No regard...for the desire of women

Karlysymon

Superstar
Joined
Mar 18, 2017
Messages
7,324
5:46 And in their footsteps We sent Jesus the son of Mary, confirming the Law that had come before him
When it says “Law”, what Law is it referring to? The Moral law (Decalogue) or the Mosaic Law and which one was He confirming and how?
From the link…
The Qur'anic mention of 'the sacred relics left behind by the house of Aaron' seems to allude to the Tablets of Law bequeathed to Moses on Mount Sinai. The Ark is also said to have contained the original copy of the Torah, which Moses himself had had transcribed and which he had himself handed over to the Levites. The Ark is also supposed to have contained a golden urn holding the manna (Hebrews 9: 2 ff - Ed.), in order that the coming generations might recall God's benevolence to their forefathers during their wandering in the desert. The Ark also probably contained the rod of Moses which was one of the great miracles of God. (Hebrews 9: 5 mentions the rod of Aaron - Ed.)

We can agree that the Levites were a priestly class, I mean it is a historical fact. In Christianity, inorder for Christ to be a High Priest, and be an intercessor/lawyer for Man before God as Aaron was for the Israelites, He had to live and die on earth. Hebrews 4:14-16
Seeing then that we have a great high priest, that is passed into the heavens, Jesus the Son of God, let us hold fast our profession.
15 For we have not an high priest which cannot be touched with the feeling of our infirmities; but was in all points tempted like as we are, yet without sin.
16 Let us therefore come boldly unto the throne of grace, that we may obtain mercy, and find grace to help in time of need

So, if the Quran says Christ didn’t die, it immediately cancels out His priesthood. Meaning Christ is in heaven but not as a High Priest and the concept/office of the high priest is simply a relic of the past. Naturally, because depending on how one understands the sin problem, only then can the death, resurrection and priesthood of Christ be understood. If there is no sin to atone for, or if the transgression of the Moral Law doesn’t immediately demand the life of the transgressor, then it makes sense that there is no need for the Cross and the High Priesthood (intercession).

The question, though, is: quranically, why did God institute the sanctuary rituals by dictating them to Moses? Fine, if Islam was inaugurated as a correction of Judaism and Christianity, why did God come up with the idea of a High Priest, and Aaron being the first? And does the Quran corroborate the Psalmist when he says: “You are a priest forever in the order of Melchizedek”? (Psalm 110:4), if so, who and what, was he talking about?

About historical accuracy of your koran (as you claim), can you please explain and justify the accuracy of this

4:157 That they said (in boast), "We killed Christ Jesus the son of Mary, the Messenger of Allah";-but they killed him not, nor crucified him, but so it was made to appear to them, and those who differ therein are full of doubts, with no (certain) knowledge, but only conjecture to follow, for of a surety they killed him not.

Historical facts seem to be going against your scriptures.
That's because the claim is, someone did die but it wasn't Jesus (he was replaced), inorder to remain consistent with secular accounts of the Crucifixion.
 

Axl888

Established
Joined
Jul 29, 2019
Messages
413
That's because the claim is, someone did die but it wasn't Jesus (he was replaced), inorder to remain consistent with secular accounts of the Crucifixion.
Then the claim is a lie as multitude of eye witnesses saw Jesus Christ died on the cross, and this is backed up with historical facts not just by the Bible.
 

Karlysymon

Superstar
Joined
Mar 18, 2017
Messages
7,324
Then the claim is a lie as multitude of eye witnesses saw Jesus Christ died on the cross, and this is backed up with historical facts not just by the Bible.
Apparently, His likeness was transposed on the victim. Just as you would be awaiting execution, a doppleganger suddenly shows up, who then takes your place and you escape with your head still sitting on your shoulders :)
 

Axl888

Established
Joined
Jul 29, 2019
Messages
413
Apparently, His likeness was transposed on the victim. Just as you would be awaiting execution, a doppleganger suddenly shows up, who then takes your place and you escape with your head still sitting on your shoulders :)
Oh well, is that account even according to their koran or just conjectures?
 

manama

Star
Joined
Mar 15, 2017
Messages
3,827
According to Islam, Jesus was saved by God by having him ascend to heaven so he would remain alive until he would come back to end the false Christ. The person on the cross was one of the people responsible for wanting Jesus dead/crucified. He was made to look like Jesus in that moment hence the infamous "Why have you forsaken me father?".
 

