they don't need to attend the temple knights' round table meetings to be considered part of the agenda. when they show the narrative, vision and symbols of the agenda, we say that they are from the agenda. and if the pattern seems too harmonious to be coincidental, there is not just "interesting story" here.
View attachment 38998
Okay, do you know why writers insert certain symbolism into stories? Since readers understand it. If an organization has an eye as part of its symbology... Well, the writer knows that people will draw various conclusions right away. Maybe they are some sort of insidious shadow organization, or at the very least a little "Big Brother"-like... And from there, they can either play into the expectations, try to subvert them in someway, or do some combination of the two.
As a fantasy author, who loves the genre because I grew up reading Arthurian romances and ghost, before moving on to Tolkien and Lovecraft, I don't write stories fit any agenda. I write stories, because I like to tell stories. I like to create worlds and characters to inhabit those worlds.
As a writer, who knows a lot of writers and knows how writers think... Well, if there's one thing that burns me out on conspiracy forums, it's people who've read a bit on symbolism and think that they understand everything now, just because they read some blog post but don't understand the creative process.