Pope pushes new one religion

[A Freeman]

Last pope Francis is referred to as "the son of the destroyer" in Scripture, and the end of Roman Catholicism and the papacy according to the prophecies of the 12th century Irish prophet Malachy.

2 Thessalonians 2:3-12
2:3 Let no man deceive you by any means: for [that day shall not come], except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of The Destroyer (Lucifer - Satan);
2:4 Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in The Temple of God, showing himself that he is God (the Holy Father).
2:5 Remember ye not, that, when I was yet with you, I told you these things?
2:6 And now ye know what withholdeth that he might be revealed in his time.
2:7 For the mystery (Rev. 17:5) of iniquity doth already work: only he who now letteth [will let], until he be taken out of the way.
2:8 And then shall that Wicked be revealed, whom the Lord shall consume with the [Sword of the] Spirit from his mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness [of the enlightening] of his coming:
2:9 [Even the Wicked], whose coming is the work of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders,
2:10 And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of The Truth, that they might be saved.
2:11 And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:
2:12 That they all might be damned who believed not The Truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.

The RCC is the beast that was, and is not, and yet is. The RCC ceased to exist briefly in 1798 when Napoleon Bonaparte sacked Rome and declared there would be no more popes. Since 1798, there have been only 7 papal names used before the current pope took the name of Francis: (1) Pius, (2) Leo, (3) Gregory, (4) Benedict, (5) John, (6) Paul, and (7) John Paul. Francis is the eighth papal name used since 1798 and he is the last pope – “Peter the Roman” – according to the prophecies of the 12th century Irish Prophet Malachy:-

Rev.17 Kings/Popes (since 1798)



The seven papal names used since 1798:-
(and the total number of popes who have used these names)

1. Twelve Popes who have used the name Pius
2. Thirteen Popes who have used the name Leo
3. Sixteen Popes who have used the name Gregory
4. Fifteen Popes who have used the name Benedict
5. Twenty One Popes who have used the name John
6. Six Popes who have used the name Paul
7. Two Popes who have used the name John Paul

And then there was Francis.

On 13 March 2013, Cardinal Jorge Mario Bergoglio, son of Italian (Roman) parents, became Pope Francis (the 1st), after St. Francis Assisi [the patron saint of Italy, whose full name was Francesco di Pietro (Peter) di Bernardone]. Bergoglio is the first Jesuit to assume the visible head of the RCC and he served and trained directly under the two previous Jesuit Generals (“black popes”) Pedro Arrupe and Peter-Hans Kovenbach.

Francis is the last pope, the Son of the Destroyer (Satan/Abaddon/Apollyon). The pope and his followers have NO chance of entering at the 'Strait' Gate (Rev. 2:20-23).

 

[redqueen]

wonder if they made reficul the same word as light as a way of
deceiving those who Believe the word they're saying is "light"
meanwhile its been reficul all along

this is just plain weird to me

Vatican unveils new cartoon mascot for Catholic Church

Archbishop Rino Fisichella says the mascot named Luce is "created from the desire to enter into the world of pop culture, so beloved by our young people".

news.sky.com

 

[phipps]

A call for Catholics and Protestants to receive Communion—side by side

Why can't Catholics and Protestants share the experience of partaking in the Eucharist each according to their tradition?

www.americamagazine.org

In the article, Meg Giordano who is a Protestant professor and who teaches at the Le Moyne College, a Jesuit institution in Syracuse, New York, promoted the idea of Catholics and Protestants celebrating together in a shared communion as a step towards Christian unity. According to Jesuit professor Giordano, the Eucharist is the essence of all Christian identity and transcends denominational differences, so both Catholics and Protestants can partake in it without violating their traditions. Professor Giordano says that the Eucharist should be a meeting point between the two faiths rather than emphasizing their individual, distinctive religious identities, which she claims only serves to further divide people.

The ultimate goal of ecumenism (one religion) is for Protestants and other religions to accept the highest expression of the Catholic faith (not the other way round) and that is to receive the so-called Holy Eucharist in the presence of a Catholic priest. If you go down the path of ecumenism, it will change your allegiance, lead you to give up your own religious identity, cause you to accept Rome’s teachings, and force you to put aside your differences with her.

Edit: I should add that Catholics believe that "when a priest blesses the bread and wine of the Eucharist, it becomes Christ's literal body and blood. Catholicism teaches that Christ taught His disciples about transubstantiation, and then gave them the power to transform the bread and wine into His body and blood. This power is then passed on through ordination to priests throughout the generations."

This is from the thread Paganism and Catholicism.

