Aisha's age at the time of her marriage

[TempestOfTempo]

Another one of your dumb attempts at distraction merely pushes this thread to the top of the page. Everytime you comment it does so, and it gives me an opportunity to reply, which equals another bump to the top of the threads here. This thread completely exposes the hadeeth lies used for this pedo reign of terror, and yall posters here who have promoted it. So by all means, continue doing your part to expose yourself and these lies with more of your online idiocy.

 

[sugarprincessxox]

Your line of thinking is merely proof of how far humanity has drifted from a family mind set, to fornication.

For instance, you more than likely think a 14, 16-year-old boy married to a 10, 12-year-old girl is p***philia. But you probably have no problems with a 17, 18-year-old boy fornicating with a 16, 17 yr old girl. Even if you did, I'm sure you'd be a-ok with an 18 yr old girl fornicating with a 19-year-old boy because there's something "magical" about 18, isn't there?

There is only one difference in the 2 scenarios mentioned. 1, the couple is married. The other is they are fornicating.
Which one has God ordained? Why did God give girls and boys the ability to have families at young ages? Do you think God intended you to deal with overwhelming hormonal urges for 8-10 years and have no outlet?

I'm sure sex before marriage probably means nothing to your generation. After all, high body counts for women is normal today. But I'm from a generation where it was forbidden. Today, they all give the milk away for free in the west, and this is simple facts. Hell, if a girl invites you over on a first date to watch Netflix, odds of sex are like 90%. Because modern western women have accepted the only way they can get a man is if they spread their legs.

They tell themselves marriage comes later… But tell that to all the single women in their late 30's and 40's with no hopes of ever having a traditional family. No man in his right mind wants a woman with a high body count to be his wife, while the vast majority of women don't want a husband before 30. Because yay feminism!


Look, society at large is indoctrinated to push marriage off as late as possible. However, you can sleep with all the guys you want, because there's nothing wrong with that. Hell, they are teaching sex ed to kindergartners over here. What is the purpose of this? Stop and think!

Yet you people still can't see the agenda? It's all about creating an immoral society because immoral people are easy to control. There's a reason porn is free and accessible for all ages. There is a reason Israel broadcast porn into Palestinian homes.

As long as there is no family unit, there is no protection.

Notice, NPR is a major news outlet.

View attachment 98937

So teenagers dating someone a year younger or apart = bad

Andyoung kids dating someone older (who is a kid or older) = acceptable because that's how it was and we shouldn't question it?

Lmfao. That makes sense. I mean ur prophet raped Aisha. I see why u explain it like that

 

[sugarprincessxox]

Your line of thinking is merely proof of how far humanity has drifted from a family mind set, to fornication.

For instance, you more than likely think a 14, 16-year-old boy married to a 10, 12-year-old girl is p***philia. But you probably have no problems with a 17, 18-year-old boy fornicating with a 16, 17 yr old girl. Even if you did, I'm sure you'd be a-ok with an 18 yr old girl fornicating with a 19-year-old boy because there's something "magical" about 18, isn't there?

There is only one difference in the 2 scenarios mentioned. 1, the couple is married. The other is they are fornicating.
Which one has God ordained? Why did God give girls and boys the ability to have families at young ages? Do you think God intended you to deal with overwhelming hormonal urges for 8-10 years and have no outlet?

I'm sure sex before marriage probably means nothing to your generation. After all, high body counts for women is normal today. But I'm from a generation where it was forbidden. Today, they all give the milk away for free in the west, and this is simple facts. Hell, if a girl invites you over on a first date to watch Netflix, odds of sex are like 90%. Because modern western women have accepted the only way they can get a man is if they spread their legs.

They tell themselves marriage comes later… But tell that to all the single women in their late 30's and 40's with no hopes of ever having a traditional family. No man in his right mind wants a woman with a high body count to be his wife, while the vast majority of women don't want a husband before 30. Because yay feminism!


