Why would they out themselves as liars? Wouldn’t that bother their loyal fans to find out that they do do news stories that aren’t true? Did you even watch the link to Panodrama? If not, what are ya scared of?
They sacked Sweeny because he broke their rules. They did not report his fake news.
I don't want to watch an hour of Robinson's ego stoking.
I have already watched an hour of him because you asked me to. That was enough.
Can you, or can you not, find a BBC news report that was later found to be factually incorrect?
I assume you can't. Or you would have.
This just proves my original point (which you either didn't read or didn't understand)
The BBC have been around too long to say anything difinitive unless they have a solid source.
If they do not have a solid source, they will get their point across in another way.
In the case of the woman in Wuhan, she will be real, her words will have been acuratly translated.
What we make of it is formed by the BBC but not explicitly stated by them.
Unless Tommy Robinson actually gets WuFlu, can we keep the unpleasant little rascist out of it, please?