Axl888

Established
Joined
Jul 29, 2019
Messages
413
According to Islam, Jesus was saved by God by having him ascend to heaven so he would remain alive until he would come back to end the false Christ. The person on the cross was one of the people responsible for wanting Jesus dead/crucified. He was made to look like Jesus in that moment hence the infamous "Why have you forsaken me father?".
Is that according to the koran? Can you please provide the actual verse, thank you.
 

manama

Star
Joined
Mar 15, 2017
Messages
3,827
Is that according to the koran? Can you please provide the actual verse, thank you.
The verse you posted literally says "but it was made to appear to them" right after the portion you highlighted.

With the next verse being
"Rather, Allah raised him to Himself. And ever is Allah Exalted in Might and Wise"
 

Red Sky at Morning

Superstar
Joined
Mar 15, 2017
Messages
14,677
The verse you posted literally says "but it was made to appear to them" right after the portion you highlighted.

With the next verse being
"Rather, Allah raised him to Himself. And ever is Allah Exalted in Might and Wise"
As this is really a way of avoiding the doctrine of the Atonement, I wonder how Muslims interpret to purpose of animal sacrifices in the OT? Certainly they are mentioned frequently enough not to be later interpolations so what was God’s idea? Why not just give the Jews some rules to follow?
 

manama

Star
Joined
Mar 15, 2017
Messages
3,827
As this is really a way of avoiding the doctrine of the Atonement, I wonder how Muslims interpret to purpose of animal sacrifices in the OT? Certainly they are mentioned frequently enough not to be later interpolations so what was God’s idea? Why not just give the Jews some rules to follow?
What do you mean? Its not truly atonement if someone else is taking it for you. Everyone should be responsible for themselves and this is why I love Islam so much. No one will ever bear the burden of someone else's sin. I would find it really messed up if some man who I have never met and will never meet sinned and that automatically made me a sinner and then another man who again I have never met and would probably never meet ended up getting sacrificed and suddenly im virtuous.
And what is "rules" meant to mean here? Jews had many rules to follow, they were also very notorious for breaking them all. Also managed to make the record for killing the most Prophets.
 

Red Sky at Morning

Superstar
Joined
Mar 15, 2017
Messages
14,677
What do you mean? Its not truly atonement if someone else is taking it for you. Everyone should be responsible for themselves and this is why I love Islam so much. No one will ever bear the burden of someone else's sin. I would find it really messed up if some man who I have never met and will never meet sinned and that automatically made me a sinner and then another man who again I have never met and would probably never meet ended up getting sacrificed and suddenly im virtuous.
And what is "rules" meant to mean here? Jews had many rules to follow, they were also very notorious for breaking them all. Also managed to make the record for killing the most Prophets.
Can you not see though - the Jews were given both “the rules” and the symbolic payment for falling short. This pointed forward to what Jesus did for us by dying on a cross? He kept the law, then came as the perfect sacrifice.

I know to the Muslim mind this must be as clear as mud, yet if you read the Bible it as plain as the nose on your face!!
 

Haich

Superstar
Joined
Mar 15, 2017
Messages
7,312
My point is exactly the same as your point.

About historical accuracy of your koran (as you claim), can you please explain and justify the accuracy of this

4:157 That they said (in boast), "We killed Christ Jesus the son of Mary, the Messenger of Allah";-but they killed him not, nor crucified him, but so it was made to appear to them, and those who differ therein are full of doubts, with no (certain) knowledge, but only conjecture to follow, for of a surety they killed him not.

Historical facts seem to be going against your scriptures.
No, your point cant be the same as mine. The Quran has one voice. You guys have tons. My point was based on the authenticity of those random unnamed authors. You just rewrote what I said, so I was asking what your point was? Was it regarding the source of the Quran, it's authenticity...etc.?

Historically, it is believed a man was crucified. I didn't say this wasn't the case. In Islam, we believe that God saved Jesus and took him up to the heavens. We dont believe he was crucified, we believe someone else was. We believe Jesus is alive and is in the heavens. He will be back to fulfill his duty as the messiah and defeat the anti christ, then unite people and clarify the misconceptions of his divinity.

