be established.
It is revealing that the Atlanta based CDCP is playing a key role in identifying the virus on behalf of several Latin American countries, including Mexico, Guatemala, El Salvador and Costa Rica. On April 30th, the US government established a CDCP lab in Mexico. In other words, a US government agency is monopolising the conduct of laboratory testing, the data and analysis.
 

justjess

Superstar
Joined
Mar 16, 2017
Messages
11,534
Millions of the poorest Americans just lost their only means of income with no clue when or if they will be able to get back to work. The “stimulus” proposals are wonderful government proposed PURPOSELY leaves them out. Try to have some freaking empathy before coming on here and trumpeting the rich and wealthy. Please.
 

A Freeman

Superstar
Joined
Nov 11, 2019
Messages
8,375
You can't see a virus under a microscope LOL
Not even under an electron microscope?

But i know people who are researching it, I know people who are researching the vaccines and medicines for it and I know doctors who are working with the patients. I'm not working with the patients myself right now because I haven't finished residency and don't have the healthiest body but due to the staff shortage i will be soon.
Understood.

Enlighten me with your information gathering ways. Are they research articles, certified websites and so on? OR is it a forum like this, facebook or that one link on google page no 31 that agrees with you?
You claimed that people were also dropping dead right now from SARS-COV-2, and that it was publicly available information when questioned about it. You were then asked to provide a link to this publicly available information, whatever the source may be.

So please, if what you've said is true, would you be so kind as to provide a link to that information instead of dodging the question?

P.S., I don't do fb (a CIA data-mining operation where people voluntarily give up their private information to public spooks) and have been researching this for decades.

Origin of the virus does NOT matter right now, it is here and its spreading. Do your part in not spreading it more.
You're assuming that the media outlets providing us with information about this situation are telling us the truth, despite their pathetic record of being nothing more than government propaganda mouthpieces.

You're assuming that the story about the coronavirus itself is real, and not fabricated.

You're assuming that the coronavirus is spread in the manner in which we've been told, which is extremely unlikely based on transmission studies that have been conducted.

And you're assuming we would all be better off under house arrest, without taking any time to question why the corporate governments of this world might want everyone safely tucked away in their homes while they loot everyone's pension funds and strip them of their remaining assets for the corporate, international banking institutions they are indebted to up to their eyeballs.

That is a lot of assuming for someone who admittedly has no personal knowledge of this situation.

P.s. COVID-19 is the disease not the virus but again like the virus, you can't see a disease under the microscope. If you are in an "information gathering phase" do it right.
By assuming lots of things with litle or no personal knowledge of them as you have done? There is MUCH more to this situation than a virus and the irrational fear it instills in people. Are you familiar with the effects of 5G please? Were you aware that 5G can cause "flu-like symptoms"? Were you aware that Wuhan was the first major city to fully implement 5G, a few weeks before China implemented mandatory vaccinations on 1 December 2019 please?



From: https://drsircus.com/general/virus-5g-and-pollution-combine-to-destroy-wuhan/

"Wuhan City, the capital of Hubei, was expected to have 10,000 5G base stations by the end of 2019, said Song Qizhu, head of Hubei Provincial Communication Administration. China Mobile Hubei Branch has activated 1,580 5G base stations in the city as of mid-October, achieving the 5G coverage of universities, transportation hubs and other densely populated areas, according to the branch.”


These are a few of numerous articles containing pieces to this puzzle, but with an irrefutable history of major problems with vaccination programs which caused permanent injury and death to their recipients (e.g. the "Spanish Flu", polio, MMR, Gardasil/HPV vaccines), it would be extremely naive (and foolish) to overlook the possibility that the mandatory vaccination program in China at the exact time the first cases of "coronavirus" were being reported in Wuhan is just a coincidence.

It seems highly likely that this was intentional, possibly (if not probably) caused by turning on the 5G, creating the flu-like symptoms in Wuhan, which in turn sped up the process of injecting the people with a new, deadly strain of the coronavirus, which is now being called COVID-19. So yes, it matters where and how this all started.

Further, is the name chosen for this virus possibly another clue as to its REAL intention? The REAL digital ID? Are the Chinese now "chipped"/digitally identifiable?


Is the same going to happen in the U.S., as the REAL ID legislation is scheduled to go into effect in Washington on 1 October 2020?


People need to evaluate this situation calmly and rationally, looking beyond the obvious for the intended purpose. On this planet, it's always about money and power. Always.
 
Last edited:

A Freeman

Superstar
Joined
Nov 11, 2019
Messages
8,375
Wow. To recap:

- Queen Elizabeth is rich, therefore all rich people are evil.
- Someone claims the virus looks like a crown, therefore Queen Elizabeth, therefore all rich people are evil.

Yup, got it.
No, you didn't "get it". Please take the time to read and digest the information that's been shared, and do some of your own research as well, rather than have a knee-jerk reaction to it in "self"-defense. If you think it's possible to become one of the richest 300 families on Earth through honesty and hard-work, then you're simply choosing to ignore a world full of evidence to the contrary.
 

Haich

Superstar
Joined
Mar 15, 2017
Messages
7,312
No, you didn't "get it". Please take the time to read and digest the information that's been shared, and do some of your own research as well, rather than have a knee-jerk reaction to it in "self"-defense. If you think it's possible to become one of the richest 300 families on Earth through honesty and hard-work, then you're simply choosing to ignore a world full of evidence to the contrary.
He's looking for trouble, quoted my post and completely disregarded what I said too.
 

manama

Star
Joined
Mar 15, 2017
Messages
3,827
Not even under an electron microscope?
Yes we can, you can probably already find pictures of it. Though there are a hundred other ways to differentiate viruses.

You claimed that people were also dropping dead right now from SARS-COV-2, and that it was publicly available information when questioned about it. You were then asked to provide a link to this publicly available information, whatever the source may be.

So please, if what you've said is true, would you be so kind as to provide a link to that information instead of dodging the question?

P.S., I don't do fb (a CIA data-mining operation where people voluntarily give up their private information to public spooks) and have been researching this for decades.
You do realize you can look up current cases + deaths on any government website or hospital one. Its constantly being updated. And don't start with the "what if they aren't true" because they very obviously are.

You're assuming that the story about the coronavirus itself is real, and not fabricated.
You're the one assuming stuff, i HAVE seen the cases, i know people who are currently sick, i know people who are currently working on it and in hospitals. YOU keep thinking and assuming because of your limited worldview or lack of contacts.

And you're assuming we would all be better off under house arrest, without taking any time to question why the corporate governments of this world might want everyone safely tucked away in their homes while they loot everyone's pension funds and strip them of their remaining assets for the corporate, international banking institutions they are indebted to up to their eyeballs.

That is a lot of assuming for someone who admittedly has no personal knowledge of this situation.
I'm a resident doctor who also has a masters in virology but sure "you" know more.
 
Top