rainerann
Star
- Joined
- Mar 18, 2017
- Messages
- 4,550
Predictive programming is a concept that seems to have originated with a man named Alan Watt who defines predictive programming as: "Predictive programming is a subtle form of psychological conditioning provided by the media to acquaint the public with planned societal changes to be implemented by our leaders. If and when these changes are put through, the public will already be familiarized with them and will accept them as natural progressions, thus lessening possible public resistance and commotion.” link to the source of the quote
The attack on the Twin Towers is commonly cited as an example of predictive programming as numerous examples of the towers being hit as well as the date 9-11 can be seen in popular media before the event took place. As a result of this, people speculate what else is being predicted in media, but are not able to collect the same common theme of an event before it takes place, and I think this is because the presence of 9-11 was not about predictive programming as it is defined by Alan Watt.
For one, predictive programming as defined by Alan Watt suggests that when 9-11 took place, there should have been conditioning involved that suppressed the effects of the attack. The attack on the towers was subsequently honored by declaring September 11 as a Holiday known as "Patriot's Day" by George W. Bush, and there are still conferences that take place on a regular basis for those who suffer from post-traumatic effects from the event. There is an organization called Voices of Sept. 11 talking about CBT and other ways to help those who are still suffering. There is a 9-11 museum, etc. All of which is a very normal, predictable response to a tragedy of this kind for a nation with an opportunity to recognize it as such. Regardless of how many times this was referenced in media, the effects do not seem to be altered from what you expect to see.
If anything, this could be considered predictive programming to send troops off to engage in military conflict in foreign locations in the same pattern that we have followed at the beginning of both world wars. When the Lusitania was hit, we went to war. When Pearl Harbor was hit, we went to war. However, that is not the definition that we are being given for what predictive programming is supposed to accomplish. In addition to this, it would seem unnecessary to go to the trouble of including this in media when two similar scenarios took place previously in history that required no predictive programming to produce the same result.
In addition to this, I perused a site that is supposed to be a collection of September 11th predictive programming examples, and several examples were not even of the twin towers. It would seem that once the idea of predictive programming was introduced, anytime there was a tall building and a plane, it became a premonition of the attack on the Twin Towers.
There was also an early reference to a 9-11 perfume from the turn of the century was rather interesting. Another reference to a watch with the hands at 9 and 11 was interesting. Most of the old comics with a tower burning, I could just as well have done without. Everything past 1968 is kind of hit or miss for me too because in the US, 911 is the number that we have used to call for an ambulance/police/fireman since 1968. It doesn't really shock me to see 911 used after this point even if New York is being referenced in the process as well because New York is one of the most famous places in the country.
Wikipedia did the heavy lifting in identifying every movie that has been set in New York since the turn of the century. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_films_set_in_New_York_City There are a lot of movies that have been set in New York because of this. New York is the equivalent of London or Paris or Rome in terms of prominent cities in the US and the Twin Towers would be the fourth and fifth tallest buildings in the country if they were still standing. When you consider making this abstract in some way either in a picture or in artwork, it is common to represent this achievement with some comparison like a plane. A plane demonstrates the height and the size of these buildings especially if you are trying to zoom in at the top, which would eliminate the comparison to the other buildings that are smaller in size. An 8th-grade art class would teach you this.
I would consider the reference to Neo's birthdate to be the first real reference to what is sensationalized as predictive programming. His birthday on his ID card is specifically September 11, 2001. Popular media is subsequently flooded with the date September 11th after this. However, there is one other reference to September 11th that is worth noting and is the basis for my own theory for the presence of an unusually significant amount of media referencing this date that there has been no comparison for since. It is the date that they started construction on the Pentagon in 1941. I think that the reference to this date was because of a military purpose and the reason this date was chosen was that of the significance to the history of the Pentagon. It would suggest that the military was financing media, which could consequently be called propaganda. Maybe that is where some of the missing money went.
Finally, I believe that since it is more likely that media references refer to a military operation, I think it is likely that September 11th signified something in regard to data collection rather than predictive programming. September 11th initiated the Patriot Act and NSA collection. Data showed a significant expansion in the year 2002. In 2012, Obama signed the Big Data Research and Development Initiative. 9-11 more than likely has something to do with the Pentagon and gathering data, which is the only legitimate discussion that is taking place right now on the capacity to make predictions, which is by gathering data in order to make them.
I don't know that I think Alan Watt is intended to create disinformation, but his research and definition of what predictive programming is, does not match the reality of what is actually taking place. It seems that people like Alex Jones and David Icke are the ones pushing this concept, and I think that has helped this concept to become the distraction that it has become for those who are seeking to understand the truth. In reality, the definition of predictive programming is really just a hybrid way of saying that there is propaganda and censorship limiting what people are exposed to and that if this censorship and propaganda increase, people won't know anything outside of what they are shown by major news sources or popular media.
This is what we are being shown in many dystopian films, but there are also too many objections being made in the present for me to believe that these dystopian stories are creating an acceptance of a reality like this.
I also don't find anything very mystical about this thing called predictive programming and I think that if there is something else taking that will eventually take place that is predicted in media, the only way to find this before it happens is with some ability to search data for this at a rapid pace. A bunch of hobbyist researchers simply are not going to be fast enough to search through the amount of data that exists in order to develop any kind of awareness of the next situation comparable with the phenomenon of September 11 before it happens otherwise.
