- Mar 13, 2017
You don’t have a willingness to learn though..you reject the Biblical claim of intelligent design, the creator God to explain how it all began and instead to try to fill that void with something else.As opposed to claims of inerrant accuracy without evidence? Meh...give me a changing landscape and a willingness to learn.
How can they have testable predictions when they don’t really know how things began? Have they been able to create the same thing and begin a whole new world? Isn’t that what it would come down to to be right?The difference between what scientists make up and what you make up to justify your fixed interpretation of your favourite myth is that science requires testable predictions. That's why it gets modified when new evidence comes to light. That's the difference between blind faith, in which you already 'know' the truth, so all observations must be bent and twisted to fit your 'knowledge', and genuine interest in the reality of the matter, where you modify your theories when something doesn't fit.
Your blind faith approach has never achieved anything. Science has given you the technology you use to preach your blind faith.
“Blind faith” taught me how the world began and who began it...I’m not still trying to come up with a feasible answer.