Even if I entertain the idea that jesus was crucified, which I dont believe to be the case as The Quran being the literal word of God for me, tells me that that's the case- it doesn't explain how he died for our present and future sins. It also doesn't explain or prove the case of his divinity. Theres no logical sense to it all and it seems in Christianity, logic is absent from certain discussions and you're just required to believe and have faith in vague translations of verses, written by dozens of random men.


Here's a detailed breakdown of the Islamic view on the crucifixion. It's a bit of a read but well worth it if you want to understand my view on the matter :

There is nothing strange about the Muslims rejecting this idea, because the Qur’aan in which they believe and accept what it tells them definitively states that that did not happen, as Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning):

“And because of their saying (in boast), ‘We killed Messiah ‘Eesa (Jesus), son of Maryam (Mary), the Messenger of Allaah,’ — but they killed him not, nor crucified him, but it appeared so to them the resemblance of ‘Eesa (Jesus) was put over another man (and they killed that man)], and those who differ therein are full of doubts. They have no (certain) knowledge, they follow nothing but conjecture. For surely; they killed him not [i.e. ‘Eesa (Jesus), son of Maryam (Mary)]”

[al-Nisa’ 4:157]

Rather the problem rests with the Christians for whom the doctrine of the crucifixion and redemption has become a central issue, so much so that the cross is the symbol of their religion.

It is strange that they differ concerning the form of this cross which indicates their confusion about this fabrication.

There are differences between their Gospels and their historians regarding everything that has to do with the story of the crucifixion.

They differ concerning the timing of the Last Supper, which according to them was one of the events in the lead-up to the crucifixion. They differ concerning the traitor who led (the Romans) to Christ – did that happen at least one day before the Last Supper, as narrated by Luke, or during it, after Christ gave him the piece of bread, as narrated by John?

Was Christ the one who carried his cross, as John says, as was customary with one who was going to be crucified, according to Nottingham, or was it Simon of Cyrene, as the other three Gospels state?

They say that two thieves were crucified alongside Christ, one on his right and one on his left, so what was the attitude of these two towards the Messiah who was being crucified, as they claim?

Did the thieves scorn him for being crucified, and say that his Lord had abandoned him and left him to his enemies? Or did only one of them scorn him, and did the other rebuke the one who scorned him?

At what hour did this crucifixion take place – was it in the third hour, as Mark says, or in the sixth as John says?

What happened after the so-called crucifixion?

Mark says that the veil of the Temple was torn from top to bottom. Matthew adds that the earth shook and rocks crumbled, and many of the saints rose from their graves and entered the holy city, appearing to many. Luke says that the sun turned dark, and the veil of the Temple was torn in the middle, and when the centurion saw what had happened, he glorified God and said, “Truly this man was righteous.”

But John does not know anything about all that!

These are not the only weak elements and indications of falseness in the story of the crucifixion, as narrated in the gospels. Rather the one who studies the details of the gospel narratives of this story will, with the least effort, notice the great differences in the details of this story, which are such that it is impossible to believe it all or even any part of it!

How desperate are the failed attempts to fill this gap and conceal the faults of this distorted book. Allaah indeed spoke the truth when He said in His Book which He has preserved (interpretation of the meaning):

“Do they not then consider the Qur’aan carefully? Had it been from other than Allaah, they would surely, have found therein many a contradiction”

[al-Nisa’ 4:82]

Apart from the fact that the gospel accounts are not sound, and their authors themselves admit that they were not revealed to the Messiah in this form, nor were they even written during his lifetime, none of the witnesses were present at the events to which they testify, as Mark says:

“Then everyone deserted him and fled.”

Mark 14:50 – New International Version (NIV)

Because these events were not witnessed by anyone who narrated them, there is a great deal of room for imagination and poetic licence.

We will complete our discussion of the fable of the crucifixion of Christ (peace be upon him) by looking at what the Gospels say about the Messiah’s prediction that he would be saved from death:

On one occasion the Pharisees and chief priests sent the guards to arrest him and he said to them:

“I am with you for only a short time, and then I go to the one who sent me. You will look for me, but you will not find me, and where I am, you cannot come.”