 

[A Freeman]

 

[AspiringSoul]

Last pope Francis is referred to as "the son of the destroyer" in Scripture, and the end of Roman Catholicism and the papacy according to the prophecies of the 12th century Irish prophet Malachy.

2 Thessalonians 2:3-12
2:3 Let no man deceive you by any means: for [that day shall not come], except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of The Destroyer (Lucifer - Satan);
2:4 Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in The Temple of God, showing himself that he is God (the Holy Father).
2:5 Remember ye not, that, when I was yet with you, I told you these things?
2:6 And now ye know what withholdeth that he might be revealed in his time.
2:7 For the mystery (Rev. 17:5) of iniquity doth already work: only he who now letteth [will let], until he be taken out of the way.
2:8 And then shall that Wicked be revealed, whom the Lord shall consume with the [Sword of the] Spirit from his mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness [of the enlightening] of his coming:
2:9 [Even the Wicked], whose coming is the work of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders,
2:10 And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of The Truth, that they might be saved.
2:11 And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:
2:12 That they all might be damned who believed not The Truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.

The RCC is the beast that was, and is not, and yet is. The RCC ceased to exist briefly in 1798 when Napoleon Bonaparte sacked Rome and declared there would be no more popes. Since 1798, there have been only 7 papal names used before the current pope took the name of Francis: (1) Pius, (2) Leo, (3) Gregory, (4) Benedict, (5) John, (6) Paul, and (7) John Paul. Francis is the eighth papal name used since 1798 and he is the last pope – “Peter the Roman” – according to the prophecies of the 12th century Irish Prophet Malachy:-

Rev.17 Kings/Popes (since 1798)

View attachment 111495

The seven papal names used since 1798:-
(and the total number of popes who have used these names)

1. Twelve Popes who have used the name Pius
2. Thirteen Popes who have used the name Leo
3. Sixteen Popes who have used the name Gregory
4. Fifteen Popes who have used the name Benedict
5. Twenty One Popes who have used the name John
6. Six Popes who have used the name Paul
7. Two Popes who have used the name John Paul

And then there was Francis.

On 13 March 2013, Cardinal Jorge Mario Bergoglio, son of Italian (Roman) parents, became Pope Francis (the 1st), after St. Francis Assisi [the patron saint of Italy, whose full name was Francesco di Pietro (Peter) di Bernardone]. Bergoglio is the first Jesuit to assume the visible head of the RCC and he served and trained directly under the two previous Jesuit Generals (“black popes”) Pedro Arrupe and Peter-Hans Kovenbach.

Francis is the last pope, the Son of the Destroyer (Satan/Abaddon/Apollyon). The pope and his followers have NO chance of entering at the 'Strait' Gate (Rev. 2:20-23).

2 Thessalonians 2:3-12
2:3 Let no man deceive you by any means: for [that day shall not come], except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of The Destroyer (Lucifer - Satan);
2:4 Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in The Temple of God, showing himself that he is God (the Holy Father).


who gave you the right to corrupt the bible like this?

3 Don’t let anyone deceive you in any way, for that day will not come until the rebellion occurs and the man of lawlessness[a] is revealed, the man doomed to destruction.

'doomed to destruction' is not the same as 'SON OF THE DESTROYER'
Besides, THE DESTROYER, is apollyon of Revelation 9, this is not SATAN, but an angel that does God's Will.
there is zero proof this is satan.

Furthermore, satan was never 'lucifer'. The morning star of isaiah 14 and revelation refer to Wisdom itself which is symbolised as Venus the morning star.
christians misinterpreted isaiah 14 eg 'fallen angel' but that chapter was really addressed to the king of babylon and only used such terminology in jest.
it's like if i mocked an mma fighter and called him 'the gwoat' and then someone took it literally.


The BEAST that 'was now isn't, referred to the ROMAN REPUBLIC. in Daniel, The 10 horns of the 4th beast (daniel 7) began with the birth of the roman empire via the emperor Augustus, ending the roman republic. Jesus was in the time of those horns and that beast system. Yet by the time Revelation came....those 10 horns were gone. They were specifically 10 emperors who ruled over the temple. Titus the final one was not technically emperor over the temple, but the son of Vespasian (the 9th emperor/horn) who destroyed jerusalem and hence he was called 'the little horn'.
Daniel 7, Daniel 9's 70 weeks in connection to Matthew 24 are misunderstood by christians, who think 'Jesus didnt come, so those prophecies have not been fulfilled'. However in Daniel 9 it's clear that the post 70 weeks events were sealed, for jews. they were given the story upto the 10th horn Titus and the destruction of the temple/70 week prophecy...and then the gentile period began. Hence in Daniel 7, it jumps from Titus to the descent of Jesus.
everything inbetween is what came via the book of Revelation and then through islam.


