VigCizMember
Star
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2018
- Messages
- 1,387
The funny thing is...his entire stance is predicated on the idea that by not getting a jab, by not masking, etc...someone is putting someone else at risk. But that's simply false. Science proves this. So if one was to argue this in court, you'd win the argument. It's not even a difficult argument to make. The shots do NOT protect against the current variant - if they did, why the h*ll is Pfizer re-working it? Why are other vax makers trying to come up with a multi-strain vax? Because the current shots do NOT protect against the current strains. And *even* IF they provide SOME level of protection...well, so does your immune system! So then we get into the argument of which is better? Which provides MORE protection. And I haven't EVEN mentioned those previously infected.
I don't think they want to entertain this conversation. Why? Because if you were to take samples from those jabbed vs. those unjabbed or naturally recovered, it would clearly show that the unjabbed are better off as well as the naturally recovered. You can also look at the data. You can compare the data which is readily available in the UK for instance, which clearly shows the jabbed are actually getting a NEGATIVE % improvement against the current variants after about 2-3 months. That means that they are actually WORSE than had they done nothing.
Why is Biden saying these people, those who were jabbed over 3 months ago not a threat to others? Because they ARE - by his measurements they are. If one's immune system is destroyed, one is more likely to get infected and to infect others.
So this logic - this pathetic reasoning that's being trotted out - it's just pure ridiculousness. It's so simplistic as to be idiotic. And anyone, with even half a brain, would recognize this. Well, the majority of the World DOES recognize this and their narrative, their false narrative, is crumbling. They're trying to double down on it though. They really are trying to hammer it down.