Look, society at large is indoctrinated to push marriage off as late as possible. However, you can sleep with all the guys you want, because there's nothing wrong with that. Hell, they are teaching sex ed to kindergartners over here. What is the purpose of this? Stop and think!

Yet you people still can't see the agenda? It's all about creating an immoral society because immoral people are easy to control. There's a reason porn is free and accessible for all ages. There is a reason Israel broadcast porn into Palestinian homes.

As long as there is no family unit, there is no protection.

Notice, NPR is a major news outlet.

View attachment 98937

A woman having a high body count doesn't devalue her or degrade her. Wheres this energy with men who have multiple wives or who had multiple partners in the past?

 

[Daze]

So teenagers dating someone a year younger or apart = bad

Andyoung kids dating someone older (who is a kid or older) = acceptable because that's how it was and we shouldn't question it?

Lmfao. That makes sense. I mean ur prophet raped Aisha. I see why u explain it like that

You missed the point. It had nothing to do with the "older couple" only being a year apart. It's just that they reached the magical age of 18.

So what's magical about it? Because I can show you multiple 30-year-olds living in their mother's basement playing with Legos and video games all day every day.


What is the point of dating? I'm against it myself, unless there is a chaperone. Meaning, both the man and woman are looking for something permanent. Why waste valuable months / years of your life?

Np if you get knocked up, because that's why God gave you abortion, right? Why have a bf at all?

A few decades back, mothers used to tell their daughters, no one buys the cow if the milk is free. They don't say that anymore. Why is that? Couldn't be because the milk is free on every corner today, could it?


Ironically, Aisha stayed with the prophet until he died. Today she is a massive part of the religion, relating numerous hadith, and is known as the mother of the believers. Go ahead and mock her all you want. She is a highly praised woman and will be among the highest ranks in paradise.

Had you known the reality of the situation and not just parroting back western indoctrination, the same agenda that convinced you to give your body away for free to anyone and everyone who bothered to give you a 2nd look, you'd envy the woman.

But just wait. Time will reveal this reality when you reach the end of the road.

 

[Daze]

A woman having a high body count doesn't devalue her or degrade her. Wheres this energy with men who have multiple wives or who had multiple partners in the past?

Absolutely it does, there is not a man on the planet that wants to marry a woman with a dozen previous partners. But thank you for stating this.
As it's the western mind set and couldn't be farther from what God sent down.

 

[Daze]

I am done with this thread and tired of bumping up the kafir who made it. It's nothing more than a troll bait thread anyway.

Take the last word princess.

 

[TempestOfTempo]

You missed the point. It had nothing to do with the "older couple" only being a year apart. It's just that they reached the magical age of 18.

So what's magical about it? Because I can show you multiple 30-year-olds living in their mother's basement playing with Legos and video games all day every day.


What is the point of dating? I'm against it myself, unless there is a chaperone. Meaning, both the man and woman are looking for something permanent. Why waste valuable months / years of your life?

Np if you get knocked up, because that's why God gave you abortion, right? Why have a bf at all?

A few decades back, mothers used to tell their daughters, no one buys the cow if the milk is free. They don't say that anymore. Why is that? Couldn't be because the milk is free on every corner today, could it?


Ironically, Aisha stayed with the prophet until he died. Today she is a massive part of the religion, relating numerous hadith, and is known as the mother of the believers. Go ahead and mock her all you want. She is a highly praised woman and will be among the highest ranks in paradise.

Had you known the reality of the situation and not just parroting back western indoctrination, the same agenda that convinced you to give your body away for free to anyone and everyone who bothered to give you a 2nd look, you'd envy the woman.

But just wait. Time will reveal this reality when you reach the end of the road.

Translation:
"Im all about that p***philia... pedo life for me! I dont have any logical or factual basis for my contentions, certainly nothing actually Islamic to back up my lies. Im not listening to anyone else (no matter how much their contentions are proven) and I dont even have any slick lies to promote this filth with... but Ive been allowed to be a bully on these boards for so long and I never developed/was blessed with the sort of intellect required to promote such controversial agendas effectively so... Im just going to continue repeating the same lies and moronic excuses because... apparently thats the best I can do... and I AINT giving up my obsession with p***philia soooo..."

