Frank Badfinger
Superstar
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2019
- Messages
- 16,151
its about conformity. its not about health or whatever its about making people conform.Yet they still call them “anti-maskers” so what does that tell you? They’re able to see that those who don’t believe in masks are intelligent and interested in the scientific method, but they themselves are not following the scientific method! So clearly it’s not ignorance on their part when pushing for masks - it’s clear it’s only to push an agenda.
It’s like this: “anti-maskers” say the sky is blue. Anti-maskers have used the scientific method to determine the sky is blue. MIT recognizes anti-maskers use the scientific method, therefore, they too must understand the scientific method. The scientific method tells us the Sky is blue. MIT researchers are now like - damn! Somehow we have GOT to get those anti-maskers to say the sky is green!!!
Basically, she knows what’s going on at the WHO.Dr. Astrid Stuckelberger is an international health scientist conducting and directing researches from clinical to epidemiological on to science for policy-makers since 25 years. After a PhD in Public Health on population health men women differential, she pursued her career at the Geneva University Hospital and at the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Geneva where she obtained the higher rank of Privat-Docent.
She is also professor at the University of Applied Science and senior lecturer at the University of Lausanne and collaborate with several universities in the world. Astrid was recently awarded the title of Honorary Professor of the Institute of Bioregulation and Gerontology of the Russian Academy of Medical Science, and is invited Professor in different universities. She is the president of the Geneva International Network on Ageing funded with WHO.
I watched this live this morning....I surprised myself with my restraint from throwing my TV out of the window.
Another c*ap article that references opinion pieces from CBS news and The New York Times to back-up their 100% unscientific and 100% morally abhorrent opinions.3 reasons for making COVID-19 vaccination mandatory for children
Full population-level protection against COVID-19 will require most adolescents and children to be vaccinated. There are ethical arguments for encouraging vaccination uptake through vaccine mandates.theconversation.com
Wasn't that last bit announced in the mainstream newspaper, like it was no big deal? I distinctly remember finding that information unnecessary and repugnant.American author Naomi Wolf has been suspended from Twitter after spreading vaccine misinformation.
Covid: Twitter suspends Naomi Wolf after tweeting anti-vaccine misinformation
The American author tweeted a wide-range of unfounded theories about vaccines.www.bbc.com
From the BBC:
Dr Wolf, well known for her acclaimed third-wave feminist book The Beauty Myth, posted a wide-range of unfounded theories about vaccines.
One tweet claimed that vaccines were a "software platform that can receive uploads".
She also compared Dr Anthony Fauci, the top Covid adviser in the US, to Satan to her more than 140,000 followers.
Most recently, she tweeted that the urine and faeces of people who had received the jab needed to be separated from general sewage supplies while tests were done to measure its impact on non-vaccinated people through drinking water.
...is this speech about the same topic?....They wrote about it in a 2010 Whitepaper that I have in PDF format.