I am against not only imposing homosexuality as normal, but I am against children hearing and seeing it at all, and if they may not understand at all that there is such an option. Sorry
@sugarprincessxox, I'm a little nasty and I may be a deep hypocrite. Maybe I'm stupid and I don't understand. I'm not sure what I would do if I had power (in no case violence, but some social separation maybe). I'm probably not a very good person. So it's great that I don't have and won't have any managerial power.
But I can never, when I meet somewhere, in a group of people, gay, go to tell him something, condemn him, etc. And what can I tell him? Most likely, he knows all the rest that I can tell him about this, I have no great insights for a "solution". And what can I say to him, since I don't know anything about him, nor how it came to what he is.
Seriously, does anyone think that's how things happen: you say things, directions, quotes from holy books, wisdom, or whatever, and hop - something will click in it, make a decision and change? Does it happen? Besides, he doesn't want to change.
Moreover, exactly how this homosexuality came about is not at all clear (but every can invent that he knows, based on partial knowledge about the situation).
For example, there was a very serious study of some Dutch man about some of their health ministers (I think it was) involved with the pharma mafia, who had included some specific vaccines in the early periods of pregnancy (2 or 3 - at the 3rd week, then at 6 or something like that, I forgot exactly). And the investigator had found scientific vaccination studies in this particular period, which can produced "chimeric effect" in the fetus.
The aim of this Dutchman's research was "why in the Netherlands (and not only) there is a boom in homosexuality and trance among the young", is it just because of propaganda, or something else? And he reasoned: why are all these laws and regulations for the recognition of homosexuality and trans and the conditions for its existence in society? Is a line of latent homosexuals created first by producing a "chimerical effect" with these early vaccinations and then it is easy to establish the norm in society? Etc.
Conspiracy!!!
But the dates coincided, though; the years of vaccination and the following years, when the number of young people with such inclinations has increased dramatically. If there is on top of some such desire to create people with certain characteristics, perhaps there may be some applicable conspiracy plan? Or not.
Anyway, I'm not judging you. But otherwise I'm against it. But I'm a lower hypocrite and I don't condemn you. I even like you because you direct mouth, I like such people. So I'm against it, but I support you.
I won't spam your thread anymore.