John 7:33-34 – NIV

Elsewhere he says:

“Once more Jesus said to them, ‘I am going away, and you will look for me, and you will die in your sin. Where I go, you cannot come.’

This made the Jews ask, ‘Will he kill himself? Is that why he says, “Where I go, you cannot come”?’

But he continued, ‘You are from below; I am from above. You are of this world; I am not of this world.

I told you that you would die in your sins; if you do not believe that I am the one I claim to be, you will indeed die in your sins.’

‘Who are you?’ they asked.

‘Just what I have been claiming all along,’ Jesus replied. ‘I have much to say in judgment of you. But he who sent me is reliable, and what I have heard from him I tell the world.’

They did not understand that he was telling them about his Father.

So Jesus said, ‘When you have lifted up the Son of Man, then you will know that I am the one I claim to be and that I do nothing on my own but speak just what the Father has taught me.

The one who sent me is with me; he has not left me alone, for I always do what pleases him.’”

John 8:21-29 – NIV

Then at the end he tells them again:

“For I tell you, you will not see me again until you say, 'Blessed is he who comes in the name of the Lord.'”

Matthew 23:39 – NIV, also Luke 13:35

The Messiah, as these texts and others show, was certain that God would never hand him over to his enemies, and would never forsake him.

“But a time is coming, and has come, when you will be scattered, each to his own home. You will leave me all alone. Yet I am not alone, for my Father is with me.

I have told you these things, so that in me you may have peace. In this world you will have trouble. But take heart! I have overcome the world.”

John 16:32-33

Because of that the passers by, and indeed everyone who attended the so-called crucifixion, mocked the Messiah, as the writer of this Gospel says (although that could not have been true):

“Those who passed by hurled insults at him, shaking their heads

and saying, ‘You who are going to destroy the temple and build it in three days, save yourself! Come down from the cross, if you are the Son of God!’

In the same way the chief priests, the teachers of the law and the elders mocked him.

‘He saved others,’ they said, ‘but he can't save himself! He's the King of Israel! Let him come down now from the cross, and we will believe in him.

He trusts in God. Let God rescue him now if he wants him, for he said, “I am the Son of God.”’

In the same way the robbers who were crucified with him also heaped insults on him.”

Matthew 27:39-44 – NIV

But it seems that Jesus’ certainty that God was with him began to waver, according to the distorted Gospel narrative, (although that could not have been true):

“Then Jesus went with his disciples to a place called Gethsemane, and he said to them, ‘Sit here while I go over there and pray.’

He took Peter and the two sons of Zebedee along with him, and he began to be sorrowful and troubled.

Then he said to them, ‘My soul is overwhelmed with sorrow to the point of death. Stay here and keep watch with me.’

Going a little farther, he fell with his face to the ground and prayed, ‘My Father, if it is possible, may this cup be taken from me. Yet not as I will, but as you will.’

Then he returned to his disciples and found them sleeping.


He went away a second time and prayed, ‘My Father, if it is not possible for this cup to be taken away unless I drink it, may your will be done.’

When he came back, he again found them sleeping, …

So he left them and went away once more and prayed the third time, sayingthe same thing.

Then he returned to the disciples and said to them, ‘Are you still sleeping and resting? Look, the hour is near, and the Son of Man is betrayed into the hands of sinners’”

Matthew 26:36-45 – NIV

Luke describes the scene and says:

“And being in anguish, he prayed more earnestly, and his sweat was like drops of blood falling to the ground.

When he rose from prayer and went back to the disciples, he found them asleep, exhausted from sorrow.

‘Why are you sleeping?’ he asked them. ‘Get up and pray so that you will not fall into temptation.’”

Luke 22:44-46 – NIV

Because of this mockery of the message of Christ – according to their claims – and because Christ thought that God was with him and would never forsake him, then it follows that the writer who fabricated this dramatic scene would end it with a vision of the despair of the Messiah and his feelings of being abandoned by God – exalted be Allaah far above what the wrongdoers say. The fabricator says:

“From the sixth hour until the ninth hour darkness came over all the land.

