Assassination attempt on Donald Trump

truth_will_out

Established
Joined
Nov 29, 2023
Messages
445
After watching this, i don't think Trump would have faked this or was purely acting. People in his circle likely pulled this off but it raises the question of whether he was supposed to survive it or not. He didn't have to be in on it. I also think that MSM peddling the Iranian narrative is in response to the intense scrutiny and people questioning the official narrative.

The first video is just an illustration of how the trajectory the bullet would have had to travelled, would it have grazed Trump's ear, as per the narrative. Rather than an as-built survey. So in my opinion doesn't really add much to the argument that real shots were taken.

We all know Trump is an actor. He's been in Hollywood films and Wrestlemania. Hopefully whoever updates his IMDB page will be adding this to his list of credits.
 

polymoog

Superstar
Joined
Jun 17, 2017
Messages
9,125
from the video below, you can see what appears to be the result of a bullet hitting one (or two?) people before hitting the railing. this shot could only have come from the direction to the right of the tower.
forget the title of the video-- i am more focused on this second shooter (and possibly a 3rd shooter in the woods, as testified by the woman in the video towards the end).

1Untitled.png



BALLISTIC EVIDENCE OF SECOND SHOOTER - TRUMP MURDERED PEOPLE TO FAKE SHOT

(make sure you mute the annoying music in the beginning-- youll see the video footage of the person(s) supposedly being hit by the bullet):

 

redqueen

Superstar
Joined
May 15, 2017
Messages
6,428
a safety factor cause the roofs sloped lmbo thats why no
security on top and they posted inside the building instead


also saw a video(looking for it now) where it said a police officer
lifted himself on the edge of the roof,saw the shooter and gun and
then fell off but they did call it in they said
wonder when that was?
there is too many things going on with this one,that it's plain to See
was a setup in some way or another
 

Lucy

Star
Joined
Feb 8, 2021
Messages
1,829
There isn't a snow ball in hell's chance that Trump was supposed to be actually assassinated. I'd go as far as to say that there isn't a snowball in hell's chance that live rounds were used. Just another embarrassingly poorly organised and executed False flag event.
I also don't believe he was going to be assassinated. However, I do believe tptb set it up to look like it was an assassination attempt and so they killed and wounded innocent Trump supporters. They also clearly had a patsy. And they made sure to use a trans, BlackRock connection patsy.
Also, I am just trying to post as many facts so everyone here can get the full picture.
 

Maldarker

Star
Joined
Mar 23, 2021
Messages
2,376
There isn't a snow ball in hell's chance that Trump was supposed to be actually assassinated. I'd go as far as to say that there isn't a snowball in hell's chance that live rounds were used. Just another embarrassingly poorly organised and executed False flag event.
Well i would say live rounds were used have to have some blood sacrifice for this.
 

truth_will_out

Established
Joined
Nov 29, 2023
Messages
445
I also don't believe he was going to be assassinated. However, I do believe tptb set it up to look like it was an assassination attempt and so they killed and wounded innocent Trump supporters. They also clearly had a patsy. And they made sure to use a trans, BlackRock connection patsy.
Also, I am just trying to post as many facts so everyone here can get the full picture.
Has it been 100% confirmed that there were definite fatalities there? I mean, is there bona-fide evidence, free of any duplicity?
 

Maldarker

Star
Joined
Mar 23, 2021
Messages
2,376
Has it been 100% confirmed that there were definite fatalities there? I mean, is there bona-fide evidence, free of any duplicity?
I would bet money that people died...they love killing and blood must be spilled so why not its not any of theirs but just some wrong place wrong time person. Someone was going to die. Blood sacs
 

Karlysymon

Superstar
Joined
Mar 18, 2017
Messages
7,324
We all know Trump is an actor. He's been in Hollywood films and Wrestlemania. Hopefully whoever updates his IMDB page will be adding this to his list of credits.
Why would he agree to act this out? To boost poll numbers? I guess that was a fail. Distance himself from the negative publicity generated by Project 2025? He is expendable, you know, and if the Establishment wanted to kill him they wouldn't hold back. We are on the road to a world government and none of these political puppets is going to carry relevance when America is balkanized.

Just like Jan 6th, the press will eventually tell us what this was all about.

Curiously, the ordinary person regardless of their political affiliation sees this as an inside job so if there are any retaliatory attacks, they'll probably emanate from these agencies to stoke a "national nervous breakdown".
FBI and DHS warn of potential ‘follow-on or retaliatory attacks’ following Trump assassination attempt | CNN Politics

Her husband Robert Kagan(of the neocon Kagan family) wrote a piece at the tail end of last year echoing a scenario in the Transition Integrity Project's 2020 election war-gaming where states secede under a "Trump win"

Americans might take to the streets. In fact, it is likely that many people will engage in protests against the new regime, perhaps even before it has had a chance to prove itself deserving of them. But then what? Even in his first term, Trump and his advisers on more than one occasion discussed invoking the Insurrection Act. No less a defender of American democracy than George H.W. Bush invoked the act to deal with the Los Angeles riots in 1992. It is hard to imagine Trump not invoking it should “the Communists, Marxists, Fascists, and Radical Left Thugs” take to the streets. One suspects he will relish the opportunity.

And who will stop him? His own handpicked military advisers? That seems unlikely. He could make retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff if he wanted, and it is unlikely a Republican Senate would decline to confirm. Does anyone think military leaders will disobey commands from their duly elected, constitutionally authorized, commander in chief? Do we even want the military to have to make that call? There is every reason to believe that active-duty troops and reservists are likely to be disproportionately more sympathetic to a newly reelected President Trump than to the “Radical Left Thugs” supposedly causing mayhem in the streets of their towns and cities. Those who hope to be saved by a U.S. military devoted to the protection of the Constitution are living in a fantasyland.

Resistance could come from the governors of predominantly Democratic states such as California and New York through a form of nullification. States with Democratic governors and statehouses could refuse to recognize the authority of a tyrannical federal government. That is always an option in our federal system. (Should Biden win, some Republican states might engage in nullification.) But not even the bluest states are monolithic, and Democratic governors are likely to find themselves under siege on their home turf if they try to become bastions of resistance to Trump’s tyranny. Republicans and conservatives throughout the nation will be energized by their hero’s triumph. The power shift at the federal level, and the tone of menace and revenge emanating from the White House, will likely embolden all kinds of counter-resistance even in deep-blue states, including violent protests. What resources will the governors have to combat such attacks and maintain order? The state and local police? Will those entities be willing to use force against protesters who will likely enjoy the public support of the president? The Democratic governors might not be eager to find out.
 
Last edited:
Top