 

[TempestOfTempo]

So teenagers dating someone a year younger or apart = bad

Andyoung kids dating someone older (who is a kid or older) = acceptable because that's how it was and we shouldn't question it?

Lmfao. That makes sense. I mean ur prophet raped Aisha. I see why u explain it like that

Thats the crux of the matter... and what these people refuse to admit.... Aisha wasnt 6-9 and she wasnt raped. Point blank, they invented those lies in order to justify their desires to r*pe and traffic children. 26 pages now and not ONE single poster has made ONE actual defense of their pedo-agenda... they talk around it, they insult, the deny/distract/deflect... but if what they say is true, why cant they offer any evidence outside of the hadeeths which are themselves in question? Because its a lie. They are liars and p***philia is the end game for these people.

 

[TempestOfTempo]

I am done with this thread and tired of bumping up the kafir who made it. It's nothing more than a troll bait thread anyway.

Take the last word princess.

Translation:
"Im done with this... until my desire for conflict and agitation attempts fall flat elsewhere... then? You know I will be right back here, following the threads I repeatedly said Im done with... stalking the posters I say Im blocking!"

 

[Zakat]

Dost thou really think that a person who waits 3 YEARS before consummating a marriage can ever be among those who are perversely inclined?



Qur'ān 61: 5

And when Moses said to his people,

'O my people, why do you hurt me, though you know I am the Messenger of God to you?'

When they swerved, God caused their hearts to swerve;

and God guides never the perverse.

 

[Zakat]

People do not use their brains because they are themselves cursed with perversity which they are struggling to be rid of, and rightfully so!

That is why they cannot fathom how a man can get married to a child, because if it were themselves, then they would certainly NOT be able to stop thinking about how to do it.

 

[Zakat]

 

[Lalas]

For me, it is the same whether Aisha was a child, or if this is a lie to justify p***phile practice. Both are very bad, I don't know which is worse.

And there is no such hypocritical practice: people neglect their children's access to abominations on the Internet, as well as the actions of their children, and at the same time resent and condemn cases of child marriage (especially paedophile - adults and children). Because people who condemn child marriage also do not neglect the activity of their children on the Internet and their actions in life; There is an overlap of at least about 80-90%.

Perhaps I am exaggerating the % share in order to get Western society better? Maybe. Perhaps even with the best desire, many do not have the opportunity to exercise much control over the activities of their children on the Internet and life. And what is the reason for the pollution of the Internet, as well as the trends imposed in society? Did Western people do it themselves because of their entire downfall? Or did the responsible authorities, due to some unannounced hidden reasons and orders from above, not stop debauchery both in the internet and in life (especially for pedophilic actions and distribution)? Aren't there super-powerful circles? Here, and in many other places, aren't there topics for this?

Perhaps, when we do not have to justify the paedophile practices of the communities to which we belong, we can see and admit that malignant tendencies have not ceased and are encouraged deliberately and with the blessing of super-powerful circles, but when we want to point to some moral advantage of our own community, then, in the West, without the deliberate intervention of high circles, the people themselves have degraded and are responsible for debauchery?


*I'm in Europe, but not in the Western part, by the way. And I neither understand nor like Western society. But it's funny that pedo practices and distribution (including on the Internet) is entirely or even only mostly Western. Absurd. It's everywhere. And between the other Russia wasn't a top distributor of child porno? What happened to "anti-pedo" Putin? Why didn't he stop him? They find any small media and even individuals who "discredit the servicemen and the special operation", on the Internet, fine them and sentence them to prison and psychiatry (recently there was such a case of being sent to psychiatry for forced treatment), but they are powerless in the face of this huge spread. Interesting..