About the ninth hour Jesus cried out in a loud voice, ‘Eloi, Eloi, lama sabachthani?’--which means, "My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?"

Matthew 27:38-47 – NIV

See also Mark 15:34

If we understand what this story means when subjected to criticism, the same will apply to the doctrine of redemption and sacrifice that is based on it.
 

Haich

Superstar
Joined
Mar 15, 2017
Messages
7,312
Can you not see though - the Jews were given both “the rules” and the symbolic payment for falling short. This pointed forward to what Jesus did for us by dying on a cross? He kept the law, then came as the perfect sacrifice.

I know to the Muslim mind this must be as clear as mud, yet if you read the Bible it as plain as the nose on your face!!
Unfortunately Red, I have to disagree. I don't think reading the bible will make it plain at all. It just conjures up more questions which are answered with 'just have faith!'
 

Lisa

Superstar
Joined
Mar 13, 2017
Messages
20,288
Or God seems to have no use or care for women outside of bearing children. Many of the early churchfathers seemed to agree and I'm sure @Lisa would too. Beautiful faith.
No, I don’t believe that God has no use or care for women outside of childbirth..but we do our best work in our families. The early church fathers thought that too you mean?
 

Todd

Star
Joined
Apr 16, 2017
Messages
2,525
Which Jesus? The Jesus of the bible?
Not if you are still preaching the same message as you do online I wouldn't.
Then why did you even discuss this passage? Someone else brought up Mark 9:38 for you to contemplate as reason to stop condemning me just because we don't see eye to eye. Then you brought up the fact that the Jesus pointed out that the people in question were successfully casting out demons in his name. So what was the point in bringing that up if you wouldn't recondisder your stance on me if I were sucessfully casting out demons in Jesus name?

You dismiss verses that contradict your position.
I don't dismiss them, I have a different interpretation of them. No different than you who dismiss verses that support my position.
You ignore the apostles' acceptance of Paul.
No I don't. Peter only recognized Paul as a beloved brother, not as an Apostle. There is no official record of the Apostles in Jerusalem accpeting Paul as the 13th Apostle.
You ignore Jesus' own words about Hell.
No I don't. You are the one who ignores the correct translation of the greek words that record Jesus words about Hell and cling to your doctrinally biased less than perfect English Bible translation. You do so to hold up your sadistic belief that God will have sinners suffer for eternity with no purpose other than to satisfy his vengance.
I repeat - which Jesus.
I repeat, the Jesus of the Bible, the messiah, born of a virgin Mary, crucified, buried and rose on the third and seated at the right hand of God. The one that Peter said God made both Lord and Christ. (How one can be made something by someone and not be subordinate to that one is beyond me.)

Todd's Jesus is not the bible Jesus.
The bible is my only source for my faith in Jesus.
Todd's Jesus did not preach about eternal Hell.
No he taught about the fire of God, that throughout the Bible is used to purify and sanctify, not cause purposeless suffering.
Todd's Jesus is not God made made Flesh.
Nope he is the perfect image of God dwelling in a man. In a figurative manner he is "God in the flesh", no different than you and I being the body of Christ. No different than what Paul spoke about when he said "it is no longer I that live, but Christ that lives in me." Was Paul claiming he was literally Jesus in the flesh? Jesus was the perfect example of a man fully submitted and yielded to the Spirit of God. I have no problem with Jesus being elevated to a "divine" status and honored as such. I simply reject the Trinity doctrine that says Jesus is co-equal with God the Father and that the Spirit of God is a seperate person than God the Father.
Todd's Jesus did not appear to Paul in Acts 9.
A vision is not the same as knowing someone in the flesh. Acknowledging Jesus in the flesh was part of the test that John propoesed to test false teaching. Paul did nothing to acknowledge Jesus in the flesh and elevated his "revelation of the spiritual, mystic Jesus" above the ministry of Jesus in the flesh. I'm not denying that Paul's vision was of the real Jesus. But the Jesus in Paul's vision called him to be a witness (evangelist) not an Apostle. Paul clearly was the greatest evangelist of the first century church, but an evangelist does not have the authority to establish doctrine the same as an Apostle.
Todd's Jesus did not stop Paul (an alleged false prophet) from having his words added to God's Word (Bible).
Jesus didn't stop many of the known additions, interpolations and mistranslations of the Bible. Anyone who denies this is making an idol of the english translation of the Bible they possess. Dueteronomy 13 says that God himself uses false teachers and prophets to test our faithfulness to his commands and to worship him only. So my faith is not at all compromised by the fact that God allowed Paul's words to be in the Bible. When one removes the scales of dogma and indoctrination from their spiritual eyes the conflict between Paul and the Apostles in Jerusalem becomes clear and we can learn alot from understanding the tension between Paul and the Apostles. As Peter said Paul wrote with the widsom that God gave him, (not the same as speaking or prophecying the actual words of God). So while not authoritative to establish doctrine, there is still much wisdom and understanding to gain from reading Paul's words. My investigation into the doctrine of Apokatastatis was actually intiatied and inspired by the words of Paul, though if I hadn't found biblical support for it outside of Paul's words I likely would not have embraced it the same as I do.
Todd's Jesus dismisses faith only in Him needed for salvation, works are required etc etc.
Yes as recorded in Matthew 25:34-46 the Jesus I have faith in says works are important. So did James!