So...the beast that was was, now is not BUT WILL COME AGAIN.
the republic......and this all coincides with the rise of the end times beast via Rev 6's white horse. european colonialism (ex roman colonies and hence part of Rome and it's end times reemergence). These countries became democracies and that has spread to all colonial subject nations...hence we have 'feet of iron/clay' and it edges towards a world government.

the RCC was infiltrated via the jesuits on behalf of the medici italian bankers. so in a way it is an aspect of the BEASt, but it isnt the beast itself.
the jewish connection to it all is about the beast using the jews as modern chaldeans, experts in asorcery, numerology etc to run the entire system on it's behalf....'to take it to it's destination' (one world government).

so in the end, im sure the RCC would push for a global religion. However the fake messiah is not a pope, it is a jewish messiah.

 

[A Freeman]

CROSSING THE THRESHOLD OF HOPE?
by John Paul pope

IS HE SERIOUS?

(CHRIST says he and his followers have NO chance)

Who Lucifer REALLY Is And Why You Should Care

The name “Lucifer” does NOT mean “light bearer”. His lies were unprecedented, which is why the coup he organized took the weaker-willed angels by surprise.

gibraltar-messenger.net

Daniel’s 70 Weeks Correctly Explained At Last

DANIEL'S 70-WEEKS has been mistakenly interpreted by some to refer to the coming of the antichrist, even though it specifically references THE MESSIAH/CHRIST throughout.

gibraltar-messenger.net

The Coming Destruction of ALL Organized Religion

Organized religion is about to have a going out of business fire sale. Read on to find out why you don’t want to buy anything they’re selling, at any price.

gibraltar-messenger.net

 

[AspiringSoul]

The 70 weeks ended in 73AD...the final week was the 66-73AD roman-jewish war, midway of which the temple was destroyed.

It's because Jesus didnt descend like it said in daniel 7, so they now misinterpret everything and think it is a future prophecy and re-create the final week of Daniel 9.
The sole reason why Daniel 7 jumped from titus the little horn, to Jesus's descent..is because everything inbetween pertains to the gentiles era which was sealed for jews. that chapter opens up from the book of Revelation.

the same reason why i do not believe in a future remnant out of this jewish mob. the remnant is already determined by the community of Jews Jesus spoke to as his faithful in luke 21. they were persecuted by the synagogue of satan which was then punished and kicked out, fulfilling zechariah 13.

The remaining jews were the christian jews...and they inherited the land as palestinians under christianity.
like ive said before, their story is there in Revelation 12, symbolising their enterance into islam.

 

[illegalbeagle]

 

[phipps]

Revelation 18:4, "And I heard another voice from heaven saying, “Come out of her, my people, lest you share in her sins, and lest you receive of her plagues."

 

[A Freeman]

And ALL organized religion on this planet is polytheistic, including the 3 western religions that claim to be monotheistic.

Talmudic Judaism -- places the man-made, Babylonian talmud on par with (and in actual fact ABOVE) the Word of God, thereby attempting to make their traditions a partner with God. The Hebrew word "talmud" literally means "the traditions of the fathers/elders".

"Christianity"/Roman Catholicism -- places their Babylonian sun-god teachings and traditions ABOVE the Word of God, including their unscriptural, polytheistic 3=1 "trinity", taught by priests who have the audacity to call themselves "fathers" despite Christ's explicit COMMAND to call NO man on this Earth "father" (Matt. 23:9). So they too are teaching "the traditions of the fathers" in their man-made doctrines, which sadly most "protestant" denominations (the harlot daughters of "the great whore"/RCC) have adopted.

"Islam" -- places the man-made, Babylonian hadith on par with (and in actual fact ABOVE) the Word of God, thereby attempting to make their traditions a partner with God, and thus committing "shirk". The Arabic word "hadith", like the Hebrew word "talmud", literally means "the traditions of the fathers/elders".

This is exactly why ALL organized religion SHALL be destroyed.

The Coming Destruction of ALL Organized Religion

Organized religion is about to have a going out of business fire sale. Read on to find out why you don’t want to buy anything they’re selling, at any price.

gibraltar-messenger.net

And the reason Christ warned His people to come out of her, to avoid the plagues/punishments we have witnessed and are currently witnessing take place against the followers of ALL organized religion (Rev. 18:4).

These punishments are meant as a final, LOVING warning while there's still time, because ALL organized religions, all of which was created by Lucifer/Satan/Iblis, are destined for The Fire, as are all of the priests, pastors, rabbis and imams, etc. and their unwitting(?) customers/parishioners/followers (Isa. 3:12).