UnderAlienControl
Superstar
- Joined
- Mar 27, 2017
- Messages
- 8,034
This needs to be shouted from the rooftops. That woman is a bloodthirsty psychopath, and it needs to be front page news.....Snowden: 'Bloody Gina's' Tortures Involved Beating Pregnant Woman, Raping Man
https://sputniknews.com/us/201805181064571318-snowden-haspel-cia-torture/
Ron Paul is the problem.
You mean Rand? Iirc he was the loudmouth (as usual) offering some rhetoric of resistance, only to fold like the laundry when it came time to back up his words. Perhaps I dont know the full story of his pops tho........Ron Paul is the problem.
As opposed to what is in place now which is surely corporate tyranny?His economic policies are corporate tyranny. He has a good foreign policy and is good on drugs, but austrian economics are ridiculous.
Not to mention he's a racist.His economic policies are corporate tyranny. He has a good foreign policy and is good on drugs, but austrian economics are ridiculous.
SEE: Trump tax cuts-that battle has been lost for awhile now...Paul would eliminate any regulation that at least attempts to reign in corporate power
He is also consistently anti-war and anti Federal Reserve...His government would exist only to protect property rights and that would serve large corporations the most who would just buy everything up.
Agree. The problem is that when it folds there's no government safety net to mitigate the fallout...Not to mention everything would be privatized and we see how well that works (it doesnt)
Gorsuch, under Trump, just pretty much went ahead and did that with his SCOTUS decision the other day. As for social services, that's where the checks and balances of the legislative branch is supposed to come into play...He opposes any workers organization, again great for corporations, and gutting all social programs is savage.
Yeah, I read up on the Mises Institute. But do keep in mind that Hillary and the neocons are acolytes of Saul Alinsky, and Trump is a follower of Benjamin Franklin. But only in one way: Franklin is on the hunnert dollar bill. Let's take a look at his real influencers...Yes, Trump is doing all that. I am not a Trump supporter, and I do aporeciate Paul being antiwar, but the fact remains that his economics are whacky.
Most of Paul's 2012 supporters became Trumpets, they were the framework for Trump, and so many people who used to call themselves Austrians or AnCaps became Trump supporters or online fascists.
Knowing that with the rise of the robots that they will be the only ones able to pay taxes (which as we've seen they mostly don't). You can't tax a robot, and you can't tax the people with no jobs because robots now do those jobs. They will have to tax businesses to create a stipend for the unemployables. We can probably figure how that will go over. Now, what was that again about that Depopulation Agenda "conspiracy"...?both parties serve the Corporate Interest
WOWSERS!Yeah, I read up on the Mises Institute. But do keep in mind that Hillary and the neocons are acolytes of Saul Alinsky, and Trump is a follower of Benjamin Franklin. But only in one way: Franklin is on the hunnert dollar bill. Let's take a look at his real influencers...
Explore The Influencers: Donald Trump’s allies in the Paradise Papers
https://www.icij.org/investigations/paradise-papers/us-president-donald-trumps-influencers/
I read up on the newsletter controversy. I'm not gonna be a Ron Paul apologist, but I think it helps to note that: it's agreed that he wasn't the actual author of the texts as that person(s) identity is pretty much known. He never signed off on any of the pieces. His name was on the masthead of the publication. They made a million dollars or more off of it, so at some point I'm assuming it was just a check to the accountant every month with very little actual oversight by the man himself. In the end, with his name being on the masthead, he did take ultimate responsibility for the publication. This isn't to say that he didn't agree with some of the positions stated, it's just to point out the lack of oversight thing.Not to mention he's a racist.
That was my understanding of the situation as well.I read up on the newsletter controversy. I'm not gonna be a Ron Paul apologist, but I think it helps to note that: it's agreed that he wasn't the actual author of the texts as that person(s) identity is pretty much known. He never signed off on any of the pieces. His name was on the masthead of the publication. They made a million dollars or more off of it, so at some point I'm assuming it was just a check to the accountant every month with very little actual oversight by the man himself. In the end, with his name being on the masthead, he did take ultimate responsibility for the publication. This isn't to say that he didn't agree with some of the positions stated, it's just to point out the lack of oversight thing.