Therefore, there is more hype and speculation regarding this subject than most subjects I have encountered within my time studying conspiracies. There is no way to say with any certainty that anything you are shown is another example of predictive programming especially when the primary example of predictive programming according to its own definition, is weak. So as a result of the this, let the speculation commence. Really anything and everything goes in a discussion on this because there is no definitive way to say that what I am saying about the subject is absolute fact, or whether what you are saying about the subject is absolute fact, which kind of makes the whole subject seems like one colossal waste of time, but whatever. You live, you learn.
link to the history of 9-11 in media
The attack on the Twin Towers is commonly cited as an example of predictive programming as numerous examples of the towers being hit as well as the date 9-11 can be seen in popular media before the event took place. As a result of this, people speculate what else is being predicted in media, but are not able to collect the same common theme of an event before it takes place, and I think this is because the presence of 9-11 was not about predictive programming as it is defined by Alan Watt.
For one, predictive programming as defined by Alan Watt suggests that when 9-11 took place, there should have been conditioning involved that suppressed the effects of the attack. The attack on the towers was subsequently honored by declaring September 11 as a Holiday known as "Patriot's Day" by George W. Bush, and there are still conferences that take place on a regular basis for those who suffer from post-traumatic effects from the event. There is an organization called Voices of Sept. 11 talking about CBT and other ways to help those who are still suffering. There is a 9-11 museum, etc. All of which is a very normal, predictable response to a tragedy of this kind for a nation with an opportunity to recognize it as such. Regardless of how many times this was referenced in media, the effects do not seem to be altered from what you expect to see.
If anything, this could be considered predictive programming to send troops off to engage in military conflict in foreign locations in the same pattern that we have followed at the beginning of both world wars. When the Lusitania was hit, we went to war. When Pearl Harbor was hit, we went to war. However, that is not the definition that we are being given for what predictive programming is supposed to accomplish. In addition to this, it would seem unnecessary to go to the trouble of including this in media when two similar scenarios took place previously in history that required no predictive programming to produce the same result.
In addition to this, I perused a site that is supposed to be a collection of September 11th predictive programming examples, and several examples were not even of the twin towers. It would seem that once the idea of predictive programming was introduced, anytime there was a tall building and a plane, it became a premonition of the attack on the Twin Towers.
There was also an early reference to a 9-11 perfume from the turn of the century was rather interesting. Another reference to a watch with the hands at 9 and 11 was interesting. Most of the old comics with a tower burning, I could just as well have done without. Everything past 1968 is kind of hit or miss for me too because in the US, 911 is the number that we have used to call for an ambulance/police/fireman since 1968. It doesn't really shock me to see 911 used after this point even if New York is being referenced in the process as well because New York is one of the most famous places in the country.
Wikipedia did the heavy lifting in identifying every movie that has been set in New York since the turn of the century. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_films_set_in_New_York_City There are a lot of movies that have been set in New York because of this. New York is the equivalent of London or Paris or Rome in terms of prominent cities in the US and the Twin Towers would be the fourth and fifth tallest buildings in the country if they were still standing. When you consider making this abstract in some way either in a picture or in artwork, it is common to represent this achievement with some comparison like a plane. A plane demonstrates the height and the size of these buildings especially if you are trying to zoom in at the top, which would eliminate the comparison to the other buildings that are smaller in size. An 8th-grade art class would teach you this.
I would consider the reference to Neo's birthdate to be the first real reference to what is sensationalized as predictive programming. His birthday on his ID card is specifically September 11, 2001. Popular media is subsequently flooded with the date September 11th after this. However, there is one other reference to September 11th that is worth noting and is the basis for my own theory for the presence of an unusually significant amount of media referencing this date that there has been no comparison for since. It is the date that they started construction on the Pentagon in 1941. I think that the reference to this date was because of a military purpose and the reason this date was chosen was that of the significance to the history of the Pentagon. It would suggest that the military was financing media, which could consequently be called propaganda. Maybe that is where some of the missing money went.
Finally, I believe that since it is more likely that media references refer to a military operation, I think it is likely that September 11th signified something in regard to data collection rather than predictive programming. September 11th initiated the Patriot Act and NSA collection. Data showed a significant expansion in the year 2002. In 2012, Obama signed the Big Data Research and Development Initiative. 9-11 more than likely has something to do with the Pentagon and gathering data, which is the only legitimate discussion that is taking place right now on the capacity to make predictions, which is by gathering data in order to make them.
I don't know that I think Alan Watt is intended to create disinformation, but his research and definition of what predictive programming is, does not match the reality of what is actually taking place. It seems that people like Alex Jones and David Icke are the ones pushing this concept, and I think that has helped this concept to become the distraction that it has become for those who are seeking to understand the truth. In reality, the definition of predictive programming is really just a hybrid way of saying that there is propaganda and censorship limiting what people are exposed to and that if this censorship and propaganda increase, people won't know anything outside of what they are shown by major news sources or popular media.
This is what we are being shown in many dystopian films, but there are also too many objections being made in the present for me to believe that these dystopian stories are creating an acceptance of a reality like this.
I also don't find anything very mystical about this thing called predictive programming and I think that if there is something else taking that will eventually take place that is predicted in media, the only way to find this before it happens is with some ability to search data for this at a rapid pace. A bunch of hobbyist researchers simply are not going to be fast enough to search through the amount of data that exists in order to develop any kind of awareness of the next situation comparable with the phenomenon of September 11 before it happens otherwise.
Therefore, there is more hype and speculation regarding this subject than most subjects I have encountered within my time studying conspiracies. There is no way to say with any certainty that anything you are shown is another example of predictive programming especially when the primary example of predictive programming according to its own definition, is weak. So as a result of the this, let the speculation commence. Really anything and everything goes in a discussion on this because there is no definitive way to say that what I am saying about the subject is absolute fact, or whether what you are saying about the subject is absolute fact, which kind of makes the whole subject seems like one colossal waste of time, but whatever. You live, you learn.
link to the history of 9-11 in media