Say, in the context of the "battle for multipolarity", of which events in Islamic countries are a part? Is it not "western desinfo" again when it is against Russia-fighter-against-Kabbalah, of which the Islamic world is partly a part? (We hear nothing, there is not much indignation on the part of people who are against the "Western/Jewish Kabbalah.")

What a pity, miserable hypocrisy. There is no bad and good, but there are my people, my world, my society, and my adversaries. What my people do is good. But if my adversaries do the same, it is evil and satanic.

It's just like the Illuminati sign with the cloak of one eye. A common wizarding practice to teach people when to see and when to close one eye and see halfway. The same thing that those who stick to the agenda and who are condemned here do, or at least we laugh at them ("there are no american crimes, banking, masonic, jews, Nato crimes..."). But the "beam in his own eye" - no.

Tempest don't get mad that I'm spamming his thread. She was spam again before me.

 

[TempestOfTempo]

For me, it is the same whether Aisha was a child, or if this is a lie to justify p***phile practice. Both are very bad, I don't know which is worse.

And there is no such hypocritical practice: people neglect their children's access to abominations on the Internet, as well as the actions of their children, and at the same time resent and condemn cases of child marriage (especially paedophile - adults and children). Because people who condemn child marriage also do not neglect the activity of their children on the Internet and their actions in life; There is an overlap of at least about 80-90%.

Perhaps I am exaggerating the % share in order to get Western society better? Maybe. Perhaps even with the best desire, many do not have the opportunity to exercise much control over the activities of their children on the Internet and life. And what is the reason for the pollution of the Internet, as well as the trends imposed in society? Did Western people do it themselves because of their entire downfall? Or did the responsible authorities, due to some unannounced hidden reasons and orders from above, not stop debauchery both in the internet and in life (especially for pedophilic actions and distribution)? Aren't there super-powerful circles? Here, and in many other places, aren't there topics for this?

Perhaps, when we do not have to justify the paedophile practices of the communities to which we belong, we can see and admit that malignant tendencies have not ceased and are encouraged deliberately and with the blessing of super-powerful circles, but when we want to point to some moral advantage of our own community, then, in the West, without the deliberate intervention of high circles, the people themselves have degraded and are responsible for debauchery?


*I'm in Europe, but not in the Western part, by the way. And I neither understand nor like Western society. But it's funny that pedo practices and distribution (including on the Internet) is entirely or even only mostly Western. Absurd. It's everywhere. And between the other Russia wasn't a top distributor of child porno? What happened to "anti-pedo" Putin? Why didn't he stop him? They find any small media and even individuals who "discredit the servicemen and the special operation", on the Internet, fine them and sentence them to prison and psychiatry (recently there was such a case of being sent to psychiatry for forced treatment), but they are powerless in the face of this huge spread. Interesting..

Say, in the context of the "battle for multipolarity", of which events in Islamic countries are a part? Is it not "western desinfo" again when it is against Russia-fighter-against-Kabbalah, of which the Islamic world is partly a part? (We hear nothing, there is not much indignation on the part of people who are against the "Western/Jewish Kabbalah.")

What a pity, miserable hypocrisy. There is no bad and good, but there are my people, my world, my society, and my adversaries. What my people do is good. But if my adversaries do the same, it is evil and satanic.

It's just like the Illuminati sign with the cloak of one eye. A common wizarding practice to teach people when to see and when to close one eye and see halfway. The same thing that those who stick to the agenda and who are condemned here do, or at least we laugh at them ("there are no american crimes, banking, masonic, jews, Nato crimes..."). But the "beam in his own eye" - no.

Tempest don't get mad that I'm spamming his thread. She was spam again before me.

You raise some good points and interesting contentions... but as far as these posters here go... the lie of Aisha being 6-9 has been completely exposed. Its been exposed and their counter-arguments have also been exposed as dimwitted and shameless. These people are WILLFULLY and KNOWINGLY promoting an epidemic of child trafficking/r*pe/murder in the so-called "Muslim" word and its spilling out into others lives as we saw with ISIS and still see with grooming gangs and etc.