Thank you @JoChris for providing this opportunity to further clarify and explain what I believe and why. Maybe it will help prevent some of you here from presuming you know what I believe and falsely accuse me of being fallen. You may not agree with me on many things, but I'm not your enemy. We serve the same God! Our imperfect and incomplete understanding of God is what differs![/quote][/quote]
 

Karlysymon

Superstar
Joined
Mar 18, 2017
Messages
7,324
As this is really a way of avoiding the doctrine of the Atonement, I wonder how Muslims interpret to purpose of animal sacrifices in the OT? Certainly they are mentioned frequently enough not to be later interpolations so what was God’s idea? Why not just give the Jews some rules to follow?
For the sacrifices, they say its an outward expression of self-sacrifice and nothing to do with atonement.Although, what we want is the explanation for the details of the Sanctuary and its keepers that God dictated to Moses. Why did God go to all that trouble? :)

I think the issue of Atonement can be understood in the way that each religion understands the problem and origin of sin. As you are well aware, the Cross wasn’t just about man’s redemption. As always, God’s actions are multi-purposed, with Paul writing in Colossians (1:19-20) that:

For it pleased the Father that in him should all fulness dwell;
20 And, having made peace through the blood of his cross, by him to reconcile all things unto himself; by him, I say, whether they be things in earth, or things in heaven.


The Cross accomplished a lot more than we’ll probably ever know or understand in this age. So for Muslims, it seems Lucifer’s rebellion and Adam’s fall aren’t that much connected. You just need to say you are sorry, repent and be on your merry way. No explanation as to the recourse on the effects on sin on other entities beyond man (as you know, when Adam rebelled against his Creator, even the creatures put under his dominion rebelled against his authority).
 
Last edited:

manama

Star
Joined
Mar 15, 2017
Messages
3,827
Can you not see though - the Jews were given both “the rules” and the symbolic payment for falling short. This pointed forward to what Jesus did for us by dying on a cross? He kept the law, then came as the perfect sacrifice.

I know to the Muslim mind this must be as clear as mud, yet if you read the Bible it as plain as the nose on your face!!
I just don't see it lol. I don't understand how an innocent man who has nothing to do with me, dying, would save me from being a sinner especially when I was labelled a sinner for the deed for a man who again has hardly anything to do with me.
Plus Jews had rules and they broke them over and over again and then they murdered the ones who tried to take them to the righteous path. Nobody has suffered in the name of their own nation more than Prophet Moses whos own nation did their best to humiliate him over and over again. Atleast Noah a.s. and Lut a.s got out and lived the rest of their days in peace after their nations got turned to dust, Moses had to lived through it all until the day he passed away. I don't see how Jesus' sacrifice would solve that.
I don't think heaven and hell need to exist if the whole sacrifice happened.
 

Red Sky at Morning

Superstar
Joined
Mar 15, 2017
Messages
14,677
Or God seems to have no use or care for women outside of bearing children. Many of the early churchfathers seemed to agree and I'm sure @Lisa would too. Beautiful faith.
I think there is no biblical way that God “expects” you to live your adult life as a Christian. A single person is not automatically lonely or a married person automatically fulfilled. Many single people have a breadth of friendships and interests that married people don’t have time or funds for!

