Again, whether Trump starts a news outlet in the future or not, the tweet you posted does not support this statement of yours -
"Don’t worry guys. He may be leaving office but he’s starting his own media channel so you’ll still be able to bask in his glory damn near 24/7 soon enough. It will be okay."
Right.. like I said get back to me. That tweet indicates an intention. If that intention materializes in the future it most certainly would be looked at as historical evidence for the statement I made. Not my fault you can’t see it or would rather nitpick with me over predictions then look at it honestly. I do note you haven’t denied the possibility yourself. I ponder why
Trump caught on phone trying to persuade Georgia secretary of state to overturn election. I think its clear the only coup de tat, is an attempted one by Trump to try and steal the election by pushing fake "election fraud" stories and trying to force Republicans to play foul and go along with HIS attempted theft.
They all suck about equally the same. Just different ways. You prefer the brand of suck trump offers, many others don’t. Either way it’s still suck and we’re still getting screwed one way or another.
True I preferred Trump over his last two opponents as I felt the sucked more. I still stand by my stand that pols suck, just some suck less. And yes it is the people that get screwed either way.
I'm repeating myself but have to comment again that Bitchute is full to the gills with channels repeating the same tripe. 80% are patriots theorizing about the deep state's agenda against him, also obsessing over progressive fails.
It hurts me because good people I work with or know- military, ex-military, and ex-law enforcement are infatuated with Dump. They're prepared to go to any length to defend him against the "communist takeover". I hate that some of our most humble people have been so deeply brainwashed.
It's a waste of energy and designed to be that. There's many things conservatives can do: form your own schools prioritizing your values, form worker co-operatives and barter systems as alternatives to globalism. Both left and right need to realize the bankers are the predatory class and we could work together to break free. No one's forcing us to put our money in the bank or take their loans.
I’ve moved your post here so as not to further derail the other thread.
And therein lies the danger. The PTB see and understand what you are saying here, which is why Trump is more of an asset than a liability to them. The prospect of armed resistance grows by the day as people get angry with the federal gov’t. The people you describe could rise up and overthrow a Biden administration or push for secession but they wouldn’t do the same if Trump was at the helm despite the fact that the same corruption would continue unabated….because he gives them hope that things could still get fixed. So, to me, it makes sense for “them” to keep him around even as “their” domestic agendas are rammed through because of the power he holds in placating that section of american society.
The question remains for supporters on either side: would you rather have those agendas rammed through under Trump or under Biden? Even if Hillary had become president, a financial implosion was still on course to happen within her first term. The only difference that the figurehead-of-a-president makes is channeling public blowback to the agendas. Trump limits the blowback against the higher echelons of power.
Anyway, I’ve felt like a “Biden win” was always just a brief interlude in the Trump song. Bank of America warned that civil unrest could crash the markets (which is ofcourse what wall street wants). I read the original article at ZeroHedge which, bizarrely, is now gone but here’s someone who quoted out of it.
“So what’s going on here, is Wall Street really starting to worry about what we first said back in 2010 – much to Time Magazine’s mockery – that the Fed’s disastrous policies would eventually push US society to armed conflict and/or to civil war. While it may be easy to dismiss such fears as hyperbolic, consider what otherwise level-headed Bloomberg macro commentator (and former Lehman trader) Mark Cudmore wrote overnight in his latest lament that markets are so broken, that in the end it will all “end in tears”, either in the form of collapse of fiat currency or through “political revolution”, read armed conflict.”
“Which brings us back to square one. Because in a world where a handful of traders are the most bullish they have been in 20 years while the living standards of tens of millions of Americans are absolutely dismal with the economy on the verge of yet another depression-causing shutdown, the flashbacks to the days just before the French Revolution are all too real.”
Trump caught on phone trying to persuade Georgia secretary of state to overturn election. I think its clear the only coup de tat, is an attempted one by Trump to try and steal the election by pushing fake "election fraud" stories and trying to force Republicans to play foul and go along with HIS attempted theft.
i’m so confused at this stuff with pence being a traitor, being fired, quitting politics, what did i miss? i see things all over twitter about him being a traitor and death threats to trump but i see no sources or anything to explain the story?
Vice President Mike Pence has backed the plan by a group of Republicans led by Ted Cruz to raise objections to formalizing Democrat Joe Biden’s victory when Congress meets on January 6, according to his chief of staff.
www.rt.com
Many are unaware of the legal processes available on January 6th and those that are doubt which one should be followed. The Electoral Count Act of 1887 seems like a long shot considering both Houses must agree to the objections raised against democratic slate of electors while one House has a dem majority.
A more secure, but far from guaranteed, route would be the 12th Amendment where the decision falls to the presiding officer of the joint session, ie. the VP, whether to certify the count. In not doing so, the House will have to elect the president, 1 vote per state, of which GOP controls majority of them.
We basically have a Secretary of State who has shown no transparency when it comes down to ballots and votes, deciding to leak a confidential settlement call to the press. Sums it up, as in, getting Trump out of office is more important than restoring faith in the election process.
Noooo just the edited highlights. Anyway, about these words coming out of Trumps mouth....waddaya think about them? You've wondered off onto ballots again. Stop doing that, it's annoying.
Is the big orange clown guilty of anything here or not?
..and don't answer the question with an argument about feckin ballots!!
Noooo just the edited highlights. Anyway, about these words coming out of Trumps mouth....waddaya think about them? You've wondered off onto ballots again. Stop doing that, it's annoying.
Is the big orange clown guilty of anything here or not?
..and don't answer the question with an argument about feckin ballots!!
In an extraordinary rebuke of President Donald Trump, all 10 living former secretaries of defense are cautioning against any move to involve the military in pursuing claims of election fraud, arguing that it would take the country into “dangerous, unlawful and unconstitutional territory.” The 10...
www.yahoo.com
WASHINGTON (AP) — In an extraordinary rebuke of President Donald Trump, all 10 living former secretaries of defense are cautioning against any move to involve the military in pursuing claims of election fraud, arguing that it would take the country into “dangerous, unlawful and unconstitutional territory.”
The 10 men, both Democrats and Republicans, signed on to an opinion article published Sunday in The Washington Post that implicitly questioned Trump's willingness to follow his Constitutional duty to peacefully relinquish power on Jan. 20. Following the Nov. 3 election and subsequent recounts in some states, as well as unsuccessful court challenges, the outcome is clear, they wrote, while not specifying Trump in the article
Like as though "someone" out there doesn't want this exact outcome of military involvement given looming financial instability and subsequent unrest.
I am not a Q expert nor have I took a deep dive on Lin Wood, but his twitter feed is crazy right now. This is what I warned Q followers about long ago. That being beware the massive disappointment if it is all bunk or a psy op. Or, we will see if there are any teeth to everything we are hearing in the next few weeks. Regardless, they are setting up a destabilized situation begging for intervention and turmoil.
Lin Wood, and honestly I know little about him other than links on another forum today... but his tweets are Kappy-esque and coming to a head. Maybe, someone can chime in who is in the Q camp or has been watching this unfold.
Noooo just the edited highlights. Anyway, about these words coming out of Trumps mouth....waddaya think about them? You've wondered off onto ballots again. Stop doing that, it's annoying.
Is the big orange clown guilty of anything here or not?
..and don't answer the question with an argument about feckin ballots!!