 

[Artful Revealer]

I didn't read the thread, just watched the OP's video, and in case the birth year of Asma is accurate (which I don't exactly know how they arrived at 595 BC), then the biggest problem for muslims is their adherence to the hadith, especially Sahih Bukhari, since that would mean the hadith are not so sahih anymore.

No problem as far as I'm concerned. I've always preferred Quranists over Sunnis after all.

 

[DesertRose]

For me, it is the same whether Aisha was a child, or if this is a lie to justify p***phile practice. Both are very bad, I don't know which is worse.

Aisha would have had to have completed the process of puberty for consummation to take place.
This was the norm for marriage customs back in those days.
All ancient societies had early marriages.
Today Muslims have changed their marriage customs since this is allowed, and marry later. Although in some war zones, earlier marriage at puberty takes place so that they can be protected by their husbands from being raped. Also wearing the face veil in war zones helps them as well. Unfortunately, armies such as the US/UK, Russia, and even the UN peacekeepers have raped those whom they occupied in places such as Afghanistan and Iraq.

Quran 4:6
"And test the orphans [in their abilities] until they reach marriageable age. Then if you perceive in them sound judgement, release their property to them. And do not consume it excessively and quickly, [anticipating] that they will grow up. And whoever, [when acting as guardian], is self-sufficient should refrain [from taking a fee]; and whoever is poor - let him take according to what is acceptable. Then when you release their property to them, bring witnesses upon them. And sufficient is Allāh as Accountant. " 4:6

 

[TempestOfTempo]

Aisha would have had to have completed the process of puberty for consummation to take place.
This was the norm for marriage customs back in those days.
All ancient societies had early marriages.
Today Muslims have changed their marriage customs since this is allowed, and marry later. Although in some war zones, earlier marriage at puberty takes place so that they can be protected by their husbands from being raped. Also wearing the face veil in war zones helps them as well.

Quran 4:6
"And test the orphans [in their abilities] until they reach marriageable age. Then if you perceive in them sound judgement, release their property to them. And do not consume it excessively and quickly, [anticipating] that they will grow up. And whoever, [when acting as guardian], is self-sufficient should refrain [from taking a fee]; and whoever is poor - let him take according to what is acceptable. Then when you release their property to them, bring witnesses upon them. And sufficient is Allāh as Accountant. " 4:6

"Aisha would have had to have completed the process of puberty for consummation to take place."
Of course she would have... because as the evidence states, Aisha's marriage/consummation timeline was 17-19, not 6-9 as your pedo-crowd contends. Its just another nothing post from these losers, attempting to cloak their pedo agenda in whataboutisms and obfuscation. Shes lying again, because there is an epidemic of child trafficking/r*pe/murder in the "Muslim" world based off of this hadeeth scam.

As far as her nutcase claims of combat weddings, if Muslims are at war with other Muslims, why aint they acting according to the Islamic Code of Ethics as it relates to rules of engagement and combat? Why are they raping? Its boneheaded posts like this one which prove their allegiance to this pedo agenda, and also further proves the invalid nature of the Oct. 7 Hamas military offensive.

 

[sugarprincessxox]

I didn't read the thread, just watched the OP's video, and in case the birth year of Asma is accurate (which I don't exactly know how they arrived at 595 BC), then the biggest problem for muslims is their adherence to the hadith, especially Sahih Bukhari, since that would mean the hadith are not so sahih anymore.

No problem as far as I'm concerned. I've always preferred Quranists over Sunnis after all.

Well hello long time no see

 

[Maldarker]

Translation:
"Im done with this... until my desire for conflict and agitation attempts fall flat elsewhere... then? You know I will be right back here, following the threads I repeatedly said Im done with... stalking the posters I say Im blocking!"

Are you a prophet?

 

[TempestOfTempo]

Are you a prophet?

It dont take no crystal ball (or even a magic 8 one) to predict these fools futures lol.