As a Christian, you can learn something of the heart of God from being a child, other things as a parent or a spouse and still others for being set apart for Him.

At one time, in my 20s I was quite happy with my friends, fellowship and direction in life without looking for “someone special”, yet the married pastor of the Church I was going to seemed to think I needed to join a “singles group”. Needless to say, I didn’t!

Some people choose singleness not because their lives are empty but because they are already full. In the case of Paul, it appears he was already so full of God’s presence and heart that he didn’t feel the need to seek the warmth of an earthly relationship to complete him.
 

Haich

Superstar
Joined
Mar 15, 2017
Messages
7,312
You just need to say you are sorry, repent and be on your merry way. No explanation as to the recourse on the effects on sin on other entities beyond man (as you know, when Adam rebelled against his Creator, even the creatures put under his dominion rebelled against his authority).
Sorry had to just point out, that we aren't just on 'our merry way'. We believe in the day of judgement which is where each soul shall be held accountable for the wrong they did but also be rewarded for the good they did.

It seems in christianity you're going to heaven regardless as there is no accountability factor for the damage one does whilst on earth. So maybe as a Christian who is exempt from the fire based on belief alone, it is you who is on their merry way...
 

manama

Star
Joined
Mar 15, 2017
Messages
3,827
For the sacrifices, they say its an outward expression of self-sacrifice and nothing to do with atonement.

I think the issue of Atonement can be understood in the way that each religion understands the problem and origin of sin. As you are well aware, the Cross wasn’t just about man’s redemption. As always, God’s actions are multi-purposed, with Paul writing in Colossians (1:19-20) that:

For it pleased the Father that in him should all fulness dwell;
20 And, having made peace through the blood of his cross, by him to reconcile all things unto himself; by him, I say, whether they be things in earth, or things in heaven.


The Cross accomplished a lot more than we’ll probably ever know or understand in this age. So for Muslims, it seems Lucifer’s rebellion and Adam’s fall aren’t that much connected. You just need to say you are sorry, repent and be on your merry way. No explanation as to the recourse on the effects on sin on other entities beyond man (as you know, when Adam rebelled against his Creator, even the creatures put under his dominion rebelled against his authority).
Lucifer's rebellion and Adam and Eve's sin is more connected for us than it is for you though. For us it forms a clear picture that at the end of the day pride and envy can make even the most mightiest and righteous person fall down. The entire story of Adam and Satan has always been told to us as a two way mirror, two people going through the EXACT same thing but reacting very differently to their outcomes.

You just believe that angels rebelled and that lucifer is a fallen angel while for us Angels and Jinns are completely different species/creatures with the former lacking any free-will and thus being unable to sin. Which is also what makes lucifer's pride's impact on his own fate very different for us than you. While every other Jinn was busy rebelling against God and killing on earth and causing massive chaos which led to a war between the demons and the angels, Lucifer spent the entire time just praying and worshipping God. A being so pious that its said there is hardly any place on earth where he hasnt bowed down infront of God and when he was raised above the angels in status as a reward, he loses all of it because of his envy against Adam. It is also said that when the body of Adam was made, Lucifer became obsessed with him.

Both sinned yet while one prays for forgiveness, the other makes a challenge. Both were given three wishes, one used all three so increase his power so he could ruin people and take them to hell, the other used all three to make sure that his descendants or humanity would have chances again and again to be saved.

This is probably why we see Adam and Eve very different from you do. To you they are people who sinned and someone else paid and now everyone is a sinner and what not. To us they are our true parents and we love them like we would love a biological parent and I know that i'm loved by them even if i sin.
 

Lisa

Superstar
Joined
Mar 13, 2017
Messages
20,288
To us they are our true parents and we love them like we would love a biological parent and I know that i'm loved by them even if i sin.
Reminds me how catholics look at Mary, but then you guys worship Mary too don’t you?

I don’t know how anyone loves people they’ve never met like they were your own parents..that’s seems a bit strange to me.
 
Top