To justify the black protest, you must prove that this condition is about being black. Those who go out on the streets talk about "black lives", but not to mention Tony Timpa.
People should absolutely have rose up for Tony Timpa. They didn't. But since people are rising up for George Floyd. there's actually a chance to change things and if you don't take that chance... Well, you're letting Tony Timpa down, since the person being propped up as a martyr matters less than the cause
@Corvus Metus
You think you get a pass because you use a non-racial identifier (cops)? Try replacing cops with a demographic and see how that sounds, even if it's true.
There's a bid difference between a profession and a race or a orientation, for one. You're not even comparing apples to oranges, but apples to motor oil.
Doesn't sound very good, does it? At least, when someone says these things I just listed, there's public outrage, because we're not allowed to generalize an entire group because of the wrongdoings of a minority. That's politically incorrect, you see.
I don't give a single shit about politcal correctness. However, this "minority" you're talking about has something other minority groups don't have; systematic power.
But you have no problem generalizing against cops, because you've been taught to dislike them by those who seek to disrupt order when things don't go their way and it's being encouraged by alot of institutions that aim to control people's minds. If you criticize cops now, all cops, you get public endorsement.
I don't hate the cops because I've been "taught to dislike them". I dislike cops because I used to want to be one, but after research, realized I'd be protecting businesses and enforce the "law" more than serving and protecting the people. I dislike them because they get get away with murder and even get away with minor crimes they'd eagerly ticket me and you for.
If you criticize criminals however, then ooooh ... dangerous territory.[/QUOTE]
'cause you know, the real criminals are people who abuse their authority.
Murder implies intent. Is it proven or can anyone be sure Chauvin intended to kill him?
Murder implies "unlawful" killing. If you were to get in an argument with someone, punch them, and they'd fall and crack open their head you would still be charged with murder. Don't try to play semantics there.
I care about fighting real oppression, not an imaginary one.
No matter who you believe in the behind the conspiracy, who do you think is going to enforce the will of the elite on a local level?
Police.