Assassination attempt on Donald Trump

polymoog

polymoog

Superstar
Joined
Jun 17, 2017
Messages
9,125
Democrats react to the Trump shooting

old.bitchute.com

Democrats react to the Trump shooting

Trump completely broke the left. Listen to what they think about July 13th.
old.bitchute.com old.bitchute.com

3:38.

its not very often that the democrats and truthers agree on something. i bet if you asked any of them, theyll believe the official stories of all the other shootings, though. plain and simple bias.
i was hoping that one of them would question whether that "reported" dead person actually died.
id like to see how they enjoy being called "conspiracy theorists" now after their own MSM has been blasting us with that label for decades.
 
M

Mini Contini

Established
Joined
Jan 25, 2021
Messages
314
Why does it look like the first three bullets that were supposedly fired towards Trump came from the police snipers? The movement of the snipers synchronised with the sound of the bullets being fired, like you can see the bullets actually came out of those snipers.
Also, the supposed sound of the shooter’s sniper firing are as loud as the supposed sound of the police snipers firing.
 
Last edited:
Stucky

Stucky

Superstar
Joined
May 17, 2020
Messages
5,955
This will probably cause more confusion among you.

Three other angles to look at.

Kushner.

Bolton.

Iran (The war of Jenkins ear?)
 
A Freeman

A Freeman

Superstar
Joined
Nov 11, 2019
Messages
8,242
Mini Contini said:
Why does it look like the first three bullets that were supposedly fired towards Trump came from the police snipers? The movement of the snipers synchronised with the sound of the bullets, like you can see the bullets actually came out of those snipers.
Also, the supposed sounds of the shooter’s sniper firing are as loud as the supposed sound of the police snipers firing.
Click to expand...
Yep, despite those shots allegedly being fired in opposite directions and over 100 yards apart.

Something else, which some here may not know, is that most rifle ammunition is supersonic, and remains supersonic as it travels through the air for hundreds of yards. If we take what the (dis)information that has been plastered on the news is claiming, that it was an "AR-15 style rifle", and use it for an example, probably the most common load for a 0.223 (AR-15 caliber) is a 55gr bullet.

The ballistics for a 0.223 55gr bullet should be expected to have a muzzle velocity of over 3200 ft/s, which is almost 3x the speed of sound (1125 ft/s). And the bullet will remain supersonic for over 500 yards, if unobstructed. So there's no question that if the rifle allegedly used was anything similar to an AR-15 (which they have to repeat ad nauseum for the next round of gun control legislation), it would have been supersonic over the 140-150 yard distance between the alleged shooter (the evil "Crooks" taking a shot at Trump) and Trump on stage.

What does this mean?

It means that the bullet would have struck BEFORE the sound (report) was actually heard.
 
Last edited:
M

Mini Contini

Established
Joined
Jan 25, 2021
Messages
314
A Freeman said:
Yep, despite those shots allegedly being fired in opposite directions and over 100 yards apart.

Something else, which some here may not know, is that most rifle ammunition is supersonic, and remains supersonic as it travels through the air for hundreds of yards. If we take what the (dis)information that has been plastered on the news, that it was an "AR-15 style rifle", and use it for an example, probably the most common load for a 0.223 (AR-15 caliber) is a 55gr bullet.

The ballistics for a 0.223 55gr bullet should be expected to have a muzzle velocity of over 3200 ft/s, which is almost 3x the speed of sound (1125 ft/s). And the bullet will remain supersonic for over 500 yards, if unobstructed. So there's no question that if the rifle allegedly used was anything similar to an AR-15 (which they have to repeat ad nauseum for the next round of gun control legislation) would have been supersonic over the 140-150 yard distance between the alleged shooter (the evil "Crooks" taking a shot at Trump) and Trump on stage.

What does this mean?

It means that the bullet would have struck BEFORE the sound (report) was actually heard.
Click to expand...
Excellent information!
 
polymoog

polymoog

Superstar
Joined
Jun 17, 2017
Messages
9,125
for the trump/white hat angle:

White Hat Drone at Rally Hacked/Jammed Minutes Before Assasination Attempt on President Trump

The Secret Service sniper who blew off the head of 20-year-old Thomas Matthew Crooks is a former Navy Seal and among a group of agents who have disavowed illegitimate pResident Biden, Alejandro Mayorkas, and Secret Service Director Kimberly Cheatle, a source in General Smith’s office told Real...
realrawnews.com realrawnews.com

Deep State Concocting Crazy Conspiracy Theories to Blame President Trump for the Attempt on His Own Life

Homeland Security Director Alejandro Mayorkas and FBI Deputy Director Paul Abbate have discussed circulating an unhinged conspiracy theory blaming Trump for the failed assassination attempt on his own life, a U.S. Army Cyber Command source told Real Raw News. As illegitimate pResident Joseph R...
realrawnews.com realrawnews.com

in this theory, there were 2 shooters. the kid was the distraction and the real sniper was over 400 yards away. everyone was supposed to be distracted with the kid, which they were. the white hats sent up a drone to find the real sniper because they supposedly had gotten wind that there would be an assassination attempt (there was a shooter in the audience about a month ago, too, that they caught), but it was hijacked and brought down by the deep state. the sniper supposedly nicked his ear, not the kid. ballistics tests should prove that the bullet did not come from the kids weapon.

------------------

these are interesting, but the lack of blood is suspicious to me.
 
Karlysymon

Karlysymon

Superstar
Joined
Mar 18, 2017
Messages
7,324
A Freeman

A Freeman

Superstar
Joined
Nov 11, 2019
Messages
8,242
Karlysymon said:
After watching this, i don't think Trump would have faked this or was purely acting. People in his circle likely pulled this off but it raises the question of whether he was supposed to survive it or not. He didn't have to be in on it. I also think that MSM peddling the Iranian narrative is in response to the intense scrutiny and people questioning the official narrative.
https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1813205999030825245

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1812460546236518607
Click to expand...
Controlled opposition?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top